John Toland

← Encyclopedia

John Toland was an Irish-born writer and freethinker whose work sits at the hinge between Enlightenment rationalism and the older European traditions of clandestine, secret-keeping religion. He is remembered for two things above all: he gave the English language the word pantheist, and he spent much of his life arguing that organized religion carries a public, simplified face over a hidden inner teaching reserved for the few.

Born near Londonderry in 1670 and raised Catholic, he converted to Protestantism as a teenager, studied at Glasgow, Edinburgh, and Leiden, and made his name — and his trouble — at twenty-six. Christianity Not Mysterious (1696) argued that nothing in genuine religion could be contrary to or above reason, and that the “mysteries” of the faith were later priestly impositions. The book was condemned by the Irish Parliament and ordered burned by the public hangman; Toland left Ireland and never held a settled position again, living by his pen, by patrons, and by political pamphleteering across England, the Netherlands, and the German courts.

The label “deist” is usually attached to him, and it fits the early work. But his later writing reaches toward something stranger. In Pantheisticon (1720) he set out, half in earnest and half as provocation, the creed and liturgy of an imagined fraternity who held that the universe itself is the only God — an infinite, self-moving whole, with no creator standing outside it. The word he minted for this position, pantheist, he had first used in print in 1705. Whether Pantheisticon describes a society that actually met, or stages one as a literary device, remains debated; what is clear is that he was reworking the materialist monism associated with Spinoza into a ritual idiom of his own.

Two further preoccupations mark him as a figure of esoteric interest in his own right. He wrote at length on the ancient Druids, treating them in A Specimen of the Critical History of the Celtic Religion and Learning as a learned priesthood who guarded knowledge by keeping it oral and hidden — a reconstruction later antiquarians and occult revivalists would seize on, often well past the evidence. And in Clidophorus he revived the old distinction between exoteric and esoteric doctrine, the claim that philosophers from antiquity onward had taught one thing openly and another in private. Scholarship reads this partly as historical thesis and partly as self-portrait: a writer who lived by saying as much as the censors allowed and reserving the rest.

He also worked as an editor and transmitter of dangerous books, producing editions of the republican James Harrington and of Milton’s prose, and moving in the freethinking networks through which clandestine manuscripts circulated. Modern study has done much to recover him from the dismissive view of a mere scandal-monger, setting him instead among the serious radical minds of his generation. He died in 1722, poor and out of favour, having spent his career on the contested ground between what may be said in public and what is kept back.

→ Related: William Whiston · Gotthold Ephraim Lessing · Xenophanes · Theodore Parker