Ndramisara

← Encyclopedia

At the doany in the Tsararano quarter of Mahajanga, on the west coast of Madagascar, four sets of relics are kept together and served as one. Hair and nail and bone, ornament and wrapping — the remains of the royal dead of the Boina kingdom, tended within a fenced enclosure by custodians who keep them as one keeps the living. Three of the four were kings. The fourth held no throne. He was the diviner who told the kings what to do, the seer who read the order of things and set out the shape of the realm the others would rule, and his relic rests among theirs, washed when theirs are washed, honored bone for bone with the sovereigns whose kingdom he is remembered to have laid out. This is Ndramisara — and the arithmetic of that shrine, three crowned and one counseling, is the whole of him in small.

The lord who divined

Ndramisara is the Sakalava form of Andriamisara, and the name is built to be read. The highland nobility carried the honorific andriana; on the west coast it wears down in speech to the contracted ndra-, so that Andriamisara becomes Ndramisara without ceasing to mean the same lord. The tradition glosses him as Lord Diviner, and the anthropologist Michael Lambek, who worked for years among the mediums and custodians of Mahajanga, takes the gloss down to its root. In his account of the diviner-ancestor, the name divides into a lordship and a labor: the andria- of rank joined to misara, so that what this lord divines are the anjara — the portions, the lots, the destinies — dealt out to the people of the kingdom. He is not named for a battle won or a country taken. He is named for an act of reckoning.

What he reckoned, in the living tradition and in the scholarship alike, was the early kingdom itself. Ndramisara is remembered as the moasy — the diviner-seer — of the first kings of the Maroserana line, the west-coast cognate of the highland ombiasy whose office of divining and healing is treated in full elsewhere. The Maroserana, or Maroseranana, are glossed in the tradition as “those who owned many ports,” and their princes are traced out of Fiherenana, the country of the modern city of Toliara, in the far southwest of the island. From that stock came the two great realms of the west coast: the Menabe, seated in the Morondava country and formed before 1600, and the Boina, or Iboina, established around 1685 by Andriamandisoarivo, whose successors made the port of Mahajanga — the Majunga of the French — their gateway to the Indian Ocean trade. The deep dynastic beginnings of the Maroserana are debated among historians rather than settled, and are best left marked as such. What the tradition and the scholarship agree on is narrower and firmer: Andriamisara I stands as the common ancestor of both dynasties at once, and his office among the first kings was not to conquer or to administer but to divine.

The tellings differ on who exactly the diviner was to the kings he served. In some he is set beside the sovereign as the counselor without whose reading no move was made; in others he is remembered nearer to the royal blood, identified with the queen’s brother, the kinsman whose office was to divine for the house he belonged to. The variance is the ordinary looseness of a founding kept in memory rather than in writing, and it does not disturb the one thing the versions hold in common: that the man honored at the doany was the diviner of the early kings, and that what he is credited with is not a conquest but a plan. The colonial vocabulary that would have called such a figure a “witch-doctor” says nothing true about him. He was a moasy, a reader of the hidden order in the service of a court, and the tradition seats him among the sovereigns for the quality of his counsel.

That places him at an angle to almost every founder-figure a kingdom keeps. The record of African monarchies is thick with warriors and lawgivers; a diviner remembered as the intelligence behind the throne, and raised for it to the first rank of the royal dead, is rarer. What is known of him is owed first to his own shrine, and only second to any book. One witness is the living cult itself — the doany still served at Tsararano, the annual bathing of the relics, the descendants and pilgrims who keep the observance present-tense. The other witness is the scholarship built on that cult, above all Lambek’s The Weight of the Past: Living with History in Mahajanga, Madagascar (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), whose fifth chapter takes the diviner-ancestor as the founding mind of Sakalava social form. The mission and colonial notices of the Sakalava kingdoms fill in the political frame, but they are read against the grain of their purpose; the diviner is not their subject, and where they touch him they diminish him. The account that takes Ndramisara seriously as what the tradition says he is — a lord who governed by reading rather than by seizing — is the ethnographic one, and it is recent, and it is drawn from people who are still his.

The apportioner of the kingdom

Within the Sakalava sacred world Ndramisara is a razana of the royal line, raised to the first rank of the crowned dead. He is not a creator-power; the making of the world and of humankind belongs in the Malagasy frame to Zanahary, and the diviner-ancestor stands a full order below that, a royal forebear present to his people rather than a maker of them. His distinction among the crowned dead is the same distinction his name carries: his standing rests on counsel, not on conquest. Three of the four at the doany were sovereigns who ruled and fought and held ports; Ndramisara held none of it, and is honored above the general run of the royal dead anyway, because the kingdom the sovereigns ruled was, in the remembering, his design before it was their possession.

The design is the heart of what the tradition teaches through him, and Lambek’s reading gives it its sharpest form. Ndramisara is remembered as the author of the kingdom’s organic division — the sorting of a whole society into kinds, each kind holding its anjara. The word will not reduce to a single English term, and its refusal is the point: an anjara is at once a responsibility and a right, a function and a portion, a lot cast and a destiny received. To hold one’s anjara is to hold a duty and an entitlement in the same grip, and both are fixed not by force but at the founding, which the tradition remembers as an act of divination. So the realm is imagined as an organism whose parts were apportioned by a diviner and not wrested by a soldier — a body of kinds, each with its work and its share, balanced against the others in a scheme of powers and obligations that a seer read out and did not impose. Lambek names the principle “kindedness”: the disposition of a people into distinct kinds, each with its allotted place, so that the differences among them are not accidents to be overcome but the very structure that holds the society together. A kingdom sorted this way is not a hierarchy of pure command, in which the king wills and the rest obey; it is a distribution, in which each part performs the office divined for it and thereby leaves the others free to perform theirs. The counsel that founds such an order is, in the strict sense, a division of labor — but a division cast as fate, received as birthright, and kept as duty. To be born into a kind is to be born into its anjara; to keep faith with the anjara is to keep the kingdom whole. A society so ordered has its apex — the Ampanzaka, the royal caste, stood at the summit of a stratified people whose lower ranks reached, in the era of the slave trade, down to the Makoa, reckoned as the descendants of African captives — but the ordering itself is credited to the diviner rather than to the crown it produced.

The four relics carry the theology bodily. The dady are the preserved remains of the royal dead — the hair, the nail-parings, the bone, the ornaments of dead kings — kept at once as the proof of royalty and as a reservoir in which hasina, the sacred efficacy that legitimates rule and quickens the soil, is held as water is held in a cistern. A Sakalava king is thought to channel that efficacy; his rule is valid, and his country fertile, insofar as the hasina runs true through him. To keep the diviner’s relic among the kings’ is therefore to keep, in the one enclosure, both the power and the plan of it: the sovereigns who bore the hasina and the seer who laid out the channels it was to run in. His dady is served exactly as theirs are — no lesser washing, no lower place — the counselor set physically among the counseled.

Two neighboring institutions of the Sakalava dead touch Ndramisara and must be kept distinct from him. He belongs to the same order of crowned ancestors who return to speak through their mediums — the tromba, whose whole institution of possession, mediumship, and royal service is told in its own place — but his proper register here is the earlier and quieter one of the founding diviner-ancestor, the mind behind the order rather than a voice within the possession. And he is a razana, but not the family razana of an ordinary household, honored at a lineage tomb over the first-fruits of the rice; he is a razana of the whole polity, addressed at the doany that stands for the kingdom, his service hedged about by the fady — the prohibitions on food and color and word and conduct — that guard the approach to a royal ancestor. What an ordinary forebear is to a family, the diviner-ancestor is to a nation: the same relation of the living to a senior who has not left, raised to the scale of a realm.

The service that outlived the state

The kingdom that took Ndramisara’s counsel was dismantled twice, and his counsel outlasted both dismantlings. From the highlands the Merina kingdom pressed the Sakalava hard in the early nineteenth century: the Menabe submitted to Radama I in 1822, Majunga fell to him in 1824, and Iboina was attacked in 1835. French conquest finished the unmaking of Sakalava sovereignty as a political fact by the turn of the twentieth century, and the colonial administration restricted and sidelined the royal rites where it could. None of this is a matter of one side’s virtue over another’s; the record carries the dates, and the dates are enough. What ended in them was the kingdom as a state.

The service the state was built to keep did not end. Every July the Doany Andriamisara Efadahy Manankasina — the shrine of the Blessed Four Men — holds the fanompoa be, the “Great Service,” the bath of the royal relics, over roughly a week. The custodians and the descendants of the royal house tend the four dady within the inner enclosure, the Zombabe, while the wider Sakalava world and pilgrims of every origin and every faith gather outside; the four kings washed together are Andriamisara, Andriamandisoarivo, Andrianamboniarivo, and Andriamihaninarivo, whose names run in variant spellings — Andriamboniarivo, Andriagnianina, and others — across the northwest. Pilgrims carry away the tanifoty, the small piece of white limestone that bears the royal ancestors’ blessing out in the hand. The full shape of that annual observance — its procession, its mediums, its custodial order — belongs to the shrine’s own account at the doany of Ndramisara and to the history of the Sakalava themselves; here it stands only at the distance of the public record, sober and without procedure, the diviner washed among the kings once a year. In the Menabe the counterpart rite is the fitampoha, held about every five years at Belo-sur-Tsiribihina, in which the dady are bathed in the waters of the Tsiribihina River — a distinct observance in a distinct realm, never to be confused with the Mahajanga service, though the two descend from the one ancestor the diviner is remembered to be.

The scholarship that has kept pace with the living cult is anchored by Lambek’s The Weight of the Past, which reads the mediums and custodians of Mahajanga as the bearers of the Sakalava past and Ndramisara as the intelligence behind its social order. Gillian Feeley-Harnik’s studies of Sakalava royal ritual and the labor of tending the relics, and Lesley Sharp’s of possession among the migrants of the plantation north, stand alongside it, each on its own ground; between them the three trace how a monarchy that lost its territory kept its dead, its shrines, and its offices, and how the ancestors of the crown still bear on the living who serve them. What none of that scholarship treats as a closed and vanished thing is the cult itself. The doany is served now; the custodians tend the four dady now; the July observance draws its pilgrims now, Christian and Muslim and keeper of the ancestral custom together, none of them turned away for the faith they arrived with. And the diviner’s weight can be measured in a modern quarrel as plainly as in an old cult: the twentieth-century disputes over the custody of the royal relics were fought precisely because the dady remain the proof and the reservoir of royalty, so that whoever holds them holds the kingship in one’s keeping. Men do not contend over what has stopped mattering. The contention is the register in which a diviner’s founding is still felt to weigh.

So the arithmetic of the shrine holds its shape across three centuries and two conquests. Three of the four were kings, and their kingdom is gone — annexed, then colonized, then folded into a republic that keeps no throne. The fourth was the diviner who apportioned that kingdom into kinds and shares, and the apportioning has proven the more durable of his gifts: the anjara-order the moasy is remembered to have read out still orders Sakalava life, long after the state it was read for came apart. Once a year the custodians bath him with the sovereigns he advised. The counsel is older than the crown, and it has outlasted it.

→ Related: Ranoro · Kalanoro · Andranoro · Doany Ndramisara · Antsahadinta · Ambohidrabiby · The Sakalava · The Betsileo · The Antemoro · Fady · Hasina