Wat Phu

← Encyclopedia

Above the right bank of the Mekong in southern Laos, the plain breaks against a single peak. Phou Kao, a single peak of about fourteen hundred meters, rises from the flatland, and near its summit a tall finger of rock stands clear of the slope — a natural pillar that the first worshippers at its foot read as a linga, the upright stone in which Shiva makes himself present. They called the mountain Lingaparvata, the mountain of the linga, and built at its base a sanctuary to the god whose form the summit already wore. Wat Phu — the name is the modern Lao, phu the mountain and wat the temple, a generic word that any temple in the Lao and Thai country carries — is the ruined complex that grew at that foot, a Khmer Shaivite mountain-shrine laid out along a single line from the spring on the cliff to the river on the plain.

The processional causeway lined with stone posts, running toward the mountain at the head of the complex — Basile Morin, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The choice of the place came before any building. A mountain that has shaped itself into the emblem of the god is a svayambhu linga, a self-arisen one, the most charged kind a Shaivite landscape can hold — not carved and consecrated by human hands but given by the earth, requiring only that it be recognized. Near the cliff below the summit a spring rises from the rock and runs the year around, and the spring fixed everything that followed. Water that has touched the mountain of the god is water charged with the god; channeled down and led over a linga, it carries the contact onward. The entire sanctuary at the head of the complex is, in the end, an apparatus for catching that spring and letting it fall across the stone — the mountain the linga, the spring the lustral flood, the temple the vessel that joins them.

The mountain, the spring, and the line to the river

The complex does not sit in a clearing; it is a line drawn across the land. From the spring at the base of the cliff, roughly a hundred meters up the hillside, an axis runs out toward the Mekong, tilted about eight degrees south of true east so that it answers both the fall of the mountain and the reach of the river — the two natural facts the builders bent the geometry to obey. Along that line, descending, stand the upper sanctuary, a steep stone staircase, a pair of long terraces, two great quadrangular pavilions facing each other across the way, a ceremonial causeway once edged with sandstone posts, and the reservoirs called barays that hold the line out toward the water. Only the central baray now keeps its water, a sheet roughly six hundred meters by two hundred lying directly on the axis; others flanked it and the causeway to north and south. The arrangement reads, top to bottom, as a descent of the sacred from the height where the god stands self-formed to the river that carries the world’s traffic — and, climbed in the other direction, as an ascent from the human plain toward the mountain at the head of things.

The steep stone staircase ascending the axis toward the upper sanctuary, overhung by frangipani — Basile Morin, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

That scheme belongs to the same grammar of sacred building that the Khmer raised across their whole world, the grammar by which a temple does not depict the cosmos but is built to be one — the same broad Indic vocabulary of mountain, water, and ascent that carried across the sea to the terraced Shaivite pyramid of Candi Sukuh on a Javanese volcano and survives as living temple-craft in the Balinese synthesis of Agama Hindu Dharma, each working the inheritance to its own ends rather than copying any single model. The stepped approach toward a summit, the encircling sheets of water standing for the cosmic ocean, the orientation set by the heavens and the land — these are the elements that reach their fullest statement downstream at Angkor Wat, where five towers raise the peaks of Mount Meru above a moat that is the sea. Wat Phu works in the same idiom and from the opposite premise: it did not need to raise an artificial mountain, because it had a real one already shaped into the sign of the god. The whole architecture is an answer to a peak it could not build and did not have to. The line to the river was the part that human hands could lay.

The upper sanctuary, at the head of the stair, is the heart of it. Its front chamber is sandstone, its rear chamber the older brick, and into the rear the spring water was once led along carved stone channels to fall continuously over the central linga — the standing image of the god kept under a perpetual flood drawn from the mountain that is itself the god. The linga is gone now, its socket empty; four Buddha images stand in the sanctuary instead, a later congregation in an older house. On the lintels and pediments of the surviving structures the Khmer carvers cut the gods of the Hindu pantheon — the Trimurti of Brahma, Vishnu, and Shiva together; Krishna; Vishnu in his boar-form Varaha lifting the earth from the waters; Indra on his elephant; ranks of apsaras — in a sandstone style close to that of the great Cambodian temples, worked here on a smaller scale and a steeper hill. Scattered through the site are the carved boulders the place is half-named for: a crocodile cut into the rock, a worn elephant, the figure of the Trimurti on a stone face, the remains of a pavilion that once held Shiva’s bull Nandi at the threshold of the god’s house.

A sandstone relief from Wat Phu, in the Khmer style of the Cambodian temples — Mattana, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

A sanctuary older than the empire

The cult at Lingaparvata is older than the empire that gave the mountain its surviving stone — older, too, than the Indic religion it embodies, for the high country of what is now Laos held sacred landscapes long before the gods of the subcontinent reached it, as the megalithic mortuary field of the Plain of Jars on the northern plateau attests. The earliest datable layer at Wat Phu reaches back to the fifth and sixth centuries, into the pre-Angkorian world of the middle Mekong — the polities that scholarship gathers under the name Chenla, themselves heirs to the older trading state of Funan in the delta below. On the plain east of the mountain stood an ancient city, set on the Mekong some kilometers from the temple, that the inscriptions call Shrestapura; it was among the early seats of power in the region, and the sanctuary on the height above it was its sacred pole.

The oldest dated voice from the place is a stele of the mid-fifth century, the inscription of a king named Devanika, cataloged by the French epigraphers as K. 365 and found at Wat Luong Kau on the plain below. In ringing Sanskrit it praises Shiva, Brahma, and Vishnu, and records that the king established at this place a great holy ford — a tirtha — which he named Kurukshetra, after the field of the Mahabharata war, the most sacred battleground of Hindu memory transposed onto the bank of the Mekong. The stone makes the mountain explicit: the place lies under the protection of Shiva present as Lingaparvata. To name a ford in Laos after Kurukshetra was to declare that the geography of the great Indian sacred texts had a second home here, that the holy places of the epics could be founded anew on a far river. A Chinese record of the late sixth century notes a temple to a mountain spirit, served with human offering, on a peak in this region — an outside glimpse of the same cult of the god of the height. Inscriptions from the seventh century onward, found around Wat Phu and across the Khmer lands, carry the cult of Lingaparvata forward as an established devotion.

The Devanika stele (K. 365), the mid-fifth-century Sanskrit inscription recording the founding of the Kurukshetra ford at the foot of Lingaparvata — Ms Sarah Welch, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

By that reckoning the sanctuary was a working center of the Shaivite cult for half a millennium before the masons of Angkor arrived to rebuild it. Whether Devanika’s kingdom belonged to Chenla or stood apart from it is argued among epigraphers, and the early political map of the middle Mekong is drawn lightly and in contending hands. What the stones agree on is the religion: from its first datable century the mountain was Shiva’s, the spring his lustral water, the ford a transplanted Kurukshetra, and the city below the temple’s earthly counterpart.

The masons of Angkor

The buildings a visitor climbs today are mostly the work of the eleventh to thirteenth centuries, when the place lay within the reach of the Khmer Empire and its kings rebuilt the old sanctuary in dressed sandstone. The complex is a stratigraphy of that long campaign. The two great quadrangular pavilions that face each other across the axis — the “north” and “south” palaces, called by later custom the men’s and the women’s, though what they actually housed is not known — carry lintels and pediments in the early Angkor Wat style of the twelfth century. The upper sanctuary, by its carving and plan, is assigned to the Baphuon manner of the later eleventh. Older brick from the pre-Angkorian centuries survives within the rebuilt stone, and excavation has turned up earlier elements reused or discarded in the foundations — a sanctuary remade in place across generations rather than cleared and begun again.

Wat Phu was not an isolated shrine but a node in a web that ran south to the imperial center. A road led from the temple down toward Cambodia, threaded with way-stations and lesser sanctuaries, and ultimately reached Angkor itself — the same processional and political artery along which the empire moved its authority and its pilgrims. The barays and channels that order the site belong to the Khmer genius for working water into the shape of meaning, the reservoir as mirror of the temple-mountain and as sign of the encircling sea, the practice that reached its vast extent on the Angkor plain and that here gave the spring-fed line to the river its measured pools. To stand at the upper sanctuary and look down the axis is to read the whole imperial idiom in a single hillside: the mountain that is the god, the staircase that is the climb to him, the pavilions and the causeway that are the approach, and the water held out toward the Mekong like an offering returned to the world.

The Buddha in Shiva’s house

The god of the sanctuary changed, as he changed at the great temples downstream. As the Theravada form of Buddhism spread through the Khmer lands and, after them, through the Lao and Thai country that took shape along this stretch of the Mekong and across the Khorat plain — the world whose Thai expression rose at Sukhothai, with its merit-economy of the monastery and the alms-bowl rather than the consecrated temple-mountain — Wat Phu was carried into Buddhist use without being emptied of its older charge. The central linga left the upper sanctuary; four images of the Buddha took the floor where the spring had once fallen across the stone of Shiva. The Hindu carvings on the lintels were not effaced. Monks settled at the site and tend it still, and the mountain remains a place of pilgrimage for a population now Buddhist, climbing the same stair that the Shaivites cut toward a summit that still wears the shape of the linga whatever name is given to the god within the shrine.

Clothed Buddha images standing in the upper sanctuary, where the spring once fell across Shiva’s linga — Basile Morin, via Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 4.0)

The layering is the site’s truth, not a problem to be resolved in favor of one cult. The same stone that held Shiva holds the Buddha; the spring that bathed the linga rises from the same cliff; the festival that fills the complex each year gathers a Buddhist crowd onto a Hindu ground laid out by Khmer hands on a peak that was sacred before any of the three traditions reached it. Every February — at the full moon of the third lunar month, the day Theravada keeps as Magha Puja in memory of the great unbidden assembly of the Buddha’s disciples — the Boun Wat Phu fills the slope, the largest festival of southern Laos. Pilgrims climb to the sanctuary with offerings; alms are given to the monks at dawn and a procession of lights circles the shrines at dusk; below the temple the days carry the older village exuberance of elephant racing, boat racing, music, and dance. A mountain read as the body of the god, a spring read as his lustral water, a Hindu temple grown into a Buddhist one, and a crowd that climbs it still: the place has never stopped being what its first builders recognized it to be — the foot of a holy mountain, where the water comes down.

The sanctuary in scholarship

Almost everything known of Wat Phu before the European arrival comes, as at Angkor, from stone — the inscriptions incised on its stelae and doorjambs in Sanskrit and Old Khmer, dating and dedicating the foundations and naming their gods and kings. The modern reading of those texts begins with George Coedès, whose monumental Inscriptions du Cambodge edited the Khmer epigraphic corpus and whose work first proposed that the early Chenla state had a center in this Bassac region around Wat Phu; the Devanika stele K. 365 that fixes the fifth-century founding of the Kurukshetra ford was edited by Coedès in the 1950s and given its first full English translation only in 2015. The digraphic Khmer stelae of the Wat Phu region — the boundary-stones of the Yashodharashrama, the network of royal hermitages — have been studied as markers of empire and sacred limits, reading the inscriptions as the survey-pegs of Angkorian authority planted around the old sanctuary.

The site itself has been worked by a succession of missions. The French archaeological mission in southern Laos, drawn from the École française d’Extrême-Orient and the CNRS and conducted in partnership with the Lao authorities, carried out the excavations of the late twentieth century — the program known as PRAL ran through the first half of the 1990s and recovered the pre-Angkorian foundations beneath the standing stone — and its results are gathered in the survey by Marielle Santoni, Christine Hawixbrock, and Viengkeo Souksavatdy. Later restoration campaigns brought an Italian mission to the Nandi pavilion and the Archaeological Survey of India to the northern palace. The deep settlement history of the middle Mekong into which the sanctuary fits has been mapped by Michel Lorrillard’s work on the pre-Angkorian communities of the valley, tracing the spread of Indic religion and Khmer settlement up the river from the Funanese delta. In December 2001 the World Heritage Committee inscribed the place under its full name — Vat Phou and Associated Ancient Settlements within the Champasak Cultural Landscape — recognizing not the temple alone but the whole planned line from mountain to river, the barays and roads and the buried city, as a single landscape shaped over more than a thousand years to set the Hindu order of nature and the divine into the ground itself.

→ Related: Shiva · Hinduism · Khmer Empire · Angkor Wat · Funan · Buddhism · Vishnu · Indra · Mahabharata · Sukhothai · Candi Sukuh · Agama Hindu Dharma · Plain Of Jars