Concept

reincarnation

The doctrine that the soul survives death and returns to live again in a new body — held, in varied forms, across Greek, Indian, and later esoteric thought.

← Encyclopedia

Reincarnation is the doctrine that the soul outlasts the death of the body and returns to live again in another — animal, human, or, in some accounts, divine. The same idea travels under several names: metempsychosis and transmigration in the older Western vocabulary, rebirth in most modern usage. What they share is a single claim: that the self now living has lived before, and that physical death is a passage rather than an end.

In the Greek world the teaching is associated above all with Pythagoras and the Orphic religious movement, from which it passed to Plato. Ancient writers reported that Pythagoras claimed to remember his own earlier lives, though the Pythagorean texts that might confirm this do not survive. Plato gave the doctrine its most influential form. His dialogues argue that the soul is immortal and pre-existent, that learning is in fact recollection of what the soul already knew, and that after death souls are judged and sent to be born again according to how they have lived. The myth that closes the Republic describes souls choosing their next lives; the Phaedo makes immortality the hinge of the whole inquiry. Through Plato the idea entered Neoplatonism, where Plotinus treated the soul’s descent into body as a recurring feature of the cosmos, and from there it ran into later esoteric currents.

The Indian traditions developed the theme on a far larger scale and made it central rather than incidental. There, rebirth — saṃsāra, the round of existence — is bound to karma, the moral weight of past action, which determines the conditions of each successive birth; and across Hindu, Buddhist, and Jain schools the governing aim is not a better rebirth but release from the cycle altogether. Buddhism complicates even this, teaching rebirth while denying a permanent self that is reborn — a distinction its philosophers spent centuries refining. These are not one doctrine in several costumes: a Platonist and a Buddhist mean genuinely different things by the soul, by what carries over, and by what would count as escape.

Historians treat the wide spread of the idea with care. The resemblance between the Greek and the Indian versions has invited speculation about a shared origin or early contact, but the evidence is thin, and independent emergence is at least as plausible; the question remains open. What can be said is that belief in some form of return is among the more widely attested religious convictions, surfacing in settings with no demonstrable link to one another.

The later Western revival owes most to the modern esoteric movements of the nineteenth century, which folded reincarnation into a scheme of spiritual evolution across many lives — a reading that drew on the Indian sources then newly available in translation, and that remains the form in which the idea is most often encountered in the West today. Whether the doctrine describes anything real is a question no text settles; what each tradition does settle, and in its own terms, is what the self is, what carries over, and what death leaves untouched.

In the library: Plato — Phaedo (Jowett) · The Bhagavad-Gita (Arnold)

Related: Karma · Neoplatonism · Gnosis · Nous

Sources

  • Bremmer 2002