Vijayanagara

← Encyclopedia

Where the Tungabhadra River breaks through a chaos of granite — boulders the size of houses, heaped and balanced as though some earlier age had been interrupted mid-work — the rock itself was already holy before any king built there. The local goddess Pampa, river and earth in one, was wedded in the older telling to Shiva, who dwelt on the hill above the ford as Pampapati, lord of Pampa; and from the husband’s other name, Virupaksha — the oddly-eyed one whose third eye burns the worlds — the place took its sanctity. The kingdom that rose on this ground in 1336 was named for the act it intended to be: Vijayanagara, the City of Victory. For three centuries it was the largest and richest power of the Indian peninsula’s south, and it understood its own wealth and arms as the temporal arm of something older than itself — the worship that had always belonged to the rock by the river.

The founding and the four lines

The conventional date of foundation is 1336, and the conventional founders are two brothers, Harihara and Bukka, of the line afterward called Sangama. They had served the Hoysalas and then, in the wreckage left by the Delhi Sultanate’s southern campaigns and the brief Tughluq governorship of the Deccan, raised a new seat on the Tungabhadra’s southern bank. South Indian memory binds the founding to a renunciant: the sage Vidyaranya of the Sringeri monastery, head of the Advaita lineage that traces itself to Sankara, is remembered as the brothers’ preceptor, the man who blessed the city and after whom some accounts call it Vidyanagara, the City of Knowledge. The historical content of that memory is examined in the entry on Vidyaranya; the earliest inscriptions naming him postdate the founding by decades, and the foundation-legend in its full form is the work of later Sringeri tradition. What is beyond dispute is the shape the tradition wished the founding to have: knowledge consecrating power, the ascetic’s word steadying the warrior’s sword — philosophy and kingship in the correct order.

Across its span the empire passed through four dynasties, and the changes of house were rarely gentle. The Sangama line ruled from the founding until about 1485, raising the city to a great power and pushing its frontiers across the peninsula; under Devaraya II in the first half of the fifteenth century it absorbed Persian and Turkic cavalry and archers into its armies, an early sign that the wars with the north were also exchanges with it. The Saluva house took the throne in a coup around 1485, when the general Saluva Narasimha seized a court grown weak; it held barely two decades. The Tuluva dynasty followed near 1505 and gave the empire its most celebrated reign. The Aravidu line, which had governed from behind the throne before it ruled in its own name, carried the empire’s wreckage forward after 1565 to its final extinction in 1646.

Krishnadevaraya

The apex is fixed by name: Krishnadevaraya, who reigned from 1509 to 1529 and whom both his own court and its enemies reckoned the greatest of the Rayas. He broke the Gajapatis of Odisha in the east and the Adil Shahi sultan of Bijapur in the north, took the fortress of Raichur in the contested doab between the rivers, and ruled at the limit of the empire’s reach, with most of the south paying him tribute. He was also a poet in Telugu, and his Amuktamalyada — the title names the one who gave the garland already worn — is a devotional epic on the life of the woman-saint Andal of the Tamil Vaishnava tradition, she who wore the Lord’s flower-garland before offering it and so was wedded to Vishnu. That a conqueror at the height of his power should choose for his great poem a girl’s bridal longing for God is the empire in miniature: arms and treasure folded inward toward devotion. Krishnadevaraya enlarged the temples of his capital lavishly, and the most extravagant of its surviving stonework dates from his hand.

Hampi: the temple-city

The capital was a city of perhaps a few hundred thousand at its height, and the foreign men who saw it left it down on paper in something close to disbelief. The Persian envoy Abd-al-Razzaq, sent by Shah Rukh of Herat, reached it in 1443 and described markets and a court of staggering scale; the Portuguese horse-traders Domingos Paes and Fernao Nunes, writing around 1520 and 1535, set down its festivals, its bazaars piled with rubies, its irrigation works and its armies. The ruins they would not recognize — the place is silent stone now, scattered across miles of rock and scrub — but the plan can still be read on the ground, and modern survey has divided it into two zones. The Sacred Center clusters along the river around the temples; the Royal Center, set back to the south, held the palaces, the audience platforms, and the apparatus of rule.

The living heart of the Sacred Center is the Virupaksha temple, the shrine of Shiva as Pampapati, which alone among the great temples of Hampi never ceased to be worshipped and is worshipped still. Its eastern tower rises in receding tiers of sculpted figures in the Dravidian manner — the southern temple idiom of the towered gateway, the gopuram, and the pillared hall, the same architectural lineage that had reached its imperial scale three centuries earlier in the Chola Brihadisvara temple at Thanjavur — and Krishnadevaraya is credited with its largest gateway. The cult here is older than the empire and outlasted it: the marriage of Shiva and Pampa, re-enacted yearly, ties the god to the river and the river to the land, so that the kingdom’s sacrality was never an imperial invention but an inheritance the kings attached themselves to.

A short way downriver stands the Vitthala temple, dedicated to Vishnu under the form Vitthala worshipped in the Marathi country to the north — a sign of how the empire’s devotion drew the whole peninsula inward. Begun under Devaraya II in the fifteenth century and enlarged under Krishnadevaraya, it is the showpiece of Vijayanagara stonecraft: a forecourt holding the famous stone chariot, a small shrine to Garuda carved as a temple-car with wheels that once turned, and great open halls whose slender granite columns, struck, are said to sound the notes of music. Around these two poles — Shaiva Virupaksha and Vaishnava Vitthala — the city arranged a dense devotional landscape: the Krishna temple Krishnadevaraya raised to mark his Odisha victory, the Hazara Rama temple within the royal quarter with its friezes of the Rama story, shrines to the goddess, and the high stepped platform, the Mahanavami Dibba, from which the kings reviewed the nine-night autumn festival of the goddess that bound army, court, and cult into a single spectacle of sovereignty.

Vijayanagara was not built to one frame. The temples are Dravidian and Hindu through and through; but the secular and courtly architecture of the Royal Center — the so-called Lotus Mahal with its lobed Islamicate arches, the domed elephant stables, the watchtowers — speaks the architectural language of the Deccan sultanates with which the empire was perpetually at war. The two idioms stand within a mile of one another, and the city refused to choose between them.

The devotional and intellectual landscape

The empire sat at the meeting of the great devotional currents of the south. The land of its earliest temples was the country of the Tamil and Kannada bhakti saints — the Vaishnava Alvars and the Shaiva Nayanars, whose hymns had centuries earlier turned worship from rite into a poetry of longing and self-surrender — the southern wellspring of the broader Indic devotional movement. The Rayas patronized the full breadth of the Shaiva-Vaishnava field without confining themselves to one school. Early Sangama kings leaned toward the Advaita establishment of Sringeri; later kings, Krishnadevaraya among them, tilted toward Vaishnavism and toward the Srivaishnava and Madhva orders — the school of the Dvaita philosopher Madhva had its homeland in the Kannada coast within the empire’s reach. The competing schools of Vedanta — the non-dualism of Sankara, the qualified non-dualism of Ramanuja, the dualism of Madhva — all found patrons among the Rayas, who endowed monasteries across the lines of doctrine. The empire’s self-understanding was framed in the vocabulary of dharma: the king as its upholder, the realm as the ground on which the gods were rightly served, the whole devotional inheritance — the Krishna devotion of the Amuktamalyada, the temple cults, the great festivals — gathered under the crown’s protection.

The empire and the sultanates

To its north lay the Bahmani sultanate, and after the Bahmani realm fractured near the close of the fifteenth century, its five successor states — Bijapur, Ahmadnagar, Golconda, Bidar, and Berar. For two centuries Vijayanagara and these Deccan powers contested the river-doabs between them in near-continuous war, the boundaries shifting with each campaign. The older historiography read this as a civilizational frontier: a Hindu empire holding the line against Islam, the last great dam against the Muslim advance into the south. The empire’s own court furnished that reading with material — the title the Rayas took, Hindu-raya-suratrana — sultan among Hindu kings — casts the king as defender of a Hindu order — and the question of how Hindu and Muslim worlds met across this frontier is taken up directly in the entry on the syncretism question.

Recent scholarship has complicated the frontier sharply. The title itself, suratrana, is the Sanskritized Arabic sultan: in claiming to be a sultan, even a Hindu one, the Rayas were claiming a place inside the shared Persianate political world of the wider Islamicate sphere, not standing outside it. The historian Philip Wagoner showed that Vijayanagara’s courtiers dressed in the kabayi, the long tunic descended from the Arabic qaba, and the tall brocaded cap of Perso-Turkic fashion; that the empire’s military, administrative, and courtly forms borrowed continuously from the sultanates; and that the cosmopolitan culture of the Deccan ran on both sides of a frontier that was political and dynastic before it was religious. The wars were real and ferocious, and the alliances crossed the supposed divide as readily as the battle-lines: Hindu kings fought beside Muslim sultans, Muslim cavalry served the Rayas, and the sultanates as often fought one another as they fought the south. Whether the conflict is best read as a defense of dharma against an alien faith, or as the ordinary dynastic warfare of a single Deccan world that happened to be religiously plural, is a question the surviving evidence has been made to answer in both directions, and the answer turns on which evidence is weighed.

Talikota, 1565

The frontier wars came to their decision on a single day. By the 1560s the empire was governed in fact by Aliya Rama Raya of the Aravidu family, son-in-law of Krishnadevaraya, who ruled in the name of a Tuluva king kept as a figurehead. Rama Raya had grown adept at the politics of the Deccan, intervening in the sultanates’ quarrels and playing one against another so freely that he came to seem, to all of them, the common danger. They set their feuds aside. Ahmadnagar, Bijapur, Golconda, and Bidar bound themselves in alliance, sealed with marriages between their houses, and marched south.

The armies met on 23 January 1565 on the plains near the villages of Rakkasagi and Tangadigi, north of the Krishna — the battle remembered in the north as Talikota, for the town behind the sultanates’ lines, and in the south as Rakkasa-Tangadi, for the ground itself. The accounts agree that the day turned suddenly. The Vijayanagara host was holding or winning when two of Rama Raya’s own commanders went over to the enemy; in the collapse that followed the old regent was taken alive and beheaded on the field, and the sight of his head raised on a pike broke the army’s will. What followed at the capital is the part the chroniclers dwell on. The victorious armies entered the undefended city and, over a span the sources reckon in months, looted and burned it — temples, palaces, and bazaars given to fire and the hammer. The Venetian merchant Caesar Frederick, who passed through two years later, found the great city deserted and its monuments broken. The empire’s heart was never reoccupied.

The afterlife

The line did not end on the field. The Aravidu survivors carried the king and the remnant of the court southeast, ruling first from Penukonda, then from Chandragiri, then from Vellore, holding a shrinking territory and a fading authority while the great provincial governors — the Nayakas of Madurai, Tanjavur, Gingee, and Keladi, who had held their lands as military fiefs of the empire — drifted into independence. The kingdom that had once spanned the peninsula contracted to a southern remnant and then to a name. The conventional terminal date is 1646, when the last toeholds fell. Long before that, the Nayaka courts had become the true inheritors of the Vijayanagara settlement, carrying its temple-patronage, its Telugu and Tamil literary culture, and its forms of kingship forward into the courts of the deep south.

At Hampi the river still runs through the boulders, and the gopuram of Virupaksha still rises above the ford. In the sanctum that the sack passed over, the lamps are still lit, and pilgrims climb the same steps the Rayas climbed. The wider field of ruins — the broken halls of Vitthala, the stone chariot, the platforms of the Royal Center — was inscribed on the World Heritage List in 1986 and is read now as one of the largest open-air records of a vanished court anywhere on the subcontinent. Inside that field, at the one shrine the sack spared, the priests still marry Shiva to the river Pampa each spring.

Texts, chronicles, and the modern study

The empire is reconstructed from three bodies of evidence held in productive tension: its own thousands of stone and copper-plate inscriptions; the accounts of foreign visitors; and the archaeology of the capital. The foundational English history is Robert Sewell’s A Forgotten Empire (Vijayanagar) of 1900, which is most valuable not for its own narrative — its foundation-legend is the traditional one that later scholarship has dismantled — but because it carries within it English renderings of the Portuguese chronicles of Domingos Paes and Fernao Nunes, the most vivid eyewitness portraits of the capital at its height. Burton Stein’s Vijayanagara in the New Cambridge History of India (1989) is the standard modern synthesis of the polity and its segmentary structure of authority. Hermann Kulke’s study of the Sringeri-Vijayanagara historiography established how much of the founding narrative was retrojected by the monastery in later centuries. The decisive reframing of the empire’s relation to the Islamicate world is Philip Wagoner’s “Sultan among Hindu Kings” in the Journal of Asian Studies (1996), with its companion essay on Harihara, Bukka, and the sultan. The capital itself has been mapped in fine grain by the long-running Vijayanagara Research Project: George Michell and John Fritz’s archaeological surveys, Michell and Wagoner’s three-volume Architectural Inventory of the Sacred Centre (2001), and Anila Verghese’s study of the religious traditions of the site, which together reconstruct the devotional geography that the ruins only hint at. The contemporary scholarship of the World Heritage Group of Monuments at Hampi treats the place as both archaeological record and living sacred landscape — the Virupaksha cult in continuous worship inside a field of monuments whose competing modern claims, religious and curatorial, are themselves part of what the site now is.

→ Related: Vidyaranya · Hinduism · Shiva · Vishnu · Islam · Bhakti Movement · Indic Bhakti · Hinduism Saiva Vaisnava Tantra · Vedanta Advaita Visistadvaita Dvaita · Sankara · Brihadisvara Temple · Hindu Muslim Syncretism Question · Krishna Bhakti · Tamil Vaisnava Bhakti