Entity
Sraosha
The Zoroastrian yazata of the heard divine word — obedience as attentive listening — who keeps the good creation sleeplessly through the night, whose bird is the cock that scatters the demoness of sloth at dawn, and who guards the soul across the Chinvat crossing.
Before the light there is a sound. In the last watch of the night — the hour the tradition counts most dangerous, when the household lies asleep and a demoness with long hands spreads them over the sleepers to hold them past the time of prayer — a bird lifts its voice in the dark and cries against the coming dawn. The Avesta names it parodars, the cock, “he who foresees the coming dawn,” and calls it the bird of a power who does not sleep. The crow is a summons. It routs the demoness Bushyasta, rouses the house to rise and wash and pray, and calls the faithful to feed the fire on the hearth before the sun clears the mountains. The bird belongs to Sraosha, and the crowing is his work: the yazata of the heard word, keeping the good creation while it rests.
Sraosha — Middle Persian Srosh or Sarosh, New Persian Sorush — is the divine power of obedience, though obedience of a particular kind. He is not the enforcer of a command so much as the discipline of listening: the divine word heard, and then heeded. In the settled theology he stands among the powers closest to ordinary devotion, because he is the very substance of the religious life — the prayer said at its hour, the fire tended, the attention held against sloth and fury. He watches the world by night while the rest of creation sleeps, and he waits at the far end of life to walk the soul across the bridge of judgment. Of the many yazatas, “those worthy of worship,” few are named so early or drawn so fully, and none is bound quite so tightly to the plain daily practice of the faith.
The name and how it reaches the record
The oldest thing about Sraosha, as with so much in this tradition, is the word. Avestan sraoša is built on the verbal root sru-, “to hear.” From that root the name draws a double sense that the whole later figure unfolds: hearkening and obedience, the ear inclined toward the sacred word and the will bent to obey it. To hear, in this language, is already halfway to obeying; the noun names the act of attending and the act of complying at once. Middle Persian shortens it to Srosh, New Persian to Sorush — a name that outlived the empire of its origin and passed, in Islamic Iran, into poetry as Sorush the angel of inspiration, the voice that whispers truth. But its root is the plainest verb of religion. Sraosha is what it means to listen.
He reaches the record in the oldest stratum of all. The Gathas — the seventeen archaic hymns that the tradition holds to be the very words of the prophet Zarathustra, and the earliest layer of the whole Avesta — name only a small handful of the divine powers by name, and Sraosha is one of them. There he is invoked as a means of drawing near to Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord: the attentive obedience through which a person comes into the Lord’s presence. How old that first mention is remains one of the genuinely unsettled questions in the study of ancient Iran. A traditional reckoning, transmitted in late sources as “258 years before Alexander,” would place the prophet near the sixth century BCE; the archaic grammar of the Gathic hymns, close kin to the Sanskrit of the Rigveda, has led most modern philologists to date their composition far deeper, to somewhere between roughly 1500 and 1000 BCE. The argument is not resolved, and its full weight is best taken up where the hymns themselves are treated. What is not in doubt is that Sraosha belongs to the tradition’s foundation and not to its later furniture.
From that first horizon he is elaborated across the Younger Avesta into a figure of great concreteness. He holds his own hymn in the collection of Yashts as Yasht 11, the Srosh Yasht Hadokht — five kardas, or chapters, running to twenty-two stanzas, a fragment that scholarship associates with the lost Hadokht Nask of the Sasanian Avesta. He is invoked again, at greater length, within the central liturgy itself as Yasna 57, the Srosh Yasht se shabag — thirteen kardas and thirty-four stanzas, a hymn whose curious byname, “of the three nights,” will be explained by the use to which it is still put at a death. It is in this Younger material that his portrait fills in. There he is called, in a much-repeated line, the strongest, the sturdiest, the most active, the swiftest, and the most awe-inspiring of youths — a god imagined young and unwearying, made for vigilance. The Encyclopaedia Iranica’s article on Sraoša reads him, across these texts, as the yazata who embodies religious obedience, discipline, and devotion, and traces the line from the Avestan power of ritual attention to the great guardian of the soul he becomes in the later books.
The heard word and the night-watch
Obedience, in this frame, is not servility, and the tradition is careful about the distinction. Sraosha is the power of the word heard and kept, and what he keeps a person aligned with is Asha — the cosmic truth, the right order that runs through the world — against the Druj, the Lie that would unmake it. To obey is to hold that alignment: to say the prayer, to keep the observance, to bend the attention toward the sacred formula rather than let it wander into forgetfulness. He is, in the liturgy’s own reckoning, the first worshiper of all. Yasna 57 names him the first being in creation to adore Ahura Mazda and the Bounteous Immortals who surround him, the first to chant the five Gathas of the prophet, and the first to spread the barsom, the ritual bundle of consecrated twigs laid out for worship. Every act of devotion the faithful perform, he performed first; he is the pattern of the religious life before he is its guardian.
He is also a warrior, and his weapons are made of the same stuff as his office. The Avesta gives him a standing epithet, darshi.dru-, “of the strong mace,” and sets that mace beside the sacred word itself: the Ahuna Vairya, the holiest of the Gathic formulae, and the other manthras are named as Sraosha’s arms against the daevas, the demons who chose the Lie. The recited word is a mace; the mace is a recited word. With them he goes out each night against the powers of darkness. His standing adversary is Aeshma, the daeva of Wrath — Aeshma daeva, the demon of fury and violence, whose own epithet is xrvi.dru-, “of the bloody mace.” The pairing is exact and deliberate: the strong mace against the bloody one, attentive devotion set against blind rage, the discipline that listens against the passion that lashes out. It is Sraosha, the tradition holds, who will overthrow Aeshma at the end of the world.
Above all he keeps the night. When the sun goes down and the good creation lies most exposed, Sraosha does not sleep. The hymn declares him unbroken by slumber in his constant vigil, and each night he descends to patrol the world and beat back the demons that gather in the dark. He belongs especially to the Ushahin gah, the last watch of the night that runs on to dawn — the most vulnerable hour, when sleep is deepest and the hour of prayer easiest to miss. Here the cock returns to the center of the picture. The bird called parodars, “he who foresees the coming dawn,” is Sraosha’s own, and its crowing is a religious act: it lifts its voice against the mighty dawn and cries the household awake. What it drives off is a specific enemy — Bushyasta, the long-handed, the demoness of sloth, who lulls the world back into sleep and makes the faithful forget in slumber the hour they should be at prayer. In the eighteenth chapter of the Vendidad the cock is set squarely against her: its crow, seconded by the Ahuna Vairya said at first light, breaks her hold and calls people to rise, to pray, and to tend Atar, the sacred fire on the hearth, so that the flame is fed and the day begun in the presence of the truth. The same chapter has the bird call the sleepers to their feet and to the Ahuna Vairya against the demons, while Bushyasta whispers over them to lie down and sleep a little longer — the crow of the cock and the murmur of sloth rendered as a contest at the threshold of the dawn. The yazata of obedience and the bird that ends the night’s sleep are, in this way, one office. To wake at the cock’s crow and pray is to be on Sraosha’s side of the oldest quarrel there is.
He must be kept distinct, in all this, from the other powers who stand near the faithful. He is not victory, which belongs to Verethragna; not the pressed offering, which is Haoma; not the guardian spirits, the pre-existent fravashis that each righteous person possesses as a higher self. Sraosha is the heard word and its discipline, the wakeful attention that holds a life in order — and it is precisely that wakefulness, carried past the last watch of the night, that fits him for the office he holds at the end of a life.
The bridge, and the rites that endure
Everything the night-watch rehearses is played out, once, at the death of every person. In the Zoroastrian account the soul — the urvan — does not leave at once. It lingers near the body for three days, and Sraosha is its protector through them; the ceremonies performed for the dead during those first three days are made in his name, and it is he who guards the soul while the demons press. At the dawn of the fourth day the soul proceeds to the Chinvat Bridge, the Bridge of the Separator, the span between the living world and what lies beyond. There it comes before a tribunal. The oldest telling, preserved in the Vendidad and cited in the standard reference accounts, sets the scene at the third night’s end: when the dawn appears and brightens, when Mithra of the beautiful weapons reaches the happy mountains and the sun is rising, the soul goes up to be judged. Mithra of the covenant presides, and with him stand Rashnu of the just balance, who weighs each deed, and Sraosha, who has walked the soul to the crossing and guards it there. As the World History Encyclopedia’s account of the Chinvat Bridge records the scene, the soul then meets the daena, the personified sum of its own life — a radiant maiden to the one who lived by the truth, a hideous hag to the one who followed the Lie — and Sraosha keeps it safe against the demons who would drag it from the span while it crosses toward the House of Song. Two four-eyed dogs, the old texts add, watch at the head of the bridge and know the true soul from the false. The span itself answers to the deeds: broad as a highway under the righteous, narrow as a blade’s edge under the wicked, so that the crossing is at once the judgment and its carrying-out.
In the Pahlavi books of the Sasanian and post-Sasanian priesthood — the cosmological Bundahishn, the encyclopedic Denkard — this eschatological Sraosha grows into one of the great guardians of the tradition. What began in the Avesta as the power of ritual obedience becomes, in the later theology, the settled companion and protector of the soul at judgment, the yazata to whom the passage of the dead is entrusted. The definitive modern study of that whole development is Philip G. Kreyenbroek’s Sraoša in the Zoroastrian Tradition, published at Leiden by E. J. Brill in 1985 as the twenty-eighth volume of the Orientalia Rheno-Traiectina series and grown from his Leiden doctorate — a monograph of some two hundred pages that traces the yazata from the Gathic hymns through the Younger Avesta to the Pahlavi eschatology, gathering the texts in Avestan and Pahlavi with English translation. Mary Boyce, in her classic 1979 account of the tradition, places Sraosha among the powers closest to lived devotion, the divine correlate of the ordinary practice of the faith.
That is where his afterlife is best measured, because it runs straight into practice that has not stopped. The hymn called “of the three nights” earns its byname from exactly this: Yasna 57 is recited in the funeral observance of the three nights after a death, the span in which Sraosha shelters the departing soul. Those rites, described here at the distance of the public record and not as any manual, belong to him; and so does the Srosh Baj, the short devotion in his name with which, by long custom, the daily prayers of a Zoroastrian open, and which many say at night before sleep, asking that the soul rest under his protection through the dark. The seventeenth day of every month in the Zoroastrian calendar is dedicated to Srosh, kept as the feast the tradition calls Sorushgan; the day-name and the god are one, so that once a month the whole of a day belongs to the heard word.
These are living observances. The Zoroastrians of Iran — in Yazd, in Kerman, in Tehran — and the Parsis of Mumbai and Gujarat still name Srosh in their prayers for the dead and in the daily baj; the community that keeps these rites is small now and, by its own sober reckoning, aging, its numbers thinned by the long minority centuries that followed the Arab conquest of the seventh century and by the emigration of the last hundred years. But the rites hold. The full history of that community, its two branches and its demographics, belongs elsewhere; what belongs to Sraosha is the narrow, unbroken thread of it — the prayer that still opens at his name, the three nights still kept in the hymn that bears their number, the mobed who still watches with the soul while it waits to cross. The yazata who never sleeps was always, first, the god of the thing done at its proper hour. In a faith kept alive by exactly such small, timed acts — the cord retied at dawn, the fire fed before the light, the word said when the cock cries against the night — the power of the heard word is not a figure out of an old book. He is the one whose watch the living still take up, night after night, before the sun clears the mountains.
→ Related: Atar · Verethragna · Fravashi · Haoma · Yazd Atash Behram · Udvada Atash Behram · Ka Ba Ye Zartosht · Pir E Naraki · The Zoroastrians · The Sasanians · Gathas
Sources
- Encyclopaedia Iranica — 'SRAOŠA'
- Wikipedia — 'Sraosha'
- Wikipedia — 'Srosh Yasht' (the two hymns and their kardas)
- Wikipedia — 'Chinvat Bridge' (the Vendidad passage on the third night)
- World History Encyclopedia — 'Chinvat Bridge' (Joshua J. Mark)
- Philip G. Kreyenbroek, Sraoša in the Zoroastrian Tradition (Leiden: E. J. Brill, Orientalia Rheno-Traiectina 28, 1985)
- Mary Boyce, Zoroastrians: Their Religious Beliefs and Practices (London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1979)