sin

← Encyclopedia

Sin is the name a religion gives to the wrong done against the divine — a transgression not merely of a human rule but of a sacred law or order, and so a fracture in the relation between the person and what the tradition holds ultimate. The word marks a moral failure that is also a religious one: the debt is owed not only to a neighbor but to God.

The Hebrew Bible works with a cluster of terms rather than a single one. The commonest, ḥaṭṭāʾt, carries the sense of missing a mark or losing the way; others name rebellion and crookedness. In that setting sin is breach of covenant — the violation of a bond God had entered into with a people — and its remedy runs through repentance, restitution, and the sacrificial system of the Temple. The annual Day of Atonement set aside one day to clear the accumulated weight of the year. Sin here is concrete and relational before it is metaphysical.

Christianity inherited the vocabulary and deepened it. The figure of Paul of Tarsus treated sin less as a tally of acts than as a power that holds humanity captive, a condition from which a person must be delivered rather than a list to be balanced — a reading later hardened, in the Latin West, into the doctrine of original sin: a fault inherited by all from the first transgression, the human will bent before any single choice. Baptism was held to wash it away; the death of Christ was understood as the act that paid what no penitent could. Islam, too, names wrongdoing and disobedience against God, and holds the way back open through repentance and God’s mercy, but rejects the notion of an inherited guilt; each soul answers for its own deeds, and no mediator stands between the worshipper and the forgiveness of God.

A different account runs through the Hermetic and Gnostic currents of late antiquity. There the deepest wrong is not disobedience but ignorance — not a law broken but a truth unseen. The Hermetic writings call ignorance of God the greatest of all ills, a kind of drunkenness from which the mind must sober and wake; the Gnostic teachers told the same story as a forgetting, a sleep, a divine spark unaware of its own origin. On this telling salvation is less pardon than recognition: what is needed is not to be forgiven but to come to know. The two pictures are not simply opposed — both treat the human condition as something gone wrong and in need of repair — but they locate the wound in different places, one in the will and one in the understanding, and they part over what could possibly heal it.

What the traditions share, across their differences, is the conviction that the wrongness is real and that it can be undone — that the broken relation is not the last word. They disagree about almost everything else: whether the fault is act or inheritance or blindness, whether it is cleared by sacrifice or by mercy or by waking, whether it stains the whole of human nature or only the deed. The word covers a single intuition worked out in incompatible ways.

→ In the library: The Corpus Hermeticum (Mead) — VII. The Greatest Ill Among Men is Ignorance of God

→ Related: Free Will · Hell · Baptism · Gnosis · Soul