Alice Bailey

← Encyclopedia

She supported three children by gutting fish. The woman who would name the Hierarchy, stage the Great Invocation, and seed half the vocabulary of the late-century New Age first arrived at her vocation through a sardine cannery on the Monterey coast, an evangelical childhood gone quiet, and a marriage that had carried her from English garrison work in India to a separation in California. From that low point the line runs in one direction: toward a corpus of twenty-four books, an international school of correspondence-discipleship, and a planetary scheme of energies and Masters that Alice Bailey insisted she had not invented but received.

Alice Ann Bailey was born Alice La Trobe-Bateman in Manchester on 16 June 1880, into an aristocratic but emotionally austere household; her mother died when she was six, her father when she was nine, and she and a sister passed into the care of paternal grandparents. An Anglican evangelical conversion in her teens drew her into YMCA welfare work at British military canteens in India, where the religious seriousness began. There she met Walter Evans, an American she married in 1907; he became an Episcopal seminarian and the marriage took her to the United States. It produced three daughters, broke down by 1915, and ended in divorce by 1919. In the interval she worked, by her own account in The Unfinished Autobiography (1951), at Pacific Grove to feed her children. Two English Theosophists at the local lodge put Blavatsky’s The Secret Doctrine into her hands, and the second half of her life began.

From Krotona to the break

By 1917 she had entered the Esoteric Section of the Theosophical Society; by 1918 she was living at Krotona, the Society’s community in the Hollywood hills; by 1919 she edited its American journal The Messenger. There she met Foster Bailey, an American Theosophist whom she married in 1921. And there, in November 1919, the encounter occurred that defines everything after it: a master she would call only the Tibetan, or by the initials D.K., or Djwhal Khul, asked her — she said — to take dictation. The first result was Initiation, Human and Solar.

The provenance of that voice stands as her testimony, neither to be endorsed nor refuted. Djwhal Khul appears in Blavatsky’s scheme as one of the lesser-ranked Mahatmas, and Bailey set him within the same hierarchy of Masters the Society already taught. She was careful, repeatedly, to distinguish her process from trance mediumship: she was conscious throughout, she said, free to question or refuse what was impressed on her, and free to shape the English. The historian of Tibet Donald S. Lopez, surveying the Western imagining of Tibet that Blavatsky’s Mahatma letters had opened, notes that no extant Tibetan Buddhist lineage holder corresponds to the name Djwhal Khul — the figure belongs to the Western occult imaginary rather than to any cataloged teacher of Tibetan Buddhism. That is a statement about the documentary record. Whether a Master spoke is not the historian’s question; that Bailey said one did, and wrote nineteen books on that basis, is documented.

The split from the Society followed fast. By 1920 the Baileys were in open conflict with Annie Besant’s Adyar leadership, ostensibly over editorial control of The Messenger. The deeper friction was that Bailey’s Tibetan trespassed on a monopoly: Charles Webster Leadbeater, Besant’s lieutenant, already claimed the channel to the Masters, and the Society around them was at that moment staking everything on a different reception — the young Jiddu Krishnamurti, groomed by Leadbeater and Besant as the vehicle of a coming World Teacher. Bailey’s was a rival voice in a house that had room for only one. In 1920 the Baileys left, or were pushed out, and went to New York. The institutional work of her life began there, on the far side of Theosophy proper.

The three pillars

The Baileys built four interlocking bodies in fifteen years. The first was the publishing arm, incorporated in 1922 as the Lucifer Publishing Company — named, openly and on the record, for Blavatsky’s own London magazine Lucifer (1887-1897), both titles invoking the Latin lucifer, light-bearer. It was renamed the Lucis Publishing Company in 1924-25. The name history matters because a strand of conspiratorial literature has rebuilt it into a covert Lucifer Trust, pointing in particular to the trust’s consultative status with the United Nations Economic and Social Council, held on the NGO roster since 1989. The documentary facts are flat: the original name was Lucifer Publishing Company; it was changed in the mid-1920s; lucis is correct Latin for of light; and roster consultative status is shared by hundreds of religious, educational, and humanitarian NGOs. The conspiratorial reading is a sociological phenomenon worth naming and not worth amplifying.

The trust proper, Lucis Trust, was the holding body. Inside it Bailey and Foster founded the Arcane School in 1923 — a correspondence school of meditation, study, and service, binding its students, on the Tibetan’s instruction, by no pledges or oaths and permitting free interpretation. It charges no tuition, runs on donation, and moves through graded degrees of discipleship, with senior students serving as correspondence secretaries to those at earlier stages. Its meditative year is anchored on three full-moon festivals: the Aries full moon kept as the festival of the Christ, the Taurus full moon as the festival of the Buddha (Wesak), and the Gemini full moon as the festival of humanity. Two further activities completed the architecture — World Goodwill, founded in 1932 as a service body addressed to what Bailey called right human relations, and Triangles, founded in 1937, in which any three people agree to link daily in thought and use the Great Invocation. The festivals, the school’s degrees, and the Triangles cell are matters of structure and meaning, not of method; the schools are living institutions and the practice itself is theirs to teach.

The corpus and the three fires

The doctrine lives in the books — twenty-four of them, written between November 1919 and her death in 1949. Five she presented as her own unaided work, among them The Consciousness of the Atom (1922), The Soul and Its Mechanism (1930), and the late Unfinished Autobiography. Nineteen she attributed to the Tibetan, the series running from Initiation, Human and Solar (1922) and Letters on Occult Meditation (1922) through to the posthumously assembled The Rays and the Initiations (1960).

The 1922 first edition of Initiation, Human and Solar, the first book Bailey said she took in dictation from the Tibetan, issued by the Lucifer Publishing Company. — Lucifer Publishing Co., New York (1922), via Wikimedia Commons (public domain)

Its systematic center is A Treatise on Cosmic Fire (1925), more than thirteen hundred pages, which Bailey offered as the direct modern continuation of Blavatsky’s Secret Doctrine — built, she said, around a set of Stanzas of Dzyan the Tibetan supplied, the same archaic source-text Blavatsky had drawn on. Where the Secret Doctrine is a cosmogony, Cosmic Fire is a treatise on three fires: electric fire, the fire of spirit; solar fire, the fire of consciousness; and fire by friction, the fire of matter. Their interplay through a graded order of planes and rays is the engine of all manifestation, and every later book extends its taxonomy. The 1925 first edition is in the public domain in the United States, the United Kingdom, and the European Union; the full text of the 1922 Initiation, Human and Solar is likewise freely available.

From that root grows the system she is best remembered for: the Seven Rays. Seven primary streams of divine energy condition everything that exists — Will or Power; Love-Wisdom; Active Intelligence; Harmony through Conflict; Concrete Knowledge or Science; Devotion or Idealism; Ceremonial Order or Magic. Each human being carries a ray structure — a soul ray, a personality ray, and rays governing mind, emotion, and body — and so do nations, historical epochs, and the kingdoms of nature. The codified statement is not a single book but a five-volume Treatise on the Seven Rays, published serially from 1936 to 1960: two volumes of esoteric psychology, then esoteric astrology, then esoteric healing, then the initiations. The naming pattern is itself the key to Bailey’s rhetoric. She calls the work science — esoteric psychology, esoteric astrology, esoteric healing — while it rests entirely on revelatory authority, the Tibetan’s dictation. Both registers run at once, and the scientific vocabulary should not be mistaken for empirical natural science; the structure analyzed by Olav Hammer as a strategy of esoteric legitimation is the post-Blavatskyan one, claiming the prestige of science for knowledge derived from revelation.

A separate strand of the corpus reaches toward the East directly. The Light of the Soul (1927) is Bailey’s own English paraphrase of the Yoga Sutras of Patanjali, with running commentary keyed to her ray cosmology — one of the routes by which classical yoga entered the Western esoteric vocabulary of the period, alongside reincarnation, which Bailey inherited from Theosophy and treated throughout as the basic mechanism of the soul’s development.

The Invocation and the Reappearance

In the late 1930s and the war years the work turned from cosmology to a kind of planetary liturgy. The Great Invocation, Bailey said, was released by the Tibetan in three stages — a first stanza in 1935, a second in 1940, and the third and now most-used stanza in April 1945, as the European war ended. The text remains in active Lucis Trust copyright and is not reproduced; what can be described is its architecture. It is a short invocatory poem calling light, love, and purpose down from a divine source through the planetary Hierarchy into humanity, and asking that the Plan work out on earth — written to be said by anyone of any faith, translated, by the trust’s account, into more than eighty languages. It is the verbal core of the Triangles work and of the festivals.

Around it Bailey set a mediating body: the New Group of World Servers, announced in 1932 as the non-organizational, non-membership company of people of goodwill through whom the Hierarchy’s Plan would reach the world — a group one belongs to by what one does, in any field, rather than by joining anything. The eschatology that frames it is explicit. The Reappearance of the Christ (1948) presents the second coming not as a distant apocalypse but as an imminent return for the Aquarian age, conditional on humanity’s own achievement of right human relations — and identifies this returning Christ, in the Buddhist register, with Maitreya, the coming World Teacher at the head of the Hierarchy. It is a reading of the second coming drawn out of Christian expectation and folded into the Theosophical scheme of Masters. The most prominent later carrier of this messianism was the Scottish painter Benjamin Creme, who from 1975 announced that Maitreya had descended and was living in London — a chronology Creme said he drew directly from Bailey; his repeated predictions of a public emergence went unfulfilled.

Bailey died in New York on 15 December 1949. Foster Bailey continued as Arcane School director; a 1956 schism split off the School for Esoteric Studies; the living lineages today include the Arcane School under Lucis Trust, the School for Esoteric Studies, Meditation Mount in Ojai, and the online Morya Federation. She is, on the consensus of scholarship of modern esoteric movements, the single most important conduit by which Theosophical occultism entered the popular spirituality of the later twentieth century.

Reception, scholarship, and the hard passages

Bailey’s standing in the study of modern esotericism rests on a specific claim about influence. James R. Lewis and J. Gordon Melton, introducing Perspectives on the New Age (SUNY, 1992), name Theosophy — and Bailey’s mediation of it in particular — as the most important single source of both the transformative metaphor of a coming age and the term New Age itself. Wouter Hanegraaff, in New Age Religion and Western Culture (Brill 1996; SUNY 1998), reads the movement as in large part a popularization and secularization of Western esoteric currents, with Bailey’s vocabulary supplying its lingua franca: the New Age as a period, the Plan, the Hierarchy, the Ascended Masters, the New Group of World Servers, planetary meditation. Steven Sutcliffe’s Children of the New Age (Routledge, 2003) traces the institutional and biographical channels by which that language traveled, often unattributed. Hammer’s Claiming Knowledge (Brill, 2001) supplies the analytic frame for the corpus’s authority, situating the Djwhal Khul dictation among the legitimation strategies that carried esoteric knowledge from Theosophy into the New Age.

No honest account can stop there. The late corpus contains a recurring discursive complex Bailey names the Jewish problem, concentrated in Esoteric Psychology I (1936), Esoteric Healing (1953), and The Externalisation of the Hierarchy (1957). Among its statements: that the Jews are paying the price, factually and symbolically, for all they have done in the past; and that the Jewish problem will be solved by intermarriage while, in the same passage, denying the same resolution to others on racial grounds. These are not stray asides; they are woven into the doctrinal fabric of the late books, and they sit alongside a racial-hierarchical cast that pervades the root-race inheritance from Blavatsky. The passages have been named in the scholarly literature on esotericism and antisemitism — Victor Shnirelman’s work for the Vidal Sassoon International Center at the Hebrew University (1998) identifies racist and antisemitic trends in Bailey’s teachings, and she is among the figures treated in Richard S. Levy’s Antisemitism: A Historical Encyclopedia (ABC-CLIO, 2005). The Lucis Trust itself acknowledges and addresses the passages in a public statement, conceding that they have raised questions among readers of goodwill since the books first appeared. They are set down in full, because a system that asks to be read as a science of right human relations must be read with its own words on the race question in view.

The corpus, then, presents two faces that the reader is asked to hold at once: a vast, internally coherent architecture of energies, rays, Masters, and an unfolding Plan, written from inside the conviction that it was given; and a documentary record — of a Manchester orphan turned channel, of institutions still running, of a vocabulary that outpaced its source, and of passages no admirer can read past. The two faces do not resolve into each other. The work has been read, ever since, by those who take up the architecture and by those who cannot get past what the same hand set down about race and nation — and the difficulty for any reader is that both are the work of the orphan-turned-channel who said a Tibetan dictated it.

→ Related: Helena Blavatsky · Theosophy · Theosophical Society · Maitreya · Second Coming · Esotericism · Occultism · Meditation · Astrology · Patanjali · Yoga · Reincarnation · Tibetan Buddhism · Rudolf Steiner · Jiddu Krishnamurti