Orestes

← Encyclopedia

Orestes is the son of Agamemnon and Clytemnestra in Greek myth: the prince who returns to Mycenae to kill his mother and her lover Aegisthus in vengeance for his murdered father, and who is then pursued for that killing by the Erinyes, the Furies who avenge the spilling of kindred blood. He is among the oldest named heroes in the tradition — Homer already knows him as the avenger held up as a model of filial duty — but his story became, in the hands of the tragic poets, the central case for a problem that family vengeance could not solve.

The bind is exact. Agamemnon, returning from Troy, is murdered by Clytemnestra, who has her own grievance: he had sacrificed their daughter Iphigenia to raise a wind for the fleet. Duty to a slain father commands Orestes to avenge him; but the only available avenging is the killing of his mother, which incurs the same pollution and summons the same avengers. In the older telling the act is simply heroic. The tragedians turned it into a trap, in which every right action generates a new crime, and the chain of retaliation has no internal stopping point.

The fullest treatment is the Oresteia of Aeschylus, three plays staged at Athens in 458 BCE. There Orestes kills under the explicit command of Apollo, is driven mad and across the world by the Furies, and is at last brought to Athens to stand trial before a court of citizens that Athena founds for the purpose — the Areopagus. The jury splits; Athena casts the deciding vote for acquittal; and the Furies, placated rather than defeated, are given honored residence in the city under a new name, the Eumenides, the Kindly Ones. The sequence dramatizes a transition that some historians of Greek religion read as reflecting a real shift in belief: that the resolution of blood-guilt passed from private revenge and the contagious pollution it spread to the public institutions of law and the rites of purification that could wash the killer clean. Sophocles and Euripides each reworked the matter differently, and the variants do not agree — proof, scholarship notes, that the myth was a frame for live ethical argument rather than a fixed account.

Two threads carry Orestes into the wider esoteric and religious imagination. One is the purification of blood-guilt itself: the ritual cleansing of the killer, the idea that a deed can leave a stain on the soul requiring more than punishment to remove, recurs across later thought about defilement and the washing away of sin. The other is the bond with his friend Pylades, which antiquity made a byword for loyalty, and the recovery of his sister Iphigenia in Euripides’ play set among the Taurians, where exile ends not in death but in a homecoming. What the tradition kept returning to was the moment after the necessary crime — the question of how a person, or a city, stops the cycle without simply beginning it again.