Emain Macha

← Encyclopedia

The mound at the center of the hilltop is not large, and a visitor who climbs to it through the grass and the cropped enclosure could be forgiven for seeing nothing more than a green swelling of the ground. There is no stone to read, no standing wall. What lies under it was put there in a single season, late in the second century before the common era, and was meant from the start to be hidden. The builders raised a building of oak forty meters across, packed it to the rafters with limestone, set it alight, and drew the burned wreck up into the mound that survives. Whatever the act was, it was finished in one motion, and the ground has kept it.

This is the place the early Irish called Emain Macha, and the people who came after them called Navan Fort — Navan being the worn-down English of Emain. It sits about two and a half kilometers west of the city of Armagh in the north of Ireland, and the legends made it the head of a kingdom.

The hill and its name

Emain Macha was the royal seat of the Ulaid, the people whose name survives in the province of Ulster. In the heroic tales they are the kings and warriors of the north, and this hill is their court — the fixed point to which the stories return, as the Greek tales return to Mycenae or to Troy. The name itself carries a goddess. Macha is one of the sovereignty figures of Ireland, bound to the land, to kingship, to horses and to war, and the country around the hill is written through with her: the fort is Emain Macha, and nearby Armagh is Ard Mhacha, the height of Macha.

The early literature gives more than one account of how her name came to the place, and the most told of them is a hard story. A man of Ulster named Crunniuc took into his house a woman who came to him from nowhere, and the house prospered, and she carried his child. She was Macha, though he did not know it. At a fair of the Ulstermen the king’s chariot-horses won every race, and Crunniuc, drunk on the boasting, said his wife could outrun them. The king heard, and held the man’s life against the claim, and so Macha was brought to the field heavy with child and made to race. She ran against the horses and beat them, and at the winning-post she fell and bore twins — and the name Emain Macha, the twins of Macha, is read from this. Dying, she laid on the men of Ulster the ces noínden, the affliction that in their hour of greatest danger they should be seized by the weakness of a woman in childbirth, helpless for the length of nine generations.

Two cautions belong here, and the prose should keep them apart from the tale. The first is that the etymology is a story the literature tells about itself; philologists do not all read Emain as “twins,” and the legend is the kind of after-the-fact naming the medieval Irish loved to compose for the great places. The second is larger. Macha and the whole pagan world of these texts reach us through Christian hands. The monks who set the tales down in the monasteries of the eleventh and twelfth centuries were the heirs of a converted island, writing of gods their own faith had unseated, and they handled the old powers by half-historicizing them — turning the goddess of the land into a queen, a wife, a doomed woman at a horse-race. Inside the frame of the stories, Macha is the goddess of the place and her curse falls real on the men of the north. In the documentary record, she is a figure refracted through centuries of Christian transmission, and the two readings should not be folded together.

The court of Conchobar and the Red Branch

In the cycle of tales the hill belongs to, Emain Macha is the seat of Conchobar mac Nessa, king of the Ulaid. His great hall was the Craeb Ruad, the Red Branch, and the warriors reared and feasted there became the Red Branch — the war-band of the north, the company against which the heroism of the cycle is measured. Conchobar’s reign is set, by the artificial chronology the monks imposed, at the turn of the eras, his birth and death synchronized with those of Christ; modern readers take that frame as a Christian scaffolding laid over native matter rather than as history.

The body of stories is the Ulster Cycle — one of the four great cycles of early Irish literature, and the richest surviving window onto the heroic imagination of the insular Celts — and Emain Macha is its hearth. Here Conchobar holds court with his champions; here the boy Sétanta is fostered and earns the name Cú Chulainn, the Hound of Culann, when he kills a smith’s guard-dog and offers to take its place. Here the quarrels begin and the heroes return. The cycle is preserved in the oldest manuscripts of Irish secular literature: the Lebor na hUidre, the Book of the Dun Cow, copied at Clonmacnoise no later than the early twelfth century, and the Book of Leinster of the middle of that century, with later witnesses behind them. The language of the earliest layers of the tales has been dated to the eighth century, which carries the matter back well before the parchment that holds it, into an oral tradition older still.

The mound crowning Navan Fort (Emain Macha), County Armagh; beneath it lies the deliberately burned timber structure of c. 95 BCE. Photograph by Jon Sullivan, released into the public domain.

The summit of the cycle is the Táin Bó Cúailnge, the Cattle Raid of Cooley. Medb, queen of Connacht in the west, marches on Ulster to carry off the great brown bull of Cúailnge, and she times the invasion for the season of the ces noínden, when Macha’s curse has felled the fighting men of the north. Only Cú Chulainn, too young to be bound by the affliction, is left to hold the province, and he does — alone, by the fords, in a long series of single combats, while the men of Ulster lie helpless behind him. The hero of the Táin is no decorous knight. In the ríastrad, the warp-spasm that takes him in battle, his body wrenches into something unrecognizable, a thing that knows neither friend nor enemy, and the country he defends would scarcely own him in that hour. From Emain Macha the muster finally rises, the curse lifting, and the cycle turns to its later sorrows. Inside the frame these are the deeds of men who lived; in the record they are the heroic literature of a people imagining its own past, and the hill is the place that past is hung upon.

Cú Chulainn as a youth, illustration by Stephen Reid (1912). Public domain (author’s life plus 70 years).

What the ground holds

The literature is one thing the hill carries. The other was found by the spade, and it does not contradict the tales so much as stand beside them, stranger than they are.

Emain Macha is a large circular enclosure ringed by a bank and an inner ditch — with the ditch set inside the bank rather than outside it — the inner-ditch signature that marks the early Irish “royal sites” as ritual rather than military ground, a boundary raised to set apart a sacred precinct rather than to hold off an army. Inside the ring stand two monuments, a ring-barrow and the great central mound. Dudley Waterman excavated almost the whole of that mound for the antiquities branch of the government between 1961 and 1971, and what he uncovered has shaped every account since.

Beneath the mound lay a long sequence. There were Neolithic traces, and then Iron-Age phases including figure-of-eight timber buildings of the centuries before Christ, set within a ditched compound — high-status ground, to judge by what came from it, including the skull of a Barbary ape, an animal from North Africa whose bones in County Armagh can only mean a chain of contact and exchange running the length of the known world, a creature kept perhaps as a curiosity or sent as a gift to a king. An ape’s skull at the edge of the Atlantic is the kind of object that quietly enlarges a place: whoever lived here was reachable from very far away.

Then, around the very end of the second century before the common era, the earlier buildings were cleared and a single enormous structure raised in their place. It was roughly circular, about forty meters across, built of some hundreds of oak posts set in four concentric rings, with a great oak pillar at the heart of it. That central post still held its bark when it was found, and the dendrochronology — the count of its tree-rings against the master sequence — fixed its felling to 95 BCE. The pillar stood perhaps thirteen meters tall, and a ramp had been cut to lever it upright. Whether the rings of posts carried a roof, making the whole a vast roundhouse, or stood open like a timber circle, is debated; what is not debated is what was done to it.

The building seems never to have been lived in. Almost as soon as it was finished it was filled — packed with a cairn of limestone blocks, tens of thousands of them, laid up in a flat-topped, radial pattern around the center, like the spokes of a wheel. Then the timber was set on fire and the whole structure burned where it stood, and over the charred and stone-filled ruin the builders heaped earth, soils of more than one kind carried in from the surrounding land, raising the turf mound that crowns the hill today. The sequence — build, fill, burn, bury — was a single deliberate program, carried through at once. This is the firmest ground the site offers, and the consensus of the archaeology rests on it: a forty-meter temple of oak, dated by its own central tree to 95 BCE, destroyed by intention the moment it was complete.

The hilltop enclosure of Navan Fort (Emain Macha), County Armagh. Photograph by Sameichel, CC BY-SA 4.0.

Why it was done is the part that stays open to argument, and here the registers must be kept distinct. That the act happened is settled. What it meant is interpretation, and the interpretations run in several directions: that the building was a temple raised to be offered whole to the powers, consummated by fire as a sacrifice is consumed; that it was a great house deliberately “killed” and entombed, as a person is buried, perhaps at the end of a reign or an age; that the burning closed and sealed a sacred space against return. Recent geophysical survey of the wider hilltop, reported in 2020, has traced further large structures and enclosures around the mound, suggesting that the burned building was the heart of a far more extensive ceremonial landscape than the single monument long implied. The reading of the act is contested. The act itself the ground has kept.

Ruin, memory, and the long afterlife

After the great burning, Emain Macha as a royal center fades. In the legendary histories the Ulaid are pressed back and the hill is abandoned as a seat of kings, its court passing into the matter of story while the place itself fell quiet under grass. What survived was not a living capital but a name and a body of tales — and these the monasteries carried. The same Christian Ireland that had displaced the old gods preserved, in its scriptoria, the cycle that made this hill the heart of the heroic north, and without that act of copying neither Conchobar nor Cú Chulainn nor the curse of Macha would have come down at all. The transmission is the paradox of the whole tradition: the pagan past is legible only because the converted island chose to write it down.

For long centuries the mound was simply the Navan, a green earthwork with old fame attached, before scholarship reattached the literary Emain Macha to the physical hill and the spade confirmed that something extraordinary lay beneath. The excavation of the 1960s, and the dating of the central oak, turned a place of legend into a place of demonstrated fact — a fact, in the burned temple, stranger than the legend had been.

In the modern era the hero of the hill became contested ground of another kind. Cú Chulainn, the boy who held Ulster alone, was taken up by Irish cultural nationalism in the revival around the turn of the twentieth century; Oliver Sheppard’s bronze of the dying hero, made before the First World War, was chosen as the memorial to the 1916 rising and stands in the Dublin General Post Office, and W. B. Yeats set Cú Chulainn beside the rebels of that Easter. Then, during the conflict in the north in the later twentieth century, Ulster loyalists claimed the same figure from the other side — pointing to the saga in which Cú Chulainn defends Ulster against the men of Ireland to the south, and drawing on Ian Adamson’s much-disputed theory of a pre-Celtic Cruthin people of the north to recast the hero as their own ancient defender. The scholarship rejects the Cruthin reading; what stands is the bare and telling fact that one mythic warrior, born in the tales at this hill, was summoned in the same century to two opposed identities. The genealogy of meaning, like the genealogy of the place, does not run in a straight line.

Emain Macha now sits inside a visitor landscape, one of the recognized royal sites of early Ireland alongside Tara, the hill of kingship, and Uisneach, reckoned the country’s center. It belongs to the same world of ceremonial earthworks as the great passage-tomb of Newgrange on the Boyne, and to the same body of story as the Tuatha Dé Danann, the divine race the medieval historians set at the head of Ireland’s ages, and the sovereignty-and-war goddess the Morrigan, who crosses into the Táin itself. Of all the early sites of the island it is the one most fully doubled — a capital of the imagination and a temple of the ground, the first remembered and the second recovered, and at the meeting of the two a green mound that was raised, on purpose, to bury a fire.

→ Related: The Morrigan · The Celts · Tara Hill · Uisneach · Newgrange · The Tuatha De Danann · The Dagda · Lugh · Brigid Goddess · Nuada · The Fomorians · Druids · Reincarnation · Immortality · Soul