Brahman

← Encyclopedia

Brahman is the name Indian thought gives to the ultimate reality — the single ground from which everything proceeds, in which everything subsists, and into which everything returns. The word is older than the speculation built on it: in the early hymns it meant the sacred utterance, the charged formula of the priest, and only later came to name the power those formulas were thought to touch, and at last the absolute itself.

The decisive move belongs to the Upanishads, the speculative texts that close the Vedic corpus. There the question of what underlies the cosmos is folded together with the question of what underlies the person, and the two answers are made one. Brahman, the ground of the world, is declared to be the same as atman, the self at the core of the individual — not the passing self of memory and desire, but what remains when those are stripped away. The great formulas compress the claim to a few syllables: tat tvam asi, “that thou art”; ayam atma brahma, “this self is Brahman.” The reality sought outside, in other words, is held to be identical with the reality found within.

How that identity is to be understood became the dividing line of later Vedanta. Śankara, in the eighth century, read it without remainder: Brahman alone is real, the manifold world is appearance laid over it by ignorance, and liberation is the waking recognition that the self was never separate from the absolute at all. Rāmānuja, centuries later, refused the collapse — for him Brahman is a personal God of whom souls and world are the real body, distinct yet wholly dependent, so that devotion, not mere knowledge, completes the path. Both claimed the same scriptures; the difference is not a quarrel over data but over what oneness can mean.

Two registers of Brahman run through the texts and are usually distinguished by interpreters. Nirguna Brahman is the absolute “without qualities,” approachable only by negation — the famous neti, neti, “not this, not this,” which clears away every predicate as inadequate. Saguna Brahman is the same reality “with qualities,” the personal lord who can be worshipped and addressed. Whether these are two truths or two vantages on one truth is itself a contested question.

The resemblance to other traditions of an ineffable First is real and has drawn comparison for as long as the texts have been read in the West — the One beyond being in the Neoplatonists, the hidden Godhead of the negative theologians. The structures rhyme: a source past all naming, reached by unsaying rather than asserting, and a self somehow continuous with it. The echoes are worth tracing and easy to overstate. Brahman is not a god among the gods, and not quite the creator-from-nothing of the monotheisms; it is what those figures, in this grammar, are themselves grounded in. The tradition’s own last word on it is mostly silence, or the patient subtraction that silence completes.

→ In the library: The Upanishads (Müller, SBE I & XV) · Śankara — The Vedânta-Sûtras (Thibaut) · The Crest-Jewel of Wisdom (Johnston, 1925)

→ Related: The One · Gnosis · Vishnu · Avatar · Neoplatonism