Christian Neoplatonism

← Encyclopedia

Christian Neoplatonism is the long reworking of Neoplatonist metaphysics inside Christian theology: the pagan school’s account of a single source from which all things flow and toward which the soul returns, taken up and fitted to the God of scripture. It is neither pagan Neoplatonism continued nor mysticism in general, but a specific intellectual inheritance — a set of philosophical instruments, picked up by Christian writers and bent to other purposes.

The decisive early figure is Augustine. In the Confessions he records that “the books of the Platonists” — Latin versions of Plotinus and Porphyry — gave him the means to conceive God as immaterial and evil as a privation rather than a thing, and so cleared his path toward the Church. What he could not find there, he says, was the Word made flesh; the structure he kept, the incarnation he added. That pattern — borrow the metaphysics, refuse the conclusion that no god would stoop to a body — recurs across the tradition.

Its boldest synthesis is the corpus circulated under the name Dionysius the Areopagite, the Athenian convert of Acts. Scholarship has established that the author wrote around the year 500 and drew heavily on the pagan Neoplatonist Proclus; the pseudonym lent his work near-apostolic authority for a thousand years. From him the Latin and Greek Middle Ages received two durable instruments: a hierarchy of being descending from God through ranked angelic orders, and a negative theology insisting that God is better approached by denying every name than by affirming any. In the ninth century John Scotus Eriugena translated the corpus into Latin and built from it a vast system in which all things proceed from God and return to him. Much later Nicholas of Cusa made the same lineage carry his “learned ignorance,” the claim that the infinite exceeds every concept the mind can frame.

What the Christian writers took was the architecture of descent and return, and the conviction that the highest reality lies beyond speech. What they would not take was the impersonal One indifferent to the world, the eternity of the cosmos, and the denial that the divine could enter matter. The adjustment was rarely smooth: a creator who makes freely from nothing is not easily reconciled with a One that overflows by necessity, and the seam shows in every major figure. The site’s own reading is that the tension was productive rather than fatal — that Christian theology gained much of its speculative reach precisely by quarrelling with a philosophy it could neither fully accept nor do without.

The line runs on. The Florentine Renaissance, the Cambridge Platonists, and strands of German idealism each rediscovered some part of it. Where later Christian thought speaks of God as beyond being, or of the soul’s ascent through degrees toward a union past knowing, the vocabulary is usually this one, still in service after the school that coined it had closed.

→ In the library: The Works of Dionysius the Areopagite (Parker, 1899) · Plotinus — The Enneads (MacKenna, 1926)

→ Related: Neoplatonism · The One · Emanation · Nous · Gnosis · Middle Ages