Maimonidean Rationalism

← Encyclopedia

Maimonidean rationalism is the tradition of Jewish religious thought descended from Moses ben Maimon — the Rambam, Latinized as Maimonides (1138–1204) — and above all from his Guide of the Perplexed, which set out to show that the Torah, read rightly, demands nothing the trained mind must reject. The work was written in Judeo-Arabic late in his life, for a reader already schooled in philosophy and unsettled by the apparent collision between scripture and the science of the age.

The collision Maimonides addressed was, in the first place, a problem about language. Scripture speaks of God’s hand, God’s anger, God seated on a throne; Aristotle’s God is incorporeal, changeless, beyond passion. His solution was the doctrine of negative attributes: of God, properly speaking, nothing positive can be said. To call God wise or living is not to ascribe a quality but to deny its opposite — to say what God is not. Every anthropomorphism in the text is figure, addressed to those who could not yet think without images, and the philosopher’s task is to read through the figure to what it guards. Around this stood a broadly Aristotelian frame, received partly through the Arabic philosophers: a doctrine of the intellect, an account of prophecy as the mind’s highest reach, and a cautious, much-debated treatment of the world’s eternity and its creation.

What Maimonides held was not that reason replaces revelation but that the two, correctly understood, cannot conflict — because both issue from the one truth. Where a verse seemed to contradict a demonstrated conclusion, the verse was to be read otherwise; where the matter was undemonstrated, scripture stood. The Guide was therefore written to be misread by the unready, its difficulties deliberate, its order broken on purpose so that it would yield its meaning only to those equipped to receive it.

The reception was a storm. Within a generation of his death the so-called Maimonidean controversy divided Jewish communities from Provence to Spain: defenders of philosophy against those who held that such study corroded faith, with bans, counter-bans, and at one point books burned. The rising Kabbalah, emerging in the same regions, offered a rival map of the divine — a God known through emanated sefirot and lived symbol rather than through negation and proof — and much of later Jewish mysticism defined itself partly against the austerity of the Maimonidean God. Among scholars the Guide’s own teaching remains contested: how far its author meant the philosophical reading to be the true one, and how far the pious surface was itself the message.

His influence ran past Judaism. Aquinas read him; the Latin schoolmen knew him as Rabbi Moses; the question he pressed — whether the God of the philosophers and the God of scripture are one — outlived the quarrel that bears his name.

The Guide itself is not yet held in this library; the standard public-domain English version is Friedländer’s translation of 1881–85, and Pines’s 1963 rendering remains under copyright.

→ Related: Neoplatonism · The One · Emanation · Middle Ages