Pohjola

← Encyclopedia

The first thing said of Pohjola is its direction. It is the North — pohja, the word that in Finnish carries two senses at once, the bottom and the northern quarter, so that to travel there is to go downward and outward together, toward the cold floor of the world. In the runo-song of the Finnish and Karelian villages, and in the Kalevala that Elias Lönnrot assembled from that song, Pohjola is where the sun stands low, where the dogs of the dead are said to bark, where iron and frost and famine come from. It is the far country a hero crosses water and waste to reach, the house at the edge of the inhabited world. Almost everything that the heroes of the song most want — a bride, a treasure, fire, knowledge — has to be fetched from there, across a hostile threshold, from a mistress who does not give it freely.

The two Northlands: oral song and compiled epic

Pohjola exists in two layers that must be kept apart, because the second is built from the first and is not identical to it.

The deeper layer is the Kalevala-meter oral poetry of the Finnic peoples: the runo or runot, sung in a non-rhyming trochaic tetrameter, built on alliteration and on the parallelism by which a line is answered by a second line restating it in other words. This song was carried for centuries by singers — many of them in Archangel (Viena) Karelia, in villages east of the present Finnish border — who held in memory long sequences about origins, suitors, smiths, and journeys to the other world. In this oral tradition there is no single fixed Pohjola. The name attaches to a cluster of overlapping ideas: a distant northern household where one goes to woo or to raid; a cold and dangerous tuonpuoleinen, an otherworld reached by crossing water; and, in many songs, a name nearly interchangeable with Tuonela, the land of the dead. Different singers placed the boundary differently. The constant is opposition: Pohjola is what the singer’s own world is set against.

The upper layer is the Kalevala itself — the literary epic that Lönnrot (1802–1884), a district physician at Kajaani and the first secretary of the Finnish Literature Society (founded 1831), compiled from this song on eleven field expeditions through Finnish and Russian Karelia and Lapland between the late 1820s and the 1840s. He published a first version, now called the Old Kalevala, in two parts in December 1835 and March 1836 — thirty-two poems and roughly 12,000 lines — and a far larger New Kalevala in 1849, fifty runot and some 22,795 lines, the version read today. Lönnrot dated the foreword to the first edition 28 February 1835, and that date is now Kalevala Day, an official flag-flying day of Finnish culture.

What Lönnrot did with the song is the central question of the field. He did not merely transcribe. He selected variants, stitched episodes from different singers and regions into a continuous narrative, smoothed contradictions, supplied connective verses in the inherited meter, and reordered events — in the Sampo cycle he took the material apart and rebuilt it, shifting names among characters to make a coherent line of action. Domenico Comparetti, in The Traditional Poetry of the Finns (1898), already made plain that the epic bore only partial resemblance to its sources and was, for all its oral material, a literary construction. Later Finnish folklorists — Julius and especially Kaarle Krohn, founders of the historic-geographic method — pressed the same point from the philological side, Kaarle Krohn arguing that the apparent pagan stamp of the narrative songs largely dissolves on close examination and that their datable formation reaches back no further than the medieval centuries. The honest position, held across the discipline, is that the Kalevala is neither pure folklore nor invention: it is an authored synthesis of genuine oral tradition, and Pohjola as a unified place — a single named kingdom with one ruler and one geography — is in large part a product of that synthesis.

A cold country at the bottom of the world

Within the frame of the song, Pohjola is read by its qualities, not its coordinates. It is dark, where the home country is light. It is poor in warmth and rich in cold; its winters are the source of the diseases and the killing frost that the heroes’ land suffers. It is a place of manala-tinged danger — the etymology that ties pohja to the bottom of things runs, in many runot, straight into the imagery of the dead, so that the road to Pohjola and the road to Tuonela are sung in nearly the same words: a river to cross, a black water, a gatekeeper, a return that is not guaranteed. To go north in this poetry is to go toward death and to come back changed, if one comes back at all.

Against Pohjola stands the heroes’ own country, called Kalevala or Väinölä — the land of Väinämöinen, the ancient singer-sage at the center of the epic. The whole architecture of the narrative is this polarity. Väinölä is the inhabited middle; Pohjola is the cold periphery that both threatens it and holds what it needs. The two are bound by exchange that is never equal and never trusted: courtships that turn into deadly tasks, gifts that must be stolen back, a peace that does not hold. Pohjola is not simply evil — its mistress is owed a daughter, a wage, a fair return — but it is other, and the song never lets the listener forget which side of the water is home.

Louhi, the mistress of the North

Pohjola has a ruler, and she is a woman. Pohjolan emäntä, the Mistress of Pohjola — Louhi — is among the most formidable figures in the whole tradition: an old woman, gap-toothed in some songs, who governs the northern household, commands weather and sickness, takes shapes, and bargains hard. She is the gatekeeper of everything the heroes come north to get. When Väinämöinen is shipwrecked and washed to her shore at the start of the central action, it is Louhi who feeds and shelters him and then sets the price of his passage home: she will release him, and promise him her beautiful daughter, only if someone forges for her the Sampo.

Louhi is not a passive guardian. She is the active antagonist of the epic’s second half — the one who imposes the impossible courtship-tasks on the suitors who come for her daughters, who later seals the Sampo away, who pursues its thieves across the sea, and who, when force fails, sends the plagues and the great frost and a bear and the theft of the sun and moon against Väinölä. In her the runo-tradition concentrates a figure who is at once a hostess, a sovereign, and a worker of the most fearsome magic — death and disease move at her word. She is the North made into a person: hospitable at the threshold and merciless past it, holding the wealth of the world behind nine locks and giving up nothing without a fight.

The Sampo: the thing forged in the North

At the center of Pohjola’s story is an object whose nature the song never fully fixes, and that uncertainty is the heart of its power. The Sampo is forged in Pohjola by Ilmarinen, the primal smith — the seppä who is said to have hammered out the dome of the sky itself before any man worked iron. Louhi demands it as the bride-price; Ilmarinen, brought north for the purpose, raises it from the forge over many days out of impossible materials, and what emerges is a mill with a kirjokansi, an ornamented lid of many colors, that grinds without ceasing. In the epic’s account it grinds three things — grain, salt, and gold — one measure to eat, one to sell, one to store, so that whoever holds it can never know want. It is, in the plainest reading, a machine of inexhaustible abundance, a wealth-engine; and Louhi, having received it, locks it inside a copper-bound hill in Pohjola behind nine locks, where its roots grow nine fathoms deep into the rock.

But the Sampo has never read only as a mill. It is the single most argued-over image in Finnish mythology. Across the songs and the scholarship it has been taken for a world-pillar holding up the vault of heaven; for the world-tree; for a sun-and-stars image, a model of the turning sky whose colored lid is the firmament; for a treasure-chest, a talisman, a coin-die, a decorated shield, a Christian relic. The cosmological reading — the Sampo as axis mundi, the support around which the heavens turn and on which all life depends — was advanced in the early twentieth century by the linguist E. N. Setälä and the historian of religions Uno Harva, among others, and is strengthened by a much-discussed etymology connecting sampo to the Sanskrit skambha, the cosmic pillar that props the universe in the Atharvaveda. Whether the name is a genuine Indo-European borrowing into Finno-Ugric or a coincidence is not settled. What the contest reveals is consistent: the Sampo is the source of all good, and to possess it is to possess the order and the plenty of the world. That is why it cannot be left in the North.

The theft, and the breaking

The Sampo cycle is the spine of the Kalevala, and it does not end with the forging. Because Pohjola hoards the Sampo while Väinölä starves, the heroes resolve to take it back. Väinämöinen, Ilmarinen, and the reckless Lemminkäinen sail north together. Väinämöinen has made a kantele — the box-zither of the tradition, in the epic strung first on the jawbone of a great pike — and with its playing he sings the whole household of Pohjola into sleep. The power that does this is the power that runs through the whole epic: song itself, the sung word as the force that shapes and unmakes the world, a craft closer to incantation and to the borderlands of ecstasy than to entertainment, and the deepest weapon any hero of the North country carries. While Louhi and her people lie spellbound, the heroes break the Sampo from its rooted hill and carry it to the ship.

They are not clear away. A crane’s cry, in one telling, wakes the North; Louhi finds the hill empty and gives chase. She raises fog and storm against the fleeing ship and looses Iku-Turso, the primordial sea-monster, but Väinämöinen turns them back. Then she takes the shape of a monstrous eagle, mounting her warriors on her wings, and falls on the ship in the open water. In the battle the Sampo is seized and lost: the great mill goes over the side and shatters, and the sea takes it. The largest fragments sink to the bottom — and these, the song says, are the wealth and luck of the sea itself, the reason the waters are richer than the dry land will ever be. The smaller shards wash to the shores of the heroes’ country, and from those splinters, scattered on the soil, come the grain and the prosperity of the home fields. The Sampo is not recovered whole. It is broken in the taking, and its breaking is the founding of the world’s two economies — the abundance of the sea, which keeps its greater share, and the slower abundance of the land, which grows from the pieces that drifted home.

Louhi, defeated at sea, does not surrender. She steals the sun and the moon and hides them in the stone hill of Pohjola and shuts fire away from Väinölä, and the long war of frost and darkness and plague that follows is her last campaign — broken at length when Ilmarinen forges tools to free the lights and Väinämöinen’s songs drive back the sickness. Pohjola ends the epic diminished but not destroyed: still there at the cold edge of the map, still holding what fragments remain, still the country one would have to cross the water to reach.

The Kalevala, Karelia, and a national epic

The Kalevala became, in the nineteenth century, the foundation-text of Finnish national identity. For a people inside the Russian Empire, with a language that had no standing as a literary medium, Lönnrot’s epic was proof that the Finnish tongue could carry an ancient and dignified literature of its own; it gave the emerging nation a usable past and a self-image. Around it grew Karelianism and the National Romantic movement: the painter Akseli Gallen-Kallela rendered the Sampo’s forging and its defense in images that became the visual shorthand of Finnishness, and Jean Sibelius drew tone-poems and the Kullervo symphony from the same material, evoking the rhythm of rune-singing without quoting it. The epic stands behind the country’s road to independence in 1917, and Kalevala Day remains a national observance.

That status is genuine, and it is also a problem the tradition has had to face honestly. The song that fed the Kalevala was overwhelmingly Karelian — collected in villages, often Orthodox and across the Russian border, whose people did not become part of the Finnish nation the epic helped to build. A literature taken as the soul of Finland was gathered, in large measure, from the memory of Karelians, and the question of whose heritage it truly is has remained live within Finnish scholarship and conscience. Lönnrot, who maintained that he had only recorded what he heard, in fact shaped it decisively, so that the ostensibly ancient epic is also a work of the 1830s and 1840s, and Pohjola — the unified Northland with its one queen and its one fated treasure — is in good part his composition over the singers’ scattered Norths.

Set beside the cold otherworlds of neighboring traditions, Pohjola keeps its own grain. It is not the bright Elysium of the warm south, nor the world-tree cosmology of the Norse Edda — though the smith-craft of Ilmarinen who hammered the sky, the wealth-bringing object, and the journey to a deadly far country invite comparison with the mythology of Odin, Thor, and Freyr across the Gulf of Bothnia, and with the imagined far Norths of Greco-Roman thought, the Hyperborea beyond the north wind and the Thule at the chart’s last edge, which the Finnic song never names. (Those last two have no companion account to point to here; they are mentioned only as comparison.) Pohjola’s particular logic is the logic of the runo-singer who faced north into the cold and sang the place where everything precious was made and from which it had, at terrible cost, to be carried home — and who knew that the carrying would break it, and that the breaking would be the beginning of the harvest.

Scholarship, editions, and the song behind the epic

The primary text in English is John Martin Crawford’s complete verse translation, The Kalevala: The Epic Poem of Finland (1888), the first full English rendering, made from the German of Anton Schiefner and now in the public domain; it is freely readable at Project Gutenberg, and the Public Domain Review collects it with the National Romantic illustration that grew up around the epic. W. F. Kirby’s 1907 translation followed; the standard modern scholarly translations are those of Francis Peabody Magoun, Jr. (1963), which renders the New Kalevala in prose and includes Lönnrot’s prefaces, and Keith Bosley (Oxford World’s Classics, 1989).

On the decisive question — what Lönnrot made, and from what — the foundational critical study is Comparetti’s The Traditional Poetry of the Finns (English translation 1898), which first argued in detail that the epic is a synthesis rather than a recovered whole. Thomas DuBois’s The Transformation of an Oral Poem in Elias Lönnrot’s Kalevala, in the open-access journal Oral Tradition (8/2, 1993), tracks in close detail how Lönnrot reworked his sources line by line and is among the clearest accounts of the editorial process. The Kalevala Society’s account of Lönnrot’s Kalevala process sets the collection trips, the Old and New editions, and the singers — above all Arhippa Perttunen of Latvajärvi, whom Lönnrot met on his fifth journey in 1834 and reckoned the finest of them all — in their documentary order. For the mythology itself, the historic-geographic school of Julius and Kaarle Krohn established the method by which individual songs are traced across their variants; Martti Haavio’s Väinämöinen (1952) and Juha Pentikäinen’s Kalevala Mythology (revised English edition 1999) carry the interpretation into the later twentieth century. The runo-singing tradition that underlies all of it survives in the archives of the Finnish Literature Society in Helsinki, where the field-notebooks and the recorded songs of the Karelian singers are kept — the actual voices behind the Kalevala, separate from it and older.

→ Related: Mythology · Edda · Odin · Thor · Freyr · Ecstasy · Talisman