Ereshkigal

← Encyclopedia

In the order of the Mesopotamian cosmos there is an above and a below, and the two do not change places. The bright gods keep the sky and the watered fields; the dead go down. They go to a single house, walled and gated, set under the earth and under the fresh waters, and over that house one power presides who does not ascend to the banquets of heaven and is not asked to. Her name in Sumerian is read Ereshkigal — most often given as “Queen of the Great Earth,” the great earth being the ground that covers the dead, with the gentler rendering “Lady of the Great Place” carrying the same meaning by way of a softened word. She is sister to the goddess of love and war, and her opposite in everything. Where her sister rises, she stays. Where her sister is desired, she is feared. The country she rules has many names, and the most exact of them is a direction: down.

The house of dust

The underworld over which Ereshkigal holds the throne is called Kur in the oldest Sumerian, and Irkalla, and in the Akkadian poems Kurnugi — the land of no return. The texts describe it with a consistency that reads almost like a creed. It is the house that those who enter do not leave, the road whose travel is one-directional, the place where the dwellers are deprived of light. Its inhabitants sit in darkness. Dust is their food and clay their bread; they are clothed like birds, in garments of wings and feathers; and over door and bolt the dust lies thick. This is not a place of torment in the later infernal sense. It is a place of subtraction — of light, of food worth the name, of motion, of the warmth of the body. Kings and slaves arrive there equally diminished, and what awaits them is not punishment but the gray permanence of being dead.

Ereshkigal belongs to the first generation of this arrangement, older than the ordering of the upper world’s offices. The later theology gave her a lineage: in the standard reckoning she is daughter of the moon-god Sin and his consort Ningal, which makes her sister to the radiant Inanna — the goddess the Akkadians called Ishtar — and to the sun-god Shamash. Her first husband is named Gugalanna, the Bull of Heaven; her vizier and the executor of her sentences is Namtar, whose name means “fate” or “doom,” and who alone among her household may pass freely between her realm and the world above. The god Ninazu appears in her circle as son, and in some strata as an older lord of the underworld whom she supersedes — a sign that the dark kingdom had governors before the tradition settled its queen on the throne. She does not leave. The gods of heaven, when they wish to deal with her, must send a messenger down or draw her servant up, because the queen of the dead is bound to her own country by the same law that binds everyone else who has entered it.

That fixity is the center of her character. The bright members of the Mesopotamian pantheon move between sky and earth, attend each other’s feasts, intervene in the affairs of cities. Ereshkigal sits. Her power is not mobility but the gate — the absolute control of a threshold that admits all and releases none. When the order of the world is challenged at that threshold, the challenge becomes a story, and two stories above all carry her name.

The “Queen of the Night” (Burney Relief), Old Babylonian, c. 1800–1750 BCE, British Museum. The British Museum favors an identification of the figure as Ereshkigal, on the grounds of the folded wings and the originally black-painted ground; Ishtar and the demon Lilith have also been proposed. Photo: Marie-Lan Nguyen, Wikimedia Commons, CC BY 2.5.

The descent of the sister

The first and greater of the two is the Sumerian poem known from its opening words, “From the Great Above she set her mind toward the Great Below” — recovered piece by piece from tablets found at Nippur and elsewhere across the early twentieth century, the composition itself reaching back to the early second millennium BCE. For decades the story was misread as a rescue; a tablet read at Yale in the 1940s corrected it. Inanna does not go down to save anyone. She goes down to add the underworld to her dominions, abandoning her temples in the great cities to do it, and the act is an overreach that the lower kingdom will punish.

She comes armored in her offices. Before she descends she instructs her faithful minister Ninshubur to plead for her with the high gods if she does not return, and then she presents herself at the outer gate of her sister’s realm and demands entry. Ereshkigal, hearing of the approach, is not gracious. She orders her gatekeeper Neti to open the seven gates of the underworld to her sister, but to open each only a crack, and at each to strip from her one thing. So Inanna passes inward, and gate by gate she is undone. At the first the great crown is taken from her head; then the rod and line of lapis lazuli with which a goddess measures; then the lapis beads at her throat; the twin stones at her breast; the gold ring from her hand; the breastplate; and at the last gate the royal robe itself, the pala garment of her ladyship. Each time she asks what this means, and each time the answer is the same formula: be silent, the ways of the underworld are perfect, they may not be questioned. She arrives at the throne room naked and bowed, stripped of every emblem of what she is.

What waits there does not negotiate. The seven Anunna, the judges of the underworld, render their judgment against her, and Ereshkigal fastens upon her the eye of death — a deadly look, a word of wrath — and the goddess of heaven is turned into a corpse and hung from a hook on the wall, a piece of rotting meat. The most powerful of the living deities, brought into the lower kingdom, is simply dead, and the world above feels it: while Inanna lies on the hook, the texts say, no bull mounts a cow and no man lies with a woman; the generative life of the earth stops with her.

Her rescue is not a victory of force but of cunning and pity. Ninshubur, true to her charge, goes to the high gods, and only Enki — the god of the sweet waters and of cleverness, lord of the deep below the earth — consents to act. He scrapes the dirt from under two of his fingernails and from it fashions two beings, sexless and weightless, neither male nor female: in the Sumerian the kurgarra and the galatura. He sends them down through the gates, which do not bar them because they are nothing, mere creatures of grime, and he gives them precise instructions. They will find Ereshkigal in the throes of what reads as labor or grief, crying out over her own body, “Oh, my inside! Oh, my outside!” — and they are not to flatter her or beg. They are to groan when she groans, to echo her every cry of pain as if they shared it. They do. And the queen of the dead, who has never been mourned with, who rules a realm where no one weeps for anyone, is so moved by being grieved alongside that she offers them a gift. They refuse the river and the field she offers. They ask only for the corpse on the hook. She gives it. They sprinkle on it the food of life and the water of life, which Enki has given them, and Inanna rises.

But the underworld does not release what it has taken without exchange. The Anunna seize her as she ascends — no one leaves the land of no return and leaves no one behind — and she may go up only if she furnishes a living substitute to go down in her place. A swarm of pitiless demons, the galla, climbs with her to find one. She refuses to surrender her loyal servants. Then she comes to her own husband, the shepherd Dumuzi — Tammuz in the later Akkadian — and finds him seated on his throne in fine robes, untroubled, not in mourning for her. On him she fixes the same eye of death that her sister fixed on her, and she gives him to the demons. Dumuzi runs and is hunted down; in the end, through the grief of his sister Geshtinanna, who offers to take half his sentence, he is granted the underworld for half the year and the upper world for the other half, and his yearly descent and return becomes the rhythm of the dying and reviving of the land’s fertility.

The Akkadian version, the Descent of Ishtar, tells the same descent in shorter and harder lines, and it preserves the most famous description of the realm — the house of dust, the food of clay, the feathered dead. In it the substitution is starker still: Ereshkigal, after the resurrection, herself directs the demons to fetch Tammuz, so that the doom is sealed from below as much as from above. The figure Enki sends is not a pair of mourners but a single sexless creature, Asushunamir, whom the queen blesses and curses in the same breath. The bones of the story are the same: the goddess of the upper world enters the lower, is unmade by its queen, and is bought back only at the price of someone else’s death.

The “Seal of Adda,” an Akkadian cylinder seal of c. 2300 BCE: the winged, armed goddess Ishtar (second from left) — Ereshkigal’s radiant sister, who in the Descent must pass naked through the seven gates. British Museum. Photo: Wikimedia Commons, CC BY-SA 2.0.

The taking of a king

The second great story moves in the opposite direction. In the Descent the upper world invades the lower and is repelled at terrible cost; in Nergal and Ereshkigal a power of the upper world goes down and stays, and the underworld gains, for the first time, a king beside its queen. The myth survives in two copies far apart in time and place. The older is a tablet from the diplomatic archive at Tell el-Amarna in Egypt, sent there in the fourteenth century BCE as a Babylonian scribal exercise; the longer and richer is a Late Assyrian recension recovered from fragments at Sultantepe in southeastern Turkey, copied around the seventh century BCE and first read by O. R. Gurney in his 1960 edition of those tablets.

It begins with a banquet of the gods, to which Ereshkigal — who cannot leave her realm — sends her vizier Namtar up as her representative to collect her share. When Namtar enters the assembly the gods all rise to honor the queen below through her servant. All but one: Nergal, the violent god of war, plague, and the scorching heat, does not stand. The slight is reported below, and Ereshkigal demands that the offender be sent down to her to answer for it — which is to say, to die. Nergal is given counsel for the journey by Ea, the Akkadian Enki; in the Sultantepe version he is warned, on entering the underworld, to accept none of its hospitality — not the bread, not the seat, not the bath, and above all not the queen herself, lest he be bound to the place. He descends through the seven gates. And then he disregards the warning. He goes to her bed, and for six days and seven nights the god of war and the queen of the dead lie together; on the seventh he slips away and climbs back to the sky.

What follows turns the tale from a story of a sentence into a story of a marriage. Ereshkigal, waking to find her bed empty, is undone — and the long Sultantepe text dwells on her grief and rage with a tenderness the genre rarely shows. She sends Namtar up again to the assembly, this time to demand the lover back, threatening, in a line that defines her office, to raise up the dead to devour the living so that the dead outnumber the living unless he is returned. So Nergal is sent down a second time, and in the violent Amarna telling he comes as a conqueror: he seizes the queen by the hair and drags her from her throne to kill her, and she stops the blow by offering him what no force could take — her hand, her bed, and the kingship of the underworld at her side. He accepts. The god of plague and war becomes lord of the dead, and Ereshkigal’s solitary sovereignty becomes a shared throne. The story is, among other things, the underworld’s answer to a theological problem: how the god of Kutha, a god of death in his own right, came to belong below — and the answer is that the queen who could not be conquered consented to be wed.

The eye of death and its long afterlife

Two features of Ereshkigal carried far beyond the cuneiform world. The first is the structure of the Descent itself, which is among the oldest surviving examples of the katabasis — the journey of a living power down into the realm of the dead and back. Comparatists have long set it beside the Greek story of Persephone, carried below by the lord of the dead while her mother Demeter blights the earth until a bargain divides the year; and beside the descents of Orpheus and Heracles and Odysseus, and the dismemberment and revival of Egyptian Osiris. The resemblance is genuine at the level of the motif — the gates, the stripping of power, the death that stops the world’s fertility, the negotiated return, the substitute or the divided year. But it is resemblance, not demonstrated descent. Ereshkigal is no Persephone: where the Greek queen was once a maiden carried down and rises each spring, Ereshkigal was always below and never returns; she is the static pole of the underworld, the one who stays. The Descent’s place at the head of the catalog of “dying and rising” myths has been argued, doubted, and argued again — the category was largely dismantled in twentieth-century scholarship and then partially rehabilitated with tighter criteria — and the cleanest thing to say is that the Mesopotamian poems are the earliest written versions of a pattern that recurs across the ancient Near East and Mediterranean, without that recurrence being proof that one tale fathered the rest.

The second strand runs through ritual and magic. By late antiquity the name had crossed languages: in the Greek magical papyri of Roman Egypt the underworld goddess Hecate is invoked under a compound title, “Hecate Ereshkigal,” the Mesopotamian queen of the dead fused with the Greek mistress of crossroads and the dark — a fusion proper to Hecate and to the syncretic appetite of the magicians who copied those spells. The lady of the great place below had become a word of power in a foreign tongue.

In the modern recovery she returned again, this time read inward. When the Sumerologist Samuel Noah Kramer and the poet Diane Wolkstein published their rendering of the Descent in 1983, and when, two years earlier, the Jungian analyst Sylvia Brinton Perera built her book Descent to the Goddess around it, Ereshkigal was lifted out of the antiquarian record and made a figure of the psyche. In Perera’s reading the radiant Inanna is the daughter of the patriarchy, outwardly successful and inwardly thin, and Ereshkigal is the deep feminine that such a world has rejected and forced into the shadow — the realm of rage, mourning, and bodily darkness that must be entered, and suffered, and answered with shared grief, before any wholeness is possible. The two beings of fingernail dirt who save Inanna do it not by power but by weeping when the queen of the dead weeps, and that detail became, for a generation of readers, the whole moral of the story: that what is buried and feared is healed only when it is grieved with rather than fought.

She remains what she was on the tablets — not a tempter, not a devil, not a goddess who can be flattered or fought free of. She is the threshold made into a person. Everything that lives goes to her in the end, clothed in feathers and fed on dust, and the few stories in which something comes back up tell, every one of them, the price of it: a substitute on the hook, a god in her bed, a name traded to the demons at the gate. The land of no return keeps its name because of her.

→ Related: Ishtar · Nergal · Enki · Sin · The Sumerians · The Assyrians · Ur · Babylon · Babylonia · Mesopotamia · Mesopotamian Religion Sumerian Akkadian · Marduk · Anu · Gilgamesh · Tiamat · Eridu · Nineveh · Hecate · Persephone · Demeter