Perun

← Encyclopedia

On the hills above Kiev, before the prince’s hall, there stood for eight years a wooden image with a head of silver and a moustache of gold. It faced the open sky. When the storms came up the Dnieper and the oaks on the high bank shook, the men of the city knew whose anger crossed above them, and they did not need to be told the name. The figure was the chief of the gods that Prince Volodymyr had gathered there in the year 980, and the name was Perun.

He was the thunderer — the god of the lightning and the storm, of the oak and the open sky, of the oath and the spear. Among the gods of the pagan Slavs he stood first, the one before whom the warriors of Rus laid down their weapons and swore. What can be known of him is bounded on every side by a hard fact about the sources: the Slavs left almost nothing of their own. The religion is reconstructed from the writings of Christians who came to end it, from chronicles set down generations after the conversion, from the late folklore of villages, and from the patient comparison of one Indo-European thunder-god with another. The silver head and the gold moustache are themselves a chronicler’s note, written by men for whom the idol was already gone.

Genealogy: the striker and his kin

Perun’s name is among the oldest things about him. The most widely held reading derives it from a Proto-Indo-European root, reconstructed as *per-, “to strike, to beat” — the thunder-god as the one who strikes. A second strand of the same comparison reaches back to a reconstructed *Perkʷūnos, in which the root *perkʷu- meant “oak,” binding the god to his tree at the level of the name itself. Whichever weighting is correct, the figure that emerges is consistent: a sky-god who strikes from above, whose sign is the splintered oak.

The kinship is not a guess made in isolation. It rests on a family of names and roles spread across the Indo-European world. The nearest cousins are the Baltic thunder-gods, the Lithuanian Perkūnas and the Latvian Pērkons, so close to Perun in both name and office that the two cults can be read almost as one inheritance split between neighboring peoples — a closeness explored in the entry on the Balts, the last pagans of Europe. Beyond the Balts the pattern widens. The Germanic Thor, oak-crowned and hammer-armed, belongs to the same type; so, in the older comparative scheme, do the Vedic rain-god Parjanya and the Norse pairing of Fjörgyn. Scholars of comparative religion have reconstructed from these scattered figures a single Proto-Indo-European thunder-god, a sky-power who fights a serpent or a dragon and frees the waters. This reconstruction belongs squarely to the second of the registers a reader must keep apart: it is a scholarly hypothesis built on resemblance, not a text any Slav ever wrote. What it offers is a frame. What it cannot offer is Perun’s own voice.

In the documentary record he appears early. The Eastern Roman historian Procopius, writing in the sixth century in his account of the Gothic wars, described a people he placed among the Slavs who held that “one god, the maker of the lightning, is alone lord of all things,” and to him they sacrificed oxen and every kind of beast. Procopius does not give the god a name. But the maker of lightning, lord of all, served with the ox — the portrait fits, and most readers since have taken it for the thunder-god under a Greek’s generalizing pen. From that sixth-century glimpse to the named Perun of the Rus is four centuries of silence, across which the comparative method, and not any chronicle, throws its bridge.

Perun, Mokosh, Khors, and Stribog as imagined in Georg Andreas Schleusing’s “La religion ancienne et moderne des Moscovites,” c. 1650 — a Christian author’s depiction of the old Slavic gods. Public domain (Wikimedia Commons).

The pantheon on the hill

The clearest moment of Perun’s cult is also one of its last. In 980, by the reckoning of the Primary Chronicle, the Kievan prince Volodymyr the Great — newly master of the city, not yet a Christian — raised before his hall a set of idols and gave the realm a state cult. The chronicle names them: Perun first, then Khors, Dazhbog, Stribog, Simargl, and Mokosh. Of these Perun was chief, and the chronicler preserved the one physical detail that has clung to him ever since — the head of silver, the moustache of gold. The gathering is treated in the entry on the Kiev pantheon; what matters here is that it was, by every sign, less an ancient inheritance than a deliberate act of statecraft. Volodymyr was binding a sprawling, many-tongued dominion to a single sky over a single hall. The thunderer, god of the warrior’s oath, was the natural keystone.

That use of him is older than the idol. The same chronicle records that when Prince Oleg made peace with Byzantium in 907, the men of Rus confirmed the treaty by their own custom, swearing “by their weapons and by Perun their god, and by Volos, the god of cattle.” In 945 Prince Igor’s men swore again the same way, and the chronicle adds the weight behind the words: should any of them break the peace, let him have no help from God or from Perun, let him not be shielded by his own shield, and let him perish by his own sword. The oath was not a formula but a hostage given to the thunderer. The weapon laid down before the god was the same weapon the god would turn against the oath-breaker. Two gods, paired in the oath — the thunderer of the warriors and Volos, the cattle-god of the lower world — set side by side at the most binding moment a treaty could have. The pairing is not incidental. It is the documentary shadow of the great opposition that the comparative scholars would later try to reconstruct in full, the standing tension between the god on high and the power below. Dazhbog the sun-giver and Mokosh the moist earth filled out the hill; but it was Perun and his counter-god whom the warriors named when their word had to hold.

Far to the north the cult had a second seat. Volodymyr’s uncle Dobrynya, set over Novgorod, raised an image of Perun above the river Volkhov, and the chronicle says the Novgorodians offered it sacrifice with fires kept burning around it. The site, Peryn, still carries the god’s name, a hill that became a shrine and then a monastery without ever surrendering the syllable.

Teaching: the storm, the serpent, and the bolt fallen to earth

What did the thunderer mean? Set the late evidence beside the comparative frame and a picture forms, though the reader must be told plainly where the firm ground ends.

The firm ground is the oak and the stone. Perun’s tree was the oak, the tall hardwood that draws the lightning and splits beneath it; sacred oaks stood at boundaries and on high places, and beneath them, where the chroniclers and the folklorists agree, beasts were offered — the ox above all. His weapon was the axe, and also the hammer or mace, and also the stone: the lightning was conceived as a thrown stone, an arrow of flint. From this grew one of the longest-lived beliefs in the Slavic countryside. When a peasant turned up in his field a polished flint axe-head, the work of a stone-age hand he could not imagine, or a smooth fossil belemnite, he knew it for a thunder-stone — a bolt of Perun’s, fallen at the place the lightning struck, sunk into the earth, and risen again after some years to the surface. These “Perun’s arrows” were kept as charms. They guarded a house against the very fire that had forged them; they warded off lightning, sickness, and the evil eye. The god’s spent weapon became the householder’s amulet. This is the tradition-internal world rendered as it was held: not a fossil mistaken for a tool, but a piece of the sky’s anger, gone cold, kept by the hearth.

The axe was also the sign. Small axe-amulets, hung at the neck, carried the thunderer’s mark much as the hammer carried Thor’s among the Norse — a kinship of objects, not only of names, and one that the warriors of the Rus, half Norse and half Slav, would have felt with peculiar force, swearing now by Perun and now sailing under the hammer-sign of the Vikings. So-called thunder-marks, simple rosette and wheel figures, were cut into roof-beams and door-posts to turn the bolt aside, the same defensive instinct that kept the flint axe on the shelf. Where the lightning struck a man dead in the open, some held that the thunderer had marked him out — a death that was punishment and election at once, the bolt finding the one it sought.

Then there is the contested ground: the myth itself. In the second half of the twentieth century the Russian philologists Vyacheslav Ivanov and Vladimir Toporov set out to recover the central Slavic myth by the comparative method, reading the Indo-European thunder-pattern back into Slavic folk songs, charms, and the scatter of chronicle names. What they reconstructed has come to be called the “basic myth.” In it the thunder-god stands at the top of the world-tree, in the sky; his adversary, a serpent — to be identified with Veles, the cattle-god and lord of the lower world — lies coiled at its roots. The serpent climbs, or steals: he takes the cattle, the waters, sometimes the god’s own wife, and hides them below, in the rock, in the dark. The thunderer pursues. He hurls his bolts, splitting the tree and shattering the stone, driving the serpent down from form to form until he is forced back beneath the earth — and as the rock breaks, what was stolen is loosed, and the rain falls upon the fields. The storm is the chase; the downpour is the victory.

It is a powerful and coherent reconstruction, and it has shaped nearly every later telling of Slavic myth. It must also be marked for exactly what it is. No Slavic text preserves this story. It is assembled — from the paired oath to Perun and Volos, from Baltic and Vedic parallels, from folk fragments — and its standing among scholars is contested; Toporov himself came in time to qualify the bolder version of the scheme. The opposition the oath records stands on documentary ground. The full narrative is an inference of great elegance whose certainty should not be overstated. A reader who meets the serpent and the stolen waters elsewhere, told as plain fact, is meeting the third register dressed as the first.

Reception: the river, the saint, and the modern fire

In 988 — the date is among the few in this whole story that rest on firm chronicle ground — Volodymyr was baptized and ordered his people into the Dnieper, and Rus became Christian. He turned first against the idols he had himself raised eight years before. The Primary Chronicle tells it with a deliberate, theatrical violence. Perun was pulled down, bound to the tail of a horse, dragged from the hill through the town while twelve men beat the image with sticks — not because wood feels the blows, the chronicler is careful to say, but to shame the demon that had dwelt in it. Then they threw it into the Dnieper. Volodymyr set men along the banks downstream with orders to push the floating idol off wherever it tried to come ashore, and to let it go free only past the rapids. The thunderer was given to the river and not permitted to land.

At Novgorod the scene repeated by water. When the new faith reached the north, the bishop had the Perun of Peryn cast into the Volkhov. A folk memory, set down long after, has the floating idol strike the bridge of the city as it passed and fling back a club or a curse upon the people — the god’s last blow on his way out of the world. The shrine on the hill gave way to a church, and the church to a monastery, but the place kept the name Peryn, as if the syllable could not be drowned with the wood.

The Zbruch idol — a four-faced limestone pillar pulled from the river Zbruch in 1848, long read as an image of the Slavic gods; here in an illustration of 1917. Public domain (Wikimedia Commons).

The cult ended; the thunderer did not. Across the Orthodox Slavic lands the storm-god went on under a borrowed name. The thunder that had been Perun’s became the work of the Prophet Elijah — Ilya in the Russian mouth — the Old Testament figure who in scripture called down fire and was taken up in a chariot of fire, and who in Slavic folk belief drove that fiery chariot across the storm-sky, the rumble of its wheels the thunder itself. Elijah’s feast in high summer was the thunder-day; on it no work was safe from the bolt. The serpent-fight passed elsewhere, to Saint George riding down the dragon. This is the double-faith that the Slavs carried for centuries — dvoeverie, a Christianity whose outer names covered an older weather. The peasant kept his thunder-stone and prayed to Saint Ilya, and saw no contradiction in it.

Two cautions belong to the modern reception of all this. The first is the matter of forgery. Some who reach for the old Slavic religion reach for the so-called Book of Veles, a manuscript presented in the twentieth century as an ancient pagan chronicle. It is a forgery, and a demonstrated one — its language and content fail every test of age — and nothing in it can stand as evidence for Perun or any other god. The second is the tidiness that later hands have imposed: a neat hierarchy, balanced opposites of a black god and a white, a fully fledged narrative theology. Much of that order is reconstruction or romantic invention laid over a record that is, in truth, fragmentary and hard. The honest shape of Slavic paganism is broken, and its students do better to show the breaks than to plaster them.

Yet the thunderer has been called back. From the late twentieth century the movements of Slavic Native Faith — Rodnovery — have raised Perun again, in groves and temples from Russia to the western Slavic lands, swearing by him, hanging the axe at the neck, keeping his day. What they worship is in part the reconstructed god, the figure pieced together by the comparative scholars and the folklorists, and in part something newly made. The silver head was floated down the Dnieper a thousand years ago. The name went into the river and came back up the bank, the way the thunder-stone was always said to do — gone under, and then, after the long years, risen again into the hand.

→ Related: Veles · Svarog · Mokosh · Dazhbog · Arkona · Peryn · Kiev Pantheon · Wolin · The Slavs · The Rus · The Balts · The Norse · The Vikings · Mithra · Christianity · Old Testament · Reincarnation · Soul