Prophecy

← Encyclopedia

In a crowded gate or a temple court, someone begins to speak in words not introduced as his own. He has not been asked a question; he answers none. He says: Thus says the LORD — or the god has entered him and the voice that follows is borrowed. The hearers must decide, on the spot and without proof, whether the speech that has broken into their afternoon comes from where it claims to come. This is the recurring scene of prophecy, and the difficulty it poses is built into it: the words arrive already certified by their source and by nothing else.

Prophecy is inspired speech held to come from a source beyond the speaker — disclosing the divine will, the hidden present, or what is to come. Its mark is that the words are received rather than worked out: the prophet reports, warns, or proclaims under a compulsion felt as not his own. This is what sets prophecy apart from divination in the technical sense — the reading of omens, entrails, stars, or lots by a learned method. The diviner consults a system; the prophet is spoken through. The two are nonetheless near kin, and the line between them has never held cleanly: the same word, mantikē, covered both in Greek, and every tradition that prized the free inspired word also kept somewhere a craft for reading signs. What divides them is the location of the initiative. In divination a human being puts the question and the cosmos answers in its script; in prophecy the initiative is the god’s, and the human being is the one addressed, often against his will.

The nabi: a verdict on the present

The figure is ancient and nearly universal, but the Hebrew scriptures gave it the shape the West would carry. There the nabi stands before kings and crowds delivering a word introduced as the LORD’s own. The Hebrew noun was long taken, following W. F. Albright, as a passive form from a Semitic root meaning to call, cognate with the Akkadian nabû, to call or announce: the prophet is one called — and, in the same breath, a spokesman who calls out. An older book remembers a change of title, noting that the figure now named nabi was formerly called roeh, the seer; alongside both stood the hozeh, the visionary. The seer answered inquiries and found lost property; the nabi who absorbed and displaced him did something harder to schedule.

What the classical prophets of Israel delivered was less a forecast than a verdict on the present and a demand for change, with the future folded in as consequence. The denunciations of Amos and Hosea, the laments and warnings gathered under the name of Jeremiah, do not chiefly predict; they indict. Injustice, idolatry, and broken covenant are named, and the disaster announced is the moral consequence of the conduct, not an arbitrary fate that foresight has merely glimpsed. The prophet is the conscience of the covenant turned outward and given a voice that claims not to be its own. Hosea’s own ruined marriage becomes the figure for God’s bond with a faithless people; the private wound is conscripted into the public word. Where the diviner relieves anxiety by answering the question put to him, the prophet manufactures anxiety, arriving uninvited to tell a people what it does not wish to hear. This is why prophecy in Israel was so often adversarial to power: the word stood over against the throne, and the throne could neither command it nor reliably silence it.

Mantis and oracle: the Greek shape

Greek antiquity knew a different configuration. The mantis was the inspired specialist — itinerant, often hereditary, reading sacrifices and birds and dreams, attached to no single shrine — while the oracle was the fixed seat where a god answered through a medium. Above all there was the Pythia at Delphi, who spoke for Apollo from the tripod in the sunken adyton, and whose responses steered colonies, wars, and the careers of men for the better part of a thousand years. The terms of the Greek inspiration were argued at the shrine itself. Plutarch, who served as a priest of Apollo at Delphi in the early second century, devoted whole dialogues to the question of how the god’s voice reached the priestess and why, in his day, the oracle answered less and less in verse. His settled view is that the god did not displace the woman but worked through her: the divine impulse moved a soul that remained the speaker of its own responses, the medium coloring the message as surely as a body colors a sound. That reading — the prophetess as instrument played rather than corpse possessed — is the more durable account of what happened on the tripod, and it survives the collapse of the later legend that the Pythia was a fume-addled mouthpiece tidied up by priests.

The Sibyls gave the inspired word a third Greek form: solitary, wandering, ecstatic prophetesses who spoke not to a consultant but to the ages, in verse, of the fall of cities and the end of times. The official Sibylline books that Rome kept under guard on the Capitol perished by fire in 83 BCE. But the form outlived the shrines. A vast body of Sibylline oracles circulated in the later Mediterranean, much of it composed by Hellenized Jews and then by Christian writers who put into the pagan prophetess’s mouth the history of the world from creation, the denunciation of idols, and the coming judgment. The mask of the Sibyl let a minority community borrow the most authoritative inspired voice of the dominant culture and turn it: the nations’ own seeress made to testify for the one God. Prophecy here is not a relic of the pagan past surviving in spite of the new faith but a living instrument repurposed by it.

The Christian gift and the false prophet

Early Christianity carried the gift forward as one of the spirit’s endowments — vivid, common, and quickly troublesome. The movement began under the preaching of John the Baptist, a prophet of the old Israelite kind whom even hostile sources record, summoning crowds in the wilderness to a baptism of repentance before a coming reckoning; the Christian memory made him the last of the old order and the hinge to the new. Paul ranked prophecy among the highest gifts of the spirit poured out on the congregation, above the more spectacular speaking in tongues precisely because the prophet’s word could be understood, weighed, and acted on. But a gift available to many is a gift that can be counterfeited, and the church had soon to ask how to tell the true prophet from the false. The question was old: the law of Israel had already supplied a brutal test — the prophet whose word does not come to pass has not spoken for the LORD — and a harder one, that even a sign fulfilled does not vindicate a prophet who calls the people after other gods. The early Christian manuals added behavioral tests: the traveling prophet who stayed too long, or asked for money, or ordered a meal he then ate himself, was a false prophet by his fruits. When a prophetic movement in second-century Asia Minor claimed fresh revelation through entranced spokesmen, the wider church condemned it, and the machinery of heresy closed around the living word: inspiration that could not be controlled was inspiration that had to be judged. Prophecy did not so much die out of the church as get subordinated to an office and a canon that fixed the deposit of revelation and treated new arrivals with suspicion.

Two accounts of the source

What the traditions claim about the source varies in instructive ways, and the variation was never idle. Some held the prophet fully conscious — a messenger who understood the message and could be held to it, an I that received and then relayed. Others described possession: the human voice borrowed while the mind stood aside, the speaker a passive apparatus through which a power not its own made sound. The distinction mattered most to those who had to live by the results. A prophet who knew what he said could be cross-examined, indicted for a word that failed, made answerable; an entranced mouth could only be weighed after the fact, by the outcome and by the fruit. The Greeks argued the same split at Delphi — possession against stimulation, the god seizing the woman against the god merely moving her — and the philosophers of revelation inherited it. The question of accountability turned on which account was true, because a tradition that wants its prophets answerable needs them conscious, while a tradition that wants its oracles infallible would rather they were merely the channel and the god the only author.

A history with a shape: the sealed line

Across Judaism, Christianity, and Islam the higher claim was that prophecy is not a scatter of random inspirations but a history with a shape — a succession of bearers running from the first man forward, and in some readings a sealing, a last prophet after whom the channel closes. Islamic thought made the claim sharpest: a line of prophets reaching back to Adam, and Muhammad as khatam al-anbiyaʾ, the seal of the prophets, after whom the office of bringing new revelation is closed. But the falsafa tradition then asked the underlying question that all three faiths share — by what faculty does a human being receive a divine word at all — and answered with a borrowed psychology. Following al-Fārābī and Avicenna, prophecy is an overflow from God through the Active Intellect onto the prophet’s rational faculty and then onto an imagination strong enough to clothe the truth in the vivid images — voices, figures, dreams — that ordinary people can follow. Maimonides carried this into Jewish thought, grading prophecy into eleven degrees, of which the lowest two are merely preparatory and not yet prophecy proper, and making the imaginative faculty the very thing that distinguishes the prophet from the philosopher who knows the same truths without seeing them. On this account revelation is the highest reach of a natural human capacity rather than a suspension of nature — a daring position that drew the charge of reducing the messenger to a gifted thinker, and one that the same traditions used and resisted in equal measure.

The shaped history could be turned in less orthodox directions. Where Maimonides restricted true prophecy to the rare perfected mind, Abraham Abulafia in the thirteenth century operationalized it: the ecstatic, prophetic Kabbalah he taught treated conjunction with the Active Intellect as a goal anyone properly trained might reach, through a discipline of permuting the letters of the divine names until, as his texts put it, the inner seal broke and the influx of prophecy came. He claimed prophetic experience for himself, wrote of his own prophetic self in the third person, and traveled to Rome intending to confront the pope — and the leading halakhist of his day condemned the claims, pushing the prophetic line to the margins of the mainstream. Two centuries later the same logic surfaced in Christian dress when an itinerant Hermetic prophet, Giovanni “Mercurio” da Correggio, rode into Rome on Palm Sunday of 1484 crowned with thorns and deposited at the altar of St. Peter’s a placard announcing himself as the sapiential angel, the Pimander of the Hermetic writings made flesh — the one documented case of Renaissance Hermetism converted from a recovered text into a public, prophetic performance. In every age the claim to a fresh word from the sealed line was at once the most powerful thing a person could assert and the most dangerous, and the traditions that prized prophecy built their fences accordingly.

Behind all of it stands the oldest and largest version of the idea: that the divine creates and addresses the world through its word — the logos that Greek philosophy made the rational order of things and Hellenistic theology made God’s own utterance, the instrument of creation and a presence still at work in the one who hears. If the world is the kind of thing that can be spoken, then a human being can in principle be the place where it is spoken again. Prophecy is that possibility taken with full seriousness: not a faculty for seeing the future but a claim that certain speech originates outside the speaker, in the same source from which the world itself was uttered. The future, where it appears, is a by-product; the disclosure of what is to come belongs properly to eschatology, and the prophets touch it only because consequence is the tail of a present verdict.

Reading the prophets

Scholarship treats prophecy as a social and literary phenomenon as fully as a religious one: a recognized role with its own conventions of speech, a relation to political power that was often adversarial, and texts shaped by later editing into the forms now read. None of this dissolves the question the traditions themselves pressed — whether anything spoke — so much as set it to one side. The standard modern study of the Hebrew prophets, Abraham Joshua Heschel’s The Prophets (Harper & Row, 1962), works from inside the prophetic consciousness rather than around it, arguing that the prophet is gripped by the divine pathos — God’s own grief and outrage at injustice — and answers it with a sympathy that makes the prophet’s anguish a participation in God’s; the durable scan of the work circulates through major libraries (see the publisher and library records for the 1962 edition). For the philosophical theory of how prophecy works, the load-bearing source remains Maimonides, The Guide of the Perplexed, Part II, chapters 32 through 48, where the eleven degrees are set out; M. Friedländer’s English translation is in the public domain and freely readable, the degrees enumerated at Part II, chapter 45 and the emanation-through-the-Active-Intellect account at chapter 36.

The Greek material has its own primary spine. Plutarch’s two Delphic dialogues — On the Obsolescence of Oracles and On the Pythia’s Prophecies — are the fullest ancient account of how a working oracle understood its own inspiration; the first is readable in the original at Perseus and the second in C. W. King’s older translation at the University of Chicago’s Penelope archive. The standard modern treatment of the inspired Greek specialist is Michael Attyah Flower, The Seer in Ancient Greece (University of California Press, 2008; publisher page), which recovers the mantis as an independent professional distinct from the institutional oracle. For the verse-Sibyls and their afterlife, the critical edition and translation are John J. Collins, “Sibylline Oracles,” in James H. Charlesworth, ed., The Old Testament Pseudepigrapha, vol. 1 (Doubleday, 1983), pp. 317–472, and J. L. Lightfoot, The Sibylline Oracles (Oxford University Press, 2007; publisher page); the first complete English verse rendering, Milton S. Terry’s The Sibylline Oracles Translated from the Greek into English Blank Verse (1899), is public domain and held in the library here. The medieval Jewish recovery of prophecy as a teachable discipline is documented in the editions of Adolph Jellinek, who first printed Abulafia’s epistles and his apocalyptic Sefer ha-Ot in the 1850s and 1880s, and reconstructed in the modern scholarship of Gershom Scholem and Moshe Idel; Scholem’s framing is laid out in Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken, 1941; publisher page).

What the inspired word leaves behind is not a record of futures correctly guessed. The prophets of Israel are remembered for the indictments that proved true as judgment, not as weather; the Pythia is remembered for the answers that turned on how they were read; the Sibyl is remembered for saying, under every mask, that empires fall and idols fail. The speech that claims not to come from the one who speaks it keeps reappearing wherever a tradition holds that the world was made by being said — and that the saying is not finished.

→ In the library: The Sibylline Oracles (Terry, 1899)

→ Related: Divination · Hosea · Jeremiah · Merlin · Logos · Delphi · Sibylline Oracles · John The Baptist · Paul The Apostle · Heresy · Eschatology · Islamic Prophetology Doxography · Enochic Idris Prophetology · Kabbalah Ecstatic Prophetic · Abraham Abulafia · Cassandra