Kama

← Encyclopedia

Kama is the Sanskrit word for desire, and for the pleasure desire reaches toward — sensual, aesthetic, erotic, the whole register of wanting and enjoying. In the classical Hindu scheme of the aims of human life, the puruṣārthas, it stands as one of four: alongside dharma (duty, the moral and religious order), artha (wealth and worldly success), and mokṣa (release from the cycle of rebirth). Pleasure, on this reckoning, is not a concession or a failing. It is a proper end, to be pursued in its place and by its own art.

Kāmadeva, the deity of love and desire, with his bow — desire itself given a divine form. — Suraj Belbase, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

That placement matters, because the same texts that legitimate kama also rank it. Three of the aims — dharma, artha, kama, the trivarga or “group of three” — belong together as the goods of a life lived in the world; mokṣa, release, comes to stand over them as a fourth and final end, drawing a life beyond the world entirely. Within the worldly three there is an order. Dharma governs the other aims; pleasure pursued at the cost of duty or truth is pleasure gone wrong. The treatises do not ask that the three be held apart but that they be held in proportion — each cultivated in its season, none allowed to injure the others — and where they collide, dharma takes precedence. Kama is licensed and bounded by the same gesture.

The discipline of pleasure

The tradition that gave kama a literature is the Kāmasūtra of Vātsyāyana — Vātsyāyana Mallanaga, of whom almost nothing is known beyond the name — composed in northern India around the third century of the Common Era, at the dawn of Gupta rule. It belongs to a triad of sciences that mirror the worldly aims themselves: dharmaśāstra, the science of law and duty; arthaśāstra, the science of power and gain; and kāmaśāstra, the science of pleasure, of which Vātsyāyana’s text is the surviving classic. He presents himself not as an inventor but as a compiler, distilling a longer line of authorities — Bābhravya, Auddālaki, and others whose works are lost — into a single ordered treatise. The very form is the argument: desire, like law and like statecraft, can be made an object of systematic knowledge.

Sculpture on the wall of the Lakshmana Temple, Khajuraho (c. 954 CE), whose carvings give the era’s celebration of kama monumental form. — Jakub Hałun, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

What the Kāmasūtra teaches is far wider than the reputation that precedes it in translation. Of its seven books, only one concerns the postures for which it became notorious in the West; the rest treat the conduct of an entire cultured life. The first book sets kama among the three aims and sketches the nāgaraka, the man-about-town, and the texture of his days — his rooms, his gardens, his company, the sixty-four arts a refined person was expected to command, from music and painting to cooking, garland-making, and the turning of verses. The remaining books move through courtship and the winning of a wife, the management of a household, the world of courtesans, and the means of attraction. The work is a manual of taste and self-cultivation as much as of the body — pleasure treated as a craft with its own learning, its own ethics, its own failures, not a surrender to appetite. Vātsyāyana himself insists that the three aims be pursued so as to harmonize, that none be made to wound the others, and that dharma keep its precedence; the science of pleasure is written inside the science of duty, not against it.

The enemy of the self

Renunciant currents took a harder line. The Bhagavad-Gītā names desire, kāma, as the standing enemy of the self — the appetite that clouds judgment and binds the soul to action and its fruits. Asked by Arjuna what it is that drives a person to do wrong even against their own will, Krishna answers that it is kama: born of rajas, the restless quality, insatiable and sinful, the great devourer; and that when it is thwarted it turns to anger. Edwin Arnold’s Victorian rendering catches the force of the indictment — Krishna names it the foe that, like smoke on fire or rust on a mirror, fouls discernment, “the unresting foe / It is of wisdom, wearing countless forms” (The Song Celestial, Book III). The remedy the Gita prescribes is not the cultivation of desire but its mastery: to act without craving the reward, niṣkāma karma, work done as offering rather than for its fruit, so that the deed leaves no binding trace on the doer. Here kama is precisely what yoga is set against, and what the discipline of detached action is meant to loosen.

Krishna as charioteer counseling Arjuna — the scene of the Bhagavad-Gītā, where desire is named the enemy of the self. Indian painting, 18th–19th century. — via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Both readings sit inside the same scripture-world, and the tradition does not force a verdict between them. Whether kama is an aim to cultivate or a fetter to loosen depends on which life the text has in view — the householder’s, for whom desire rightly ordered is one of the goods of being alive, or the renouncer’s, for whom every craving is a thread tying the soul to the wheel of rebirth. The Kāmasūtra’s cultured citizen and the Gita’s detached actor are two faces of one ethics, addressed to two stations on a single road; the same word, kama, marks a legitimate pleasure from one angle and a binding compulsion from the other. The tension runs the length of Hindu thought and is not resolved so much as inhabited.

Desire personified

Desire was also a god. Kāma, or Kāmadeva, is the deity of love, pictured young and beautiful, riding a parrot, bow of sugarcane in hand, his arrows tipped with flowers — by one count five, lotus and jasmine and mango-blossom among them — and his bowstring a line of bees. His consort is Rati, “pleasure” herself; among his many names are Madana, the intoxicator, and Manmatha, the churner of minds. The iconography is exact about what kind of power he is: a sweetness that disarms, the soft compulsion by which the world is drawn into pairing and continuance. He is closer in office to the Greek Eros — the daimon of desire who draws the soul toward the beautiful, and who stands in some Greek cosmogonies at the very beginning of things — than to the self-giving love the Greek tongue called agape; kama is the love of wanting, not the love of the gift.

A much-repeated myth holds the whole ambivalence in one image. The gods, beset by the demon Tāraka, whom no one but a son of Shiva could kill, need the great ascetic roused from his trance toward the goddess so that such a son might be born. They send Kāma to do it. As Shiva sits deep in tapas, the god looses an arrow to kindle desire in him — and Shiva opens his third eye and burns Kāma to ash on the spot: desire incinerated by the very renunciation it tried to interrupt. In the tellings that follow, Rati’s grief moves Shiva to relent, and Kāma is restored — but in some versions only as Ananga, “the bodiless,” a power now present everywhere precisely because it no longer has a form to be aimed and destroyed. In Kālidāsa’s courtly retelling, the Kumārasambhava, it is then Pārvatī’s own austerity, not Kāma’s archery, that finally wins Shiva; desire achieves its end by being burned away and returning as something subtler. The story is the doctrine in narrative: pleasure is a true power and a vulnerable one, set against renunciation and yet, in the end, serving the order renunciation guards.

The first stirring

The word reaches back before any of this. In the Rig Veda’s hymn of creation, the Nāsadīya, kāma is named as the first thing that arose in the One at the beginning. The hymn looks back to a moment before being and non-being, before death and deathlessness, when the One breathed windless by its own power and nothing else was — and then, in Griffith’s Victorian translation, “Thereafter rose Desire in the beginning, Desire, the primal seed and germ of Spirit.” Desire is the seed of mind, the first inclination by which the unmanifest leans toward becoming; the sages, the hymn goes on, found in their hearts the bond that ties what is to what is not. The hymn ends in genuine doubt — perhaps even the One that surveys creation from the highest heaven does not know how it arose, or perhaps it does not know at all — but it does not doubt that whatever moved first was kama.

A page from a manuscript of the Rig Veda, in whose creation hymn, the Nāsadīya, kāma is named the first thing to arise. — via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The cosmological sense and the human one are not the same, and the tradition rarely collapses them: the desire that seeds a universe is not the appetite the Gita warns against, and the texts that personify Kāma the archer do not make him the demiurge of the Nāsadīya. The historian of religion Wendy Doniger, who has done more than anyone to carry this material into English, treats the identifications carefully rather than fusing them. Yet the single word does catch both — the force that makes a world and the force that moves a person toward another — and that breadth is itself the point.

The texts and their readers

The primary record divides cleanly by era and aim. The cosmological kāma of the Nāsadīya sits in the latest stratum of the Rig Veda — the tenth maṇḍala, the speculative hymns, composed late in the Vedic period that ran across the second millennium before the Common Era. The ethical kāma of the puruṣārtha scheme is a creation of the later didactic literature, the dharmaśāstra and the epics, where the trivarga of dharma, artha, and kama is named and ordered and the fourth aim of mokṣa is added above it. The Kāmasūtra belongs to the same classical centuries, the science of pleasure taking its place beside the sciences of law and statecraft; the deity Kāmadeva is fixed in the form now standard by the Purāṇas and by Kālidāsa’s court poetry of the Gupta age. Reading these strata together is a synthesis the tradition’s own commentators made and modern scholarship continues, but each layer carries its own date and its own concern, and the philological work has been to keep them distinct even while tracing the thread of the word that runs through all.

The modern scholarly recovery of kama turns on two acts of translation. The Bhagavad-Gītā entered English through K. T. Telang’s careful prose for the Sacred Books of the East, the founding philological rendering (Telang, SBE VIII, 1882), and through Edwin Arnold’s verse Song Celestial, the version that carried the Gita into Victorian and later popular reading; both are now in the public domain, and both render the Gita’s verdict on kama as the enemy of discernment with the same weight, if in very different idioms. The Kāmasūtra had a stranger career. Sir Richard Burton’s 1883 English version — produced with the Indian scholars Bhagavanlal Indraji and Shivaram Parshuram Bhide, and largely the work of the collaborator Foster Fitzgerald Arbuthnot — fixed the text in the Anglophone imagination as a manual of erotic technique, stripping away the framing that makes it a treatise on the conduct of a cultivated life. The corrective is recent: Wendy Doniger and Sudhir Kakar’s 2002 translation restored the work as, in Doniger’s reading, an art of living and a dramatic work of art rather than a pillow book, and a body of scholarship — Doniger’s own essays, and analyses such as Patrick Olivelle’s study of Vātsyāyana’s stance toward dharma and the dharmaśāstra — has reset the text inside the ethical scheme that licensed it. The householder-versus-renouncer question that the Kāmasūtra and the Gita pose between them is, on the consensus reading, internal to the tradition: two stations of a single life-course, neither cancelling the other, and the texts do not adjudicate between them.

The breadth of the word

Kama is the name a whole civilization gave to the pull at the root of things: the first tilt of the unmanifest toward form, the sweetness that draws bodies and lives together, and the craving a disciplined soul must learn to govern. One Sanskrit syllable holds world-making and person-moving force at once, and asks to be read in every register where wanting does its work.

→ In the library: The Bhagavad-Gita (Arnold) — The Song Celestial · The Bhagavadgita (Telang, SBE VIII)

→ Related: Indra · Soma · Kali · Lakshmi · Agape · Shiva · Eros · Bhagavad Gita · Vishnu · Karma · Reincarnation · Asceticism · Yoga · Brahman · Hinduism · Gupta Empire