Edda

← Encyclopedia

The Edda is not one book but two, written in Iceland within a few decades of each other in the thirteenth century, and between them the chief reason anything detailed is known of the old Norse gods. They share a name whose meaning was already uncertain to the people who used it. One is a collection of poems; the other is a prose handbook written to explain such poems and the lore behind them. Neither was composed as scripture. Both became, by default, the closest thing the tradition has to one. Almost every later retelling of the world-tree, of the war between the divine families, of the death of the bright god and the burning of the worlds, descends from one of these two volumes or from both.

The Prose Edda

The work usually called the Prose Edda — and sometimes the Younger Edda — was made by Snorri Sturluson, an Icelandic chieftain, lawspeaker at the Althing, and historian, written around 1220. He was among the most powerful men of his age and one of its most prolific authors; the same hand produced Heimskringla, the great chronicle of the Norwegian kings whose opening section gives the fullest single portrait of Odin as a master of the dark art of seiðr. His purpose in the Edda was technical and pedagogical: to teach young poets the craft of skaldic verse, the dense, allusive court poetry of the Viking age and after, which leaned so heavily on compressed mythological reference that it could not be read at all by anyone who had forgotten the stories behind it. Skaldic diction worked by the kenning — a riddling, compounded substitution in which gold is the otter’s ransom, poetry is the mead of the slain giant, a ship is the horse of the sea — and every such figure assumed a listener who already held the whole myth in memory. Two centuries after the conversion, that memory was failing. To teach the figures of speech, Snorri had to teach the stories; and so a manual of poetics became the single most coherent surviving account of Norse cosmology.

The book has four parts, and the architecture matters, because the mythological substance the modern reader prizes is in fact embedded in a structure built for an entirely different end. A Prologue opens it. Then comes Gylfaginning, “the deluding of Gylfi,” in which a Swedish king of that name travels to the hall of the Aesir and questions three enthroned figures, who answer him with the body of the cosmology — the shaping of the worlds out of the meeting of fire and ice, the great ash Yggdrasil whose roots and branches structure the nine realms, the ordering of the gods, the death of the bright god Baldr, and the doom of the powers at Ragnarök, when Odin falls to the wolf Fenrir, Thor to the world-serpent, and Freyr to the fire-giant, before a cleansed earth rises again from the sea. The third part, Skáldskaparmál, “the language of poetry,” is the technical heart: a catalog of kennings and poetic synonyms, organized by what they name, each anchored to the myth that licenses it, so that a poet might know why a sword could be called the fire of wounds or Freyja’s tears could mean gold. The fourth, Háttatal, “the enumeration of meters,” is a tour de force in its own right: a single long praise-poem Snorri composed for the Norwegian king Hákon and earl Skúli, demonstrating one hundred and two verse-forms in sequence, with a running prose commentary on each. The order of the work runs from frame to story to diction to meter — outward from myth toward technique — which is to say the cosmology that later readers came for is the foundation course, the thing a poet must hold before the craft can be taught at all.

A Christian author and a heathen subject

Snorri wrote as a Christian, more than two centuries after Iceland adopted Christianity by decision of the Althing around the year 1000. This shapes everything, and the shape is not hidden. The Prologue does not present the gods as gods. It offers instead a learned, euhemerizing genealogy in the medieval manner: the Aesir are derived from Troy — Odin is made a migrant chieftain of that line who traveled north out of Asia, won kingdoms by his wisdom and his arts, and was taken for a god by the peoples he settled among, his descendants worshipped after him. Elsewhere the old powers are framed as a delusion, idols mistaken for the divine by men who had lost the knowledge of the true God. This is plainly a thirteenth-century gloss, a way for a Christian antiquarian to preserve the matter of his ancestors without endorsing their cult; it owes more to medieval historiography and to the classical tradition of explaining gods as deified men than to anything a heathen would have recognized.

And yet the same book, a few pages on, transmits in Gylfaginning and Skáldskaparmál mythological detail that is corroborated by skaldic poetry composed two and three centuries before Snorri was born — verse whose kennings presuppose exactly the stories he tells. The work is therefore layered: a Christian frame around a substantially older deposit, with antiquarian reconstruction, genuine oral inheritance, and the author’s own systematizing intelligence intricately mixed through it. How far the frame distorts what it carries — whether Snorri tidied a ragged tradition into a coherence it never had, whether his Christian vantage colored the matter even where he meant only to record it — is the central problem of reading him, and the constant labor of the scholarship that does. The paradox is exact: the most ordered map of the heathen cosmos was drawn by a man who did not believe it, for purposes that had nothing to do with belief.

The Poetic Edda

The Poetic Edda — the Elder Edda — is a different kind of object altogether. It is not an authored book but an anonymous gathering of Old Norse poems, mythological and heroic, preserved chiefly in a single Icelandic vellum manuscript known as the Codex Regius, written down around 1270. The manuscript holds twenty-nine poems, complete or fragmentary; the thirty-odd poems conventionally printed under the title “the Poetic Edda” add a handful drawn from other manuscripts on grounds of style and theme. The poems are far older than their writing. They were carried orally, in the strict alliterative meters of Germanic verse, and the linguistic and metrical evidence places parts of some of them — the Hávamál, the Völuspá — plausibly in the tenth century, within or close to the pagan period itself; others are demonstrably later. The collection thus preserves, more directly than Snorri’s prose, the voices of the tradition speaking in their own measure.

Two of its poems carry exceptional weight. The Völuspá, “the seeress’s prophecy,” is spoken by a völva, a woman of the dead or near-dead summoned and compelled to speak, who recounts the whole arc of the world from its making to its fiery end and renewal — the single most concentrated source for Norse cosmogony and eschatology, and the spine on which Snorri hung much of Gylfaginning. The Hávamál, “the sayings of the High One,” is a body of gnomic and proverbial counsel attributed to Odin: worldly prudence, hospitality, the brevity of life and the durability of reputation, and, in its later stanzas, the god’s own account of hanging nine nights on the windy tree, wounded and given to himself, to seize the runes from below. The heroic poems that fill the manuscript’s second half carry the matter of the Völsungs and the Niflungs — Sigurd, the dragon’s hoard, the doom of the Burgundian kings — the same legendary cycle that surfaces across the Germanic world. What the völva, the High One, and the heroes share is that they are heard, not summarized: the poems give the tradition’s own idiom rather than a later author’s ordering of it.

The inverted name

The relation between the two books is the reverse of what the shared name leads one to expect. The intuitive picture would be that the poems came first and the handbook was written to gloss an existing, titled collection. The truth runs the other way. Snorri’s prose Edda came first — composed around 1220, half a century before the Codex Regius was inscribed — and it quotes the older poems as its authorities, drawing on Völuspá, Grímnismál, Vafþrúðnismál and others to substantiate its account. The manuscript that holds those poems carries no title at all; it was a bishop, Brynjólfur Sveinsson, who recovered it in Iceland in 1643 and, finding in it the very verses Snorri had cited, supposed it must be the source-book behind Snorri’s work and attached the name Edda to it — and to the king of Denmark, to whom he sent it, the manuscript owes the name Codex Regius, the King’s Book. So the older poetry was christened after the younger handbook that quoted it, by a seventeenth-century scholar reasoning backward from the prose to the verse. The word Edda itself has never yielded a secure meaning: it has been read as “great-grandmother,” as a place-name (Oddi, the estate where Snorri was raised), and as a coinage from a word for poetry, and none of these has carried the field. The name that anchors the whole tradition was uncertain at its origin and was fastened onto the elder collection by an error of inference that later proved durable.

Scholarship and the texts

The modern study of the Eddas is a discipline built on disentangling strata — separating genuinely archaic material from oral reshaping, antiquarian reconstruction, euhemerizing historiography, and Christian framing, all layered in works that reached vellum late. The standard reference is Rudolf Simek’s Dictionary of Northern Mythology (trans. Angela Hall, Brewer, 1993), with John Lindow’s Norse Mythology (Oxford, 2001) the most used English handbook; both treat the corpus as a composite literary deposit rather than a transparent window on the pre-Christian cult. The authoritative critical edition and translation of the Prose Edda in English is Anthony Faulkes’s, published by the Viking Society for Northern Research and freely available — the four parts issued as three volumes (Prologue and Gylfaginning; Skáldskaparmál; Háttatal), with the Edda translation appearing through Everyman in 1987; the Viking Society texts are posted in full at vsnrweb-publications.org.uk. For the Poetic Edda, Carolyne Larrington’s translation (Oxford World’s Classics, 1996; rev. 2014) is the current standard. Margaret Clunies Ross’s Prolonged Echoes (Odense, 1994–1998) and her History of Old Norse Poetry and Poetics (2005) reframed how the mythological material is read as a literary system.

Because both Eddas postdate Iceland’s conversion by some two centuries, the older public-domain translations remain in wide use and are openly hosted. Arthur Gilchrist Brodeur’s translation of the Prose Edda (American-Scandinavian Foundation, 1916) is on Wikisource and at sacred-texts.com; Henry Adams Bellows’s Poetic Edda (American-Scandinavian Foundation, 1923) is hosted at sacred-texts.com/neu/poe and on Project Gutenberg. The nineteenth-century translations of Benjamin Thorpe and the Corpus Poeticum Boreale of Guðbrandur Vigfússon and F. York Powell (Clarendon, 1883) preserve the philological labor on which the field was founded, though their racial-comparative idiom is a period document and not a guide to current fact. One distinct caution governs the whole subject: the medieval Eddas, and the academic Old Norse scholarship that reads them, are categorically separate both from the contemporary reconstructionist movement called Ásatrú or Heathenry and from the early-twentieth-century voelkisch and Nazi-era misappropriation of Germanic material — Guido von List’s invented “Armanen runes” and the Ariosophy that followed have no continuity with the runic or poetic tradition the manuscripts actually carry, and the conflation of the medieval record with either modern phenomenon is a methodological error that the source-critical discipline exists in part to prevent.

For the modern reader the two books function as a pair, mutually correcting: the prose supplies the order the verse withholds, the verse supplies the voice the prose flattens. Together they are the deposit through which an entire mythology is known. The deepest fact about them is the one buried in the order of their making — that the cosmos came down to us not as the speech of a cult but as the worked example in a poet’s grammar, a doctrine surviving because it was the prerequisite for a craft, and named, in the end, backward.

→ Related: Frigg · Odin · Thor · Yggdrasil · Freyja · Freyr · Tyr · Heimdall · Fenrir