Tiamat

← Encyclopedia

Before there was a sky to be named or dry ground to be called by a name, there were two waters, and they were not divided. One was sweet and lay beneath; the other was salt and lay all around. The salt was Tiamat. The poem that tells of her begins by describing what was not yet there — no reed-hut matted, no marsh-land appeared, no god whatever called into being — and arrives at the one thing that was: her waters and the fresh waters of her consort mingling together as a single body. Out of that mingling the gods themselves were born. She is, in the oldest account the Babylonians left of the world’s making, not a monster confronted at the edge of creation but the medium of creation, the maternal ocean from which everything that has a name was drawn.

The waters before the world

The text is the Enūma Eliš, named, as Babylonian compositions were, from its opening words — enūma eliš, “when on high.” It runs to roughly a thousand lines across seven clay tablets, and it is by scholarly consensus a theological charter written to explain why the god of Babylon should stand at the head of heaven. The copies that survive were recovered from the great library the Assyrian king Ashurbanipal assembled at Nineveh in the seventh century BCE, though the poem is older than that collection; most scholarship sets its composition in the long window between about 1500 and 1100 BCE, when Babylon’s local god was being raised toward supremacy. The fragments came to Europe in the crates of the British Museum, and it was there in 1875 that the Assyriologist George Smith first read the creation tablets and announced, in The Chaldean Account of Genesis the following year, that Babylon had possessed a cosmogony of its own, immensely ancient, with disquieting resemblances to the first chapter of the Hebrew Bible.

The name itself is a clue to her nature. Tiāmat is built from the Akkadian tâmtu, the ordinary word for “sea,” and behind it stands an older form, tiʾamtum. She is the sea spoken of as a person: the salt ocean given a will, a womb, and at last a body that can be cut. Her consort is Apsû — apsû likewise being the common noun for the fresh groundwater, the sweet water imagined as lying beneath the earth, the source of springs and wells. The pairing is not arbitrary mythmaking. Along the shore of the Persian Gulf the fresh waters welling up from the Arabian aquifer meet and mingle with the salt of the sea, and the Enūma Eliš reads that visible commingling back to the beginning of all things. The first cosmology of the Babylonians is a cosmology of two waters that were once one continuous medium, before anything had edges.

From the union of Apsû and Tiamat the generations of the gods proceed. The poem names the first pairs — Laḫmu and Laḫamu, then Anšar and Kišar, the horizons of sky and earth — and from them the great gods, down to the sky-god Anu and the clever god of the sweet waters and of magic, Ea, whom the Sumerians had called Enki and worshipped at Eridu, the oldest of their cities. Tiamat is the great-grandmother of the world, and one of her epithets in the text is Ummu-Ḫubur, the mother-watercourse “who formed all things.” She is not, in this opening movement, an enemy of anything. She is the origin.

An armed god pursues a winged monster; engraving after a gypsum relief from the temple at Nimrud (883–859 BCE), published in Austen Henry Layard, “A Second Series of the Monuments of Nineveh,” 1853. Long captioned as Marduk fighting Tiamat, the scene is now more often read as Ninurta pursuing the bird-demon Anzu — the uncertainty is itself the point. British Museum, BM 124571. Public domain (Wikimedia Commons).

The war over the noise of the young

What turns the mother of the gods into a power that must be killed is, in the poem, a small and almost domestic thing: noise. The young gods are restless. They crowd together, they dance, they disturb the quiet of the primordial waters, and Apsû cannot rest. He goes to Tiamat and proposes that they destroy their own offspring so that silence may return. Tiamat recoils — “Why should we destroy that which we ourselves have brought forth?” runs the sense of her answer — and will not consent. But the plan is already abroad. Ea, wisest of the gods, learns of it, and acts first: he composes a spell of overwhelming power, pours sleep over Apsû, strips him of his crown and his radiance, and kills him. Upon the body of the slain fresh water Ea builds his own dwelling, and there, in the deep, his son is conceived — the god who will become the hero of the rest of the poem.

For a time Tiamat does nothing. It is the other gods, the children who survived, who finally rouse her, complaining that she lay still while Apsû was killed, that she did not stir when her consort was struck down. Reproached into motion, the salt sea turns to vengeance, and the poem’s register changes. Tiamat arms herself by giving birth to an army. She breeds eleven monsters — a venomous serpent, a great dragon, a horned snake, a fierce lion-demon, a scorpion-man, a fish-man, a bull-man, raging storms and a mad dog among them — and she clothes them in terror so that whoever looks on them dies of fright. Over this host she sets the god Qingu, raises him to be her new consort and her general, and fastens to his breast the Tablet of Destinies, the warrant by which decrees become irrevocable. The mother of the gods has become the mustering-ground of chaos, and the order of the world hangs on whether anyone can be found to face her.

No one can. The poem makes the terror of the high gods explicit: Anu is sent against her and turns back; Ea will not go; the assembly sits in stunned silence. Then the young god conceived in the deep — Ea’s son, the city-god of Babylon, Marduk — steps forward, and he names his price. He will fight Tiamat, but only if the gods first make him their king, and a king whose word fixes fates absolutely, whose decree cannot be reversed. The desperate gods agree. They set a constellation before him and bid him destroy it and create it again by speaking; the star vanishes at his command and returns at his command, and they acclaim him: Marduk is king. The whole machinery of the poem — the noise, the murder of Apsû, the breeding of the monsters — has been turning toward this transfer of sovereignty.

The body divided into a world

Marduk arms himself as a storm. He takes bow and arrow, a mace, lightning before his face, and a net to enclose Tiamat held at its four corners by the four winds; behind him he marshals the evil wind, the whirlwind, the hurricane, the sevenfold blast. He mounts the storm-chariot and rides out, and when he comes before Tiamat he challenges her to single combat. She opens her mouth to swallow him. That is the opening he has prepared for. He drives the evil wind into her gaping mouth so that she cannot close her lips, and the raging winds fill her belly and distend it; her body is held open, unable to shut, while the wind roars inside her. Then he looses the arrow. In the wording of L. W. King’s translation of 1902, the shaft “tore her belly, it cut through her inward parts, it clave her heart.” The salt sea is dead.

What follows is the act that makes Marduk not merely a victor but a maker. He stands on Tiamat’s corpse, splits her skull with his mace, severs the arteries of her blood. Then, in the poem’s most famous image, “he split her up like a flat fish into two halves.” One half he raises overhead and fixes in place as the sky — the heaven that is, quite literally, the upper body of the sea held up above the world. He posts a bar across it and stations guards and commands them that her waters must not be allowed to escape: the firmament is a dam, and what it holds back is Tiamat herself. The other half he lays down as the earth beneath. He fixes the stations of the great gods as constellations, sets the year and its twelve months, draws the boundary of day and night, and gives the moon-god his crescent to mark the days. From Tiamat’s two eyes he opens the Tigris and the Euphrates, the two rivers of the land flowing out of the weeping sockets of the slain sea. He heaps her mountains, makes her udder into the high hills, pierces her flesh for springs. The world the Babylonians knew is, member by member, the anatomy of the mother the storm-god killed.

The poem is not finished with her death until the human race is made from a fellow casualty of the war. Qingu, the rebel commander, is condemned; his arteries are cut, and from his blood mixed with clay Ea fashions humankind, made to bear the labor of the gods so that the gods may rest. In gratitude the freed gods take up the brick-mold and build Marduk a city and a temple — Babylon and the sanctuary Esagila, with its great ziggurat Etemenanki reaching toward the heaven he has just fixed in place. From beginning to end the Enūma Eliš moves from the undivided salt sea to the divided, governed, named cosmos, and the engine of that movement is the killing and parceling-out of Tiamat’s body. She is the raw material of order precisely because she was the disorder that preceded it.

A fragment of the Enūma Eliš (tablet K.3473) in cuneiform on clay, from the Library of Ashurbanipal at Nineveh, 7th century BCE. British Museum, Room 55. Photo: Zunkir, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 4.0.

The Enūma Eliš was not read privately. It was recited aloud, year by year, during the akītu — the great New Year festival held in Babylon in the first month of spring, when the agricultural year turned. Over the festival’s central days the poem was performed before Marduk’s statue, so that the defeat of the salt sea and the founding of the ordered world were not merely remembered but renewed, and the king’s mandate to rule was re-issued beneath a cosmos re-won from chaos. Tiamat’s death was, in the cult, an annual event. The order it established was understood to need re-establishing every spring, as though the waters were always pressing back against the bar of heaven.

Is she a dragon?

Modern imagination has fixed on Tiamat as a dragon — a vast, multi-headed, fire-breathing serpent — and the texts do not quite license the picture. The surviving evidence pulls two ways. On one side, the Enūma Eliš gives Tiamat a body anatomized in detail when Marduk dismembers it: a tail, a thigh, a belly, an udder, ribs, a neck, a head, a skull, eyes, nostrils, a mouth, lips. Some of those parts are anthropomorphic and maternal — she has an udder, she is the mother who bore the gods — and some are the parts of a great beast. The eleven monsters she breeds are serpents and dragons, but they are her offspring, not her own form. When the Assyriologist Alexander Heidel weighed the matter he concluded that a dragon-shape “can not be imputed to Tiamat with certainty,” and that caution still holds. The poem is more interested in her as the sea and the mother than in describing her silhouette.

The dragon does have a thread of support. A black cylinder seal in the British Museum, of the early first millennium, shows a horned, snouted serpentine creature pursued by an armed and bearded god, and this has often been read as Marduk against Tiamat — though it has just as often been read as the god Ninurta against the bird-demon Anzu, a different combat altogether. The most-reproduced image of “Marduk fighting Tiamat,” the Nimrud relief engraved for Layard’s Monuments of Nineveh, suffers the same double identification. The visual record, in other words, never gives a single, certain picture of Tiamat as a dragon; it gives scenes of a god fighting a monster that later viewers have attached her name to. The modern dragon — the many-headed Tiamat of games and films — is a real cultural figure, but one assembled in the twentieth century, drawing the serpentine forms of her monstrous brood onto the mother herself.

A god battling a winged serpent-dragon, line drawing after an Assyrian relief, from Anton Nyström’s “Allmän kulturhistoria,” 1900. The scene was captioned as Marduk’s battle with Tiamat, though it is now usually identified with the Anzu myth — an instance of the way the chaos-combat and its combatants are continually re-labeled. Public domain (Wikimedia Commons).

The deep and the dragon in another scripture

It was the resemblance to Genesis that made Tiamat famous beyond Assyriology, and that resemblance is the most carefully argued and most contested part of her afterlife. The first verses of the Hebrew creation account describe the earth as formless and void, with darkness over the face of the təhôm — “the deep,” the primeval waters over which the spirit of God moves before the work of separation begins. In 1895 the German scholar Hermann Gunkel, in Schöpfung und Chaos, proposed that this tehom was the Hebrew descendant of Tiamat: that behind the serene opening of Genesis lay a defeated chaos-sea, the same primordial ocean the Babylonians had personified and the storm-god had split. Gunkel went further, gathering the scattered references in the Psalms and the prophets to God’s crushing of the sea-dragons, to Leviathan whose heads were broken upon the waters, to Rahab cut in pieces — and reading them all as fragments of a Hebrew creation-combat, a Chaoskampf, cognate with Marduk’s victory over Tiamat. This is the register of contested-and-attributed claim, not of established history; it is a hypothesis about how motifs travel, argued over for more than a century.

The argument has narrowed in an instructive way. Gunkel’s strongest claim — that the Hebrew tehom is derived from the name Tiamat, a word borrowed from Babylon into the Bible — is now generally rejected by Semitic philologists. The two words are cognate, not borrowed: both descend from a common Semitic root for the sea and its depths, cousins inherited from a shared linguistic ancestry rather than parent and child. Grammar settles part of the case as well, for tehom in Genesis is not personified, not female, not a combatant; it is simply the deep. What survives of Gunkel’s thesis is subtler and harder to dismiss, and recent study of the deep and its demonization sharpens it: that the wider biblical imagery of God subduing the sea and striking the dragon belongs to a stock of Near Eastern combat-motifs that Mesopotamia, Ugarit, and Israel all drew upon, and that the Israelite writers knew this motif and, in Genesis 1, deliberately unmade it — letting the deep lie inert and unopposed under the breath of God, a chaos with no fight left in it. That is motif-tracing, a study of family likeness among the literatures of the region; it is not a documented line of descent from one scripture to another, and it should not be read as one.

The closer kinship runs not to Genesis but to the storm-gods of Israel’s neighbors. The Ugaritic texts from the Syrian coast tell of the god Baal defeating Yam, the Sea, and the twisting serpent Lotan — the same Lotan whose name surfaces in Hebrew as Leviathan. Here the combat is explicit and the sea is named and fought, and the family resemblance to Marduk against Tiamat is close and widely accepted as a shared regional pattern rather than a borrowing in either direction. Tiamat stands at the eastern, Babylonian end of that pattern: the most fully developed of the chaos-seas, the one whose defeated body became, member by member, the visible structure of the sky and the land.

Afterlives

Tiamat’s name did not survive the cuneiform world as a living cult. When Babylon’s own religion faded, and the script that recorded the Enūma Eliš fell silent and unread for the better part of two thousand years, she went under with it. The Babylonian priest Berossus, writing in Greek for a Seleucid king around 290 BCE, preserved a version of the creation-combat in which a monstrous female named Omorka — a Hellenized form standing in for Tiamat — is cut in two by Bel to make heaven and earth; through Berossus a memory of the salt sea passed, distorted, into the classical world’s notion of “Chaldean” wisdom. But the poem itself, and the figure within it, were recovered only with the decipherment of cuneiform in the nineteenth century, when George Smith read the broken tablets from Nineveh and the world learned again that there had been a Tiamat.

Since that recovery she has had two afterlives that rarely meet. In the study of religion she is a fixed point — the most complete surviving form of the ancient combat of order against the watery chaos that precedes it, cited wherever the Chaoskampf is discussed, set beside the Hebrew, Ugaritic, Hittite, and Greek versions of the slain sea or serpent. In popular culture she has been remade into a dragon, queen of an evil brood, a shape the texts withhold and the modern imagination supplied. Neither is quite the Tiamat of the poem. The figure on the tablets is stranger and more fundamental than either — the salt ocean that was there before the gods, that gave birth to them, that was killed by the youngest of them, and whose divided body a Babylonian congregation could look up at every clear night and call the sky.

→ Related: Marduk · Enki · Anu · Ishtar · Nabu · Berossus · Gilgamesh · Oannes · Babylon · Babylonia · The Sumerians · The Assyrians · The Elamites · Eridu · Etemenanki · The Apkallu · Ereshkigal · Sin · Chaldeans