Mary, mother of Jesus

← Encyclopedia

Mary — Hebrew Miriam, Greek Maria, in the Qur’an Maryam — was the mother of Jesus of Nazareth, and is honored across the Christian world under the Greek title Theotokos, “God-bearer.” In the canonical Gospels she is a sparse presence: Mark barely names her, John keeps her unnamed from first scene to last, and only Matthew and Luke recount the conception and birth. It is Luke who gives her the lines that later devotion would build on — her assent to the angel, and the hymn of praise known by its Latin first word as the Magnificat. From these few passages grew a figure who, by the Middle Ages, overshadowed nearly every saint in the calendar, and around whom more art, music, and architecture were made than around any human being except her son.

What the Gospels say

The four Gospels do not agree on how much of Mary to show, and the order in which they were written runs from less to more. The earliest, Mark, gives her almost nothing: she appears once at the edge of a crowd, when Jesus’s family comes to take him home thinking he is beside himself, and he answers by redefining family around those who do the will of God. Mark names her in passing as the mother of the carpenter, alongside brothers and sisters, and then sets her aside. There is no birth, no annunciation, no infancy. The man at the center of the New Testament arrives in Mark already grown.

John, the latest of the four, keeps Mary present but unnamed throughout. She prompts the first sign at the wedding in Cana, where Jesus addresses her not as mother but as woman, and she stands again beneath the cross, where the dying son once more calls her woman and gives her and the beloved disciple to each other as mother and son. John’s Mary is a figure of beginnings and endings, framing the public life without ever being called by her name — a deliberate reticence that later readers would fill with meaning the text withholds.

The infancy material — the account behind the feast of Christmas — belongs to Matthew and Luke alone, and even they tell it differently. Matthew narrates the birth largely through Joseph: the angel comes to him in dreams, the threat is Herod, the journey is the flight into Egypt, and Mary is the silent figure carried through a man’s story. Luke reverses the lighting. Here the angel comes to Mary herself, at Nazareth, and the scene turns on her answer — her consent, freely given, to bear the child. Luke alone records the Magnificat, the song she speaks at the visitation, a poem of reversal in which the proud are scattered and the lowly lifted, modeled on the song of Hannah in the Hebrew scriptures. It is the longest speech given to any woman in the New Testament, and almost everything that devotion would later say about Mary’s voice traces back to it.

What can be said of the historical figure is correspondingly small. Outside the Gospels there is essentially nothing — no independent record, no contemporary mention. A woman of first-century Galilee, mother of a man whose movement reshaped the Mediterranean: that is the secure remainder when everything later is set aside. The rest belongs to the history of belief rather than the history of events, and the distance between the two is the whole subject.

The apocryphal layer

The Mary that art and liturgy would inherit is in large part not the Mary of the canon. Her own birth, her childhood, the names of her parents, her presentation in the Temple — none of these come from scripture. They come from the Protoevangelium of James, an infancy gospel composed in Greek around the middle of the second century, perhaps about 150, which the churches never admitted to the canon and yet absorbed almost whole.

The text supplies what the Gospels lack. It gives Mary parents, the childless Joachim and Anna, who conceive her in old age after an angel’s promise, in a pattern borrowed from the barren-mother stories of the Hebrew Bible; it has them dedicate the child to the Temple, where she is raised in purity; it stages her betrothal to the aging Joseph and defends, scene by scene, the claim that her virginity was intact before, during, and after the birth. The Protoevangelium is, in effect, a sustained argument for Mary’s holiness pressed back to her own conception — and it is from this argument, not from Matthew or Luke, that the later doctrines drew their narrative furniture. The feast of Mary’s Nativity, the feast of her Presentation, the iconography of Joachim and Anna at the golden gate: all rest on a book the canon refused. More than a hundred Greek manuscripts survive, with translations into Syriac, Coptic, Latin, and other languages, and the earliest substantial witness, a papyrus now in the Bodmer collection in Geneva, dates to the third or early fourth century — early enough to show how fast and how far the apocryphal Mary traveled.

The doctrine, by stages

The veneration moved by stages, and each stage attached itself to a fixed point in time and a settled formula. The decisive one was not, in the first instance, about Mary at all.

Ephesus, 431: Theotokos

At the Council of Ephesus, which met in the city’s Church of Mary from late June to the end of July in 431, the title Theotokos — God-bearer, Mother of God — was affirmed against Nestorius, archbishop of Constantinople, who held that Mary should rather be called Christotokos, mother of Christ, on the ground that she bore the man and not the divine Word. Cyril of Alexandria pressed the opposing case: if the one born of Mary is a single person who is both God and man, then to divide the title is to divide the person, splitting Christ in two. The council sided with Cyril, deposed Nestorius, and fixed Theotokos as the orthodox word.

The point is easy to mistake. The decision at Ephesus was a claim about the son, not the mother — a defense of the unity of God and man in Christ, with Mary’s title as its instrument. But once the church had named her God-bearer in a binding sense, the logic ran outward. If she bore God, the imagination could hardly leave her where the Gospels had left her, a name in a crowd. From the fifth century the elaboration accelerates, and the two halves of Christendom elaborate in different directions.

The East: hymn and icon

The Eastern churches surrounded the Theotokos with a liturgical and visual world. She is invoked in the festal hymnody — the great Akathist hymn addresses her in a long chain of titles and salutations — and her image becomes one of the fixed types of the icon: the Hodegetria who points to the child, the Eleousa who presses her cheek to his, the Platytera whose body opens to contain the uncontainable God. The East kept the older emphasis on her death, which it calls the Dormition, the Koimesis or falling-asleep, commemorated on the fifteenth of August. It tended to hold the mystery of her end in the register of liturgy and image rather than to define it in propositions — the path the Latin West would take.

The West: virginity, the Immaculate Conception, the Assumption

The Latin church moved toward sharper formulation. Three doctrines mark the line. The first, the perpetual virginity, holds that Mary remained a virgin not only in conceiving but throughout her life — a belief already at work in the Protoevangelium and broadly shared across the early and medieval church. The second, the Immaculate Conception, holds that Mary herself was conceived free of original sin; long debated in the schools, with figures as great as Thomas Aquinas hesitating over it, it was defined as dogma only in 1854, in Pope Pius IX’s bull Ineffabilis Deus. The third, the bodily Assumption — the belief that at the end of her earthly life she was taken up body and soul into heaven — was defined in 1950 by Pope Pius XII in the apostolic constitution Munificentissimus Deus, the most recent dogma proclaimed under papal infallible authority, and one that pointedly left open whether Mary first died before she was assumed. Each is treated at its own length in the entries on the Assumption and in the devotions that grew around her; what matters here is the shape of the arc. Across fifteen centuries the West did not so much discover new facts about Mary as draw out, one definition at a time, the consequences of having called her God-bearer.

The Reformation: honor without invocation

The sixteenth-century Reformers did not strip Mary away. Luther preached her perpetual virginity through his life and praised the Magnificat as a model of faith; Calvin, more reserved, still defended her against those who would deny her lifelong virginity. What the Reformers cut was the cult — the prayers addressed to her, the pilgrimages, the trust in her intercession — on the principle that prayer belongs to God alone and that the long elaboration had overgrown its scriptural root. The result was a Mary honored as the first and exemplary believer, the woman who said yes, but no longer prayed to. That division still runs between the confessions, and the Hail Mary, the rosary, and the apparitions all stand on the Catholic side of it.

Popular devotion

Doctrine ran behind devotion as often as ahead of it. Long before the schoolmen defined the Immaculate Conception, ordinary worshippers were keeping its feast; long before any council weighed her intercession, they were asking for it. The rosary, with its counted decades of the Hail Mary, gave the unlettered a Marian psalter they could carry in the hand. Shrines drew pilgrims across Europe and, later, the world. And from the late Middle Ages onward, reported apparitions gave the devotion fresh anchors in particular places and dates: the figure said to have appeared to Juan Diego near Mexico City in 1531, whose image is venerated as Our Lady of Guadalupe and who became patron of the Americas; the vision reported by the fourteen-year-old Bernadette Soubirous at Lourdes in southern France in 1858, a few years after the Immaculate Conception had been defined, after which Lourdes became the great healing pilgrimage of the modern church. The church investigates such claims slowly and approves few, but the approved ones reshaped the map of Catholic practice.

This was also the Mary of the contemplatives. The medieval devotional currents gathered under Christian mysticism leaned on her steadily: the Franciscans, after Francis of Assisi, made her a special patron and helped spread the affective, tender piety of the suffering mother at the foot of the cross, the Mater Dolorosa of so much later art and music. The English anchoress Julian of Norwich, writing of her visions, saw Mary at the heart of them — a small, low, simple maid, and at the same time, in Julian’s seeing, higher than all creation beneath God. In such writers the doctrinal Theotokos and the intimate mother meet: the woman of the council and the woman of the heart are one figure, addressed at once as queen of heaven and as the nearest of helps.

Maryam in Islam

Islam holds her in its own register, and holds her high. The Qur’an names Maryam far more often than the New Testament names Jesus’s mother — by the usual count, around thirty-four times — and she is the only woman called by name in the entire scripture. A sura bears her name, Surah Maryam, the nineteenth chapter, and another, the Family of Imran, returns to her story. The Qur’an affirms the virgin birth without reserve: Maryam conceives Jesus — Isa — by the word and spirit of God, and the infant speaks from the cradle to defend her against the slander her chastity provokes. He declares himself a servant of God, given the scripture and made a prophet.

There the two traditions meet on the same woman and part on what she means. For Islam, Maryam’s son is a prophet, mighty and miraculously born, but not divine; the text turns directly against the claim that God takes a son — the very claim the Christian title Theotokos was coined to assert. So the figure stands at the exact seam between the faiths: revered in both, named with honor in both, and made to carry, in each, the doctrine the other denies. The virgin mother is held in common; the meaning of the child she bore is not.

Scholarship and sources

The modern study of Mary is as much a study of culture as of theology, because the figure grew so far beyond her texts. Jaroslav Pelikan’s Mary Through the Centuries: Her Place in the History of Culture (Yale University Press, 1996) traces how the few biblical fragments were expanded, age by age, into the saturated figure of art and dogma, organizing the history around the successive images the centuries required of her (publisher record). Marina Warner’s Alone of All Her Sex: The Myth and Cult of the Virgin Mary (Alfred A. Knopf, 1976) reads the same accumulation critically, as a history of how the symbols of virgin, queen, bride, and mother bore on the lives and self-understanding of actual women (author’s record). On her end, Stephen Shoemaker’s Ancient Traditions of the Virgin Mary’s Dormition and Assumption (Oxford University Press, 2002) maps the tangled early narratives of her passing that lie beneath the later dogma.

For the primary layer, the Protoevangelium of James is the indispensable second-century source for everything the canon omits; its text and the scholarship on it are cataloged in the standard reference apparatus for the Christian apocrypha (NASSCAL e-Clavis). The doctrinal turning point is preserved in the acts of the Council of Ephesus of 431, where the title Theotokos was fixed; the two modern Marian definitions stand in their defining bulls, Ineffabilis Deus of 1854 and Munificentissimus Deus of 1950. The Islamic portrait is set out in Surah Maryam, the nineteenth chapter of the Qur’an, where the virgin birth is affirmed and the divinity of the child denied in the same breath.

The interpretive thread worth tracing is how a figure so lightly drawn in her sources became so heavily laden. The veneration is real and historically enormous; it is also, demonstrably, a thing that accumulated — each age adding the Mary it required, the grieving mother, the queen of heaven, the merciful intercessor. The texts say little. The devotion says almost everything, and it says it about the people who built it as much as about the woman at its center.

→ Related: Christianity · Islam · New Testament · Gospel · Jesus Christ · Middle Ages · Hail Mary · Rosary · Assumption Of Mary · Christmas · Christian Mysticism · Julian Of Norwich · Francis Of Assisi