Antsahadinta

← Encyclopedia

Six kinds of tree stand on the crest, and each was put there on purpose. There are the amontana and the aviavy, the two great figs that stand for Merina royalty; the nonoka; the manjakatokana, whose name carries the sense of sole and unshared sovereignty; the zahana, a hardwood the kings reserved for building; and the andrarezina. They were set as the emblems of a royal hill and rooted where the sovereigns wanted them, markers of ground held holy. They have outlived every hand that ever tended them. The men who planted them lie in the tombs beneath their roots, and the trees go on standing above the graves — the oldest officials of Antsahadinta, still at their posts long after the keepers who appointed them were laid down below.

The valley of the leeches

The name is plain and unlovely, and the tradition does not pretend otherwise. It reads an-tsaha, in the valley or the field, and dinta, the leech: Antsahadinta, the valley of the leeches — a marshy crest in the highland country, named for what a wet hollow breeds. Local usage renders it in French as la vallée aux sangsues, the valley of the leeches, without embarrassment; the sanctity of the place was never a function of its name. The hill rises to about 1,390 meters, some twenty kilometers southwest of Antananarivo, in the hamlet of Fidasiana, the commune of Androhibe, the district of Antananarivo-Atsimondrano, in the Analamanga region of the central highlands. On the gazetteer it is a point among the crested hills of Imerina; in the tradition it is a seat of kings.

The highland country around Antsahadinta, the marshy crest whose name reads as the valley of the leeches. MPMF24, via Wikimedia Commons. CC BY 4.0.

Antsahadinta reaches the record as a founding and a place-name in one breath. It has no single founding text of its own; what is known of its beginnings is carried in the genealogies kept on the hill by the families settled there, gathered up into the heritage literature of the sacred hills and fixed to a point on the map by the modern gazetteers. Those genealogies name the founder as King Andriamangarira, remembered as building the royal city here around 1725 and reigning until about 1775. The line placed behind him is a royal one. He is remembered as a grandson of Andriamasinavalona, king of Imerina at the close of the seventeenth century, and as the son of Rasohanamanjaka; and it was the death of that same Andriamasinavalona, around 1710, that shattered Imerina into the four feuding principalities later drawn back together by Andrianampoinimerina — a story that belongs to the account of the Merina kingdom and is not re-argued here. Antsahadinta is one of the pieces that broke off: a seat of power in the western reaches of Imerina, in the Ambodirano country of the divided realm, holding its own crest while the highland was split among rival princes. To found a royal city here around 1725, with a rova and a tomb and the trees of kingship, was to make a claim of sovereignty at exactly the moment when sovereignty in the highlands had come loose from any single hand — a small crowned hill among many, each descended from the same broken line and each keeping its own dead.

The succession on the hill ran on after the founder. When Andriamangarira died in 1775, his second son, Andriambolamena, took the throne of Antsahadinta and held it until about 1803. Their descendants form the clan of Zanamangarira, ranked in the aristocratic order of the andriana that traces itself to Andriamasinavalona, and the wider country their line held is remembered as the Anjanamangarira (Andriamangarira). The record here is a family’s account of itself, kept on the ground it describes, and it is worth reading as such — the tradition of a royal line about the hill where that line still lives.

Antsahadinta stands, in the reckoning of the tradition, among the twelve sacred hills of Imerina, the douze collines sacrées. That count is less fixed than the phrase suggests. The designation of the sacred hills is traced first to King Andrianjaka, who reigned around 1610 to 1630 and is said to have named twelve; it was taken up again by Andrianampoinimerina, reigning 1787 to 1810, who designated twelve in his own turn, including several of those first named. Precisely which hills belong on the list of twelve is, in the words of the heritage record, “a point of some contention,” and there are in fact more than twelve hills around Antananarivo that claim sacred standing (Twelve sacred hills of Imerina). The number is a form the tradition keeps rather than a closed canon, and Antsahadinta’s place in it is a claim made and honored, not a slot in a settled table. Its nearest kin in that reckoning are hills of the same order — the king’s hill of Ambohidrabiby among them — each with its own founding and its own dead.

Trees, tombs, and the shape of holy ground

Within the Malagasy sacred world Antsahadinta works as a center of hasina, the sacred efficacy that runs between the living, the ancestors, and the land, held here at the scale of a royal tomb-village; its holiness is territorial, inherited, and alive rather than commemorative. What sets it apart among the highland hills is where that holiness is lodged. At other sacred sites the emblems of sovereignty are gates or stones or crypts; here they are planted and rooted. The crest keeps its stand of named trees, and the naming is not botanical but political. The amontana and the aviavy, the two great figs, are the trees of Merina royalty, set to mark ground that belongs to a sovereign line; the manjakatokana carries kingship in its very name; the zahana was the hardwood of royal building, the nonoka and the andrarezina markers of the same order. They were planted by the kings and tended for centuries, so that the oldest continuous presences on the hill are not its houses or its walls but the trees a dynasty set into the ground as the living sign of its rule.

The figs are the heart of it. In the highland reckoning the amontana and the aviavy belong to royalty as a matter of settled sense — great, long-lived, spreading trees whose planting marks a place as a sovereign’s, so that to set them on a crest is to declare the ground a king’s ground and to keep them is to keep that declaration in force. A fig does not so much stand on the land as hold it: its roots take the soil and its canopy claims the air above the tombs, and the years that pass under it are the same years the dead beneath it have lain there. Where another hill might mark its sovereignty in a wall of stone that outlasts the builder, Antsahadinta marks it in a living thing that goes on growing after the builder is buried — a slower and stranger monument, renewing itself out of the same ground that holds the king.

Beneath the trees lie the tombs, and the founder’s own is the first of them. Andriamangarira’s grave is remembered as a “pirogue” burial — the body laid in a canoe-shaped resting place, in the older highland manner — and beside it stands his Tranomasina, the sacred house that crowned a sovereign’s tomb, still pointed out on the hill by the tradition that keeps it (Andriamangarira). Other royal dead lie with him. By the site’s genealogies the hill holds the tomb of Rabodozafimanjaka, a wife of Andrianampoinimerina, and of her brother Ratsimisotry, among their kin — a tie that binds this western seat to the unifier of the highlands whose own hill lies to the northeast.

The Tranomasina of Andriamangarira — the sacred house raised over the founding king’s tomb on the crest. CampMaster, via Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 4.0.

The tombs are addressed, in the living understanding of the place, as the resting place of ancestors who remain present and answering — the razana, the senior dead who bless and warn, whose full theology belongs to their own account and is only the working assumption here. What Antsahadinta adds to that assumption is the joining of the tombed dead to the marked land: the ancestors are not merely buried on the hill but written into it, their sovereignty declared by the trees above their graves and the ground kept holy by fady, the order of prohibition that fences a sacred place from ordinary use. The trees are not to be cut, the ground not to be treated as common; the shape of proper conduct on the hill is fixed by the same logic of fady that governs any place charged with hasina.

Even the name of the hamlet carries the sense of the thing. Fidasiana, in the tradition’s reading, names the ground of sanctification — the place where blessing and hasina are conferred — the same term that names the sovereign’s public court at Ambohimanga, where the king’s word was given beneath a great sacred fig. That a royal tomb-village should bear such a name is fitting: Antsahadinta is not merely a burial hill but a hill where the order of a sacred kingship was set into trees, tombs, and the very shape of the ground, so that the crest itself reads as a statement of who held it and by what right.

The afterlife of a tomb-village

Antsahadinta’s afterlife runs through kingdom, mission, conquest, and heritage, and it is preserved where a good deal else was not. As a seat of power in western Imerina the hill kept its aristocratic settlement, and that settlement is the reason it matters to the record now. Its wooden noble houses — the trano kotona of the highland manner, timber dwellings of the andriana — survive among the best-preserved examples of Merina domestic architecture, and the site is spoken of as an open-air museum of the aristocratic world, its old furnishings and household things kept alongside the buildings. In the reckoning of the heritage literature, the cultural and archaeological heritage held on this hill is second only to Ambohimanga among all the royal hills of Imerina — a standing that has less to do with grandeur than with survival, for what fell elsewhere still stands here.

The houses are worth the standing. The trano kotona are timber dwellings of the old highland kind, built without the imported forms that later reshaped Merina building, and to walk among them is to see the domestic world of the andriana at a scale and a completeness that little else preserves — the rooms, the household goods, the furniture and implements kept where they were used. A royal capital such as Antananarivo rebuilt itself in stone and outgrew its wooden past; a lesser seat that never grew into a city had less reason to tear down what it had, and so a hill that lost its political importance gained, without meaning to, the role of keeping the record of how such a place once looked and was lived in. The open-air museum on the crest is not a reconstruction but a survival — the aristocratic hill left much as it stood.

The mission era left its mark directly, and characteristically. A former zebu enclosure on the hill was converted into a school in the reign of Radama I, who held the throne from 1810 to 1828 — one of the early schools of the London Missionary Society period, the same wave of letters, printing, and building that gave the highlands their fixed alphabet and their press, told in full for the Merina kingdom and not re-argued here (Rova d’Antsahadinta). A pen for cattle became a room for letters; the change is a small measure of how the highland order absorbed the new schooling into its own ground rather than being displaced by it, and the hill has since carried its churches without ceasing to keep its tombs.

Through the French annexation and the colonial suppression of the royal rites, the hill’s tombs and trees remained. The sharpest colonial blow against the highland dead fell not here but at Ambohimanga, whose royal tombs were emptied of their remains in 1897 — an act, and its meaning, that belong to that hill’s own account. Antsahadinta was not subjected to the same stripping, and its graves and its emblem-trees came through the colonial century in place. The deeper questions that surround the highland past — whether the earliest dead of such hills were of the vazimba, the first people of the land, and how the turning of the bones, the famadihana, renews the tie between a family and its ancestors — live in full in their own accounts; here they are only the background against which a tomb-village kept its continuity.

That continuity is the plainest fact about the hill in the present. Antsahadinta is at once a preserved monument and a lived-in place: it is still inhabited by descendants of its royal line, who tend the tombs and keep the sacred trees, its care carried by an association of the descendants rather than left to the state alone. Its observances are present-tense. The graves are visited and maintained; the trees are protected; the households on the crest reckon their descent from the kings whose Tranomasina stands among them. The hill is not a ruin that people come to look at but a home that people happen also to preserve.

The scholarship that frames what a place like Antsahadinta embodies is anchored, for the highlands, in Maurice Bloch’s Placing the Dead: Tombs, Ancestral Villages and Kinship Organization in Madagascar (Seminar Press, 1971) — precisely the logic a tomb-village makes visible, where the dead are the permanent residents and the living the ones who return. The wider heritage record around the twelve hills, and the UNESCO reading of the joined cults of kings and ancestors developed for Ambohimanga, set Antsahadinta in its class: a hill where sovereignty and ancestry were held together. The site’s own tradition dates some of its tombs, loosely, to more than seven hundred years — a claim of the hill’s antiquity best marked as the heritage tradition it is rather than fixed to a year. What is not in question is the arrangement itself. The kings of this hill planted their emblems in the ground and lay down beneath them, and their descendants keep both the graves and the trees; the sovereigns went into the earth, and the figs they set went on growing, and the line that planted them is still on the crest to tend what remains.

→ Related: Ranoro · Kalanoro · Ndramisara · Andranoro · Doany Ndramisara · Ambohidrabiby · The Sakalava · The Betsileo · The Antemoro · Fady · Hasina