Zechariah

← Encyclopedia

In the second year of Darius — 520 BCE, by the dating the text itself supplies — a voice comes to a man in Jerusalem and the word is reproach before it is promise: the fathers are gone, the prophets who warned them are gone, and the warnings came true. This is the opening of the Book of Zechariah, and the man who receives it is named there as Zechariah, son of Berechiah, grandson of Iddo, a figure of the early Persian period whose oracles run from that plain summons into some of the strangest visionary material in the Hebrew Bible. He is not the priest Zechariah of Luke’s gospel, the father of John the Baptist — a separate and much later figure who shares only the name, and whose story belongs to a different century and a different testament.

The setting is a small, struggling community of returned exiles. Babylon had razed the Temple in 587 BCE and carried Judah’s leadership into captivity; the Persian conquest of Babylon under Cyrus had then permitted a return and a rebuilding, but the work had stalled for nearly two decades amid poverty, discouragement, and the friction of a province under imperial administration. Into that stall step two prophets at once. Haggai, whose brief oracles are gathered in the Book of Haggai, speaks in the same months of the same year, prodding the people in blunt economic terms: their houses are paneled while the house of God lies in ruins. Zechariah’s word arrives beside Haggai’s and carries the same end — finish the Temple — but reaches it by a wholly different road, through images that must be interpreted rather than commands that can simply be obeyed.

The precision of the dating is itself part of the book’s character. The visionary night is anchored to the twenty-fourth day of the eleventh month in the second year of Darius, and the later oracles of the first half carry their own datelines down to the day. This is a prophet writing not at the edge of a collapse but inside an administration, in a province of the Achaemenid empire whose calendar he keeps. The grand restoration he is shown — the Lord returning to a crowded, unwalled, light-flooded Jerusalem — is held against a stubbornly modest present: a half-built sanctuary, a discouraged remnant, a governor and a priest doing the unglamorous work of getting a foundation laid. Much of the book’s force comes from that gap between the scale of the vision and the smallness of the occasion, and from the insistence that the small occasion is the place where the large promise begins.

The eight night visions

The book divides sharply in two, and the prophet’s profile changes across the seam. Chapters one through eight are built around eight visions reported in the first person and received, the text says, in a single night. The sequence runs in an order that has the symmetry of a deliberate composition: a man riding a red horse among the myrtle trees in a glen, with riders behind him who have patrolled the earth and found it at rest; four horns that scattered Judah and four smiths come to cast them down; a man with a measuring line going out to measure Jerusalem, told that the city will be too full to wall; the high priest Joshua — Joshua son of Jehozadak, not the conqueror of the older book — standing in filthy garments before an accusing figure and re-clothed in clean ones; a golden lampstand flanked by two olive trees that feed it; a flying scroll that carries a curse across the land; a woman named Wickedness sealed inside a basket and carried off on stork’s wings to the land of Shinar, which is Babylon; and four chariots issuing from between two mountains of bronze to the four winds of heaven.

What binds the eight is not their imagery but their grammar. Each vision is shown and then explained, and the explanation comes through a figure who stands between the prophet and what he sees — an interpreting angel who answers the prophet’s repeated question, “What are these, my lord?” The prophet does not decode the images by his own skill; he is told. This device — the seer who sees and the celestial guide who interprets — is one of Zechariah’s lasting contributions to the literature that came after him. The older prophets had heard the word of the Lord and spoken it; here the word arrives as a coded scene and requires a mediator to be read at all, and that structure becomes a standard furniture of later apocalyptic, recurring in Daniel, in the Book of Enoch, and onward.

These chapters keep the rebuilding steadily in view. They name Zerubbabel the governor — a descendant of the house of David, set at the head of the returned community — and Joshua the high priest, and they hold the two together as a pair: two olive trees, two anointed ones standing by the Lord of the whole earth. The lampstand vision turns on a word given to Zerubbabel that the mountain of obstruction will become a plain, and that the work will be finished not by force or by power but by spirit. Joshua’s re-clothing is a public absolution, the priesthood purified and reinstated for a sanctuary about to function again. The Temple’s restoration is folded into a wider promise: that the God of Israel is returning to dwell in Jerusalem, that the exiles scattered to the corners of the earth will be gathered, and that nations will come to seek the Lord in the city they once besieged.

Second Zechariah

Chapters nine through fourteen are different in kind, and historical scholarship has long held them to be later work gathered under the same name — conventionally called Second Zechariah, or Deutero-Zechariah. The dated visions and the named contemporaries fall away. There is no Zerubbabel here, no Joshua, no interpreting angel asking and answering; there are instead two long, untitled oracular blocks (chapters nine to eleven and twelve to fourteen) given to sweeping and often violent pictures of an end. A king comes to Jerusalem humble and riding on a donkey, on the foal of a donkey, and his dominion reaches to the ends of the earth. A worthless shepherd is broken; thirty pieces of silver, the price of a slave, are thrown into the house of the Lord. A figure is pierced, and the city mourns over the one it pierced as for an only child. The nations are massed against Jerusalem and the Mount of Olives is split in two; a fountain is opened for cleansing; living waters flow out east and west, in summer and in winter; and on a final day the Lord becomes king over all the earth and his name one.

The seam between the two halves is among the more closely studied in the prophetic canon. The vocabulary shifts, the historical anchoring dissolves, and a passing reference in chapter nine to the “sons of Greece” has long been read as a marker of a later horizon — by some, of the world after Alexander, though the phrase alone does not settle the matter. Where the prophet of the visions ends and the editors of the oracles begin is drawn differently by different hands. Carol and Eric Meyers treat chapters one through eight and chapters nine through fourteen in separate volumes; David Petersen goes further still, reading even nine through fourteen as three distinct collections rather than one. The divisions vary, but the recognition is shared, and it is old: the book carries more than one voice, joined under a single name because the later material took up and extended the imagery of the earlier.

Reception across two traditions

The traditions that received the book read across the seam as prophecy, and they read it in two directions at once. Jewish interpreters preserved Zechariah among the twelve Minor Prophets — the collection the older sources count as a single book — and drew on its imagery of restoration, its purified Jerusalem, its gathering of the scattered, and its day on which the Lord would be one. The priest and scribe Ezra, whose work belongs to the same Persian-era restoration the visions serve, stands in the same stream of texts that narrate the return and the reordering of the community around the rebuilt sanctuary; the prophet of the visions and the restorer of the Law are read together as the architects of the second Temple’s world.

Christian readers mined the later chapters with extraordinary intensity. The entry of the humble king on a donkey, the thirty pieces of silver, the pierced one, and the struck shepherd were all taken up by the gospel writers and read as foretelling the passion. Matthew quotes the donkey at the entry into Jerusalem and the thirty silver pieces at the betrayal, ascribing the latter — by a known crossing of names — to Jeremiah; John reads the pierced figure at the cross; Matthew and Mark both put the struck shepherd and the scattered sheep into the night of the arrest, and the pierced one returns at the opening of the Book of Revelation, where every eye will see him and the tribes of the earth will mourn. Counted against its small size, the result is that few prophetic books are quoted more often in the New Testament, and that the passion narratives lean on Second Zechariah more than on any other stretch of the older scriptures. The same images that resisted a single reading in their first setting proved unusually generative in their second: a coded scene, by design, holds more than one meaning, and the gospel writers found their own meaning waiting inside the cipher.

The two receptions are not, in their own terms, rivals so much as readings of the same dense surface from two standpoints. The book’s purified Jerusalem, its fountain opened for cleansing, its day on which the Lord is king over all the earth and his name one, gave Jewish expectation a vocabulary for an age yet to come; the same passages gave Christian readers a grid laid over a life already lived. Both are working with a text that volunteers very little of its own referent. The humble king is not named; the pierced one is not named; the shepherd struck so that the sheep scatter is left as a figure. That reticence — the meaning present but unstated, waiting on an interpreter — is the same trait that organizes the first half’s visions, carried over into the second half’s oracles and there made the seed of two long traditions of reading.

The esoteric afterlife

Among apocalyptic and esoteric currents the visions held their force as exactly that — a cipher. Angel-interpreted images, sealed meanings, a measured and patrolled earth, an end disclosed in figures rather than stated outright: these are the working parts of a way of knowing that runs forward into the genre of the apocalypse. Where ordinary prophecy is inspired speech, the report of a will felt as not the speaker’s own, Zechariah’s first half is something closer to divination’s shadow inverted — not a system consulted by the seer, but a system that consults the seer, presenting him with omens he cannot read until a guide reads them for him. The four horsemen patrolling the earth, the horns of the nations, the woman of Wickedness flown back to the land of Babylon from which the exiles had only just come: each is a sign whose meaning is withheld and then granted.

That architecture feeds the same stream that runs through Daniel’s beasts and seventy weeks, through the watchers and the heavenly tablets of the Book of Enoch, and into the Book of Revelation, whose lampstands, horsemen, measured city, and horns of the nations are Zechariah’s furniture rebuilt for a new end. Where the older prophets stood in the assembly of the Lord and reported what they heard, the visionary of the night visions is shown what he could never have reasoned his way to, and is given an interpreter without whom the showing would stay opaque. The book itself keeps insisting on this discipline. What is shown must be explained; the meaning is not pried loose by the seer but handed to him — given, not seized.

Scholarship and texts

The standard critical treatments separate the book along the seam the text itself opens. Carol L. Meyers and Eric M. Meyers produced the major modern edition of the first half, Haggai, Zechariah 1–8: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (Anchor Bible 25B, Doubleday, 1987), and a companion Zechariah 9–14 (Anchor Yale Bible 25C, Yale University Press, 1993), reading the Persian-period material against the social and archaeological record of the restoration; the publisher’s listing carries the bibliographic detail. David L. Petersen’s two Old Testament Library volumes, Haggai and Zechariah 1–8 (1984) and Zechariah 9–14 and Malachi (Westminster John Knox, 1995), divide the second half into three collections — chapters nine through eleven, twelve through fourteen, and Malachi — and read each in its own right rather than as one Deutero-Zechariah. For the visions’ bearing on the rise of the apocalyptic genre the landmark study is Paul D. Hanson’s The Dawn of Apocalyptic (Fortress Press, 1975), which traces apocalyptic eschatology not to a sudden second-century import but to a long development out of prophetic roots, with Second Zechariah a decisive stage. The Society for Old Testament Study’s survey of Zechariah scholarship and the Oxford Bibliographies entry map the wider field, from the unity debate to the book’s place among the Twelve. The cluster of later texts the visions helped shape — the Enochic corpus, the apocalypses gathered under other patriarchs’ names — is collected in R. H. Charles’s editions, the two-volume Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament and his translation of The Book of Enoch, both held in full.

→ In the library: Charles — The Apocrypha and Pseudepigrapha of the Old Testament (1913) · Charles — The Book of Enoch (1912)

→ Related: Book Of Zechariah · Book Of Haggai · Daniel · Ezra · Apocalypse · Prophecy · Divination · Angel · Book Of Enoch