China

← Encyclopedia

China, for the purposes of this site, is less the modern state than the long civilization of the East Asian mainland — the body of language, ritual, and cosmological assumption out of which Taoism, Confucianism, and the Chinese arts of alchemy and divination grew. Its formative age runs from the Shang and Zhou dynasties through the philosophical ferment of the Warring States and the imperial syntheses that followed, when the chief schools of Chinese thought took the shape they would keep for two thousand years.

Underneath the schools lay a cosmology most of them shared. The world was held to be a single field of relation rather than a thing made: it arose not from a creator standing outside it but from the interplay of yin and yang, the receptive and the active, and unfolded through the Five Phases — wood, fire, earth, metal, water — that succeed and constrain one another in cycles. The animating term was qi, the breath or vital energy thought to circulate through cosmos and body alike. Heaven, earth, and the human being were taken to answer to one another, so that order in the state, in the body, and in the seasons was a single problem in different registers. The Yijing, the Book of Changes, supplied the diagrams by which that order was read — sixty-four hexagrams built from the broken and unbroken lines of yin and yang, each a configuration of forces caught at a moment of change.

Heaven and the Mandate

The pivot on which the whole order turned was Tian — Heaven. Where the Shang kings had served Shangdi, the Lord on High, a personal high god approached through their royal ancestors and the cracked oracle bones, the Zhou, who overthrew them around 1046 BCE, spoke instead of Tian, an order at once sky and moral law, less a deity to be petitioned than a tribunal that watched. From this came the doctrine that would govern Chinese political theology for three thousand years: the Tianming, the Mandate of Heaven. The ruler held the empire not by birthright but by virtue, as Heaven’s regent and Son of Heaven; should he govern cruelly, Heaven could withdraw its warrant, and the withdrawal announced itself in flood, drought, eclipse, and revolt. The Duke of Zhou framed the conquest of the larger Shang state in exactly these terms — the Shang had forfeited the Mandate by their misrule, and a smaller house had received it through merit. The doctrine cut both ways with a sharpness that later moralists pressed: because virtue alone secured the Mandate, a dynasty’s collapse was its own indictment, and rebellion against a fallen house could be read not as treason but as Heaven’s instrument. Every dynasty down to the nineteenth century would invoke it, and the historians of each would scour the record of the last for the signs by which Heaven had given notice.

The Three Teachings

Within this frame the schools diverged sharply, and the divergence settled into the pattern the Chinese called the Sanjiao, the Three Teachings — Confucianism, Taoism, and the Buddhism that arrived later from India. Confucius (traditionally 551–479 BCE) and his heirs held that the way was kept by li — ritual propriety, the cultivation of character, and the bonds of family and rule — a discipline aimed squarely at the human order. Heaven was real and watchful, but the sage’s work lay in the patterning of conduct: in ren, humaneness; in the rectification of names, so that father, son, ruler, and minister each answered to what the word demanded. Mencius drew out the political edge, teaching that Heaven made the sovereign for the people and not the people for the sovereign, and that a tyrant who lost the people had already lost the Mandate. The Taoist texts gathered under Laozi and Zhuangzi turned the other direction: the Dao, the Way, was the nameless source that could not be grasped by striving, and the sage’s art was wuwei, action so attuned to it as to look like doing nothing. The library holds these in their first full English dress, in James Legge’s and Herbert Giles’s late-nineteenth-century translations, alongside the earlier and more idiosyncratic Victorian renderings of Frederic Balfour. Later, Buddhism entering from India was absorbed and reworked — first by borrowing Taoist vocabulary to render its alien concepts, a practice called geyi, the matching of meanings, and then by repaying the debt as its own terms flowed back into Taoist and Confucian thought. Its most distinctively Chinese form was Chan, the school the West knows by its Japanese name, Zen.

These were rivals but never sealed compartments. Educated Chinese moved among them by register rather than by allegiance — Confucian in office, Taoist in retirement, Buddhist at the funeral — and the official mind held that the Three Teachings, rightly understood, converged. The conviction crystallized in the slogan sanjiao heyi — the three teachings resolved into one — which by the late imperial period had become the working theology of much popular religion. Its sharpest philosophical synthesis came in the Song, when Neo-Confucian thinkers, above all Zhu Xi (1130–1200), rebuilt the Confucian project on a metaphysics of li (pattern or principle) and qi, crowned by the taiji, the Supreme Polarity — terms long resident in Taoist cosmology, now turned to Confucian ends even as Zhu publicly dismissed Taoist immortality-seeking as delusion.

The two alchemies

The Chinese arts of transformation are twofold, and the distinction matters. Waidan, outer or operative alchemy, was the laboratory pursuit of an elixir of immortality, compounded often from cinnabar and other toxic minerals and refined through graded firing-cycles mapped onto the hexagrams of the Yijing. Its prestige reached the throne, and so did its cost: as many as half a dozen Tang emperors are reported dead or undone by elixirs — among them Xianzong, Muzong, Wuzong, and Xuanzong, with Taizong’s death also laid by some to alchemists’ pills — Wuzong’s decline bearing the textbook signature of chronic mercury toxicity. By the late Tang a literati revulsion had set in, and the practice contracted to a margin.

What replaced it ran inward. Neidan, inner alchemy, kept the entire vocabulary of furnace and tripod, lead and mercury, dragon and tiger, but relocated the work from the bench to the body, now read as the vessel in which an immortal embryo could be refined. The operation reverses the ordinary flow of life: where nature spends jing (essence) into reproduction and disperses shen (spirit) into the senses, the adept gathers and returns, refining essence into breath, breath into spirit, spirit back into the emptiness from which all proceeds, until — in the tradition’s own logic — the prenatal integrity that precedes the differentiated world is restored within a living person. The pivot from outer to inner is one of the cleaner cases of a tradition preserving its operational language while transposing its referent; whether the two were one art continuous or a deliberate reinterpretation is itself a matter the textual record was built to argue. What the practitioners sought was plain enough: not metaphor but transformation — a body made to last. The foundational texts of the inner stream — the Cantong qi, the Wuzhen pian of Zhang Boduan (d. 1082), the Huangting jing that mapped the gods of the body — are the classics of a literature with its own dedicated treatment among these entries.

The institutional tradition

Behind the texts stands an organized religion, daojiao, with an ordained priesthood, a revealed canon, and a liturgy that is older than most of its doctrine. Its first datable institution is the Way of the Celestial Masters, founded in 142 CE in Sichuan when Zhang Daoling received, by the tradition’s account, a covenant from the deified Laozi; his grandson Zhang Lu governed a short-lived theocracy of twenty-four parishes before submitting to Cao Cao in 215 CE, and the dispersal of that community seeded Taoist institutional life across the empire. Two great revelations of the Six Dynasties reshaped it into a scholastic religion: the Shangqing (Highest Clarity) corpus, received by the visionary Yang Xi between 364 and 370 CE and centered on Mount Mao, with its interior visualization and astral flight; and the Lingbao (Numinous Treasure) scriptures of the following generation, the first Taoist body to absorb Buddhist universal salvation wholesale. From these the canon took the threefold Cavern architecture that would order the Daozang, the Taoist canon, whose surviving Ming edition of 1445 runs to some five thousand fascicles — a scriptural mass comparable to the Buddhist Tripitaka.

The living tradition is liturgical before it is doctrinal. Its central rites — the communal jiao of renewal for the living and the zhai of merit for the dead — operate through talismans, incantations, patterned pacing of the stars, and an inner visualization by which the officiating priest constitutes himself a functionary of the celestial bureaucracy, able to present the community’s memorial to a heaven organized like an imperial chancery. That bureaucratic imagination is the signature of the whole pantheon: the Three Pure Ones at the apex, the Jade Emperor administering below them, the Three Officials of Heaven, Earth, and Water keeping the ledgers of sin and merit, and an underworld of courts and registers through which the dead are processed. Two great orders carry the tradition today. The hereditary, householder Zhengyi priesthood, descending from the Celestial Masters and licensed historically from Longhushan in Jiangxi, dominates the south and the Chinese diaspora. The monastic, celibate Quanzhen order — Complete Perfection — founded by Wang Chongyang (1113–1170) and consolidated under Mongol patronage when his disciple Qiu Chuji answered Chinggis Khan’s summons, governs the monastic north; its dominant Longmen lineage made inner alchemy the contemplative core of monastic life. Quanzhen was from the first a Three-Teachings synthesis — Wang had his disciples read the Daodejing, the Heart Sutra, and the Confucian Classic of Filial Piety together — and it produced in Sun Bu’er (1119–1182), one of its Seven Perfected, a foundational woman master and the later figurehead of a distinct tradition of female inner alchemy.

The modern currents

The tradition’s relation to its own modern forms is not simple. The wave of lay, syncretic salvationist associations that scholars call the redemptive societies — the Yiguandao most prominent among them, with the Daoyuan and its World Red Swastika Society beside it — flourished in Republican China by drawing on the old sectarian eschatology of the Eternal Venerable Mother and the three-kalpa ages of the world, generating their scriptures not by canonical transmission but through fuji, spirit-writing at the sand-tray. They wove Confucian ethics, Buddhist karma, Taoist cultivation, and increasingly Christianity and Islam into a five-teachings-as-one universalism, and were suppressed as reactionary sects in the People’s Republic after 1949 while surviving and growing in Taiwan and overseas. They are not institutional Taoism — lay where it is ordained, revelation- generating where it is canon-transmitting — but they share its substrate and its ritual idiom, and they belong to the same religious landscape.

So, more obliquely, does the qigong movement. The breath-and-body cultivation called yangsheng, the nourishing of life, is genuinely ancient, attested in the illustrated exercise charts of the Mawangdui tombs sealed in 168 BCE. But qigong as a unified discipline is a twentieth-century coinage, medicalized and deliberately stripped of religious framing by Liu Guizhen in the 1950s to fit a materialist state. From it grew the qigong fever of roughly 1979 to 1999, when between sixty and two hundred million people practiced, charismatic grandmasters claimed to emit a measurable external qi (wai qi) able to act at a distance, and a rocket scientist’s prestige briefly lent the claims the banner of a new somatic science. Mainstream physics never accepted them; the strongest demonstrations were documented as conjuring; and the era ended in the 1999 suppression that followed the rise of Falun Gong out of the same milieu. The external-qi claim is best read as a recent reframing of an old substrate in the idiom of physics and national destiny rather than a transmission of ancient practice — and the contemporary Taoist temple, accordingly, teaches its movement arts under state-approved categories of health rather than as a road to the immortals.

Scholarship and the textual record

The Western study of Chinese religion and thought began with translators and missionaries and matured into a discipline only in the twentieth century. The foundational English rendering of the Taoist classics remains James Legge’s The Texts of Tâoism (Oxford, 1891), volumes 39 and 40 of the Sacred Books of the East, which carries the Daodejing, the Zhuangzi, and the redemption tractates, and is available in full in the Library, as are Herbert Giles’s freer 1889 Chuang Tzŭ and Frederic Balfour’s pioneering 1884 Taoist Texts. The single most consequential pre-modern Western treatment of the religion proper was Léon Wieger’s two-volume Taoïsme (Xianxian, 1911–1913), the first index in any Western language to the contents of the Daozang, written from a frankly Jesuit and polemical standpoint; and Jan de Groot’s six-volume The Religious System of China (Leiden, 1892–1910) remains an irreplaceable field record of southern Chinese ritual despite the colonial frame of Universism its author imposed on it.

The modern apparatus is in copyright and must be pointed to rather than hosted. A. C. Graham’s Disputers of the Tao: Philosophical Argument in Ancient China (Open Court, 1989) is the standard account of the Warring States schools and is held at the Internet Archive. Joseph Needham’s vast Science and Civilisation in China (Cambridge, from 1954) recovered the Chinese scientific and alchemical record for Western scholarship and posed the enduring question of why modern science did not arise there; the series is cataloged by Cambridge and surveyed at Wikipedia. For the religion, the embodied-ritual paradigm descends from Kristofer Schipper’s The Taoist Body (1982; English 1993) and culminates in the three-volume Schipper–Verellen The Taoist Canon (Chicago, 2004), the definitive guide to the Daozang; Isabelle Robinet’s Taoism: Growth of a Religion (Stanford, 1997) reconstructed the Shangqing visionary corpus; Fabrizio Pregadio’s Encyclopedia of Taoism (Routledge, 2008) is the field’s reference compendium; and Vincent Goossaert and David Palmer’s The Religious Question in Modern China (Chicago, 2011) frames the redemptive societies and the qigong movement within the modern remaking of the very category of religion.

What the parallels reach toward

Currents further west invite comparison. The Dao that cannot be named recalls the apophatic God of the mystics; the world arising by interplay rather than fiat has its analogue in the doctrines of emanation; and inner alchemy’s refinement of a hidden body has been set beside the Hermetic and European alchemical traditions ever since the first sustained comparisons a century ago — Carl Jung’s reading of the inner-alchemical Secret of the Golden Flower through the lens of individuation being the most influential, and the most contested, of them. Such pairings have occupied the comparative study of mysticism for generations. Pressed, each tradition means something exact and its own: the Daoist body is organized through the mai vessels and the cinnabar fields, not the channels and centers of Indian yoga, and the Daozang is a canon and not an anthology of portable wisdom. China named the unnameable in its own grammar, and built from it a way of seeing in which the cosmos was less a creation to be explained than an order to be kept in tune with — where the conduct of the ruler, the breath of the adept, and the turning of the seasons were three readings of one text.

→ In the library: Legge — The Tao Teh King (1891) · Legge — The Texts of Tâoism (1891) · Giles — Chuang Tzŭ (1889) · Balfour — Taoist Texts (1884)

→ Related: Karma · Reincarnation · Monism · Reason · Taoism · Confucianism · Buddhism · I Ching · Daoist Neidan · Quanzhen · Zhengyi · Daoist Canon Daozang · Shangqing Highest Clarity · Longmen Lineage · Chinese Popular Religion · Neo Confucianism Song Lixue · Qigong Fever Qigong Re · Alchemy · Immortality · Divination · Emanation