Mot

← Encyclopedia

In the alphabetic cuneiform of the clay tablets dug from the coast of Syria, his name is two signs that spell the plainest word a language can hold: mt, death. Not death as an event that happens to a body, and not a shadowed country into which the dead are gathered, but Death standing up and given a will — a son of the high god, seated on a throne in the pit, eating. The other gods of the Canaanite world govern things: storm, sea, war, love, the grain. He governs the end of all of them. He is the only member of the divine family who is, in his own person, the enemy of life.

The word made a person

The texts that name him come from Ugarit, the Late Bronze Age kingdom on the north Syrian coast whose tell at Ras Shamra a French expedition under Claude Schaeffer began excavating in 1929, a year after a farmer’s plow broke into a tomb nearby. Among the tablets were six that scholars now number KTU 1.1 through 1.6 — the Baal Cycle, copied around 1400–1350 BCE by a scribe named Ilimilku and written in a thirty-sign consonantal cuneiform script that was deciphered within two years of its discovery. The poem is the principal source for everything that can be said about Mot, because he had almost nothing else: no temple has been found, no priesthood, no festival calendar, none of the ordinary furniture of a Canaanite cult. A god who is Death itself is not a god one builds a house for. He is the one against whom the houses are built.

Within the West Semitic divine assembly Mot is a son of El, the aged patriarch who sits enthroned at the source of the two rivers and from whom the great gods take their authority. The poem calls Mot El’s beloved, the hero, and this is not a softening: it places Death inside the family at the highest level, a brother to the storm and the sea, summoned and answered to by the father of the gods. His realm is below. The Cycle locates his seat in a city of mire whose ground is filth, a throne that is a pit, and his food there is mud and the dead. Where Baal the storm-king reigns on the heights of Mount Ṣapānu and pours the rain that greens the world, Mot rules the parched place underneath it, and the two domains do not coexist so much as take turns.

His defining attribute is appetite. The poem renders it in an image that has outlived almost everything else in the literature: Mot’s mouth is cosmic. One lip to the earth, one lip to the heavens, his tongue reaching to the stars — a gullet stretched between the ground and the sky into which all that lives must finally pass. He is said to eat by the handful, to devour with both hands, and to remain unfilled; his hunger is compared to a lion’s in the waste and to the longing of the wild thing for water. This is the heart of the figure. Death is not a place one arrives at but a throat one is swallowed into, and the throat is never satisfied. Everything that breathes — the birds of the air and the fish of the sea among them — is, in the end, food.

It is worth pausing on how thin this portrait is by design, and how that thinness is itself the theology. The other gods of the Ugaritic assembly accumulate epithets, consorts, sanctuaries, offering-lists; the tablets that survive include ritual texts cataloguing sacrifices owed to El, to Baal, to the war-goddess and the rest, the machinery of a working temple economy. Mot has none of this. He is summoned, he speaks, he eats, he is destroyed and restored — and that is nearly the whole of him. There is no liturgy in which a worshipper approaches Mot to ask for anything, because there is nothing Death gives. The Canaanite imagination did not deny him; it made him a person of the first rank, a son of the supreme god, and then refused him the one thing every other god possessed, a place among the living where his name could be honored. He belongs wholly to the realm under the mountain. The closest the wider West Semitic world comes to a cult of the underworld is the care given to the dead themselves — the food set out for departed ancestors, the deified royal dead invoked by name in the funerary texts of the kings of Ugarit — but that is reverence paid to the dead, not worship offered to the power that consumed them. Mot stands outside even that. He is the appetite the offerings are meant to hold off.

Limestone stele of Baal with thunderbolt, Ugarit, c. 15th–13th c. BCE, Louvre AO 15775. Photo by Mbzt, CC BY 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

The swallowing of the storm

The great drama of the Cycle is the contest between this appetite and the god of the rain, and it is the climactic movement of the whole poem — coming after Baal has already defeated Yamm, the Sea, and won his palace on the mountain. From that palace, in the flush of his kingship, Baal sends messengers down to Mot. The answer that comes back is the appetite itself, turned into a summons. Mot reminds the storm-king of what his own jaws can do, and bids him come down into the gullet, into the throat of El’s beloved the hero, as a morsel goes down. There is no combat of the ordinary kind, no duel of weapons. There is only the descent. Baal goes down alive into the mouth of Death, and is swallowed.

The world answers the way a body answers a stopped heart. With the storm-god inside the earth, the rain ceases; the furrows crack; the green fails. El, hearing that Baal is dead, comes down from his throne, sits on the ground, pours ashes of mourning on his head, gashes his own skin with a blade and rakes his cheeks — the loud, self-wounding grief that the Canaanite world gave to its dead and that the later Hebrew law would forbid. The sun-goddess Šapšu, who alone passes daily through both the upper world and the realm below, carries the body, and Baal’s sister and consort Anat takes it up, weeps over it, and buries it on the mountain with a great funeral of slaughtered cattle and sheep. Then she goes to find the one who did this.

What Anat does to Mot is the most concrete thing in the poem, and it is told in the vocabulary of the threshing-floor. She seizes the son of El. She splits him with a blade. She winnows him in a sieve. She burns him in fire. She grinds him in a hand-mill. She scatters what is left across the field, and the birds eat him — the same birds that, in his mouth, he had eaten. The verbs are the verbs of harvest: cutting, sieving, parching, milling, sowing. Death is processed like grain. And whether or not the poet intended the full force of it, the image binds the destruction of Death to the cycle of the seed, the thing that is buried and broken in the ground in order to come up again.

Cuneiform tablet of the Baal Cycle, Ugarit, 14th c. BCE, Louvre AO 16641–16642. Photo by Mbzt, CC BY-SA 3.0, via Wikimedia Commons.

After Mot is scattered, El dreams. In his dream the heavens rain oil and the wadis run with honey, and by this he knows that Baal the mighty lives — that the dry land has revived because the storm-king has come back to it. Baal returns to his throne and the rains return with him. But the poem does not end there, and the ending is the part most worth holding onto. After seven years Mot comes back too, restored, demanding recompense for what was done to him, charging that one of Baal’s own brothers was given to his mouth in place of the storm-god. The two of them fight — and now it is the wrestling of equals, goring like wild bulls, biting like serpents, kicking like horses, until both fall, neither able to put the other down. It is the sun-goddess Šapšu who breaks the deadlock, warning Mot that El, the father, has turned against him and will overturn his throne. Mot, afraid, yields. Baal is confirmed king. Death is not annihilated; he is made to submit, and the order of the world is fixed not by victory but by the father’s word.

Reading the dry year

What the Cycle means has been argued for nearly a century, and the most durable reading hears in it the turning of the Levantine year. The eastern Mediterranean climate divides the calendar in two: a wet season of autumn and winter rains that revive the land, and a long, rainless summer drought in which the grass burns off and the earth bakes hard. On this reading Baal is the rain that fails in the dry months and the storm that breaks in the autumn; Mot is the killing heat of the parched season, the death of fertility, the months when nothing grows. Baal’s descent into Mot’s throat is the summer; his return is the first autumn storm; Anat’s grinding of Death like grain folds the destruction of the dry season into the harvest itself.

The reading is old and it is powerful, but it has to be marked as a scholarly reconstruction rather than something the poem states. The mathematics do not quite work: the seven-year interval before Mot’s return fits a fallow or famine cycle better than an annual one, and the precise mapping of mythic episode onto calendar month has never won full agreement. A long-running scholarly argument turns on whether Baal is properly a “dying and rising” god at all — whether his descent and return are a genuine death overcome, on the pattern that Tryggve Mettinger’s Riddle of Resurrection (2001) defends with Baal as his strongest case, or whether, as Mark S. Smith has argued, Baal is better understood as a god who disappears and is recovered, a storm that goes away and comes back rather than a corpse raised. The seasonal frame is the most natural sense the imagery offers; it is not the only one, and the texts leave the question open between them. What is not in doubt, on any reading, is the structure: a god of life goes down into the mouth of Death, the world dies with him, and something — a sister’s violence, a father’s dream, the sun’s intervention — brings him back.

Death in the windows

When the storytellers and prophets of ancient Israel reached for a figure of Death, they reached, knowingly or not, into this same well. The Hebrew word for death is mawet, cognate to the Ugaritic mt, and in the older poetry of the Bible it does not always stay a common noun. It rises up and acts. The figure is never a god to be worshipped — the Hebrew writers are monotheists polemicizing against exactly the world Ugarit preserves — but the grammar of personified Death survives in their lines, and the resemblance to Mot is too specific to be accidental.

Death comes through the windows in Jeremiah, climbing into the houses to cut off the children from the streets and the young men from the squares, an intruder with a will of its own. In Isaiah the rulers of Jerusalem are said to have cut a covenant with Death and struck a bargain with Sheol, the underworld — a treaty with the power below, which the prophet promises will not hold. Habakkuk speaks of the greedy man whose appetite is wide as Sheol, who like Death is never satisfied, the very phrase the Ugaritic poet used of Mot’s unfillable throat. And in the fifth chapter of Isaiah the underworld opens its mouth without measure and enlarges its gullet, swallowing down the nobility and the multitude of the city — Sheol with the appetite of Mot, the throat stretched wide between earth and sky. Scholars reading these lines against the Baal Cycle have long recognized the shared West Semitic image: Death as a mouth, the grave as a swallower, the living as a meal.

There is a further layer beneath the language. The shades of the dead in the Hebrew underworld are called the rephaim, the weak ones who dwell in Sheol, and the same word — rpʾum — names the assembled dead in the Ugaritic texts, where it carries the dignity of the divinized royal ancestors who banquet below. The continuity of vocabulary is not in dispute; what the continuity means is a long-running argument among scholars, between those who read the biblical underworld as the direct heir of a living Canaanite cult of the dead that Israel’s reformers were trying to suppress, and those who treat much of the biblical polemic as a later literary construction projecting a Canaanite face onto more recent practices. That debate runs alongside Mot rather than through him, since he himself never receives offerings; but it is the same world of words, and the grave that swallows in Hebrew poetry is the same grave whose lord, at Ugarit, had a name and a face.

The most striking inheritance reverses the image. The Canaanite poem ends with Death made to submit but not destroyed, the dry season always returning. Centuries later the book of Isaiah promises something the Cycle never imagined: that on the mountain the Lord will swallow up Death itself forever, and wipe the tears from every face. The swallower is swallowed. Whether the Hebrew poet knew he was inverting an ancient picture or simply found the same image waiting in his language, the line completes a figure that runs from the tablets of Ugarit through the poetry of the prophets and on into the long Western tradition of Death as a devouring power — the open mouth, the insatiable appetite, the throat that takes everything in. In the Canaanite frame that picture had a name and a father and a throne in the pit, and the world’s first answer to him was not a conqueror but a sister with a winnowing-fork, scattering Death across the field like seed.

→ Related: Baal · Anat · El God · Asherah · Astarte Goddess · Ugarit · Ugaritic West Semitic Religion · The Canaanites · Canaan · Old Testament · The Phoenicians · Byblos · Tyre · Sidon · Tophet · Dagon · Ishtar · Ereshkigal · Osiris · Anubis · Nergal