Bodh Gaya

← Encyclopedia

In the Buddha’s lifetime there was no Bodh Gaya. There was a village called Uruvela on the bank of a river then named the Nairanjana, in the country of Magadha, with a stretch of forest beside it and a farmer’s daughter named Sujata who one morning carried out a bowl of milk-rice to a thin man sitting under a tree. The name Bodh Gaya is recent — eighteenth-century, by the usual reckoning, displacing older names the place had carried in between: Sambodhi, Vajrasana, Mahabodhi, each of them a way of saying the awakening or the seat of it. The town renamed itself after the event. What happened under the tree was held to be of such weight that everything around it — the village, the river, the ground — was eventually reorganized as its setting.

Uruvela: the place before the name

The man under the tree had spent six years in the forests of Magadha as an extreme ascetic, starving the body toward release, and had concluded that the method failed. Sujata’s offering — a thickened milk-rice, in the traditional telling her gift to the spirit of a sacred tree, given by mistake to the gaunt seeker she took for that spirit — restored him enough to abandon the austerities and sit. He crossed the river, took a seat beneath a pipal, the sacred fig (Ficus religiosa), facing east, and resolved not to rise until he had seen through the cause of suffering. Through the night he was assailed by Mara, the tempter, who marshaled armies and daughters against him; near dawn the seeker touched the earth with his right hand, calling the ground itself to witness his right to the seat, and the earth answered. At first light, on the full-moon day of the month of Vaisakha, he saw what he had set out to see. He rose the Buddha — the Awakened One.

This is the founding scene the place exists to mark. The historical questions around it stay separate and stay open: the field places the Buddha’s life somewhere in the fifth or early fourth century BCE, the older convention of about 528 BCE for the awakening now treated as traditional rather than secure, and Uruvela’s identification with the present site rests on a long chain of pilgrim memory rather than on any contemporary record. What is not in doubt is that within two centuries the spot was already being visited as the place of the event, and that the visiting has not stopped since.

The earliest hard datum is imperial. The emperor Ashoka, about 250 BCE — some two centuries after the awakening, by the tradition’s own count — came to the tree, venerated it, and raised the first shrine on the ground. From near his reign survives a polished sandstone slab, the vajrasana or “diamond throne,” its low-relief border of geese and palmettes carrying the unmistakable signature of Mauryan stonework. Set against the western face of the tree, it marks the exact seat. In the understanding of the tradition it is not a representation of the place of awakening but that place itself: the literal ground the Buddha touched, hard as adamant, the one point of the earth able to bear the weight of a being passing into perfect stillness.

The Mahabodhi Temple at Bodh Gaya; the Bodhi tree, descendant of the tree of the awakening, stands at left behind the seated monks. — Bpilgrim, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.5)

The seat where every buddha wakes

What makes Bodh Gaya the navel of the Buddhist world is not only that one man awakened here. It is the claim, developed across the tradition’s cosmology, that this is the bodhimanda — the seat, or circle, or terrace of awakening — the single point on which the awakening of any buddha, in any age of the world, must take place. The geography is not incidental and not repeatable. When the world is destroyed at the end of an aeon, the bodhimanda is held to be the last thing to vanish and the first to reappear; when a new world forms, it forms around this seat. The pilgrim-monk Xuanzang, who passed through in the seventh century, set the logic down plainly: were this ground not as hard as diamond, no part of the earth could support a being entering the stillness of complete awakening. Every buddha of an age comes here because there is nowhere else the event can be held.

This converts a biographical fact into a cosmological one. Sarnath, where the Buddha first taught, and Kushinagar, where he died, mark moments in one life; Bodh Gaya marks a structural feature of the cosmos. The distinction matters for how the place is read. A birthplace and a death-place are accidents of where a particular person happened to be; the bodhimanda is held to be a property of reality, a feature the world would possess even if this Buddha had never lived, waiting for whoever would come and sit on it. The awakening that happened here was not the production of something new but the seeing of something always true — the chain of dependent origination, the conditioned arising and ceasing of all things, the absence of any abiding self (anatta) within the round of rebirth. Tradition holds that the content of the awakened state is the same for every buddha because what is seen is the same; and so the place where it is seen is the same. The seat under the tree is, in this reading, the most fixed point in an impermanent world.

The story does not end at dawn. The tradition fills the weeks after the awakening with a sacred geography of stations, each now marked on the ground within a few hundred paces of the throne. The Buddha is held to have remained seven days more beneath the tree, gazing at it unblinking; then to have paced a jeweled walk, the chankramana, between the tree and a second spot to the north; then to have contemplated the tree from the place later called the Animeshlochana, the “unblinking” shrine; then to have meditated under the storm at the edge of a pool, where the serpent-king Muchalinda is said to have risen from the water and spread his sevenfold hood above the seated figure to shelter him from the rain. The naga sheltering the Buddha — a coil of serpent below, a canopy of cobra-hoods above — becomes one of the most reproduced images in Buddhist art, and the pond at Bodh Gaya is shown as the place it happened. The town is, in effect, a map of the first seven weeks of the religion, walked rather than read.

The tree and its long descent

At the center of all of it stands a tree, and the tree is itself a lineage. The present pipal at Bodh Gaya is no relic but a successor many times over, held to descend by an unbroken chain of cuttings from the tree of the awakening. That descent is, remarkably, partly documented — and partly a circle.

The original tree had a violent history. The Sri Lankan chronicle tradition records that a sapling was carried to the island in the third century BCE by Sanghamitta, daughter of Ashoka, and planted at Anuradhapura as the Jaya Sri Maha Bodhi; the Mahavamsa gives its planting as 288 BCE, which would make it the oldest human-planted tree with a recorded planting date still living. Meanwhile the parent tree at Bodh Gaya was repeatedly destroyed and regrown. The chronicles name a queen, Tissarakkha, who is said to have had it killed out of jealousy around 254 BCE; tradition charges the Shunga king Pushyamitra with damaging it in the second century BCE; and the most consequential assault is dated about 600 CE, when King Shashanka of Gauda, a Shaiva hostile to Buddhism, is recorded by Xuanzang as cutting the tree down and clearing its roots. The Magadha king Purnavarma is said to have restored it from a surviving root and walled it round to head off the next attempt. Each felling was answered by a replanting from a saved cutting.

The circle closes in the colonial nineteenth century. When the old tree at Bodh Gaya finally fell — weakened, storm-struck, and gone by the 1870s — the line that replaced it was drawn back from Sri Lanka. The archaeologist Alexander Cunningham planted the present tree in 1881, raised, in the usual account, from the Anuradhapura stock that the parent tree had founded two thousand years before. The daughter-tree preserved the descent the mother-tree had lost, and gave it back. What is venerated at Bodh Gaya is therefore not an object but a continuity — a single living thing maintained across more than two millennia by deliberate human propagation, cut and carried and replanted whenever the world tried to end it.

The Great Buddha statue at Bodh Gaya, some twenty-five meters high, consecrated in November 1989 under Japanese (Daijokyo) patronage — one of many national presences in the modern pilgrimage town. — Andrew Moore, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 2.0)

First of the four

Bodh Gaya is the holiest of four places, and the four were named, in the tradition’s account, by the Buddha himself. The Mahaparinibbana Sutta, the long narrative of his last days, has him tell his attendant Ananda of the places “a pious person should visit and look upon with feelings of reverence”: where the Buddha was born (Lumbini), where he attained supreme enlightenment (Bodh Gaya), where he first set rolling the Wheel of the Dhamma (Sarnath), and where he passed into final Nibbana (Kushinagar). One who dies with a believing heart while making such a journey, the text adds, will be reborn in a happy realm. The instruction is given as the Buddha is dying, and it has the character of a bequest: these, he tells Ananda in the canonical account of his last days, are the places “which a pious person should visit and look upon with feelings of reverence.” The four pilgrimage places of Buddhism descend directly from this passage, and Bodh Gaya — the place of the awakening that is the origin of everything the Buddha had to teach — stands first among them.

Pilgrimage to these sites was established early. Within the first two centuries after the Buddha’s death the visiting of the great sites had already become a fixture of the community’s life, and the road between birthplace, awakening-place, teaching-place, and death-place became the oldest map the religion kept. What Bodh Gaya commemorates is not a deity but an event, and that shapes how it is used. Pilgrims come to circumambulate the temple and the tree, to prostrate, to recite, and above all to sit — for the ground is held to make meditation easier, charged by what once happened on it, the same earth that bore the original awakening still bearing those who seek it. The tall brick tower that rises over the seat, the Mahabodhi Temple — a Gupta-age shikhara of about the fifth or sixth century over the Ashokan foundation, much rebuilt — gives the place its skyline, but the object of the pilgrimage is older and lower: the throne, and the tree above it, and the patch of ground between.

Ruin, recovery, and a contested sanctity

For long stretches the place was nearly lost. By the medieval period the surrounding country had largely ceased to be Buddhist; the monastic universities of the eastern Gangetic plain, Nalanda among them, were sacked in the late twelfth and early thirteenth centuries, and the community that tended Bodh Gaya thinned and went. The great tower stood through long generations half-derelict, silted by the river and the seasons, a ruin the country around it knew but no longer thronged. Pilgrims still came from the Buddhist lands beyond India — Burmese and Sri Lankan missions are recorded attempting repairs across the centuries — but the living congregation at the seat was gone. Into that vacancy in 1590 came a Shaiva ascetic, who founded a monastery by the temple and took the title of mahant; for roughly three centuries the holiest place of the Buddhist world was held as the property of his Hindu lineage, who performed their own rites at and around it.

The modern recovery began with a paradox: the shrine was substantially rebuilt by outsiders before it was reclaimed by Buddhists. In the 1870s the Burmese crown obtained leave to renovate the temple; the work was judged destructive and the British administration took it over, and under Alexander Cunningham, founder of the Archaeological Survey of India, the temple was excavated and reconstructed across the 1880s. The contest over who the restored shrine belonged to opened in 1891, when the Sri Lankan reformer Anagarika Dharmapala, stricken at finding the place of the awakening in a Shaiva math’s keeping, founded the Maha Bodhi Society to campaign for its return. The dispute went to court and into politics; a provisional settlement came with Indian independence, when the Bodh Gaya Temple Act of 1949 vested the shrine in a management committee drawn from both communities. The arrangement institutionalized the shared claim rather than dissolving it, and the argument over custody — whether the holiest Buddhist site should be governed by Buddhists, as Hindu temples are by Hindus and mosques by Muslims, or whether the math’s long stewardship is itself part of the site’s history — continues into the present.

The Mahabodhi Temple photographed in 1880, after the nineteenth-century conservation — a museum copy of the record that fixed the recovered shrine. — Sumitsurai, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The town the awakening built

The modern pilgrimage town is the strangest outcome of the long history, and the most vivid sign of the seat’s pull. Around the recovered temple has grown a ring of monasteries built by the Buddhist nations of the world, each in its own architectural idiom — Thai, Bhutanese, Tibetan, Japanese, Burmese, Sri Lankan, Vietnamese, Bangladeshi, and more — so that a short walk through Bodh Gaya passes through a survey of the whole Buddhist world rendered in brick and gilding. A monumental seated Buddha some twenty-five meters high, raised under Japanese patronage and consecrated in 1989, presides over the southern end of the town. In winter the Tibetan schools gather here for the great Monlam prayer-festivals, filling the precinct with tens of thousands; in spring the full-moon of Vaisakha draws pilgrims from every tradition to the day of the awakening itself. A site that doctrine and lineage would otherwise divide — the Mahayana and the southern schools, the tantric and the plain — is unified by geography, because whatever else separates them, the seat under the tree is one seat.

In 2002 the Mahabodhi Temple Complex was inscribed as a UNESCO World Heritage Site — the tower, the diamond throne, the Bodhi tree, and the votive stupas within the enclosure — recognized at once for its antiquity, for its place in the history of brick architecture, and for its living centrality to a world religion. The recognition arrived as a kind of bookend: the place that the medieval world nearly forgot, and that the colonial world dug back out of the silt, entered the twenty-first century as one of the most visited sacred sites on earth. The tree has been cut down and grown again more than once; the throne has been buried and exhumed; the town has emptied and refilled. The seat itself, the tradition holds, never moved.

→ Related: Gautama Buddha · Buddhism · Sarnath · Buddha · Nirvana · Dependent Origination · Dhammacakkappavattana Sutta · Mahabodhi Temple · Gaya · Varanasi · Mount Hiei · Vajrabodhi · Meditation · Karma · Mahayana · Tibetan Buddhism · Hinduism · Samsara · Anatta · Moksha