Gournay-sur-Aronde

← Encyclopedia

In the gentle valley of the Aronde, a tributary that runs down to the Oise north of Compiègne, a low rise of farmland holds no ruin a passerby would notice. There is no standing stone, no fallen column, no mound. What lay in the ground was a square of ditches enclosing a few hundred square meters of earth, and into those ditches, over some two centuries, a people of the Belgic north laid the iron of war and the carcasses of oxen and the bones of men. The swords were bent double before they were given. The great cattle were killed and left whole, in pits, to rot in the open air. The place is known now almost entirely from the spade, and it speaks in a voice the Gauls themselves left behind, without the mediation of any Greek or Roman pen.

A sanctuary in the country of the Bellovaci

Gournay-sur-Aronde lies in the department of the Oise, in the region of Hauts-de-France, in the old heartland of the Belgae. When Caesar opened his account of the conquest of Gaul, he divided the country into three parts and ranked their fighting men. “Of all these, the Belgae are the bravest,” he wrote — horum omnium fortissimi sunt Belgae — because they lived farthest from the refinements of the Roman Province, were least visited by the merchants who carried the goods that soften a people, and bordered the Germani across the Rhine, with whom they were continually at war. The judgment is a conqueror’s, made by a man who would shortly be killing them, and it should be read at that distance. But it locates the sanctuary in a particular world: the northern Gaul of warrior peoples who reckoned arms and the giving of arms among the gravest of sacred acts.

The territory of the Aronde belonged to the Bellovaci, whom Caesar named the most numerous and the most spirited of the Belgic confederation, able by his account to put tens of thousands of men into the field. It was these people, or their forebears, who in the third century before the common era marked off the enclosure at Gournay. The ground had been used before — there are traces of a fortified enclosure of the fifth and fourth centuries beneath the sacred phase — but the sanctuary proper, the precinct of the offered weapons and the sacrificed beasts, took shape from the third century onward and remained in use, with its deposits accumulating, until the decades before the Roman conquest, when it was burned and leveled at the end of the first century BCE.

The form of the place owes nothing to a temple of stone. It was a square enclosure, each side roughly forty-five meters, cut off from the world by a ditch and, behind the ditch, a wooden palisade. A single gateway, a monumental wooden porch, opened to the east, toward the rising of the sun. Inside there was no cella of masonry, no row of columns, nothing a Mediterranean eye would have called a temple. At the center of the open ground a pit was sunk into the earth, oval in plan and roughly three meters by four, dug down some two meters — a hollow altar, the point at which the precinct reached toward the powers below. This is the kind of holy place the spade has recovered across the Belgic north, a sanctuary defined not by what was built up but by what was dug down and given: the nemeton, the bounded sacred ground, made over to the gods of war and of the earth.

The orientation matters. A precinct that opens to the east opens to the dawn, and the act of stepping through the gate is an act of crossing from common ground into sacred ground at the quarter where the day begins. Inside, the deep central pit reached the other way, down toward the earth and the dead, so that the enclosure was strung between the sunrise at its threshold and the underworld at its heart. Around the inner edge ran the ditch that received the offerings, and beyond the palisade a second, outer ditch — by some readings water-filled — kept the precinct apart from the fields. Nothing about the plan is casual. It is a machine for separation: an inner trench for the giving of weapons and the bones of the sacrifice, a central shaft for the slow gift of the whole beast, a fortified line between the two and the world, and one gate, eastward, through which the cult passed in and the dawn came in to meet it. Such an enclosure could be raised by a people without a single mason; what it required was not stone but the knowledge of where the boundary should fall and what should be given across it.

The rite of the enclosure

What makes Gournay extraordinary is not the architecture, which is austere, but the deposits, which are not. Read in sequence by the excavators, the layers of the ditch reconstruct the acts of a cult that no text of the Gauls survives to describe — and they describe three orders of offering, woven together at the threshold and in the encircling trench.

The first is the giving of weapons. Into the inner ditch, over roughly two centuries between the middle of the third and the beginning of the first century BCE, were laid on the order of two thousand pieces of iron — long swords, the wooden-and-iron scabbards that sheathed them (something near seven hundred of these alone), the bossed centers of shields, the heads of spears and javelins. They were not lost or abandoned. They were destroyed before they were given. Swords were heated and folded back on themselves, bent double or coiled; scabbards were taken apart, twisted, cut into pieces; the iron bosses of shields were hammered flat or punched through or sheared. Even the brooches and the few bronze arm-rings show the same deliberate ruin. This is the logic of the war-offering carried to its conclusion: the arm of battle is put beyond all use, killed as a thing is killed, and in that killing passed wholly out of the world of men and into the keeping of the gods. The weapons offered here are not spoils kept for their worth; they are sacrifices, and a sword that could still cut would be a sacrifice withheld.

The second is the sacrifice of beasts. Around and within the central pits the excavators found the bones of cattle — great oxen above all, with pigs and sheep among them — to a number near three thousand. The cattle were not treated as the Greeks and Romans treated their victims, killed and divided and eaten in a feast that bound the worshipers to the god and to one another. At Gournay the ox was given in its entirety. The animal was killed and laid whole into one of the pits at the heart of the enclosure, and there it was left, for months, to decompose in the open air, the flesh surrendered and not consumed. Nine such pits held these slow offerings. When at last the bones were gathered up, the long bones and the skulls of the cattle were moved out to the encircling ditch and the gateway, taking their place among the ruined weapons. To give the whole beast, and to give it to rot rather than to share it at table, is to make the offering total: this is food withheld from the living and rendered down to the gods of the earth and the dead.

The third order is the hardest to read, and it must be held at its true distance. Among the cattle bones in the ditch and about the eastern porch were human remains as well — skulls and other bones of men, set into the structure of the threshold where the weapons and the ox-skulls were displayed. The porch seems to have carried, on its posts and lintel, a trophy: arms, parts of chariots, and the crania of cattle and of men, raised at the gate for those who approached to see. Here the interpretations divide, and a reader should keep the seam visible. Jean-Louis Brunaux, who excavated the site and gave it its first full reading, understood the human remains as the bones of defeated enemies — warriors killed in battle or sacrificed afterward, their bodies and their arms ruined together and offered to the gods of the underworld, the sanctuary thus a place of victory where the vanquished were given over wholesale to the powers. Others have been more cautious: some have asked whether the dead are enemies or the community’s own war-fallen, and whether so elaborate a precinct would be raised merely to destroy a foe. What the bones do not allow is the easy reach for savagery. In the world of this enclosure the head is no trophy of cruelty but the seat of the person and its power, and the body of the slain, like the body of the ox and the blade of the sword, is a thing surrendered at the boundary between the offering and the killed — a boundary that here is deliberately, ritually thin.

These three givings belong together. The same gesture governs all of them: the total surrender of a thing of value, put beyond recovery and passed to the gods. The weapon is bent so it cannot be taken back; the ox is left to rot so it cannot be eaten; the dead are raised at the gate, where the precinct faces the dawn and the line between this world and the other is kept open. It is a religion of the threshold and the offering, read off the floor of a ditch.

The destruction of the weapons in particular is worth dwelling on, because it is so deliberate and so labored. To fold an iron sword back on itself is not the work of a moment’s rage; the blade must be heated and worked, the metal coaxed past the point where it will hold an edge. A people that prized the long sword as the Gauls did, and that fought, by the testimony of their enemies, with a particular fury, did not ruin these blades carelessly. The ruin is the offering. The same care appears in the dismantling of the scabbards and the punching of the shield-bosses: each piece is methodically unmade, as if the giver were taking the implement of war apart the way a body is taken apart, killing the thing so that it might pass entire into the other world. Read against the deposits of the southern sanctuaries, where the power of the dead was gathered into the kept and displayed head, the northern rite turns on a different object — the arm itself, the sword and the shield — but the underlying conviction is kin: that a thing surrendered with its full value intact, and put beyond all reclaiming, is the gift the powers of war require.

How the ground was read

Nothing in any ancient text would let one reconstruct the cult of Gournay. The Greek and Roman writers who described the religion of the Gauls — Caesar above all, and after him the ethnographers who drew on the lost work of Posidonius — wrote from outside, as travelers, observers, and conquerors, and their reports of Gaulish sacrifice run quickly to the lurid and the formulaic. The sanctuary in the Aronde valley owes its detail to a different kind of evidence entirely. Here the Gauls are not described; they are read, through the things they themselves put in the ground, in the order in which they put them.

That reading was the work of a campaign of excavation carried out from the later 1970s into the 1980s — the principal seasons ran from 1977 to 1984 — under Jean-Louis Brunaux, with the faunal remains studied by Patrice Méniel and the weapons by André Rapin. Their method was to treat the fill of the ditch not as a heap of finds but as a stratified record of acts, and from the sequence of the layers — what was deposited, in what state, in what relation to what else, and in what order — to reconstruct the gestures of the cult: the felling of the ox, the months of decomposition, the gathering of the bones, the ruin of the weapons, the building of the trophy at the gate. The monographs that came out of the work — on the structures and the sacrificed animals, on the shields and spears, on the sword-scabbards — set the standard for how a Gaulish sanctuary could be made to speak. The roughly two thousand weapons and three thousand bones are now held and shown at the Musée Antoine Vivenel in Compiègne, where the bent swords form one of the most important collections of Celtic arms in Europe; a reconstruction of the enclosure has been raised at the archaeological park of Aubechies, across the modern border in Belgium, so that the vanished square of ditch and palisade can be walked.

Out of that work Gournay became a type-site. It gave archaeologists a model for the Belgic war-sanctuary — the ditched square with its eastern gate, its central pit-altar, its offered and ruined weapons, its whole beasts left to rot, its trophy of arms and skulls — against which other northern sites could be set. The nearby and even more drastic sanctuary at Ribemont-sur-Ancre, with its mass of human remains, was read in its light; and the type itself came to be recognized across the territory of the Belgae and beyond. It stands at a particular distance from the head-sanctuaries of the Mediterranean south, Roquepertuse and Entremont, where the skull was set in a portico of stone among the cities of the Salyes; and at a further distance still from the healing spring of Fontes Sequanae, where what the worshipers gave was not the ruin of war but carved images of their own afflicted bodies. The gods served at these places differ, and the gestures differ, but the underlying grammar — the bounded precinct, the thing given over and not taken back — is one the northern enclosure shares.

There is a last thing the ground at Gournay holds, beyond the swords and the bones. For the religion of the northern Gauls, so often known only through the eyes and the prejudices of its enemies, it offers a record made by its practitioners and not by its observers. The deposits are not a description of the cult; they are the cult, fossilized at the moment of the offering. A bent sword in a museum case in Compiègne was bent by a hand that meant the gesture, in a precinct that faced the dawn, for powers that were, within that world, as present as the iron. The strangers who wrote of the Gauls could not have told us this. The Gauls, by leaving it in the ditch, did.

A long iron sword from Gournay-sur-Aronde, dating between the 3rd and 1st centuries BCE, deliberately bent before it was given to the gods and laid in the sanctuary ditch. Musée Antoine Vivenel, Compiègne. Zetrollhebus, via Wikimedia Commons. CC BY 3.0.

→ Related: The Belgae · Roquepertuse · Entremont · Fontes Sequanae · Teutates · Taranis · Esus · Cernunnos · Sequana · The Helvetii · The Galatians · The Celts · Druidism · Gaul · Mars · Sacrifice Ritual · Soul · Reincarnation