As Above, So Below

← Encyclopedia

“As above, so below” is the most quoted sentence in Western esotericism: the claim that the higher and lower orders of reality mirror one another — that the pattern of the heavens repeats in the earth, and the pattern of the cosmos in the human being. It is also a compression. The text it comes from says something longer and stranger: that what is below is like what is above, and what is above like what is below, to accomplish the wonders of the one thing.

That text is the Emerald Tablet, a page of cryptic instruction attributed to Hermes Trismegistus. Its pedigree is not what its admirers believed. It does not appear in the Corpus Hermeticum; its earliest known versions are Arabic, embedded in works of the early Islamic centuries — most famously a Book of the Secret of Creation attributed to Apollonius of Tyana, of the late eighth or early ninth century — and it reached Europe in Latin translations from the twelfth century onward. The discovery legend is as old as the text itself: in the Secret of Creation’s frame-tale the sage finds a crypt beneath a statue of Hermes, and within it the tablet, held by a seated old man. The 1650 English preface to the Divine Pymander, in the library’s holdings, repeats a later version in which it is discovered in a valley after the Flood. The legends are testimony to the text’s authority, not its origin.

The maxim’s own wording has a history. In the oldest Arabic recensions the relation is not likeness but descent: “that which is above is from that which is below, and that which is below is from that which is above, working the miracles of one thing,” in E. J. Holmyard’s translation. Hugo of Santalla, its first Latin translator (c. 1145–1151), kept that “from” — superiora de inferioribus, inferiora de superioribus — and his version barely circulated. The one that conquered Europe was an anonymous twelfth-century translation now called the vulgate, where descent has become resemblance: quod est superius est sicut quod inferius, et quod inferius est sicut quod est superius, ad preparanda miracula rei unius. Early printings begin instead from below, the order everyone quotes; a third carrier, the pseudo-Aristotelian Secretum secretorum, reached Latin through Philip of Tripoli in the thirteenth century and has been called the most popular book of the Latin Middle Ages. No scribe set the versions side by side; done now, the comparison records a quiet change of doctrine: a cosmos whose levels are born of one another became one whose levels resemble one another. The famous mirror owes something to a translator.

For the alchemists the Tablet was a charter document. Its account of a single thing whose power ascends from earth to heaven and descends again read as the program of the laboratory work itself, and writers cite it the way lawyers cite statute — the seventeenth-century tracts in the library invoke “noble Hermes in his Smaragdine Table” mid-argument, expecting no objection. Isaac Newton left a manuscript English rendering of the vulgate among his alchemical papers: “that which is below is like that which is above & that which is above is like that which is below to do the miracles of one only thing.”

The maxim was never merely quoted; it was operated. Astrology runs on it: the legible sky is correspondence equipped with instruments. Renaissance philosophy widened it into a picture of the world: a web of correspondences binding planets, metals, plants, and the human body, in which the microcosm of man repeats the macrocosm in miniature. Marsilio Ficino’s De vita (1489) built a medicine on that web, teaching how the life of the heavens might be drawn into body and spirit; Cornelius Agrippa opened his De occulta philosophia (1533) with the architecture itself — a threefold world, elemental, celestial, and intellectual, in which “every inferior is governed by its superior, and receiveth the influence of the vertues thereof,” as the 1651 English translation has it. Magic, astrology, and early medicine all worked inside that building.

The wording most people now know — “As above, so below; as below, so above” — comes from none of these. The short form was already loose in the nineteenth century: Helena Blavatsky used it from Isis Unveiled (1877) onward as a free-standing axiom, read through Swedenborg’s correspondences. The double formula is the Kybalion’s, a New Thought work published pseudonymously in Chicago in 1908, which lists it second among seven Hermetic laws: the “Principle of Correspondence.” The Kybalion is a modern book wearing antique dress, and its maxim is a paraphrase doing new work: where the medieval Tablet narrates the career of one thing through a continuous cosmos, the Kybalion offers a general law of planes, a tool by which the student may “reason intelligently from the Known to the Unknown.” It is also, by now, the door through which most readers first enter this material — which is its own kind of correspondence: a twentieth-century echo of a medieval Latin rendering of an Arabic text ascribed to an Egyptian god. The echoes continue — the site’s entry on quantum entanglement takes up the most recent.

What the maxim asserts — likeness between levels, as a key that turns — remains the working intuition of the whole Hermetic current. Read one way it is a method; read another, a metaphysics. The Tablet, characteristically, does not say which.

→ In the library: The Kybalion (1908)

→ Related: Emanation · Hermes Trismegistus · Apollonius Of Tyana · Arabic Hermetica · Alchemy · Astrology · Renaissance Hermetism · Cornelius Agrippa · New Thought American Metaphysical Religion · Quantum Entanglement