Gathas

← Encyclopedia

The central act of Zoroastrian worship, the Yasna, runs to seventy-two chapters, and somewhere past its midpoint the priest reaches a stretch whose language is not the language of the rest. The grammar tightens. The syntax folds over itself. For the length of this passage he is no longer sounding the liturgy of his order but the words of the prophet who stands at the source of it, spoken in a tongue already archaic when the surrounding service was composed. The oldest scripture of the religion is not a volume anyone can take down from a shelf. It is seventeen songs, lodged inside a longer rite like an older stone set in newer masonry, kept alive because the priesthood never stopped singing it.

These are the Gathas — Avestan gāθā, “song” or “hymn” — held by the tradition and by modern philology alike to preserve the very words of Zarathustra (the Zoroaster of Greek and Latin), the priest-poet who taught the worship of Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord. They are the oldest layer of the Avesta, the Zoroastrian scriptures, and the direct textual witness to the message of Zarathustra himself. They are also, by a wide margin, the most difficult thing in the whole corpus to read.

The seventeen songs and their meters

The Gathas number seventeen hymns, and they do not stand on their own. They are embedded in the Yasna, gathered at the ritual heart of the service in the section the tradition calls the Staota Yesnya, the “worship of praises” — the most sacred stretch of the entire liturgy. Editors group the seventeen by their poetic meter into five Gathas, each named for the words with which its first hymn opens: the Ahunavaiti (Yasna 28–34), the Ushtavaiti (43–46), the Spenta Mainyu (47–50), the Vohu Khshathra (51), and the Vahishtoishti (53). The first is much the longest — seven hymns, on the order of a hundred stanzas. The Ushtavaiti and the Spenta Mainyu run to four hymns apiece, some sixty-six and forty-one stanzas. The last two are single hymns, of twenty-two and nine stanzas. Together the five amount to about 238 stanzas, close to six thousand words. It is a small text, and its weight in the religion is out of all proportion to its length.

The names are not neutral labels. Each is drawn from the opening words of its first hymn, words that in several cases became prayers in their own right: the Ahunavaiti takes its name from the vicinity of the Ahuna Vairya, the short and supremely holy formula the tradition sets at the very head of worship; the Ushtavaiti from ushta, “bliss” or “well-being,” the first word of Yasna 43; the Vahishtoishti from vahishta ishti, “the best gift.” Within each group the hymns are built in fixed syllabic meters, the lines counted and the caesuras placed with the same care as in the Vedic craft, so that the form itself is part of what was memorized and part of what fixes the words against drift. A stanza that scans cannot be casually altered; the meter is a kind of lock.

Between the first Gatha and the other four sits a second archaic composition, in the same old language but cast in prose: the Yasna Haptanghaiti, the “Worship in Seven Chapters” (Yasna 35–41). It is nearly as old as the hymns that surround it, addressed to fire and the waters and the good creation, and its central placement is deliberate — the four later Gathas flank it on the far side while the Ahunavaiti opens the sequence, so that the whole Old Avestan core stands enclosed together at the middle of the service. The seventeen hymns and the seven prose chapters share not only a language but an age; everything else in the Yasna was built up around them later.

That language is Old Avestan — “Gathic” Avestan, named for these very hymns — the most archaic recorded stage of any Iranian tongue, and among the oldest attested Indo-European literature of any kind. Its closeness to a sister tradition is the single most consequential fact about it. The grammar, the meters, even the formulaic turns of the Gathas stand beside the Sanskrit of the Rigveda as a near twin; the two poetic crafts descend from one Indo-Iranian ancestor and were worked, for a time, in parallel. The very word Yasna, the name of the central worship, is the exact cognate of Sanskrit yajña, the Vedic sacrifice. To set the Gathas open beside the oldest Vedic hymns is to watch a single inheritance fork into two.

Yasna 28.1 — the opening stanza of the Ahunavaiti Gatha — in the Bodleian manuscript J2, copied in 1323, one of the two oldest securely dated Avestan manuscripts. Written in the phonetic Avestan alphabet devised to fix the recited text. Bodleian Library, MS J2 fol. 175, via Wikimedia Commons. Public domain.

How old is the voice

Because almost nothing else about Zarathustra reaches the record — no tomb, no inscription, no contemporary notice — the age of the Gathas is the age of the prophet, and it is the most contested chronological question in the field. Two reckonings hold the ground, and they stand centuries apart.

The first is linguistic. The archaism of Old Avestan, and the pastoral world the hymns describe — a society of herdsmen and priests and cattle-raiders, with no cities, no writing, and no horizon resembling the later Persian empires — places the Gathas deep in the second millennium BCE, roughly contemporary with the Rigveda. Mary Boyce, whose 1979 study remained the standard authority for a generation, argued on these grounds for a date between about 1700 and 1000 BCE; many scholars settle near the lower end, around 1000 BCE. On this reading the Gathas are older than the whole documented history of the Iranian peoples, a voice from before the record begins.

The second is traditional. The inherited Zoroastrian chronology places Zarathustra “258 years before Alexander” — a genealogical count preserved in the Pahlavi book the Bundahishn and echoed in later Islamic-era sources — which yields a floruit in the sixth century BCE, a life of roughly 628 to 551. In the last century that date found its principal modern defender in Gherardo Gnoli, who argued that the tradition’s own reckoning deserved more weight than it was given. Most philologists reject it as far too recent: a sixth-century Zarathustra would have composed in a language already many centuries dead by his own day, an impossibility the linguistic case turns on. The evidence to decide between the two dates does not exist, and neither position can close the other out. What is firmer than the chronology is the geography — the eastern lands, the Iranian world of the steppe and the plateau, not the Persis and Media of the later kings.

The choice at the beginning

Within the tradition the Gathas are the founding revelation: Zarathustra’s own questioning, passionate address to Ahura Mazda, the Wise Lord — wholly good, the sole uncreated creator, to whom the hymns speak in the first person and from whom the poet reports an answer. They are the earliest and most concentrated statement of the religion’s ethical vision, and much of that address takes the form of questions — the poet asking the Wise Lord who fixed the course of the sun and stars, who upheld the earth and the sky, who made the mind and the will, a whole catechism of makings put not as doctrine but as inquiry. The founding scripture of the faith is, in large part, a man interrogating his god. Beneath everything stands a single opposition: asha, the cosmic truth and right order of things, set against the druj, the Lie, the disordering of what should hold. Every human life, in the Gathic frame, is a decision between the two — a free and consequential choice to strengthen truth in the world or to feed its ruin.

The choice is not only the worshipper’s. It is written into the structure of the cosmos itself, in the passage that carries more theological weight than any other in the corpus: Yasna 30.3. There the poet names two spirits, or mainyu, twins who at the beginning revealed themselves in thought and word and deed — the one bounteous, Spenta Mainyu, the other evil, named Aka or Angra Mainyu. Each freely elected its own nature: the holy spirit clung to asha, and the destructive one, choosing, embraced the worst. This is the coherent ethical dualism of the faith, and it is easy for an outsider to mistake. It is not a rivalry of two gods, nor a later corruption of a purer creed. The opposition unfolds beneath the one supreme and wholly good God, Ahura Mazda, whose creation is entirely good and whose adversary, Angra Mainyu, is a made choice rather than a co-eternal maker. The moral universe is a battlefield, but it has a single author and a settled end.

Around the Wise Lord the Gathas set an entourage of luminous powers, and it is here that they first appear as the vocabulary of the divine world — the beings the later tradition would call the Amesha Spentas, the Bounteous Immortals: Vohu Manah, the Good Mind; Asha Vahishta, Best Truth; Khshathra Vairya, the Kingdom to be chosen; Spenta Armaiti, holy devotion; and the paired Haurvatat and Ameretat, wholeness and life without end. In the hymns they are less a fixed hierarchy than a way of naming the aspects of the good — the qualities through which Ahura Mazda is present and by which a person joins the divine work. The imagery through which the hymns think is pastoral, and one scene in particular has drawn readers for a century and a half. In the Ahunavaiti Gatha, at Yasna 29, the soul of the ox — the geush urvan, the spirit of the herds and of the settled, cattle-keeping life — cries out to Ahura Mazda against the violence of the raiders and asks for a protector. The divine council searches for a champion strong enough, and finds only one man named for the task: Zarathustra himself, who to the ox’s dismay is no warrior but a poet, armed with nothing but the word. The passage folds the prophet into his own revelation and makes the whole moral drama turn on a herdsman’s plea, and it is characteristic of the Gathas that their cosmology arrives not as system but as scene — the pasture, the threatened cattle, the ordering and disordering of a world small enough to be seen. The poetry that carries all this is dense, allusive, aphoristic, and it looks toward the Frashokereti, the final making-wonderful in which good is at last set right and the Lie undone. To recite the Gathas, for priest and worshipper both, is to speak the prophet’s own words — which is the reason they sit at the ritual heart of the Yasna and not in a library.

Canon, translation, and the living voice

Because they were liturgy before they were ever a text, the Gathas were carried in the throat. The priesthood transmitted them orally across many centuries, in a language that grew opaque as the spoken tongues moved on, sounded correctly long after they had ceased to be fully understood. Only under the Sasanian kings was the Avesta assembled, given a canonical shape, and written down at all, in an alphabet devised for the purpose — a phonetic script accurate enough to fix the exact sound of the recitation — with a Middle Persian translation and commentary, the Zand, set alongside the archaic verse to gloss what the priests could no longer parse unaided. This was the medium through which the hymns passed into the Islamic era after the Arab conquest of Iran in the mid-seventh century; the history of that empire and its state church belongs to the Sasanians, and only the fate of the text concerns the Gathas here. What survived did so, as it always had, in trained memory as much as on the page. The manuscripts that reach us are late — the two oldest securely dated copies, the Bodleian J2 among them, were written only in 1323, more than two millennia after any linguistic date for the composition — and they descend from a written archetype younger still. The measure of the priesthood’s discipline is that a text carried by mouth across such a gulf came through archaic enough that modern grammar can still recognize it as older than everything around it. The lock of the meter held.

Kept alive by the priests of the surviving communities — the Zoroastrians of Yazd and Kerman in Iran and the Parsis of India — the Gathas remain ritually central today, still recited within the Yasna by mobeds for whom the Old Avestan is a holy instrument sounded rather than a language read. The Zoroastrians are a small and aging people now, in Iran and in the Indian diaspora alike, but they are a continuous one, and the seventeen songs are sung in the same order they have held for as long as the tradition can account for them.

Western scholarship began wrestling with the hymns in the nineteenth century and has never stopped. Their difficulty is not a matter of degree but of kind: the grammar is archaic past the reach of the later tradition’s own understanding, the diction terse to the edge of collapse, and the lexicon riddled with words that occur only once in all of surviving Avestan, so that whole lines resist any confident sense. The Encyclopaedia Iranica’s survey of the translations reckons that of the 238 Gathic stanzas scarcely fewer than 190 are, in places or in whole, still not understood (iranicaonline.org). The consequence is that the major renderings diverge sharply, line by line, and to translate the Gathas is already to decide what their author taught. Christian Bartholomae produced the first linguistically grounded version; Helmut Humbach’s Die Gāthās des Zarathustra (1959) broke from him philologically; Stanley Insler’s English verse translation and commentary, The Gāthās of Zarathustra (1975), became the most widely read rendering in the language; and the work continues through Prods Oktor Skjærvø and others. Mary Boyce’s 1979 study set the hymns in the fullest account of the religion’s development.

Among Zoroastrians themselves a reforming current reads the Gathas as the pure teaching of the prophet, measuring the later Avesta against them and finding in these seventeen songs alone the unmediated voice at the origin. Whether or not that reading holds, it fixes the reason the hymns matter beyond the study of a dead language. They are the one place the tradition and its critics agree to look for Zarathustra — not a life anyone can reconstruct, but a voice, still sounded at the center of the rite, in words no one has finished translating.

→ Related: Atar · Verethragna · Sraosha · Fravashi · Haoma · Yazd Atash Behram · Udvada Atash Behram · Ka Ba Ye Zartosht · Pir E Naraki · The Zoroastrians · The Sasanians