Chimera

← Encyclopedia

The Chimera (Greek Chimaira, a she-goat) is a fire-breathing monster of Greek myth: a single creature compounded of three animals — a lion in front, a goat rising from its back, and a serpent for a tail. The name carries the smallest of the three parts. Chimaira means a she-goat, more strictly a beast a year old — a winter-old animal, from the same family of words that gives Greek its term for winter — and it is the goat’s head, set in the middle of the body and breathing out the fire, that names the whole. The earliest surviving notice is in the Iliad, where Homer calls it a thing of divine stock, not of men, lion before, serpent behind, goat in the middle, breathing out the force of blazing fire. The line is the oldest the tradition keeps, and already the creature is not described as a marvel to be explained but named as a fact: born of gods, not of men, and therefore not subject to the ordinary rules of what a body may contain.

The Chimera in its canonical form — lion’s body, goat’s head from the back, serpent tail — on a red-figure Apulian plate, about 350-340 BCE, Louvre. — Marie-Lan Nguyen (Jastrow), via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

The name and the earliest text

Homer’s notice comes embedded in a story told by one warrior to another. In the sixth book of the Iliad the Lycian Glaucus and the Argive Diomedes, meeting between the lines, discover a bond of guest-friendship between their houses, and Glaucus recites his lineage — and so the Chimera enters Greek literature sideways, as a grandfather’s deed recalled on a battlefield. The shape Homer fixes is exact: three animals in one frame, the lion’s strength forward, the serpent’s behind, and at the center the goat that gives the thing its name and its fire. He adds only that Bellerophon killed it, trusting in the signs of the gods. The poem does not pause to ask how a lion, a goat, and a snake might share a single set of lungs; the impossibility is the point, and the early verse states it without flinching.

A generation or so later, Hesiod’s Theogony supplies what Homer omits: parents and kin. The Chimera is born of the monster Typhon and the half-serpent Echidna — the same coupling that produces the worst of the Greek monster-brood — and is sister to the Hydra of the marsh and to the hound Cerberus who keeps the gate of the dead. Hesiod fixes the count of three heads, breathing irresistible fire, great and terrible, swift-footed and strong; and where Homer named only the hero, Hesiod credits the winged horse Pegasus alongside Bellerophon with the kill. The textual line at Theogony 319 is itself contested — scholars from M.L. West onward have argued over whether Echidna or the Hydra is the grammatical mother of the Chimera, the Greek leaving the antecedent genuinely ambiguous — but the function is not in doubt. The Chimera belongs to a family of guardian-monsters, each set as a trial, each in the end overcome.

The brood is worth naming, because the Chimera’s identity is partly its relations. From Typhon and Echidna, in Hesiod’s reckoning, come the dog Orthrus, the hound Cerberus, the Hydra of Lerna, and the Chimera; and the line extends, in one reading of the same passage, to the Nemean Lion and the riddling Sphinx of Thebes. These are not random horrors. They are the standing adversaries of the heroic age — the Lion and the Hydra falling to the labors of Hercules, the Sphinx to Oedipus, the Chimera to Bellerophon — a generation of monsters supplied so that a generation of heroes might be measured against them. The Chimera is the Lycian member of that family, the one set in Anatolia rather than in the Argolid or at Thebes, and its peculiarity within the brood is a matter of kind. Where its sister the Hydra multiplies heads, the Chimera fuses animals: the Hydra’s terror is number, the Chimera’s is combination — a single body that holds together three creatures no body should contain.

The Bellerophon narrative

The story attached to the creature is the Bellerophon story, and its fullest ancient form survives in the Bibliotheca ascribed to Apollodorus. Bellerophon, a Corinthian exile, comes to the court of Proetus to be purified of a killing. The queen — Anteia in Homer, Stheneboea in the tragic tradition — desires him, is refused, and revenges the refusal with a lie, telling her husband that the guest assaulted her. Proetus will not kill a man at his own hearth, a man he has purified; instead he sends Bellerophon to Lycia bearing a folded tablet of deadly signs addressed to his father-in-law, the Lycian king Iobates — a message the carrier cannot read, ordering the carrier’s death. The detail is one of the oldest in Greek narrative: a man sent abroad with the warrant for his own killing sealed in his hand, the proverbial Bellerophontic letter.

Bellerophon on Pegasus attacking the Chimera, a Hellenistic pebble mosaic from Rhodes, about 300-270 BCE. — Photograph by TobyJ, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Iobates, reluctant in turn to murder a guest, sets the impossible task. He sends Bellerophon against the Chimera, expecting the monster to do what hospitality forbids the king to do himself. Bellerophon, mounted on the winged Pegasus, attacks from above, out of the reach of the fire — and in the version the later mythographers preserve, defeats the creature by its own element: he fits a lump of lead to the point of his spear, drives it into the open mouth, and the fire that the Chimera breathes melts the lead, which runs molten down its throat and kills it from within. The detail is a small masterpiece of rationalizing ingenuity, turning the monster’s one terrible weapon into the instrument of its death; it is later than Homer, who says only that the hero trusted in the gods, but it is the form the slaying took once the tradition wanted a method as well as a result.

The fight did not end the trials. Iobates, finding the hero alive, set him next against the warlike Solymi and then the Amazons, and laid an ambush of his own picked men, all of which Bellerophon survived; in the end the king read the gods’ protection correctly, gave Bellerophon his daughter and a share of the kingdom, and the Chimera-killer became a Lycian prince. The monster, in the narrative economy, is the first and hardest of the labors that prove the hero — a function it shares with its sister the Hydra, set as the second of the labors of Hercules, and with the Gorgon Medusa, whose slayer Perseus is the Chimera-killer’s closest analogue: two heroes, two flights, two impossible adversaries killed by indirection rather than by simple force. The lines should not be crossed — Perseus took the Gorgon’s head with a mirrored shield, not a leaded spear, and the deeds are kept distinct in every ancient telling — but the pattern of the monster-as-proof is common to both.

Lycia and the burning mountain

The myth was localized, and the localization was taken seriously in antiquity. The Chimera belongs to Lycia, the mountainous coast of southwestern Anatolia, and ancient writers connected the beast with a specific place: Mount Chimaera, a hillside above the sea where natural gas vents burned with flames that did not go out. Pliny the Elder records the Lycian mountain that flames by night; the fourth-century commentator Servius, glossing Virgil, made the connection plain by reading the monster itself as the mountain — fire at the summit, goats grazing the slopes, snakes among the rocks at the base, the three animals distributed across one burning massif. Whether the flames named the monster or the monster the flames, the geography was held to be real.

The perpetual gas flames at Yanartas — ancient Mount Chimaera — above the Lycian coast in modern Turkey. — Carole Raddato, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

The fires are real, and they still burn. The site, now called Yanartaş — the flaming rock — lies in the Antalya region of modern Turkey, where dozens of vents across a hillside emit gas that ignites on contact with the air and has burned, by the testimony of ancient sailors who steered by it, for at least two and a half thousand years. The gas is chiefly methane and hydrogen, and its origin is unusual: geochemists have traced it largely to abiotic processes deep underground, where water circulating through the iron-rich rock of the Tekirova ophiolite drives a low-temperature reaction — serpentinization — that releases hydrogen, which combines at depth to form methane, the rare ruthenium in the underlying rock acting as a natural catalyst. A mountain that breathes fire of its own making, in the place where the fire-breathing monster was said to live, is the kind of coincidence that the ancient geographers and the modern geochemists have each, in their own register, found worth recording.

Two later lives of the word

In antiquity the Chimera was a fixed image of the impossible composite — a body assembled from parts that nature does not join. From that the word passed into the later European languages with a second life. A chimera came to mean a fancy, an idle or unfounded imagining, something put together in the mind that has no answering reality. The word reached English through Latin chimaera and Old French; the creature is named in English by the late fourteenth century, and by the 1580s the figurative sense — a wild conception, a thing imagined that cannot exist — is in steady use. The two meanings run in parallel: the monster slain in Lycia, and the figure of speech for a delusion, the second long outliving belief in the first. To call a plan a chimera is to call it a thing stitched from incompatible parts, plausible only in the mind that made it.

Bellerophon on Pegasus spears the Chimera, oil on panel by Peter Paul Rubens, about 1635, Musee Bonnat, Bayonne. — Peter Paul Rubens, via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Modern biology has since borrowed the term a third time, and in borrowing it has turned the word back toward its first meaning. A chimera in genetics is a single organism whose cells come from more than one source — two distinct genetic lineages housed in one body. The usage began in botany, for grafted plants of mixed tissue, and passed into zoology and medicine: an animal grown from the fusion of two embryos, a human formed when two fertilized eggs merge early in development to make one person carrying two sets of DNA, the quieter microchimerism by which a mother and the child she carries exchange cells that persist for years. Where the figurative chimera means a thing that cannot exist, the biological chimera is a thing that does — a real single body of mixed origin, which is precisely what the Greek monster was. The word that came to stand for the impossible composite now names a documented one, and in doing so returns to the literal sense it started from.

The allegorist’s reading

Because the creature was so thoroughly a composite, it drew the allegorist early. The first interpreters were rationalizers rather than mystics: Plutarch preserves the notion that the Chimera was really a pirate captain named for the beast, whose ship carried the three animals as figureheads, and Servius, as already noted, read it as the Lycian volcano. From these the tradition moved to decoding rather than explaining away. Late antique and then medieval and Renaissance mythographers, who inherited the Greek monsters as material to be interpreted, read the three animals as the ages of the year — the lion’s vigor, the goat’s fecundity, the serpent’s decline — or as the three passions of the soul, or as the parts of a single divided nature, a beast to be mastered within. These readings are interpretation laid over the myth, the work of commentators centuries after the poets; they are not anything Homer or Hesiod states. What the early texts give is the shape and the death of the thing — a body that should not hold together, and a hero who unmade it.

Texts, scholarship, and the surviving image

The Chimera is reconstructed from a small spread of primary notices, no two of which agree in every particular. The earliest is Homer, Iliad 6.179-183, the notice within Glaucus’s genealogy; the full parentage and the kinship to the Hydra and Cerberus come from Hesiod, Theogony 319-325; the connected Bellerophon narrative, with the molten-lead detail, is fullest in the Bibliotheca of Apollodorus (2.3.1-2), the later mythographic handbook that gathers the scattered tragic and epic versions. Pindar’s thirteenth Olympian and the lost Stheneboea of Euripides supplied material now known only at second hand. For the modern reader the standard synthesis of the whole tangle — the variant parentages, the relation of the Homeric and Hesiodic forms, the spread of the Bellerophon story across the sources — is Timothy Gantz’s Early Greek Myth (1993), and the textual problem at Theogony 319 is set out in M.L. West’s critical edition of the Theogony (1966). The geology of the burning mountain has its own literature: the abiotic origin of the Yanartaş gas was established in a series of geochemical studies, among them the work on the Chimaera seep and the surrounding Tekirova ophiolites, which place the eternal flames within the chemistry of low-temperature serpentinization.

The Chimera of Arezzo, an Etruscan bronze of about 400 BCE, now in the National Archaeological Museum, Florence. — Photograph by Sailko, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

The creature also survives in bronze. The Chimera of Arezzo, an Etruscan casting of about 400 BCE discovered near Arezzo in central Italy in 1553 and claimed for the collection of Cosimo I de’ Medici, shows the beast at the moment of the fight — lion’s body, goat’s head wrenched back from the spine, serpent’s tail curling to strike — and carries on its right foreleg the inscribed dedication tinscvil, a gift to the Etruscan high god Tin. It was once part of a group that included the mounted hero, the Etruscans having taken the Greek monster as readily as they took the Greek gods. The bronze, now in Florence, is among the finest survivals of Etruscan art, and it fixes the Chimera’s canonical form for later European eyes more durably than any single text.

What the Greeks built into a single body — and what later readers found they had a word for only because the Chimera had given them one — is the thought of a thing assembled from parts that cannot belong together, fearsome precisely because it should not cohere and does.

→ Related: Orpheus · Themis · Vulcan · Pluto · Hydra · Cerberus · Lycia · Perseus · Jason · Python