Vikings

← Encyclopedia

The word came before the people. In the Old Norse sources a víkingr is a man who goes raiding overseas, and víking is the activity itself — a season’s work, a voyage taken and returned from, not a nation or a creed. Most of the Norse-speakers of the age never went on one. They were farmers tied to a short growing season, herders, traders who carried furs and walrus ivory and amber and thralls down the river-roads to Byzantium and the caliphate, smiths, fishermen, poets. The raider was the exception who gave his name to the whole — so that the period conventionally dated from the attack on the island monastery of Lindisfarne in 793 to the Norman conquest of England in 1066 is called the Viking Age after its most violent and least typical figure. What falls under that name is not only the raiding and the settlement, which belong to the wider history of the European Middle Ages; it is also the religious and mythological world the raiders came from — the pre-Christian polytheism of the North, its picture of the cosmos, and the texts in which both barely survive.

A religion without scripture

Before Christianity reached Scandinavia the North held a polytheism with no fixed canon, no founding revelation, and no central creed. The medieval texts that describe it from outside call it forn siðr, “the old custom,” and heiðinn dómr, “the heathen estate” — names given retrospectively, by people who had already left it. There was no church and no scripture, because the religion was not a body of belief to be assented to but a body of practice to be carried out: sacrifice at the turning of the seasons, the feast at which gods and men ate and drank together, the oath sworn on a ring, the burial that equipped the dead for wherever the dead went. Cult was local and various. A god strong in one valley might be barely named in the next; a great hall like the one Adam of Bremen described at Uppsala in the eleventh century stood beside countless small household and graveside observances that left no record at all. To speak of “Norse mythology” as a single ordered system is already to impose a coherence the thing itself did not have — a point that governs everything that can be said about it.

The two families of the gods

The powers of this world fall, in the surviving accounts, into two divine families who once made war on each other and then made peace by exchanging hostages: the Æsir and the Vanir.

At the head of the Æsir stands Odin — restless, many-named, and dangerous to his own followers. He is god of war and of the battle-slain, but also of poetry, of inspired and ecstatic states, and of the hidden knowledge won through ordeal. The myths organize him around an unyielding exchange: wisdom is never given, only paid for. He surrenders an eye at Mímir’s well for a draught of its water; he hangs nine nights on the windswept tree, wounded with a spear and given to himself, to take up the runes screaming; he wins the mead of poetry from a giant by theft and seduction; he sends out the two ravens Huginn and Muninn, thought and memory, to bring the world back to him each day. He is also, uncomfortably for a sovereign god, a master of the magic called seiðr, which the tradition marks as a woman’s art — so that the highest of the gods is also the great crosser of boundaries.

Against him in temperament stands Thor, Odin’s son and the most widely worshipped god of the late pagan North — the one whose hammer-amulets fill the grave-finds, whose name fills the personal names, who answers when called. Thor guards the inhabited world, Miðgarðr, against the jötnar, the giant-powers of the outer dark; his hammer Mjölnir is the weapon that holds chaos at the fence-line. Where Odin is subtle and treacherous, Thor is direct, enormous, and reliable — the defender rather than the schemer.

Beside them stands Tyr, whose name is the oldest of all, a cognate of the very word for “god” and of the sky-father of the wider Indo-European family. He is the god of law and the sworn oath, remembered above all for a single act: when the gods bound the wolf Fenrir with a fetter the wolf suspected, Tyr laid his hand in the wolf’s mouth as a pledge of good faith, and when the binding held, the wolf bit the hand off. The oath-god keeps the oath even at the cost of the hand that swore it.

The Vanir are the other family — gods of fertility, wealth, the sea, and the generative powers of the land. Their chief figures are Freyr and his sister Freyja. Freyr is the god of harvest and peace and worldly increase, of fair weather and the good year; his cult promised abundance. Freyja is the goddess of desire and of death together — she takes half the battle-slain to her own hall — and she is the divinity most closely bound to seiðr, the sorcery that reads and shapes fate. The war between Æsir and Vanir and its settlement is itself a myth of how sovereignty and fertility, the two great claims on a people, were brought under one roof.

The world-tree and the nine worlds

The cosmos of the North is imagined as a great ash, Yggdrasil, whose roots and branches structure everything. Beneath its roots lie the wells — the well of Urðr, where the Norns, the female powers of fate, sit and shape what will be; the well of Mímir, where wisdom is kept; the spring of the frost-giants. Along the tree are ranged the worlds: the dwelling of the gods, the dwelling of men in the middle, the realm of the giants beyond, the worlds of elves and dwarfs, the fire-world and the ice-world, and Hel below, where most of the dead go. The seeress of the Völuspá says she remembers nine worlds, nine in the tree — but the tidy list of nine named realms that modern handbooks print is assembled from scattered references and given nowhere in the old sources as a single enumeration. That the North imagined a many-tiered cosmos held together by a world-tree is firmly attested; the schematic count is a later neatening.

It is a world with edges and a center, and a world with a history that runs toward a known end. This is the deepest difference between Norse cosmology and many another: the gods are not eternal, and they know it.

Ragnarök, the doom of the powers

The end is called Ragnarök, the doom or fate of the ruling powers. The Völuspá and Snorri’s prose tell it in sequence: a collapse of bonds and oaths among men, the great winter, the Fimbulvetr, that comes without a summer between; the loosing of the bound monsters; the last battle on the plain, in which the gods go out to meet enemies they cannot defeat. Odin is swallowed by the wolf Fenrir; Thor kills the world-serpent and walks nine steps from it before its venom kills him; Freyr falls to the fire-giant Surtr, who sets the world alight. The earth sinks into the sea. And then, in the same poem, it rises again, green, and the surviving sons of the gods return to the empty field and find the golden gaming pieces in the grass, and a renewed world begins.

Whether this vision of an ending and a renewal is old Germanic eschatology or a late poet’s absorption of Christian apocalyptic — the poem of the Völuspá most likely belongs to the tenth or eleventh century, on the cusp of the conversion — is among the oldest running debates in the field; the responsible position is that both strands are present and cannot be cleanly pulled apart. Set beside the Judeo-Christian frameworks of eschatology and apocalypse, Ragnarök is structurally strange: there is no last judgment, no separation of the saved from the damned, no triumph of one side. The gods lose. They go out knowing they will lose, against the appointed enemies, in the appointed way, and they fight anyway. The renewal is not their reward; it is what comes after them.

Fate, the seeress, and the magic called seiðr

A religion this attentive to a foreseen ending is also a religion saturated with fate. The Norns at the root of the tree shape the lives of men as they shape the life of the world; what is laid down is laid down, and the measure of a person is how they bear it. Knowledge of what is fixed is therefore power, and the arts of divination and prophecy sit near the center of the cult rather than at its margins.

The most developed of these arts is seiðr, the form of magic most heavily attested in the sources. Its architecture, as the texts describe it, is built around a ritual specialist — most often a woman, a völva or seiðkona — who is raised above the gathering on a high platform, the seiðhjallr, and there, aided by the chanting of those around her, passes into a state in which the hidden and the not-yet are made known. The Völuspá itself is cast as the speech of such a seeress, summoned to deliver the whole shape of the world from origin to end. The fullest narrative places a traveling völva at a remote farmstead in a hard season, seated, fed a special meal, and asked for the year to come. Snorri’s history makes Odin the supreme practitioner of the art and adds the tradition’s persistent unease about it: that so much ergi — unmanliness, a charge among the gravest in the Norse social register — clung to seiðr that men did not practice it without shame, and so it was the women’s. That the art was strongly gendered, and that male practice drew the accusation of argr, is solidly attested; what exactly that meant in lived ninth- and tenth-century practice is reconstructed from late, and often hostile, witnesses. Whether seiðr should be understood as a northern branch of the wider circumpolar shamanism — cognate with the Sámi practice next door — is the field’s most persistent open question, weighted by a great deal of twentieth-century ideology on every side.

The latecomers’ record

Almost everything that can be told of this world comes from a later hand and a different faith, and this is the central problem of the whole subject. Iceland took the new religion by public decision at its assembly around the year 1000. The men who then wrote down the old gods were Christian Icelanders of the twelfth and thirteenth centuries — more than two hundred years after the cult they describe had been formally set aside. The two indispensable works are the Poetic Edda, an anonymous gathering of mythological and heroic verse preserved chiefly in a single late-thirteenth-century manuscript, the Codex Regius, found again in an Icelandic farmhouse in 1643; and the Prose Edda of Snorri Sturluson, the great chieftain, lawspeaker, and historian, composed in the 1220s. The Eddas are not scripture and were never meant to be. Snorri’s was written in good part as a handbook for poets — a guide to the mythological allusions that the inherited diction of skaldic verse, the kennings, could not be understood without. The sagas of the Icelanders, set in the settlement age but written generations later, and the court poetry embedded in them, supply much of the rest, along with the contemporary stones and ship-burials and the runic inscriptions, the only writing the pagan North left in its own hand.

The difficulty is that Snorri was a learned Christian writing inside a Latin education. His prologue derives the gods from Troy and presents them as deified human kings — plainly a medieval scholar’s gloss, not a pagan doctrine — even as the same book preserves elsewhere details confirmed by verse composed two and three centuries earlier. He arranges a scattered and contradictory inheritance into a clean and orderly account, and scholarship cannot always tell where he is faithfully transmitting old tradition and where he is supplying the order himself, or quietly importing Christian and classical learning into material that had neither. Every reconstruction of Norse religion is therefore a reading through this thirteenth-century lens, and the honest ones say so.

The scholarship and the texts

The modern study of the field begins in nineteenth-century philology — Jacob Grimm, Sophus Bugge, the great editors and translators — and runs through a twentieth-century reckoning with how much of the picture is genuinely old and how much is medieval and modern construction. The standard reference works of the present are John Lindow’s Norse Mythology: A Guide to the Gods, Heroes, Rituals, and Beliefs (Oxford, 2001) and Rudolf Simek’s Dictionary of Northern Mythology; the standard translations of the Poetic Edda are by Carolyne Larrington and Andy Orchard, and of the Prose Edda by Anthony Faulkes and Jesse Byock. Margaret Clunies Ross reframed the whole corpus as a literary deposit to be read with full attention to its medieval making. On seiðr and the question of northern shamanism the foundational monograph is Dag Strömbäck’s Sejd (1935), and the major recent reassessment, marshaling the grave-goods of the ritual specialists alongside the texts, is Neil Price’s The Viking Way: Magic and Mind in Late Iron Age Scandinavia (Oxbow, 2nd ed. 2019).

The primary texts survive in the public domain in their early translations, and the two Eddas in particular can be read in full. Henry Adams Bellows’s 1923 verse rendering of the Poetic Edda — Völuspá, Hávamál, and the rest — is hosted complete at sacred-texts.com, and Arthur Gilchrist Brodeur’s 1916 Prose Edda of Snorri Sturluson, including the Gylfaginning in which Snorri lays out the cosmos and the doom of the gods, likewise. The fullest single ancient portrait of Odin as a master of seiðr stands in the Ynglinga saga that opens Snorri’s Heimskringla. On the modern reception — the contemporary revival and its tangled genealogy — the standard scholarly account is Stefanie von Schnurbein’s Norse Revival: Transformations of Germanic Neopaganism, published open-access and readable in full through OAPEN.

Two modern things the old religion is not

Two later phenomena must be held strictly apart from the pre-Christian tradition, because both are routinely confused with it. The first is contemporary Heathenry, or Ásatrú — a new religious movement organized in Iceland from 1972, when the Ásatrúarfélagið was founded under Sveinbjörn Beinteinsson and granted state recognition the following year, and spread since through Scandinavia, the English-speaking world, and beyond, with adherents numbered in the low tens of thousands worldwide. It draws selectively and seriously on the medieval Icelandic corpus and on academic scholarship, but it is a twentieth- and twenty-first-century reconstruction, not an unbroken survival of the old cult, and it does not claim to be one.

The second is the racial-occult misappropriation of Germanic material that grew up in the völkisch milieu of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries — Guido von List’s invented “Armanen” runes, claimed as a private revelation and published in 1908; Jörg Lanz von Liebenfels’s Ariosophy; the Thule-Gesellschaft; and the later deployment of Germanic symbols under National Socialism. None of this is continuous with the historical runic or religious tradition. The runes of the epigraphic record are an alphabet — the Elder Futhark of some twenty-four characters, the reduced Younger Futhark of the Viking Age — used overwhelmingly to mark ownership and to commemorate the dead, and the modern esoteric “rune systems” built on them have no historical descent from the pagan North. That distinction belongs to its own subject and stands apart from the pre-Christian tradition.

For those who lived inside this world, the gods were neither allegory nor system but powers to be reckoned with — fed at the feast, called on at the grave, trusted, bargained with, feared. The comparative instinct that sets Odin beside other wounded or self-giving gods, or reads Ragnarök against other myths of an ending, can illuminate and can also flatten. What the texts give, taken on their own terms, is a religion attentive to fate above all — a sense that even the gods are bound toward an end they foresee and cannot escape, and go on acting anyway.

→ Related: Middle Ages · Odin · Thor · Freyr · Freyja · Yggdrasil · Tyr · Fate · Divination · Prophecy · Magic · Edda