Freemasonry

← Encyclopedia

Freemasonry is a fraternal initiatic order whose members are bound by oath into lodges and advanced through a sequence of ceremonial degrees, taught by ritual, symbol, and allegory drawn from the imagery of the stonemason’s craft. It is a system of morality, veiled in allegory and illustrated by symbols — the definition is the ritual’s own, fixed in the English lecture system associated with William Preston (1742–1818) — and its instruments are the working tools of the medieval builder turned to the shaping of character rather than of stone. The candidate enters as a rough ashlar to be dressed toward the perfect ashlar; the lodge in which the work proceeds is a Temple forever under construction; and at the summit of the third degree lies a word that was lost and is still sought. The order’s histories, rites, schisms, and enemies all elaborate that single architecture.

From operative lodge to speculative Craft

Behind the order stands the guild world of the working (“operative”) stonemasons of the late medieval and early modern centuries, documented in the roughly 130 surviving manuscript constitutions called the Old Charges. The oldest, the Regius Manuscript (British Library Royal MS 17 A I), is a 794-line Middle English poem conventionally dated c. 1390 and redated by modern paleography to c. 1425–50; the Cooke Manuscript (c. 1410–1450) supplies the legendary history — geometry, Euclid, Solomon’s Temple, King Athelstan — that the modern order inherited.

The turn toward speculation is documented earliest in Scotland. William Schaw, Master of Works to James VI, issued statutes for the lodges on 28 December 1598 and 28 December 1599, the second requiring candidates to be tested in “the art of memorie” — a clause that has been read against the Hermetic art of memory. The earliest lodge minutes anywhere survive from Aitchison’s Haven (1598/9) and Edinburgh Mary’s Chapel (1599), and the Scottish lodges guarded a “Mason Word.” Gentlemen who never cut a block began to be admitted: Sir Robert Moray at Newcastle on 20 May 1641 by members of the Lodge of Edinburgh, and the alchemist and antiquary Elias Ashmole at Warrington on 16 October 1646 — the earliest documented initiation of a non-operative on English soil by an English lodge, set down in his own diary. Across the seventeenth century the “accepted” or speculative element grew within the operative body until it became the whole. That transition remains one of the genuinely difficult problems of the history: the records are thin, and the line from operative guild to philosophical society runs through Scotland and England in ways scholarship is still working out — David Stevenson’s case for Scotland as the forge of the lodge system standing in counterpoint to the English origin of the Old Charges themselves. The romance that roots the Craft in Rosslyn Chapel and its St Clair patrons belongs to that chapel’s own story.

The Grand Lodge era

Tradition dates the modern institution to 24 June 1717, when four London lodges — meeting at the Goose and Gridiron alehouse in St Paul’s Churchyard, the Crown, the Apple-Tree, and the Rummer and Grapes — assembled to constitute the first Grand Lodge and elected Anthony Sayer Grand Master. The account rests entirely on James Anderson’s New Book of Constitutions of 1738; the 1723 Constitutions, produced under Desaguliers — experimental philosopher of Isaac Newton’s circle — and George Payne, says nothing of it. Set down two decades after the fact, the tidy origin is one historians treat with caution, and the tercentenary years sharpened caution into revision: Andrew Prescott and Susan Mitchell Sommers argue that the Grand Lodge was organized de facto only in 1721 under the Duke of Montagu, since no contemporary reference to it survives from 1717 to 1721 and William Stukeley described his own 1721 initiation as the first in London for many years. The tradition keeps 1717; the surviving documents, on this reading, point to 1721. Anderson’s Constitutions gave the order its charter and its theology of the Great Architect of the Universe, and Benjamin Franklin’s Philadelphia reprint of 1734 became the first masonic book printed in America.

From London the institution spread quickly through Europe and the Americas, splitting and reuniting into the patchwork of rival jurisdictions it remains. In England a rival Grand Lodge of the “Antients” — largely London-Irish masons organized at the Turk’s Head Tavern in Greek Street, Soho, on 17 July 1751, with Laurence Dermott’s Ahiman Rezon (1756) for a constitution — confronted the original body, which it branded the “Moderns,” for six decades. The Articles of Union were signed on 25 November 1813, and the United Grand Lodge of England was constituted on 27 December 1813, its Lodge of Reconciliation fixing the English ritual and the union declaring the Royal Arch the completion of “pure Antient Masonry.”

The degrees and the lost word

At the core stand three degrees — Entered Apprentice, Fellow Craft, Master Mason. The trigradal system is younger than the lodges: Scottish operative records show two grades, and a distinct Master’s ceremony first surfaces in the minutes of the Philo-Musicae et -Architecturae Societas, a London music club of masons whose 1725 minutes record two members “passed Masters”; the first printed description of all three degrees came with Samuel Prichard’s exposure Masonry Dissected in 1730, by which date the legend at the system’s summit is documented. In that legend the candidate enacts the death and figurative raising of Hiram Abiff, master builder of Solomon’s Temple, slain for refusing to betray the Master’s word before the Temple was complete. The word dies with him; the third degree confers its substitute; and the search for the genuine word ascends into the Royal Arch, worked from at least the 1740s — its earliest known record a lodge procession at Youghal, County Cork, on 27 December 1743, in which, as Faulkner’s Dublin Journal reported, “the Royall Arch” was “carried by two Excellent Masons” — whose drama is the recovery of the lost word, identified with the Tetragrammaton.

Above and beside these run further degree systems, elaborating the symbolism without superseding the first three. The Ancient and Accepted Scottish Rite descends from the patent Étienne Morin received at Paris on 27 August 1761 and the 25-degree Order of the Royal Secret he carried through the Caribbean; its Supreme Council of the 33rd Degree opened at Charleston on 31 May 1801, and Albert Pike, Sovereign Grand Commander from 1859, rewrote its degrees and supplied them with Morals and Dogma (1871) as their exegetical companion. The York Rite — in America an umbrella for Royal Arch Chapter, Cryptic Council, and Knights Templar Commandery — was standardized by Thomas Smith Webb’s Freemason’s Monitor (1797), which also popularized the All-Seeing Eye.

One Craft, many jurisdictions

In its Anglo-American, “regular” mainstream, Freemasonry requires of a candidate belief in a Supreme Being while prescribing no theology and admitting men of differing faiths; it is not a religion, though its relations with the churches, and with the Roman Catholic Church above all, have often been hostile. The boundary of that requirement defines the great modern schism. In September 1877 the Grand Orient de France adopted Motion IX, on a report read by the Protestant pastor Frédéric Desmons, rewriting the first article of its constitution: where it had affirmed the existence of God and the immortality of the soul, it now affirmed “absolute liberty of conscience and human solidarity.” The vote made belief optional; it did not abolish the Great Architect formula, which remained in the rituals and faded only afterward. The United Grand Lodge of England answered in March 1878 by withdrawing recognition, and the regular–liberal divide of world masonry dates from that exchange. At the opposite pole, the Swedish Rite requires Christian profession.

Two further geographies complete the map. Prince Hall and fourteen other free Black men were initiated on 6 March 1775 in an Irish-constitution military lodge attached to the 38th Regiment of Foot in Boston Harbor; the Grand Lodge of England warranted African Lodge No. 459 on 29 September 1784, and from it descends the Prince Hall family of Grand Lodges, a parallel African American masonry that endures. And although the mainstream Craft initiates men only, eighteenth-century France built lodges of adoption — a parallel rite for women, documented at The Hague in 1751–52 and widely diffused — while the modern mixed orders begin with Maria Deraismes, initiated in the men’s lodge Les Libres Penseurs at Le Pecq on 14 January 1882, who with Georges Martin founded Le Droit Humain at Paris in 1893; Annie Besant carried it to Britain in 1902 and bound it into the world of theosophy.

The temple of symbols

The order’s emergence coincided with the early modern fascination with Hermetic, Rosicrucian, and Kabbalistic learning, and its symbolic furniture — the temple, the sacred geometry, the language of light and initiation — drew on that common stock, mapping closely onto the Renaissance emblem tradition. Geometry is already the noblest of sciences in the Cooke Manuscript; the 1723 Constitutions theologized it in the Great Architect; square and compasses, plumb and level, the point within a circle, and the blazing star furnish the lodge; and the tracing board — evolved from chalk drawings on the lodge floor into the standard English designs of John Harris in the early nineteenth century — composes each degree’s emblems into one image of the path of the work.

The high-degree systems of the eighteenth century absorbed alchemical and Kabbalistic motifs in earnest. The Royal Arch’s divine names are the Craft’s principal inheritance from Christian Kabbalah; sephirotic trees appear on higher-degree tracing boards; and the 18th degree of the Scottish Rite, Knight of the Rose Croix of Heredom, concentrates the Rosicrucian thematic within Latin masonry. Jean-Baptiste Willermoz embedded the theurgy of Martinès de Pasqually in the Rectified Scottish Rite at the Convents of Lyon (1778) and Wilhelmsbad (1782) — the masonic face of Martinism, reconstituted as an order in 1886–87 under Papus. Egyptian-rite masonry runs from Cagliostro’s Egyptian Rite (Lyon, 1784, open to women) through the Rite of Misraïm (c. 1805) and the Rite of Memphis (1838), fused at Naples in September 1881 with Garibaldi as first Grand Hierophant. And later occultists borrowed the lodge form itself: the Societas Rosicruciana in Anglia, organized at a formation meeting of 1 June 1867 and restricted to Master Masons, supplied the three officers who founded the Golden Dawn in 1888.

A minority current inside the Craft has always worked it as a school of esotericism; the institution as practiced is a moral and convivial society. The thesis of a continuous Rosicrucian-Hermetic descent into the lodges has been eroded in the scholarship since the 1970s, and reading the Craft wholly as a vehicle of secret doctrine mistakes that minority current for the whole.

Oppositions and panics

Rome condemned the order within two decades of the Grand Lodge tradition and has never withdrawn. Clement XII’s In eminenti apostolatus specula of 28 April 1738 imposed the first papal ban with automatic excommunication; Providas (1751) reaffirmed it, Leo XIII’s Humanum genus (20 April 1884) elaborated it, canon 2335 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law codified it, and the 1983 declaration of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith confirmed that “the negative judgment remains unchanged.”

A separate matter is the conspiratorial literature, which from the 1790s onward has cast the order as a hidden hand behind revolutions and world events. John Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy (1797) and Augustin Barruel’s Mémoires (1797–99) fixed the genre by laying the French Revolution at the door of the lodges and the Bavarian Illuminati. That tradition is voluminous, durable, and almost entirely without evidentiary foundation; it tells more about the anxieties of its authors than about anything done in a lodge. Two panics frame the nineteenth century. The disappearance of William Morgan at Batavia, New York, in 1826, after he contracted to publish a ritual exposure, ignited the American Anti-Masonic Party — the first third party in United States politics, whose candidate William Wirt took 7.8 percent of the vote and carried Vermont in 1832 — and halved American membership. The Taxil hoax of 1885–97 saw Gabriel Jogand-Pagès, writing as Léo Taxil, fabricate a satanic masonic inner order, “Palladism,” ruled by the fictitious priestess Diana Vaughan and propped on spurious “Lucifer” texts ascribed to Pike; Catholic Europe believed it until his confession of 19 April 1897 at the Société de Géographie in Paris. A. E. Waite’s Devil-Worship in France (1896) had already taken the fabrication apart.

The scholarship and the open texts

The modern history of the Craft is built in counterpoint. David Stevenson’s The Origins of Freemasonry: Scotland’s Century, 1590–1710 (Cambridge University Press, 1988; https://www.cambridge.org/core/books/origins-of-freemasonry/EB839D576657C1FBAD7BC26965468B30) argues the Scottish case at full documentary length. Margaret C. Jacob’s Living the Enlightenment (Oxford University Press, 1991) and The Origins of Freemasonry: Facts and Fictions (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2006; https://www.pennpress.org/9780812294248/the-origins-of-freemasonry/) read the lodges as laboratories of Enlightenment civil society. Ric Berman’s The Foundations of Modern Freemasonry: The Grand Architects (Sussex Academic Press, 2012; http://www.sussex-academic.com/sa/titles/history/Berman.htm) treats the Grand Lodge era as a deliberate reconfiguration by a Whig-Newtonian core; Jessica Harland-Jacobs’s Builders of Empire: Freemasonry and British Imperialism, 1717–1927 (University of North Carolina Press, 2007; https://uncpress.org/9781469613482/builders-of-empire/) follows the Craft through the British world; Andrew Prescott and Susan Mitchell Sommers’s “Searching for the Apple Tree: Revisiting the Earliest Years of Organized English Freemasonry” (REHMLAC+ 10:1, 2018; https://www.scielo.sa.cr/scielo.php?pid=S1659-42232018000100022&script=sci_abstract) carries the 1721 revision; the Bogdan–Snoek Handbook of Freemasonry (Brill, 2014; https://brill.com/display/title/15580) is the standard scholarly survey; and Andreas Önnerfors’s Freemasonry: A Very Short Introduction (Oxford University Press, 2017; https://global.oup.com/academic/product/freemasonry-9780198796275) is the best compact overview.

The primary record is open. Franklin’s 1734 reprint of Anderson’s Constitutions survives in a free scholarly edition at https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libraryscience/25/ and Prichard’s Masonry Dissected (1730) in a public-domain scan at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Masonry_Dissected.djvu — both cited here as documents, not as instruction. Albert G. Mackey’s The Symbolism of Freemasonry (1869) is at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/11937 and Pike’s Morals and Dogma (1871) at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/19447 — the latter read with the caution that it paraphrases extensively and without credit, conspicuously from Éliphas Lévi, as the de Hoyos annotated edition documents. W. L. Wilmshurst’s The Meaning of Masonry (1922), the perennialist reading of the Craft degrees, is at https://sacred-texts.com/mas/mom/index.htm ; Robison’s Proofs of a Conspiracy at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/47605 ; William Morgan’s The Mysteries of Free Masonry (1827) at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/18136 ; and Waite’s Devil-Worship in France at https://www.gutenberg.org/ebooks/21258 . The reference apparatus: the Old Charges database (https://old-charges.org/manuscript/regius/) for the manuscript corpus, Masonic Periodicals Online (https://www.masonicperiodicals.org/) for the digitized English masonic press, and the English text of In eminenti at https://www.papalencyclicals.net/clem12/c12inemengl.htm .

The historical society — secretive in its rituals, public in its lodges and charities — is a more ordinary and more interesting thing than its mythology allows. Inside the lodge, the work the ritual describes goes on as it has for three centuries: the rough stone dressed toward the perfect ashlar, the Temple unfinished, the word still sought.

→ Related: Rosicrucianism · Kabbalah · Esotericism · Christian Kabbalah · Illuminati · Eliphas Levi Alphonse Louis Constant · Occultism