Anahita

← Encyclopedia

At the back of the great vaulted grotto of Taq-e Bostan, cut into the limestone above a spring in the Zagros, three figures stand in stone. In the center is a Sasanian king, his hand closing on the ringed diadem of rule. On one side stands Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord. On the other stands a woman in a pleated gown and a crown, holding a vessel of water in one hand and, in the other, a ribboned ring that she extends toward the king. She is the goddess of the waters, and what she offers, in the language of the relief, is sovereignty itself — poured out like a stream. Her name is Anahita.

She is one of the strangest presences in the religion of Zoroaster: a faith that taught the worship of a single uncreated God through fire and abstraction, and yet made room for a goddess so concrete that kings raised her likeness in marble and gold across half a continent. To follow her is to watch a river-spirit out of the deep Indo-Iranian past become, by the imperial centuries, the divine patroness of the throne of Persia.

The moist, the mighty, the immaculate

Her full Avestan name is Arədvī Sūrā Anāhitā — three words that the hymns repeat like a single breath. Arədvī names the moist or the streaming; sūrā is the mighty, the strong; anāhitā is the immaculate, the undefiled, the pure. The moist, the mighty, the immaculate: a goddess who is also a river, and a river that is also a goddess. Behind the figure lies a deep genealogy. The yazata of the Waters is of common Indo-Iranian descent, kin to the Vedic river-goddess Sarasvatī, whose name answers to a Proto-Iranian Harahvatī; both descend from a remembered celestial stream. Anahita is the Iranian inheritor of that ancient image of a sky-river feeding the world.

She is hymned in the Ābān Yašt, the fifth of the great Avestan hymns and, by long agreement, one of the most beautiful — the song “to the Waters.” There she is not a small spirit of one spring but the source of every water that runs. From the height of Mount Hukairya she pours down “the width of a thousand men’s height” into the sea Vouru-Kasha, and from that sea she sets all the world’s waters flowing. She is invoked as “the life-increasing, the herd-increasing, the fold-increasing, the wealth-increasing, the country-increasing” — the principle of all fertility. The hymn is explicit and unsqueamish about what this means: she purifies the seed of all males and the womb of all females who bear, and she makes the milk flow in the breasts of mothers when their hour comes. Generation itself, in the body and in the field, runs from her.

The Yašt gives her a body to match. She is imagined as a tall and beautiful maiden, “strong and bright, of high build,” girt high, in a mantle of gold, a golden crown of eight rays and a hundred stars upon her head, golden earrings and a golden necklace, shod in shining sandals. And she travels in a chariot — this, in a religion of formless powers, is itself remarkable — drawn by four white horses, all of one color. The four horses have names that are the elements of weather: Wind, Rain, Cloud, and Sleet. The waters of the sky, harnessed and driven. With these she breaks the dams of the enemies of the Good Religion and clears the road for those who pray to her.

For she is also a goddess of victory, and here her thread crosses one of the central nerves of Iranian kingship: the xvarənah, the royal glory, the radiant fortune that settles on the rightful ruler and abandons the usurper. The Ābān Yašt is built, in its long central stretch, as a roll-call of supplicants. One legendary figure after another comes down to the riverbank and offers her the same enormous sacrifice — a hundred horses, a thousand oxen, ten thousand lambs — and asks for the one boon he needs. The primal ruler Haoshyangha asks for the strength to drive the demons from the seven regions of the earth. Yima the radiant, the first king of the golden age, asks for sovereignty over gods and men. Thraetaona, the dragon-slayer, asks for the power to overcome Aži Dahāka, the three-mouthed, three-headed serpent of the lie. Even the tyrant Aži Dahāka himself comes to her and prays — for the unmaking of the world — and she does not grant it. That refusal is the whole moral of the catalog: she gives victory to the worthy and turns her face from the wicked, however lavish his offering. Sovereignty, in this telling, is something that flows downhill from her waters into the hands of the king who deserves it, and dries up in the hands of the one who does not.

There is a logic in this binding of water to rule that runs deeper than metaphor. In the Iranian imagination the legitimate king is the one through whom the world is kept fertile and ordered — through whom the rains come, the herds increase, the lie is held back. A goddess who is at once the source of all waters and the arbiter of victory is therefore the natural patroness of the throne. To pray to Anahita for sovereignty is to ask the very principle of abundance to confirm one’s right to govern it.

A goddess among goddesses

A figure this rich did not stay sealed inside one tradition. To her west lay Mesopotamia, with its towering goddess of love, war, and the morning star — Ishtar, and her later avatar Nanaia. Somewhere before the fourth century BCE the Iranian water-yazata and the Semitic star-goddess flowed together, and Anahita took on Ishtar’s coloring: the warlike edge, the erotic fertility, the identification with the planet Venus. To Greek eyes she split into familiar shapes. Where she was the goddess of love and generation she was Aphrodite; where she was the chaste and martial huntress she was Artemis; and across Anatolia and the Iranian plateau the Greeks simply transliterated her as Anaïtis, “the Persian Artemis,” and built her temples with herds of sacred cattle and crowds of votaries. In the rich cities of Lydia and Cappadocia her sanctuaries grew wealthy on land and offerings; a Greek geographer could describe the temple-state of her cult at Zela in Pontus, where her worship was conducted with great solemnity and oaths were sworn in her name. The resemblances ran in several directions at once, which is exactly what one expects of a goddess who already contained the river, the womb, the morning star, and the spear. None of these equations is an identity — the Iranian water-yazata is not Ishtar and not Aphrodite — but each was a true door through which a foreign worshipper could enter her cult, and through which her own features quietly broadened. By the time the Greeks knew her, she had gathered into one figure the streaming river of the Avesta, the war-and-love goddess of Mesopotamia, and the bright planet of the dawn.

That breadth is the key to her strangest feature. The religion of Zoroaster, as the Magi practiced it, did not make images of its gods. The powers were honored in fire and in the recited word; a statue would have seemed a confusion of the formless with the formed. Yet Anahita became, almost alone, a goddess of statues.

The witness is a Babylonian priest named Berossus, writing in Greek in the third century BCE, whose account survives because the Christian apologist Clement of Alexandria quoted it some five centuries later to mock the inconstancy of pagan worship. The Persians, Berossus reports, knew no images of the gods in human form until late; it was Artaxerxes, son of Darius — Artaxerxes II, who reigned from 404 to 358 BCE — who “first set up the statue of Aphrodite Anaitis” and enjoined her worship, placing her likeness in Babylon, Susa, Ecbatana, and on outward to Persepolis, Bactra, Damascus, and Sardis. The detail is no isolated slander. The royal inscriptions confirm its shape from the other side: every Achaemenid king before Artaxerxes II names only Ahura Mazda, and Artaxerxes II is the first to invoke, in his building inscriptions at Susa and Ecbatana, a triad — Ahura Mazda, Anahita, and Mithra, the god of the covenant. From his reign the goddess of the waters has a face, and that face stands in temples from the Tigris to the Aegean.

Sasanian silver-and-gilt vessel (300–500 CE) bearing a female figure long associated with Anahita, the goddess of waters and fertility. — Cleveland Museum of Art, photo Daderot, via Wikimedia Commons (CC0 / public domain).

Why a religion suspicious of images made this one exception is a puzzle the field has never fully resolved. Some read it as the price of empire — a borrowed Mesopotamian and Anatolian form of devotion grafted onto an Iranian power that ruled over peoples long accustomed to image-worship. Some read it as the throne deliberately fusing the goddess of fertility and victory to the cult of royal glory, building her a visible face precisely because the king needed a visible source for his legitimacy. Others have wondered whether the Ābān Yašt itself, with its gold-clad maiden and her chariot, already half-invited the carver’s chisel; a power described in such vivid bodily detail is closer to a portrait than the formless flame of Ahura Mazda ever was. What is not in doubt is that the orthodox priesthood was never wholly at ease with it. By the later centuries the statue-cult was being quietly converted into a cult of fire — the goddess honored at a hearth that bore her name rather than before an idol that bore her face. But for a long span the immaculate one had a body of carved stone and gold, and kings from Sardis to Bactra knelt to it.

The fire of the goddess

The center of her later devotion lay in the old heartland of Persia, at Estakhr, a town beside the ruined terraces of Persepolis. There stood the great sanctuary of Anahita, and there a local priestly family kept the cult through the long Parthian centuries — the descendants, the dynastic memory held, of a man named Sasan, who served as warden of the temple of Anahid. His son Papak ruled the district; Papak’s son Ardashir, around 224 CE, threw down the last Parthian king and made himself King of Kings. The dynasty that would carry Persia for four hundred years thus rose, by its own account, out of the wardenship of a water-goddess. Its founders had been her priests before they were emperors.

Their devotion was fierce and not always gentle. Ardashir I, in the reports, sent the severed heads of his defeated enemies to be displayed at her temple in the first campaigns of his reign; a century later Shapur II is said to have had the heads of Christian martyrs strung up there in the persecutions of the 340s. The sanctuary was a place of both fertility and blood, the two faces the goddess had worn since Ishtar — the giver of milk and the taker of heads. To bring an enemy’s head to Anahita was not mere display; it was an offering laid at the feet of the power who decided victory, a way of telling the goddess and the realm at once whose glory had prevailed. When the mighty priest Kartir rose to power in the third century and set about purifying and disciplining the religion — a campaign he recorded in his own self-glorifying inscriptions on the rock — the wardenship of the temple of Anahid at Estakhr passed for a time into his hands, a measure of how central that one shrine had become to the legitimacy of the realm.

Investiture relief at Taq-e Bostan: the king flanked by Ahura Mazda and, at left, Anahita with her water jug and the beribboned ring of kingship. — Photo Philippe Chavin (Simorg), via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0).

In Sasanian art she comes fully into view. On the rock face at Naqsh-e Rostam the goddess — in a mural crown, her hair gathered in a topknot — holds out the diadem to the king Narseh. In the grotto at Taq-e Bostan she stands again beside the throne, the water jug in her hand. Sasanian silversmiths worked her image into gilded vessels: a woman amid vines and pouring streams, the principle of abundance made portable. The goddess who began as a river in the sky had become the visible guarantor of the crown.

Afterlives

The temple at Estakhr kept its weight to the very end. The last Sasanian sovereign, Yazdegerd III, was crowned there in 632, in the old sanctuary of the goddess, only for the empire to fall to the Arab armies within the decade. With the coming of Islam her temples closed and her statues vanished. But a goddess so deeply woven into the language does not disappear cleanly.

Her name went up into the sky. The planet that the Babylonians had given to Ishtar and the Greeks to Aphrodite — the bright wanderer of the dawn and dusk — the Iranians had long since given to Anahita, by way of her fusion with the star-goddess of the west. And so in Persian the planet Venus is Nāhīd to this day, a worn-down form of Anāhitā; and Nahid remains a common given name for Iranian women, most of whom carry it without knowing they bear the name of the immaculate one of the waters. The river-goddess survives as a point of light and as a syllable on the tongue.

Among the living Zoroastrians of Iran and India her hymn is still chanted; the Ābān Yašt is recited, and the waters are still honored as her domain, though the statues that once carried her face are long gone and the orthodox memory prefers the formless flame. Scholarship, for its part, keeps returning to the same hard question she always posed — a question the standard reference treatments of the goddess and her cult still circle: how a faith that placed at its center an invisible and uncreated Lord came nonetheless to kneel, for centuries, before the carved image of a goddess of rivers — and why, of all the powers of the Iranian sky, it was she who was given a body, a chariot, and a throne to stand beside. The water found its own level, and ran straight into the heart of the empire.

→ Related: Mithra · The Amesha Spentas · Ahura Mazda · Zoroaster · Avesta · Kartir · Persepolis · Takht E Soleyman · Naqsh E Rostam · Angra Mainyu · Saoshyant · Zurvan · The Magi · Cyrus The Great · Pasargadae · The Parsis · Chaldeans · Ostanes