Doany Ndramisara

← Encyclopedia

Once a year, for about a week in July, a fenced compound in the Tsararano quarter of Mahajanga fills with song and does not sleep. The rest of the year it is quiet and guarded, closed to the idle visitor — a walled yard with a gate and a keeper, holding no image and no altar, only four kings. They died three centuries ago and are kept here as what endures of a body: bone, hair, nail, and the ornaments they wore. The place is not a temple to a god. It is an address, and it keeps office hours.

The four-relics shrine

The compound goes by more than one name, and the names are worth holding together. It is the Doany Ndramisara — the shrine of Ndramisara — and also the Doany Miarinarivo, after the quarter of Miarinarivo-Tsararano in which it stands, and also, plainly, the Doany Andriamisara, for the founding lord whose relics it keeps at its head. What it is under all three names is a reliquary: the house that holds the royal remains of the kings of Boina, the Sakalava kingdom of the northwest whose great port was, and is, Mahajanga — the town the French called Majunga, second seaport of Madagascar, opening on the Mozambique Channel.

The word doany is itself worn to carry several senses at once, and the record keeps all of them. It can mean a royal palace, a royal tomb, a reliquary. At Tsararano it means the last of these first: the fenced enclosure in which the dady — the royal relics — are kept and served. The dady are the enduring matter of dead kings. The record that describes the shrine names what they comprise without ceremony: the bones, the hair, the nails, and the jewelry and ornaments of the sovereigns, gathered and wrapped and kept as the proof of royalty and the reservoir of its power. They are handled by a noble custodian lineage whose office is precisely to keep them — to guard, to wrap, and to serve the remains, never to display them. What the compound holds it holds under wraps.

There are four of these relic-bundles, and the shrine is known for them: the Doany Efadahy, the shrine of the four men. The four are the great kings of Boina, and the roster most often given names them Andriamisara, Andriamandisoarivo, Andrianamboniarivo, and Andriamihaninarivo — the last two also written Andriamboniarivo and Andriamihanina, and every one of the four appearing in variant spellings across the francophone and Malagasy record. The naming is not fixed. An older tradition of the efaday, the “four relics,” gives a different set — Andriandahifotsy, Andriamandisoarivo, Toakafo, and Andriamisara — and the identity of the four has itself been hotly contested in the modern history of the shrine. The four can be named without pretending the list is settled: which kings the four dady are is a question the tradition itself has argued, and it stands here as argued, not resolved.

Behind the relics stands the founding of the kingdom whose kings they were. The ruling house was the Maroserana — Maroseranana — dynasty, out of which came the two great realms of the Sakalava west. The Kingdom of Boina, or Iboina, was established in 1685 by Andriamandisoarivo, whose successors made Majunga the principal of their gateways to the Indian Ocean trade, the port through which the cattle and the slaves and the silver of the interior met the dhows of the Swahili coast and the Arabian Sea. The doany at Tsararano is the reliquary of that kingdom’s crowned dead, set down in its own capital-port, so that the relics of the kings rest in the town their trade built.

The first of the four, Andriamisara, is remembered less as a conqueror than as the mind behind the conquest — a founding diviner, a lord of counsel who laid the philosophical ground of the kingship rather than winning it by the spear. His own portrait belongs to the account of Ndramisara; here it is enough that the shrine bears his name because he stands at the head of the four, the diviner-ancestor whose ordering of the Sakalava world the relics keep. And the people whose kingdom this was — their formation, their monarchy, their spread — are told in the Sakalava; this account keeps to the building and its year.

How the shrine reaches the documentary record it does so along lines that do not quite meet. There is the living tradition, kept in the present tense by the custodian lineage, the client-mediums, and the pilgrims who attend the doany and observe what it requires. There is the francophone Madagascar record — the heritage notices, the regional press, the travel and tourism accounts — that reports the shrine and its July service as a standing institution of the Boeny region. And there is the ethnography, above all the fieldwork of the anthropologist Michael Lambek at Mahajanga, which reads the doany not as a monument but as a working archive of the Sakalava past. The three do not always agree on a name or a date; where they diverge, the divergence is part of what there is to report.

The great baobab of Mahajanga, long the emblem of the town — the northwest seaport of Boina, in whose Tsararano quarter the reliquary-shrine of the four kings stands. Lukys, via Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 3.0.

A house that holds ancestors and keeps their year

In the Sakalava sacred world the doany is not a place where a god is worshiped. It is a place where kings are kept, and attended, and answered to. The distinction is exact and it governs everything about the enclosure. What lies behind the fence is not a divinity but a lineage of the dead — four sovereigns who, in the Sakalava understanding, did not stop being kings when they died, and who therefore remain an authority one can still approach, provided one approaches as one would a living king: at the right distance and on the right terms.

That is why entering is not walking in. A visitor to the compound is met before the gate and told the conditions of the ground — what may be worn and what may not, what must be left outside, how one carries oneself once within. These are matters of fady, the prohibition-order that fixes what may and may not be done or brought into a place charged with the sacred; the full working of that order belongs to the account of fady, but at the doany it is simply the etiquette any royal presence commands, and the enclosure enforces it as a court would. One is admitted to the kings’ house on the kings’ conditions.

Through the relics and their service runs hasina — the sacred efficacy that legitimates authority, quickens the land and the child, and passes down the line from the crowned dead to the living who serve them. The concept has its own full treatment in hasina; what belongs to the shrine is that the dady are among its reservoirs. The relics are not merely mementoes of dead power but stores of a living one, and the shrine is where that store is guarded and, on its calendar, replenished. A king reduced to his bones has not been reduced to nothing; he has been reduced to what carries his hasina forward, and the custodians keep it as one keeps a thing that still works.

The dady are handled, throughout, as mortuary matter — because that is what they are. They are the kings themselves, kept as what remains of a body, and the dignity owed a sovereign is owed to them undiminished. They are shrouded, guarded, and served by their custodian lineage; they are not shown. There is no spectacle of relics at the doany, and the record that describes the shrine keeps, in this, the tradition’s own reticence: the remains of kings are not a display. Around this material center turns a debt. In the ancestral theology of the island the living owe the crowned dead a service, a standing obligation that the household pays to its own razana and that a kingdom pays, at a higher pitch, to its royal dead; the theology itself is set out in razana, and the doany is simply the place where the royal form of that debt is paid on a fixed cycle. The relics are the creditors; the calendar is the reckoning.

And the reach of the shrine is wider than one kingdom. The first of the four, Andriamisara I, is revered as the common ancestor of both the great Sakalava dynasties — of Menabe in the south and Boina in the north alike — so that the Mahajanga doany is not the seat of one kingdom’s dead only but a seat of the Sakalava royal past at its root. The kings of the two realms trace back through him to a single head, and the relic-house that keeps him keeps the ancestor from whom both lines descend.

The pilgrim who comes to the doany and is admitted does not come away empty-handed. From the shrine the visitor receives the tanifoty, a small piece of white limestone, given as the token and the physical carrier of the royal ancestors’ blessing — the favor of the crowned dead taken away in the hand, and a mark of white set on the body to confirm it. It is a small thing and an exact one: the blessing that runs through the relics made portable, so that what the doany holds in bulk the pilgrim carries off in the palm.

The great service and the century that could not close it

The shrine’s year turns on a single week. Each July the doany holds the fanompoa be — the “great service,” the bath of the royal relics — and for roughly seven days the quiet compound becomes the center of the Sakalava northwest. Descendants of the royal line, client-mediums, and pilgrims come from across the region and beyond it for a week of antsa, the Sakalava songs, and of vigils that run through the nights, of dances, and of tromba, the possession in which the dead kings return to speak through their mediums. The whole institution of that possession — the saha who carry the spirits, the mechanics of how a king comes into a living body — has its own full account in tromba, which also narrates this doany and its four kings as the possession-cult’s seat; it is not re-argued here. What belongs to the place and its calendar is that the fanompoa be is the year’s summit, the week on which the shrine’s whole quiet standing is spent at once.

At the center of the week is the bath. The four dady are shrouded anew and immersed — generally in seawater, in the channel on which the port stands — and in the washing the hasina in them is reactivated and the commitment of the living to the crowned dead renewed in the open. Of the service itself, beyond this, little is set down. The public record keeps its distance from the closed acts of the relic-service, and so does this account: no procedure of the bath is recorded here, because the tradition does not offer it and the observers who have kept faith with the tradition have not taken it. What can be said is what the week is for — the relics rewrapped, the potency in them renewed, the year begun again — and there the description stops.

The Menabe keep a sibling rite that must be named and never merged with this one. It is the fitampoha, held about every five years at Belo-sur-Tsiribihina in the southwest, in which the dady of the Menabe kings are bathed not in the sea but in the fresh water of the Tsiribihina River, at the sandy islet of Ampasy. Two bathings of royal relics, two kingdoms of the one dynasty, two waters and two calendars — the annual sea-bath of Boina at Mahajanga and the five-yearly river-bath of Menabe at Belo — descending from the same ancestor and kept apart in the same tradition. To collapse the two is to lose the very distinction the Sakalava maintain between their northern and southern houses.

The custody of the relics has not been peaceable in the modern era. The identity of the four and the right to keep and serve them have been disputed across the later twentieth century, and into the present: the francophone press of the 2010s reported contests over the Doany Miarinarivo and its sanctuary, and, in 2018, the possibility that the year’s bath of the relics might be forbidden altogether amid a quarrel over the shrine. The details of these disputes are reported rather than settled, and are given here as reported. What they measure is not confusion but importance. A thing is fought over because it is worth holding; the contest over the dady is the exact index of how much the dady still weigh.

The seafront of Mahajanga on the Mozambique Channel. It is in the sea off this coast that the dady of the four kings are immersed at the great service each July. Caramel1223, via Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 4.0.

The century that dismantled the Sakalava state could not close the doany. The expansion of the highland Merina kingdom from the interior pressed hard on the northwest: Majunga fell to Radama I in 1824, and the port passed out of independent Sakalava hands. French conquest later ended Sakalava sovereignty as a political fact entirely, breaking the last of the western kingdoms as governing powers. Both are set down here soberly and without a side; they are the documented history of a conquest, not a verdict on it. What the record shows, against that history, is that the shrine outlasted the state it served. The kingdom of Boina is gone as a polity; the relics of its kings are kept, and washed each July, by living custodians and living pilgrims. The state fell and the house stayed open.

The scholarship that has taken the shrine most seriously runs, above all, through Lambek’s Mahajanga fieldwork, gathered in The Weight of the Past: Living with History in Mahajanga, Madagascar (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002). His reading is that the doany and its service are not a survival to be cataloged but a living way of carrying the past — the royal dead kept present and answerable, the history of the kingdom borne as an obligation and a performance rather than shelved as a record. Beside him stands Gillian Feeley-Harnik’s Sakalava work, which attends to the mortuary and relic order — the logic by which dead kings become sacred matter to be served — at the register the doany makes concrete. Read together, the two describe a shrine that does exactly what it looks like it does: keeps four kings, and keeps them working.

A stranger to Tsararano, told there is a great shrine in the quarter, looks for something raised and finds instead a wall. Behind it is no god and no idol, only four men who ruled a coast three hundred years ago and are kept as the little that lasts of a body. They are still served on a fixed year, still bathed each July in the sea their port opens on, still able to send a pilgrim home with a chip of white limestone in the hand. The kingdom that crowned them was taken by conquest and dissolved by a colonial state, and neither reached the enclosure. The four are still at their address, and the year still comes round to attend them.

→ Related: Ranoro · Kalanoro · Ndramisara · Andranoro · Antsahadinta · Ambohidrabiby · The Sakalava · The Betsileo · The Antemoro · Fady · Hasina