Entity
Samuel Taylor Coleridge
English poet, critic, and philosopher (1772–1834) who carried German idealism into English and read the Neoplatonists and Jakob Boehme as living thought, not curiosities.
Samuel Taylor Coleridge (1772–1834) was an English poet, critic, and philosopher whose verse made him a founder of English Romanticism and whose prose made him one of its hardest thinkers. He is remembered first for the poems — The Rime of the Ancient Mariner, Kubla Khan, Christabel — but he spent the second half of his life reading and writing philosophy, and it is there that he matters to the history of esoteric thought.
His formation was unusually wide. He read the Cambridge Platonists and, through them, the Neoplatonic tradition; he studied Spinoza closely enough to be both drawn and alarmed; and after a stay in Germany in 1798–99 he became the chief English conduit for the new German idealism of Kant, Fichte, and above all Schelling. The Biographia Literaria of 1817 carries that idealism into English so directly that later readers found whole passages translated almost unaltered from Schelling — a debt Coleridge acknowledged unevenly, and which scholarship has documented in detail. What he took from that reading was a conviction that mind and nature are not two opposed substances but one living order seen from two sides.
Coleridge also read the Christian theosophist Jakob Boehme — the “honoured Behmen” of his notebooks — and the alchemical and Hermetic writers, and he did not read them as superstition. He held that such figures had grasped, in strange and broken language, something the mechanical philosophy of his own age had lost: that the world is alive, generative, shot through with spirit. From this came his most influential distinction, between the Imagination — a shaping, almost divine power that he called “esemplastic,” the mind’s repetition of the eternal act of creation — and the merely associative Fancy. He drew a parallel distinction between Reason, the faculty of the supersensible, and the Understanding, which handles the world of the senses. These were not literary flourishes but a metaphysics, one in which the human imagination participates in the divine.
How far Coleridge was an esotericist in his own right is genuinely contested. He was a churchman who ended as a defender of Anglican orthodoxy, and he can be read as a Christian philosopher who merely raided idealism and the mystics for materials. He can equally be read as the point at which the older European current of Neoplatonism, Boehmean theosophy, and the perennial philosophy re-entered English letters in a form the nineteenth century could use. Both readings have evidence. What is not in doubt is the line of transmission: the American Transcendentalists, the later idealists, and the Victorian writers who spoke of a “living” universe were drawing, often without knowing it, on the channel he had opened.
His authority outran his output. He published less, and finished less, than his contemporaries expected, and much of his deepest thinking survives in marginalia and notebooks edited long after his death. The figure who emerges from them is less the ruined poet of legend than a mind that spent decades trying to think spirit and nature together — and left the attempt unfinished, in fragments that others kept returning to.
→ In the library: Plotinus — The Enneads (MacKenna, 1926)
→ Related: William Blake · Johann Wolfgang Von Goethe · Benedictus De Spinoza · Neoplatonism · The One
Sources
- McFarland 1969
- Perkins 1994