Danae

← Encyclopedia

Danae is a figure of Greek myth: the daughter of Acrisius, king of Argos, imprisoned by her own father, made pregnant by Zeus in the form of falling gold, and remembered above all as the mother of Perseus. Her story is one of the oldest in the Greek repertoire, told and retold from the archaic poets through the tragedians and the later mythographers, and it turns on a single hard fact about the future: a thing foretold, a father’s effort to prevent it, and the gap that the effort itself opens for the god to enter.

The oracle and the bronze chamber

The narrative begins not with Danae but with a question her father carried to the god. Acrisius had no son. He went to the oracle to ask how he might get male children, and the answer he received was not the one he sought: he would have no son of his own, and the son his daughter bore would kill him. In the logic of these stories the response is itself the engine of the catastrophe, because Acrisius, taking the warning seriously, acts on it — and the action is exactly the wrong move, the move that the prophecy requires in order to come true. He could not bring himself to kill the daughter; he resolved instead to keep her from ever conceiving.

The means was a sealed chamber of bronze. The accounts disagree on its form, and the disagreement is itself informative: some place it underground, a brazen vault sunk into the earth where Danae was kept under guard, while others raise it into a bronze-walled tower sealed against the open sky. The two images pull in opposite directions and meet at the same point. The buried chamber is a tomb for the living, a girl shut away from light below the floor of the world; the high tower is a fortress against the heavens, a wall built specifically against the one quarter from which the danger would come. Acrisius, fearing a god he could not name, builds against every approach he can imagine and leaves unguarded the only one that matters.

The genealogists set this inside an older quarrel. Acrisius was one of twin sons of Abas, king of Argos, and his brother was Proetus; the two were said to have fought even in the womb, and on reaching manhood they divided the Argolid between them, Acrisius holding Argos and Proetus taking Tiryns. Danae was Acrisius’s only child, born to him by Eurydice, a daughter of Lacedaemon — so the absence of a male heir, which sends him to the oracle in the first place, is the precondition of everything that follows. A king with a son would never have asked the question that doomed him.

The shower of gold

What the bronze could not exclude was Zeus. The god reached Danae as a rain of gold, pouring through the roof of her chamber and falling into her lap, and from that descent she conceived Perseus. The image is among the most exact in Greek myth and among the most contested in its afterlife: not a swan, not a bull, not the disguises of beast or man that the god wears elsewhere, but metal turned to weather, wealth become rain, a brightness that passes through stone the way nothing solid can. The poets fixed it early. Pindar, in the twelfth Pythian ode written for a flute-player of Acragas in 490 BCE, names Perseus the son of Danae and speaks of him as conceived in a self-flowing shower of gold — the phrase that would carry the image down the whole tradition.

This is one of a recognizable class of Greek tales in which Zeus, desiring a mortal woman, comes to her transformed, and the consequence the stories care about is never the union but the child. Europa is carried over the sea on the back of a bull; Callisto is approached in the guise of a goddess and then turned into a bear; Leda receives the god as a swan. Danae stands apart within the group for the strangeness of the form. The others are met by a living shape, however disguised; she is reached by a substance, by gold that behaves like rain, and the very abstraction of it — desire arriving as falling money — is what made her story so available to readers who wanted it to mean something other than what it plainly said. Where the bull and the swan are seductions, the golden rain reads almost as a transaction, and that reading was waiting in the image from the start.

The chest at sea

When the child was born, the chamber that had been built to prevent his conception became the proof that it had failed. Acrisius discovered the infant and would not accept that Zeus was the father — in one strand of the tradition he suspected his brother Proetus instead, and the gold was a story told to cover an ordinary scandal. Either way he was caught between two horrors: he dared not kill his own daughter and grandchild with his hands, for the blood-guilt and the gods’ anger that would follow, yet he could not let the boy live to fulfill the oracle. He chose the sea as his executioner, the open water that kills without a visible killer. Mother and infant were shut together in a wooden chest — a larnax, the same kind of box that held the dead — and the chest was set adrift on the water, an exposure that left the verdict to the waves and let Acrisius keep his hands clean of a death he had nonetheless ordered.

It is this moment, the chest on the night sea, that produced the single most famous surviving fragment of the story. The lyric poet Simonides set Danae inside the drifting box at the height of the storm, the wind howling and the black water rising, and gave her a lament over the sleeping child who does not know where he is or what hangs over him — she marks the contrast between the terror around them and the infant’s calm, and turns at last to Zeus, the boy’s father, with something between a prayer and a reproach. The poem survives only because a later critic quoted it to praise its composition, and it breaks off mid-thought, so that the reader is pitched into the storm and then torn out of it; the damage has become part of its power. It is the one place in the whole tradition where Danae is given a voice rather than a fate, and the voice is a mother’s, addressed to a husband who is also a god and who has not, so far, answered.

The chest did not sink. It drifted to Seriphos, a small island of the Cyclades, and there a fisherman named Dictys drew it from the water in his net and broke it open to find a living woman and her child. He took them in. This rescue is the subject of the best-preserved of the lost dramatic treatments — Aeschylus made it a satyr play, Diktyoulkoi, the “Net-Haulers,” in which the fisherman hauls a heavy catch he cannot land alone, the satyrs crowd in to help and then leer at the woman they have pulled ashore, and the decent Dictys takes mother and child under his protection. The island became the ground on which Perseus grew, and the deeds that followed there and beyond — the demand of the island’s king, the quest for the Gorgon, the head that turns the looker to stone — belong to the hero’s own story rather than to his mother’s.

The prophecy closed

The oracle that started everything is satisfied at the far end, after the hero has done what heroes do and come home. Acrisius, learning that the grandson he had cast away was alive and grown and returning to Argos, fled the city for fear of the prophecy — fled, that is, from the man, having failed to prevent the birth. The accounts bring him to Larissa in Thessaly, where funeral games were being held, and Perseus, traveling and competing or simply passing through, took part in the contests. A discus thrown in the games went wrong. It struck Acrisius and killed him, and the death was an accident in every respect that the actors could control: the grandson did not know the old man was there, the old man had run precisely to avoid the grandson, and the throw that joined them was the kind of mischance any athlete might suffer. The prophecy was fulfilled exactly, and by no one’s intention. This is the shape of fate in the Greek imagination — not a doom that compels a wicked act, but one that arrives through the very steps taken to escape it, so that the death of Acrisius rhymes with the death foretold for the father of Oedipus, each man destroyed by the precaution he took against the word he had been given. The death of Acrisius at the discus was dramatized by Sophocles, whose Larisaioi took the funeral games for its setting. The surviving fragments of the satyric Net-Haulers are gathered in the Loeb edition of the attributed Aeschylean remains (Sommerstein, Aeschylus: Fragments).

The textual situation

The story reaches us in fragments and late summaries rather than in one authoritative telling, which is the ordinary condition of Greek myth rather than a defect in it. The earliest naming is in Homer, where the Iliad lists Danae the daughter of Acrisius and mother of Perseus among the loves of Zeus. Pindar gives the golden shower its canonical phrasing. Simonides gives the lament. After that the fullest connected account comes late, in the mythographic handbook ascribed to Apollodorus, the Bibliotheca, which narrates the oracle, the bronze chamber, the rival explanations of her pregnancy — Zeus’s gold or her uncle’s seduction — the chest, the landing at Seriphos, and Dictys, in the compressed register of a reference work setting the genealogy in order (Apollodorus 2.4.1, Frazer’s Loeb text at Perseus).

The tragedians made her a stage figure repeatedly, and almost everything they wrote is lost. Aeschylus treated the cycle in a group of plays of which the satyric Net-Haulers survives best, in papyrus fragments. Sophocles returned to the material more than once, in a Danae, an Acrisius, and the Men of Larissa; the first two staged the early part of the story, the father’s fear and the exposure, and may even have been a single play, while the third carried it to the death at the games. Euripides wrote a Danae and a Dictys, the latter produced in 431 BCE in the same group as his Medea, and their fragments preserve speeches on chance, on wealth, and on a parent’s dealings with a child. What survives of all this is enough to show how steadily the Greek theater returned to Danae and how little of that return is now legible; the connected narrative we read is largely the work of the handbook compilers and the Roman poets who came after the stage had fallen silent on the subject.

Reading and re-reading the gold

The afterlife of the myth is mostly the afterlife of one image. The shower of gold became a favored subject of European painters from the Renaissance onward, and the subject could carry several readings at once, sometimes within a single canvas. It could be a study of divine desire, the descent of the god rendered as light and warmth on a reclining body. It could be a meditation on innocence, the unknowing girl in the sealed room. And it could be, in a frankly moralizing key, an emblem of a woman bought with money — a reading the gold invites by its very nature, since the substance of the god’s approach is also the substance of payment. Titian painted the scene more than once, and in the later versions, made for patrons including Philip II of Spain, he set beside the reclining Danae an old nursemaid who holds out a cloth to catch the falling gold as if it were coin; the contrast between the woman receiving a god and the servant gathering currency stages the ambiguity directly, the same fall of gold read on the canvas as miracle and as money at once. Correggio, Rembrandt, and, much later, Klimt each took the subject and angled it differently, toward serenity, toward intimacy, toward ecstatic abstraction. The shifting moral charge of the subject across these centuries — from chaste emblem to courtesan to luminous abstraction — has been traced in detail by the curators of the J. Paul Getty Museum (on the metamorphoses of the Danaë image).

This venal reading was not a Renaissance invention. The allegorists of antiquity had already turned the gold toward suspicion, and the Roman poets made it explicit. Horace, in the sixteenth ode of his third book, uses Danae’s bronze tower precisely as a parable of corruption: the doors of oak and the patrolling watchdogs would have kept her safe, but Jupiter and Venus knew the god would pass freely once he had turned himself into a bribe, for gold loves to walk through the midst of guards and breaks stone more surely than a thunderbolt. On that reading the myth is not about a god at all but about what wealth can buy, the locked room a figure for every defense that money dissolves. The later allegorizing handbooks, Fulgentius among them, carried the moralized Danae into the Middle Ages as an emblem of chastity overcome by gold.

The Christian Middle Ages made an opposite move with the same materials. Some medieval readers set Danae’s sealed chamber and her impregnation by a descending brightness alongside the conception of Mary, reading the pagan story as a foreshadowing of the Christian one. The clearest instance is a work defending the doctrine of Mary’s perpetual virginity, composed by Franciscus de Retza around the end of the fourteenth century, which pairs an image of Danae in her tower receiving Jupiter’s golden rays with an argument from the lesser case to the greater: if a pagan girl could conceive by a god in a rain of gold, the objection that the Virgin could not conceive by the Holy Spirit falls away. The visual rhyme was ready to hand — the medieval Annunciation showed the divine descending on a beam of light, and Danae’s gold through the roof made the same figure in advance. This comparison was advanced as typology, a defense of the Christian mystery’s possibility, and not as a claim about what the Greek tellers had meant; the medieval readers who made it were reasoning from their own scripture outward, and the Greek story sat where it had always sat, indifferent to the use. The two glosses, the bribery and the foreshadowing, are mirror images: one drags the gold down into the market, the other lifts it up into grace.

Both readings say more about their readers than about the archaic story, which is plainer and stranger: a girl locked away, gold falling through a roof, a child no wall could keep out.

→ Related: Prophecy · Leda · Arachne · Orestes · Perseus · Zeus · Fate · Europa · Callisto · Oedipus · Mary