Kabbalah

← Encyclopedia

Beyond every name stands Ein Sof, the Infinite: God as utterly hidden, without limit or attribute, of whom nothing can be said. From that concealment the divine life unfolds through ten sefirot — stages, vessels, lights — by which the Infinite becomes active, knowable, and capable of relation to the world it sustains. Kabbalah is the knowledge of this hidden life of God and of the soul’s part in it: the principal tradition of Jewish mysticism, given its classical form in medieval Provence and Spain. The Hebrew word means “that which is received.” It names a tradition handed on rather than reasoned out — master to disciple, allusion to allusion — descending, by its own teaching, in unbroken transmission from Sinai — a lineage no document shortens for those inside it.

The sefirot are most often drawn as a single figure, the Tree of Life, the master map of emanation; the earliest printed form of the diagram is the title woodcut of the Latin Portae Lucis of 1516, though its manuscript ancestors are older. Down the Tree the Infinite pours itself into form; up it, human action returns. For the kabbalist the sefirot are genuinely how God acts, and the traffic runs both ways: the commandments performed below have effect above, and prayer offered with right intention — kavvanah — ascends through the vessels and moves the divine life itself. Contemplation, observance, and intention can mend a fracture within the divine order, the labor that Lurianic Kabbalah would later name tikkun, the repair of a world broken at its making. This working premise makes Kabbalah a theurgy as much as a metaphysics. The full architecture — the ten names and their order, the dispute over whether the sefirot are God’s essence or only God’s instruments — is treated under the doctrine of the ten sefirot; the letter-and-number disciplines that accompany it, under gematria.

The deepest layer of the tradition is older than the sefirotic scheme. The Mishnah already restricts public exposition of the work of creation and the work of the chariot — Ezekiel’s throne-vision — and around those guarded subjects late antiquity produced the merkavah and hekhalot literature, itineraries of ascent through the celestial palaces toward the Throne. From the same broad era comes the Sefer Yetzirah, the Book of Formation, which speaks of ten sefirot belimah and of the twenty-two Hebrew letters as the instruments by which the world was carved out; its composition lies somewhere in late antiquity, and the date is disputed sharply, with proposals scattered from the second century to the ninth. The whole sequence running from the chariot-mystics through the Rhineland pietism of the Hasidei Ashkenaz is surveyed under pre-Zoharic Jewish mysticism.

Kabbalah under that name enters the record in Languedoc in the second half of the twelfth century. The Sefer ha-Bahir surfaced in Provence around 1180, speaking of the divine potencies in myth and parable and supplying the lexicon of the sefirot as living powers. In the great rabbinic house of Abraham ben David of Posquières (d. 1198), his son Isaac the Blind (c. 1160–1235) — remembered as the father of the Kabbalah — taught the contemplation of the sefirot and protested, in a famous letter, when disciples began to spread the teaching openly. From Provence the doctrine passed to Catalonia and the Gerona circle: Ezra ben Solomon and Azriel, who gave Ein Sof its fixed technical sense and articulated the doctrine of emanation in vocabulary borrowed from Neoplatonism, working in the shadow of the Maimonidean controversies; and Nahmanides (1194–1270), whose rabbinic stature legitimated the young tradition while his own Torah commentary alluded to its secrets only “by the way of truth.” The discipline of reticence was constitutive from the start: Kabbalah was taught discreetly, often only to the mature, and warned against the dangers of ascent undertaken unprepared.

By the later thirteenth century the tradition ran in two streams. The theosophic-theurgic stream contemplated the sefirot and worked upon the divine order through commandment and intention. The ecstatic or prophetic stream, whose master is Abraham Abulafia (1240–after 1291), sought prophecy directly, through the permutation of letters and divine names — the “way of the Names” set against the “way of the sefirot.” Condemned by the rabbinic establishment in his own lifetime, Abulafia’s manuals traveled underground and were still being studied by the masters of Safed three centuries later.

The mature system’s great document is the Zohar, the Book of Radiance: a sprawling Aramaic mystical commentary on the Torah that appeared in Castile in the last decades of the thirteenth century, presenting itself as the teaching of the second-century sage Shimon bar Yochai. The kabbalist who circulated it, Moses de León (d. 1305), was named as its author already in the nineteenth century by Adolph Jellinek; Gershom Scholem established the attribution philologically; and later scholarship, led by Yehuda Liebes, reads the work as the produce of a whole circle of Castilian kabbalists around de León — the question of how far it draws on older material remains live. First printed at Mantua and at Cremona in 1558–60, the Zohar rose in many communities to a canonical standing third after the Bible and the Talmud.

In the sixteenth century the tradition’s capital moved to Safed in the Galilee, a town of saints and confraternities where Moses Cordovero built the great systematization of the classical doctrine, the Pardes Rimmonim (1548), Joseph Karo wrote at the dictation of a heavenly mentor, and Solomon Alkabetz composed the Sabbath hymn Lekhah Dodi. Then came Isaac Luria (1534–1572), and with him the boldest cosmogony the tradition produced: tzimtzum, the Infinite’s self-withdrawal to make room for a world; shevirat ha-kelim, the breaking of the vessels that could not hold the entering light; tikkun, the gathering of the scattered sparks, in which every commandment and every act of intention takes part. Luria wrote almost nothing; his teaching was recorded by his disciple Hayyim Vital, whose Etz Hayyim reached print only at Korzec in 1782. The system’s detail belongs to Lurianic Kabbalah.

Carried into common Jewish life, the Lurianic myth bore explosive fruit. In 1665 Nathan of Gaza proclaimed Sabbatai Zevi (1626–1676) the Messiah; the movement swept the diaspora until Sabbatai’s conversion to Islam in 1666, and Sabbatianism survived the apostasy as an underground theology, with Frankism as its radical aftermath. In the following century Hasidism, rising in the generation of the Baal Shem Tov (d. 1760) and his successor Dov Ber of Mezeritch, took the kabbalistic idiom — the sparks, the divine immanence, the cleaving to God called devekut — and made of it a popular movement of prayer and community that remains Kabbalah’s largest living inheritance, fierce rabbinic opposition notwithstanding. The tradition’s ethical literature carries the same inheritance, treated under kabbalistic musar.

The tradition’s reach extended far beyond Judaism. In 1486 Giovanni Pico della Mirandola set kabbalistic theses among his nine hundred Conclusiones, reading Latin versions of treatises from Abulafia’s circle and taking the sefirot and the science of the divine names as confirmation of Christian theology; a Christian Kabbalah followed — Johann Reuchlin’s De Verbo Mirifico (1494) and De Arte Cabalistica (1517); Paulus Ricius’s Portae Lucis (Augsburg, 1516), the Latin Gates of Light of Joseph Gikatilla that became the principal channel of sefirotic doctrine to Christian readers; Athanasius Kircher’s engraved sefirotic tree of 1653; and Christian Knorr von Rosenroth’s Kabbala Denudata (1677–84), the anthology through which Europe read Zoharic and Lurianic texts for two centuries. From Knorr’s Latin, S. L. MacGregor Mathers made The Kabbalah Unveiled (1887), and through the Golden Dawn lineage the Tree of Life became the master diagram of correspondence for modern occultism — the Hermetic Qabalah, whose distinct spelling, like the Christian “Cabala,” grew into shorthand for the distance traveled from the Jewish source. Each crossing carried the architecture over a confessional frontier and re-keyed its meaning, and the English-reading world of the nineteenth and early twentieth centuries met Kabbalah almost entirely through this filter — Mathers working from Knorr’s Latin, W. Wynn Westcott’s Sepher Yetzirah descending through Latin intermediaries — long before the Jewish texts themselves were rendered whole. What the rabbis received and what the magicians built serve different masters, and the parent tradition never lost sight of which God it was seeking to know.

Scholem’s century and after

Nineteenth-century Jewish scholarship mostly held Kabbalah at arm’s length — Heinrich Graetz treated it as a pathology of Judaism — but Adolph Jellinek was already editing the manuscripts, printing Abulafia’s treatises at Leipzig in the 1850s and at Breslau in 1887, and arguing, against the grain of his age, that Moses de León wrote the Zohar. The field as it now exists was built by Gershom Scholem (1897–1982). His Major Trends in Jewish Mysticism (Schocken, 1941; third revised edition 1954) ran the whole arc in nine lectures — Merkavah mysticism, Abulafia, the Zohar with the philological case for de León’s authorship, Safed, Sabbatianism, Hasidism — and fixed the typology and the periodization that every later account answers to. His Origins of the Kabbalah (German original 1962; English translation by Allan Arkush, edited by R. J. Zwi Werblowsky, 1987) mapped the emergence — the Bahir problem, the first kabbalists of Provence, the Gerona center — and remains the baseline against which the revisionists measure themselves. And his Sabbatai Sevi: The Mystical Messiah, 1626–1676 (Hebrew 1957; English by Werblowsky, Princeton/Bollingen, 1973) read the messianic explosion of 1665–66 as popularized Lurianism in action — a thesis still at the hinge of debate, since Moshe Idel countered in Messianic Mystics (Yale, 1998) that Sabbatai himself “did not study Lurianic Kabbalah and even opposed some of its doctrine.”

Idel’s Kabbalah: New Perspectives (Yale University Press, 1988) is the landmark revision of the Scholem paradigm at large: phenomenological where Scholem was historical-philological, it recentered the ecstatic stream and the theurgic core and argued for continuity with ancient Jewish materials against Scholem’s genealogy from Gnosticism. On the Zohar, Yehuda Liebes’s Studies in the Zohar (State University of New York Press, 1993), with its pivotal essay “How the Zohar Was Written,” replaced the single author with a Castilian circle around de León; Daniel Abrams’s work on kabbalistic manuscripts and textual theory (2010) has since unsettled the assumption of fixed texts altogether, and Elliot Wolfson, Haviva Pedaya, Moshe Halbertal, and Tzahi Weiss have rebuilt the picture of the beginnings — Weiss’s 2021 re-readings of Isaac the Blind’s letter, first published by Scholem in 1934, press hard on the Gerona narrative Scholem drew from it. On the tradition’s oldest book, Weiss’s “Sefer Yesirah” and Its Contexts: The Other Jewish Book (University of Pennsylvania Press, 2018) argues for a seventh-century milieu shaped by Syriac Christian surroundings — the most recent word in the dating dispute, not the last. On Hasidism, the eight-author Hasidism: A New History of David Biale and his colleagues (Princeton University Press, 2018) consolidated the post-Scholem account of the movement: no single founding moment, deep regional variety, the tsaddik as an institution. And the Zohar itself at last reached complete scholarly English in the Pritzker Edition (Stanford University Press, 2004–2017): twelve annotated volumes on a freshly established Aramaic text, the first nine translated by Daniel C. Matt and the final three by Nathan Wolski and Joel Hecker, superseding the partial and filtered versions through which English readers had glimpsed the book since the Soncino translation of 1931–34.

That eighteen-year labor closed in 2017: twelve volumes of annotated Aramaic, and the book that came out of Castile wearing the mantle of a second-century sage — denounced, canonized, printed at Mantua, Latinized for Christian courts, veiled and unveiled by magicians — rendered whole at last for readers of English. The tradition itself never waited on the philology. Wherever Lekhah Dodi is sung as the Sabbath comes in, wherever a Hasid aims at devekut in the middle of an ordinary prayer, the sparks are still being gathered — the repair of the world going forward by intention, one commandment at a time.

→ In the library: The Zohar (Nurho de Manhar, partial — 1914) · Sepher Yetzirah (Westcott — 1911) · Sepher Yezirah (Kalisch — 1877) · Mordell — The Origin of Letters and Numerals according to the Sefer Yetzirah (1914) · Mathers — The Kabbalah Unveiled (1887)

→ Related: Emanation · Christian Kabbalah · Neoplatonism · Gnosis · Occultism · Hermetic Qabalah · Jewish Mysticism Zohar · Jewish Mysticism Pre Zoharic · Doctrine Of The Ten Sefirot · Early Kabbalah · Provencal Kabbalah · Kabbalah Ecstatic Prophetic · Pre Lurianic Safed Kabbalah · Lurianic Kabbalah · Hebrew Gematria Kabbalah · Sabbateanism · Hasidism · Hekhalot Merkavah Mysticism · Theurgy