The Amesha Spentas

← Encyclopedia

In the oldest Zoroastrian liturgy a worshipper, standing before the fire, names them in a single breath and in reverse order, as though counting back up a stair toward its top. Spenta Amesha — the holy immortals. The phrase occurs in the Yasna Haptanghaiti, the “Worship of Seven Chapters,” a prose text whose Old Avestan is nearly as archaic as the hymns of the prophet himself; it surfaces again at Yasna 47.1, where six powers cluster about a seventh and the seventh is the mind of God. To pronounce the list is already to pray. The names are not titles of separate gods so much as the furniture of a single divine interior, set out where a soul can climb among them.

They are usually counted as six, and almost as often as seven. The discrepancy is not a slip. It is the whole theology in miniature: a one that is also a company, a council whose chairman is the source of the council.

The names and the genealogy

The Amesha Spentas — the term is conventionally Englished as “Bounteous Immortals” or “Holy Immortals,” from amesha, “undying,” and spenta, an adjective for which there is no clean equivalent, carrying at once “holy,” “bounteous,” “furthering,” “incremental,” the quality of a thing that increases the good — first appear not as persons but as nouns. In the Gathas, the seventeen hymns ascribed to Zarathustra and preserved at the metrical core of the Yasna, the words vohu manah, “good mind,” and asha, “truth” or “right order,” are among the most frequent in the text; asha and its variants recur more than a hundred and fifty times across two hundred and thirty-eight verses, vohu manah well over a hundred. They name the very texture of the divine. Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord, is addressed through them: he has good mind, he is truth, his is the desirable dominion. A worshipper who cultivates good mind and truth is, in the hymns’ logic, taking on the lineaments of God — drawing near not by ascent through space but by becoming, in some measure, what the Lord already is.

Out of this Gathic substance the later tradition raised a structure. The abstractions hardened, without ever quite ceasing to be abstractions, into a heptad of beings ranged about a throne. The canonical six, with their domains, became fixed:

• Vohu Manah (Good Mind), Middle Persian Wahman, guardian of the cattle and the animal creation;
• Asha Vahishta (Best Truth, Best Righteousness), Ardwahisht, guardian of fire and of the cosmic order it images;
• Khshathra Vairya (Desirable Dominion, the Kingdom-to-be-chosen), Shahrewar, guardian of the metals and, with them, of the sky, itself imagined as a shell of stone or metal;
• Spenta Armaiti (Holy Devotion, right-mindedness, humble piety), Spandarmad, feminine, guardian of the earth;
• Haurvatat (Wholeness, Health, Integrity), Hordad, guardian of the waters;
• Ameretat (Immortality, Deathlessness), Amurdad, guardian of the plants.

At their head stands a seventh. In the Gathas the place is held by Spenta Mainyu, the “bounteous spirit,” the creative aspect of Ahura Mazda himself — paired against Angra Mainyu, the destructive spirit, in the great choice of Yasna 30. In the later orthodoxy the seventh is simply the Wise Lord. Whether Spenta Mainyu is God or is God’s instrument, his “active principle” of creation, is one of those questions the texts decline to flatten; both readings have been held, and the seam between the six and their source is left, deliberately, a little open.

There is an order to the list, and the order is a ladder. Good Mind comes first because Good Mind is where a human meets the divine: it is through Vohu Manah that the prophet, in the hymns, is brought before Ahura Mazda and taught. From Good Mind the soul passes to Truth, the right order of things rightly perceived; from Truth to the rightful power that truth confers; and so upward, through devotion, to wholeness and at last to deathlessness — the destination, the soul’s own undying, named by the topmost Immortal. The heptad is thus not only an inventory of God’s qualities but an itinerary, the rungs by which a mind climbs out of itself toward the Lord. The Gathas give the impression less of a doctrine being stated than of a single ascent being repeatedly attempted, each hymn a fresh approach up the same six steps.

What the heptad is has been argued over for as long as Europeans have read the Avesta, and the standard reference survey of the question lays the competing readings side by side. Mary Boyce, whose three-volume history dominated the field in the late twentieth century, took the Immortals for genuine divinities of an older Iranian religion, deities whom Zarathustra reorganized into a graded company subordinate to the one God. Jean Kellens read them rather as ritual entities, presences activated in the liturgy. A third line, older and persistent, sees them as hypostases — qualities of the divine mind given just enough personhood to be invoked. The texts permit all three, and the disagreement is not a failure of evidence so much as a property of the things themselves, which were never built to fall on one side of the line between an attribute and an angel.

What they hold and what they fight

The distinctive teaching is an architecture, and the architecture is exact. Each Immortal is three things at once, and the three are inseparable: an aspect of God, a guardian of one of the creations, and a moral good a person is asked to make his own.

The Faravahar relief at Persepolis. The winged figure, often read as a guardian-spirit or as the divine glory, became the modern emblem of the faith. — Napishtim, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

The Zoroastrian cosmos is an inventory of seven creations: the sky, the waters, the earth, the plants, the animals, humankind, and fire. Six of the seven fall to the six Immortals as their special care — sky and metals to Khshathra Vairya, waters to Haurvatat, earth to Spenta Armaiti, plants to Ameretat, cattle to Vohu Manah, fire to Asha Vahishta — while the seventh creation, the human being, belongs to Ahura Mazda himself, the one who stands at the head and for whom all the rest is made. The scheme is at once a list of divine virtues and a map of the physical world, and the genius of it is that the two maps are the same map.

This is the hinge on which the whole ethic turns. To pollute a river is to wound Haurvatat; to tend the earth, to plant and to keep it clean, is an act of devotion to Spenta Armaiti, and the earth, tradition holds, rejoices under the foot of the righteous and grieves under the foot of the wicked. The fire on the temple hearth is the visible body of Asha, best truth; to keep it pure is to strengthen truth in the cosmos. Caring rightly for cattle is service to Good Mind. The result is a religion in which the moral and the ecological are not two departments but one: to cultivate the virtue and to protect the creation are, in the end, the same act, performed in two registers. A believer who lives in good thoughts, good words, and good deeds is not merely behaving well; he is reinforcing the structure of a world under siege.

Under siege, because each Immortal is set against an enemy. The Gathas already give the abstract oppositions — Good Mind against Aka Manah, evil mind; truth against Druj, the Lie; the desirable dominion against tyranny; devotion against contempt. The later cosmology of the Bundahishn, the great Pahlavi compendium of creation, personalizes these into a counter-heptad: six arch-demons, the kamarags, fashioned by Angra Mainyu in mockery of the Immortals, each assigned to assail one of them. The ninth-century text ranges them in formal pairs — Vohu Manah against Akoman, “evil thought”; Asha Vahishta against Indar, who freezes the minds of the righteous so they abandon the good; Khshathra Vairya against Sawar, the demon of misrule and oppression; Spenta Armaiti against Taromat, presumption, sometimes named Naonhaithya; Haurvatat against Tauriz, who corrupts; Ameretat against Zariz, who poisons the plants. Where the Immortals build, the kamarags spoil; the world is the ground they contest. At the renovation of all things, the Saoshyant and the resurrected dead will see each Immortal seize and bind his demon, and the structure that the Bundahishn sets out in mirror-image will resolve into the single, unopposed good it was always meant to be.

A Sasanian investiture relief at Taq-e Bostan, with the figure usually read as Ahura Mazda conferring sovereignty. The Wise Lord stands at the head of the heptad of the Immortals. — Philippe Chavin (Simorg), via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

There is a further turn, and it is the boldest the theology takes. Because each Immortal is also a virtue, the believer is not merely the Immortals’ beneficiary but, potentially, their host. To think with Good Mind is to make Vohu Manah present in oneself; to live in truth is to lodge Asha Vahishta in one’s own conduct. The Pahlavi literature pushes this to its conclusion: the perfected person becomes a dwelling for the Amesha Spentas, who take up residence in a righteous body as in a temple, and a sin against the corresponding virtue drives the corresponding Immortal out. The structure that begins as cosmology ends as a kind of moral physiology. The same six powers that hold the sky and the waters apart from the Lie hold a single life together, and the human being, the one creation reserved to Ahura Mazda himself, is the field on which the whole heptad is finally either gathered or scattered.

The feminine note is worth marking. Three of the six — Spenta Armaiti, Haurvatat, Ameretat — are grammatically and conceptually feminine, and Spenta Armaiti, holy devotion, is identified with the earth itself, so that piety and the soil under one’s feet wear a single face. The three masculine powers — Vohu Manah, Asha Vahishta, Khshathra Vairya — and the three feminine make a balanced household about the Lord, the cosmos imagined less as a hierarchy of command than as a family that holds together by its own inner harmonies.

Reception and afterlife

When the first European students of the religion came to the Avesta in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, they reached for the nearest category their own scriptures offered. James Darmesteter, whose translations in the Sacred Books of the East shaped how the Anglophone world first read these texts, rendered the Amesha Spentas as “archangels,” and the word stuck. It carried an implicit thesis: that here, behind the angelology of Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, lay an Iranian original — that the heavenly host of named intercessors who serve a single God before his throne had been learned, by the Jews of the exile and through them by their successors, from Persia.

The argument is old and it is unsettled. Several signatures of the later Abrahamic imagination — a developed hierarchy of angels, a final judgment, a resurrection of the body, fire as the purifier at the end of the age, a cosmos divided between God and an adversary — find earlier and precise parallels in Zoroastrian material, and the Achaemenid centuries, when Judah was a province of an empire whose kings invoked Ahura Mazda, supplied the contact. Boyce and others built a strong case that the influence ran from Iran outward. A more skeptical school answers that the surviving Zoroastrian texts in which these doctrines stand were redacted late, often centuries after the same ideas are already attested in Jewish and Christian writing, so that the direction of borrowing is not safe to assert; the doctrines may have developed orally far earlier than their manuscripts, or both traditions may draw on a common older stock. The honest statement is that the resemblance is close and the causation contested. To call the Immortals the ancestors of Michael and Gabriel is to take a position in a two-century quarrel, not to report a fact.

Within the tradition, meanwhile, modern Zoroastrian thought has pulled hard in the opposite direction from “archangel.” The reformist and apologetic literature of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries, anxious to refute the old Western charge that the faith was a dualism of two gods or a polytheism dressed up, reads the Amesha Spentas firmly as facets of one God — emanations, attributes, the radii of a single center, never independent objects of worship. On this reading the heptad is the proof of monotheism rather than its embarrassment: the six are how the one God is many without ceasing to be one, the spectrum a single white light throws when it passes through creation.

A modern gold rendering of the Faravahar. — Shaahin, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

And there is the quiet, durable afterlife of the calendar. The Zoroastrian month has thirty days, and each day bears the name of a divinity, invoked in the litany called the Sirozah, the “thirty days.” The first day belongs to Ahura Mazda; the next six, in order, to the six Immortals — Vohuman, Ardwahisht, Shahrewar, Spandarmad, Hordad, Amurdad — so that a Zoroastrian week, in effect, walks once through the whole heptad before turning to the other powers, the yazatas, among them Mithra and the waters’ lady Anahita. Several of the months carry the same names; the modern Iranian calendar still keeps Bahman, Ordibehesht, Shahrivar, Esfand, Khordad, and Mordad among its months, the Immortals surviving, half-anonymous, in the dating of letters and the birthdays of people who may no longer know whose name they keep. When the name-day and the month-name coincide — when, say, the day Mordad falls in the month Mordad — the tradition marks a small feast, a jashan, the virtue meeting itself in the grid of time.

For the Parsis of India and the Zoroastrians of Yazd and Tehran and the diaspora, the Immortals are still named in daily prayer, still the powers in whose honor the elements are kept clean. The fire is tended for Asha; the water is not defiled, for Haurvatat’s sake; the earth is not burdened with the dead. A theology that began as the vocabulary of a prophet’s hymns, that became a council of radiant beings and then, to outside eyes, a rank of archangels, comes to rest at last in the most ordinary places — a clean hearth, a planted field, a day with a holy name. The six were never only in heaven. They were always the shape a good life makes in the world.

→ Related: Ahura Mazda · Zoroaster · Avesta · The Parsis · Angra Mainyu · Mithra · Anahita · Saoshyant · Zurvan · The Magi · Naqsh E Rostam · Persepolis · Kartir · Chak Chak · Cyrus The Great · The Mandaeans