Concept

The One

The Neoplatonist name for the first principle — the source of everything that exists, itself beyond being, beyond thought, and beyond every name, including this one.

← Encyclopedia

The One (Greek to hen) is the name Neoplatonist philosophy gives its first principle: the source of everything that exists, which is itself beyond existence — beyond being, beyond thought, beyond every description, including the name “One.” It is less a thing the philosophers found than the place their arguments kept arriving.

The argument is older than the school. Parmenides, in the fifth century BCE, had pressed the logic of unity until the changing world of the senses fell away from it; Plato’s dialogue named for him subjects “the one” to a long gauntlet of hypotheses — if the one is, what follows; if it is not, what follows — that reads, depending on the reader, as theology or as logical exercise. Late antiquity read it as theology. Plotinus, the third-century philosopher whose Enneads state the doctrine in full, took the dialogue’s first, strictest “one” — a unity so pure that nothing, not even being, can be added to it — as the supreme principle, and pointed to the dialogue as his warrant. The doctrine, he insisted, was not his invention but Plato’s meaning.

His own best argument is disarmingly simple, and opens the tractate the library holds: it is in virtue of unity that beings are beings. An army, a chorus, a house, a living body — each exists exactly insofar as it holds together as one; let the unity go and the thing goes with it. Whatever bestows unity on everything else, then, cannot itself be one being among others. It must stand before being altogether. From this principle, Plotinus taught, reality proceeds in order — first Intellect, then Soul, then the world of the senses — without the One ever moving, diminishing, or taking notice.

What can be said of something beyond every predicate? Strictly, nothing — and the Neoplatonists said so, founding a discipline of saying-nothing that proved enormously sayable. Their language of negation passed into the Christian mystical tradition, where writers like the pseudonymous Dionysius praised a God beyond every name; similar austerities appear in other traditions, though each works under its own logic and toward its own end. The resemblance is real and much studied. It is not an identity.

Plotinus did not think the One was merely an inference. The Enneads end with the union toward which the whole system leans — the soul, stripped of everything alien, meeting its source: in MacKenna’s rendering, the passing of solitary to solitary. The most rigorous metaphysics of late antiquity closes not with a proof but with an arrival.

In the library: The Enneads (MacKenna) — VI. 9, On the Good, or the One · The Enneads (MacKenna) — V. 1, The Three Initial Hypostases

Related: Nous · Emanation

Sources

  • Armstrong 1967
  • Wallis 1972
  • Gerson 1994