Xenophanes

← Encyclopedia

Xenophanes of Colophon was a Greek poet and philosopher of the sixth century BCE, best known for his sustained attack on the gods of traditional religion and for the idea, advanced in fragments of verse, of one greatest god unlike mortals in body or in mind. Ancient and modern writers place his long life roughly between 570 and 478 BCE; driven from his Ionian home, he describes himself wandering the Greek world for some sixty-seven years, reciting his own compositions.

His surviving work comes down only in quotation, gathered from later authors who cited him to praise, refute, or merely record. What those fragments preserve is a critic with an unusually sharp eye for how people make their gods. Homer and Hesiod, he charged, had saddled the divine with every human disgrace — theft, adultery, deceit. The deeper point was about projection: mortals assume the gods are born, wear clothes, and have voices and bodies like their own. He drove it home with an observation still quoted today — that Ethiopians make their gods dark and snub-nosed, Thracians give theirs blue eyes and red hair, and that if oxen and horses could draw, they would draw gods shaped like oxen and horses. Belief, on this account, follows the shape of the believer.

Against that, he set a different picture: one god, greatest among gods and men, resembling mortals neither in form nor in thought, who sees as a whole, thinks as a whole, hears as a whole, and stirs all things by the thought of his mind alone, himself unmoving. Whether this amounts to monotheism, to a single supreme god above lesser ones, or to a poetic figure for the cosmos itself is a question the fragments leave genuinely open, and scholarship has long divided over it. He paired the theology with an early caution about knowledge: the clear and certain truth, he wrote, no man has seen or will ever know; what we have at best is something like opinion.

Later tradition made Xenophanes the founder of the Eleatic school and the teacher of Parmenides, a lineage Plato and Aristotle already report. Present-day scholars treat that genealogy with care — the doxographers were prone to tidy succession-stories, and Xenophanes’ surviving lines argue nothing as rigorously as Parmenides would. What is not in doubt is the reach of his criticism. The argument that the divine, conceived in human likeness, is the divine remade in the worshipper’s image has been returned to, in varied forms, by thinkers down to the modern philosophy of religion. His own positive god, austere and bodiless and known only through the order of things, sits at the start of a long Greek movement away from the gods of the poets toward a first principle reached by reflection.

→ Related: Heraclitus · The One