Norumbega

← Encyclopedia

A word came back from the coast of the Northeast before any settled fact did. On the two charts that Girolamo da Verrazzano drew to record his brother Giovanni’s 1524 voyage along the Atlantic seaboard — a coast surveyed for Francis I of France in the single ship Dauphine — a name sits on the shore of what would later be New England: oranbega. It is almost certainly an Algonquian phrase, glossed by linguists as something on the order of the quiet place between the rapids, or a quiet stretch of water — a hydrographic term, the kind of word a pilot writes where a native informant points and says, there, that calm reach above the falls. Within a generation the syllables had shifted to Norumbega, the calm reach had become a kingdom, and the kingdom had grown a capital roofed in gold. The whole later career of Norumbega is the distance between what the word meant on the Penobscot and what Europe needed it to mean across the ocean.

A name slides onto the map

The Northeast of North America entered European cartography as a rumor with a coastline attached. Giovanni da Verrazzano (c. 1485–1528), a Florentine in French service, had run the seaboard from the Carolinas past New York Harbor and Narragansett Bay; the next year, 1525, the Portuguese pilot Estêvão Gomes traced the same waters in Spanish service. Neither founded anything. What they left was a strip of names along an unmapped edge, and oranbega among them, soon attaching itself to the great tidal river of the Maine coast — the Penobscot — and to the broad reach of water now called the Gulf of Maine.

A name on a chart is an invitation, and the sixteenth century filled it. Around 1539 a French pilot’s narrative, the so-called Dieppe account, described Norumbega as a wide and wealthy country. By 1542 the navigator Jean Alfonce (Jean Fonteneau, called Alfonse de Saintonge) reported a town named Norumbegue some leagues up its river, its people clothed in furs, fair and tall, sun-worshippers who used words that sounded to his ear like Latin — the standard furniture of the marvelous, assembled at a distance. The cartographers did the rest. On Gerardus Mercator’s world map of 1569, Norumbega is no longer a calm stretch of water but a fortified capital bristling with towers near the head of the bay; Abraham Ortelius repeated the figure, and after them Cornelis de Jode, Petrus Plancius, and Cornelis Wytfliet — whose 1597 Norumbega et Virginia gives the place its own engraved province. For more than a century the city sat on the printed maps of Europe, a walled metropolis at a latitude where no walled metropolis stood, copied forward from plate to plate by men who had never crossed the ocean and were not in the business of doubting one another’s coastlines.

This is the ordinary physics of the cartographic legend. A toponym, once engraved, acquires the authority of ink; each new mapmaker inherits it as data; and the name, repeated, grows heavier than the ground it names. Norumbega became real the way a debt becomes real — by being carried on the books.

The city swells: David Ingram’s marvels

What turned a cartographers’ province into a destination was testimony — and the most lavish testimony came from a man who walked. In 1567–1568 the English sailor David Ingram shipped on John Hawkins’s slaving voyage to the Spanish Caribbean; after the disaster at San Juan de Ulúa in September 1568, where a Spanish fleet shattered Hawkins’s squadron near Veracruz, Hawkins put scores of surplus men ashore on the Mexican coast to fend for themselves. Ingram, with two companions named Richard Browne and Richard Twide, set off on foot. By the autumn of 1569 — having crossed, by his telling, the breadth of the continent — he reached the Atlantic coast near Nova Scotia, was taken aboard a French ship, and came home.

More than a decade later, in 1582, the geographer and impresario of English expansion Richard Hakluyt took down Ingram’s recollections as “The Relation of David Ingram,” and printed them in the first edition of his great compilation, The Principall Navigations, Voiages and Discoveries of the English Nation (1589). Ingram, questioned about the lands he had crossed, furnished a Norumbega to match the maps and then some: a great city, kings carried in chairs of crystal and silver, houses with pillars of gold and silver, pearls scattered common as gravel, rubies in the streets. The account is a compound — genuine, hard-won observation of native peoples and northern country fused with the era’s idea of what a rich land owed an Englishman who had endured to find it. The historian’s task, taken up most fully in Dean Snow’s study of Ingram’s journey, is to separate the plausible ethnographer from the salesman of marvels; and the marvels are exactly the part Norumbega kept. Hakluyt himself came to distrust the relation and quietly dropped it from his enlarged second edition (1598–1600) — but by then the gold pillars had done their work. A fuller narrative of the overland walk and its reception traces how a sailor’s tale, recorded and then half-retracted, lodged in the literature of the Northeast for three hundred years.

The pattern here is older than Ingram and wider than Maine. A blank quarter of the map, a hard journey, a returning witness whose credit depends on the wonder of what he reports: this is the engine that drove the search for El Dorado in the Andean north and the Seven Cities of Cíbola into the deserts of the Southwest, each a golden city projected onto territory not yet known well enough to refuse it. Norumbega is the same machine turned northeast — toward fur, fog, and a granite coast — and assembled out of a fur-trader’s calm-water toponym rather than a real rite of gold.

Champlain finds the river and not the city

A legend built of ink and distance is undone by arrival. In 1604 Samuel de Champlain, establishing the French foothold of Acadia, took a shallop up the Penobscot in deliberate search of Norumbega. He found the river the old accounts promised — he was willing to call it the river of Norumbega — and followed it inland to the falls near present-day Bangor, the very rapids that the first Algonquian phrase had named. Of the towered capital he found nothing. There were villages of the Penobscot people, longhouses and canoes and a living country, but no walls of gold, no kings in crystal, no metropolis of any kind. Champlain met the place and measured it, and the measurement was fatal: after him, French and then other mapmakers struck Norumbega from their charts — first as a city, then as a region, finally even as the name of the river — and the engraved province quietly contracted back into the actual coast it had always overlain.

Norumbega had a contemporary against which its collapse can be read precisely. Far up the St. Lawrence, Jacques Cartier had in 1535 been welcomed at Hochelaga, a real palisaded town of more than a thousand St. Lawrence Iroquoian people; when Europeans returned two generations later it had vanished without trace, its inhabitants dispersed, its site lost. Hochelaga was a town that existed and then ceased to. Norumbega was a town that never existed and was made to cease — talked into being on the strength of a name and a marvel, and then talked out of being by a man who rowed up the river and counted what was there. The one disappearance is history; the other is the deflation of a rumor. Holding them apart is the whole discipline of the thing.

A second life: Norumbega turned Norse

A deflated legend is not a dead one; it is empty, and an empty legend can be refilled. In the nineteenth century Norumbega was poured full again — this time not with Spanish gold but with Scandinavian ancestry. The agent of the refilling was Eben Norton Horsford (1818–1893), a Harvard chemist who had grown wealthy as the formulator of a modern baking powder and co-founder of the Rumford Chemical Works, and who spent the last years of his life and a good deal of his fortune proving that Norumbega had been a Norse city — the long-sought Vinland of the Icelandic voyages — set not on the Penobscot at all but on the Charles River, in the towns of Watertown and Cambridge a few miles from his own door.

Horsford published the thesis in a sequence of confident volumes — The Discovery of the Ancient City of Norumbega and The Problem of the Northmen (both 1889), followed by The Defences of Norumbega (1891) — and he built it into the landscape. He read terraces and stone heaps along the lower Charles as the wharves and walls of a vanished Norse city; he placed a tablet on the riverbank at Cambridge marking the supposed house of Leif Erikson; in 1889, at the confluence of Stony Brook and the Charles in Weston, he raised the Norumbega Tower, a round fieldstone keep some thirty-eight feet high, to stand over the spot where he located Fort Norumbega. He had already, in 1887, paid for the bronze figure of Leif Erikson that still stands on Commonwealth Avenue in Boston. The full statement of the case can be read in his address to the American Geographical Society, delivered at Watertown in 1889.

Horsford’s Norse Norumbega belongs to a wider current. The Icelandic sagas of the Vinland voyages — the body of narrative that survives in the medieval Edda tradition’s cultural orbit and in the saga literature of the Norse seafarers — describe Leif Erikson and his kin reaching a land of wild grapes west across the Atlantic around the year 1000. That a Norse presence in North America is genuine was confirmed in the twentieth century at L’Anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland; what is not genuine is the network of New England claims that nineteenth-century antiquarians spun around it. The same decades produced the Kensington Runestone, a graywacke slab turned up in 1898 by the Swedish-immigrant farmer Olof Ohman near Kensington, Minnesota, its runic inscription dating a party of Goths and Norwegians on a journey from Vinland to the year 1362 — a stone that runologists have consistently judged a modern forgery, its letter-forms and language betraying the nineteenth century rather than the fourteenth. Dighton Rock in Massachusetts was read as Norse; carved horizons and mooring-holes were found up and down the New England coast. The fuel was the National Romantic enthusiasm of the era — Scandinavian-American communities and Anglo-American antiquarians alike reaching back into the saga world for an ancestry older and whiter than Columbus, an alternative founding planted on the soil of the Northeast.

The scholarship is plain. There is no archaeological evidence of a Norse settlement anywhere in New England; Horsford’s terraces are natural and colonial features; the Charles River city is as absent from the ground as the gold city was. The cosmological furniture of the saga world — the world-ash Yggdrasil, the doom-narrative whose shape belongs to Norse eschatology — is the real inheritance of the medieval North; the New England Norumbega is a Victorian construction laid over it, the way the golden city had been laid over a fur-trade toponym three centuries before. The same impulse to find a lost high civilization beneath the visible land runs through the whole modern reception of Atlantis and the lost-continent idea, of which Horsford’s Vinland-on-the-Charles is a regional, antiquarian instance.

The recurring projection

The same architecture stands under both Norumbegas. A real and modest thing on the ground — a calm reach above the Penobscot falls, the actual villages of a living people — is overwritten by a need brought from elsewhere: by Renaissance Europe’s hunger for a golden kingdom to justify the cost of crossing an ocean, and then by an industrial-age America’s hunger for an ancient and noble founding. In each case the unmapped or under-known stands in for the wished-for. The golden Norumbega is a cousin of El Dorado, Cíbola, the Arabian city of Iram of the Pillars lost in the sands, and the mist-veiled Atlantic phantom Hy-Brasil that lived for centuries only on charts; the longed-for noble founding is a cousin of the way later ages furnished Camelot with stone it never had. What distinguishes Norumbega is that it was projected twice, onto the same coast, by two civilizations that wanted opposite treasures from it.

Both treasures answered to the same test, and failed it the same way. Champlain rowed up the river and found longhouses where the gold should have been; the archaeologists dug the lower Charles and found nothing Norse where the city should have been. The Penobscot still runs over its falls in the quiet stretch that first gave the name its sound, and the calm water keeps its only true meaning — the one the pilots wrote down before Europe taught the word to mean a kingdom.

Scholarship and sources

The standard scholarly treatment is the conference volume American Beginnings: Exploration, Culture, and Cartography in the Land of Norumbega, edited by Emerson W. Baker, Edwin A. Churchill, Richard D’Abate, Kristine L. Jones, Victor A. Konrad, and Harald E. L. Prins (University of Nebraska Press, 1994) — the proceedings of a 1988 Portland, Maine conference, gathering historians, archaeologists, and geographers around the toponym’s career and the European–Wabanaki contact it records; the collection reproduces many of the early maps from the Osher Map Library. For David Ingram, the recent reassessment is Dean R. Snow’s The Extraordinary Journey of David Ingram (Oxford University Press, 2023), which subjects the 1582 relation to archaeological and ethnographic scrutiny and recovers the credible eyewitness inside the embroidered marvel.

The primary documents are largely available. Verrazzano’s report of the 1524 voyage survives as his letter to Francis I, held in the Cellere Codex at the Morgan Library; Ingram’s relation circulates in editions of Hakluyt’s Principall Navigations (1589); Horsford’s The Discovery of the Ancient City of Norumbega (1889/1890), The Problem of the Northmen (1889), and The Defences of Norumbega (1891) are all public domain and document the Norse revival in its own voice. The cartographic line — Mercator (1569), Ortelius, Wytfliet’s Norumbega et Virginia (1597) — is studied in the Renaissance-mapping literature, including the Imago Mundi scholarship on how the name traveled from plate to plate. The Norse-revival pseudohistory, including the Kensington Runestone, is documented and assessed by institutional collections such as the Minnesota Historical Society, which sets the 1898 find within the runological consensus of forgery and the National Romantic milieu that received it.

→ Related: Atlantology Lost Civilization Reception · Vikings · Edda · Yggdrasil · Garden Of Eden · Eschatology · El Dorado · Cibola · Hy Brasil · The Fortunate Isles · Iram Of The Pillars · Camelot