Vertumnus

← Encyclopedia

Vertere: to turn. The Latin verb carries a whole world — the wheel that turns, the soldier who turns to flee, the speaker who turns a phrase, the season that turns toward its end, the green fruit that turns red on the bough. Romans of the late Republic heard that verb inside the name Vertumnus, and the god they named with it became the patron of turning as such — not of any one season but of the hinge between them, the moment when one thing becomes another. His province was transformation itself: the bud opening, the grape darkening from green to wine-color, the harvest field standing where the meadow stood. Whether vertere is truly the root of his name is a separate question, and a doubtful one. The character it gave him is not in doubt. He is the god of the year caught in the act of changing.

The Etruscan behind the Roman

The deeper origin lies to the north, in Etruria. Ancient writers report that Vertumnus came to Rome from the Etruscan country, and the form of the name they sometimes used — Vortumnus — points back across the linguistic border. Modern scholarship has generally connected him to Voltumna, named in the sources as the chief god of the Etruscan league. Voltumna’s sanctuary, the fanum Voltumnae, was the federal meeting-place of the Etruscan cities: there the principes Etruriae, the leading men of the twelve, gathered each year to elect a common priest, to weigh war and peace, and to keep the rites that bound the league together. Livy returns to that sanctuary again and again in his narrative of the fifth century — the councils of 434, 433, 405, 397, and 389 before the common era all convene there — which makes Voltumna’s shrine the political and sacral navel of an entire people. The league itself did not outlast the fall of Volsinii to Rome in the 260s; its god, in one reading, walked south into the Roman pantheon and kept his name in altered dress.

How close that descent really is remains debated. The equation Vertumnus = Voltumna is attractive and old, but the linguistic bridge is uncertain and the cultic links are inferred more than documented. Even the Etruscan god is partly a silhouette: the sources call the league’s deity Voltumna, and an Etruscan divinity Veltha or Veltune is sometimes drawn into the same orbit, but the surviving Etruscan record is thin enough that the figure behind the federal sanctuary is reconstructed almost as much as it is read. To run the chain Veltha — Voltumna — Vortumnus — Vertumnus is to make four uncertain links hold at once, and prudent scholarship treats each junction as probable rather than proven. The most that can be said with confidence is that Rome itself regarded the god as Etruscan and treated him accordingly. Marcus Terentius Varro, the great antiquarian, wrote in his treatise on the Latin language that Vertumnus stood in the Vicus Tuscus because he is “the chief god of Etruria” — deus Etruriae princeps — making the statue’s foreign address a deliberate statement of the deity’s pedigree rather than an accident of geography. The identification of the Roman god with the Etruscan one was, in other words, already the Roman understanding; what later philology cannot quite secure is whether the Roman understanding was right.

The bronze in the Vicus Tuscus

His standing cult-site in Rome was a statue — the signum Vortumni — in the Vicus Tuscus, the “Etruscan street” running from the Velabrum up toward the Forum. The location advertised the pedigree Varro described. The street was no quiet precinct: by the Republic it had become a crowded commercial artery lined with shops, and the tradesmen who worked there made their offerings to the god whose image stood among them. He presided over the turn of their goods as much as over the turn of the year.

The statue had its own history of transformation. The tradition held that the original image was carved in maple wood and brought to the city in the earliest days, and that the bronze that later stood in the street was the work of Mamurius Veturius — the same legendary smith credited with casting the eleven copies of the sacred shield, the ancile, so that the heaven-fallen original could not be told from its doubles and stolen. In Propertius the god himself blesses Mamurius’s hands for the work. A wooden god turned to bronze by the maker of indistinguishable copies: even the cult-object enacted the deity’s theme. His festival, the Vortumnalia, fell on the thirteenth of August, in the season of ripening fruit and the long turn toward autumn, when the offerings laid before him were the first of the season’s produce.

The statue speaks: Propertius

His fame, in the end, is chiefly literary, and it begins with the statue learning to talk. The poet Propertius, in the second elegy of his fourth book, gives the bronze in the Vicus Tuscus a voice and lets it address the passer-by in the first person. The poem is a virtuoso run through the disguises the god can assume, each one a small proof of the etymology the Romans loved. Hand him a scythe and a twist of hay for his brow and he is the reaper. Set a pruning-knife in his grip and he is the vine-dresser among the leaves; arm him and he is the soldier; give him a rod and he is the angler at the bank. He claims the whole agricultural year as his wardrobe — the first grape darkening in the bunch, the bearded ears swelling with milky grain, the cherries and plums and mulberries reddening in their turn — and then pushes the boast past gender itself: dress him in soft Coan silk and he is a girl, put a toga on him and no one will deny he is a man. Turn me, the statue says, into whatever you please. The poem makes the god a figure of pure mutability, an image that is every image, and it plants its own footnotes: a Tuscan born of Tuscans, it says, who left the hearths of Volsinii behind. Propertius is the first surviving voice to fuse the foreign god, the street-corner bronze, and the doctrine of universal turning into a single performance — and modern criticism, which has read the elegy as everything from a hymn to a sly comedy of social climbing, keeps returning to it as the keystone of all later understanding of the god.

Ovid and Pomona

The story that made the name immortal is told in the fourteenth book of Ovid’s Metamorphoses, and it turns the doctrine of disguise into a courtship. Vertumnus loves Pomona, the wood-nymph who has given herself wholly to her orchard — who knows nothing of the wild and everything of the grafted bough, who prunes and waters and wants no suitor near her trees. He comes to her in form after form: as a harvester with a basket of grain, as a hay-maker, as a ploughman, a vine-pruner, a soldier, a fisherman, each shape a key tried in the same lock and each one failing to turn it. At last he takes the shape that works — an old woman, gray and stooped, who walks into the orchard, admires the fruit, kisses the goddess as an old woman might, and sits down to talk. In that borrowed voice the god praises the absent Vertumnus to his own beloved, and points to a vine running up an elm nearby: were the elm not there, he says, the vine would trail useless on the ground; were the vine not there, the elm would stand bare; so it is with a woman alone and a woman wed. The argument made, the disguise drops. The crone straightens into the young god, bright as the sun breaking through cloud, and Pomona, won as much by the revelation as by the reasoning, yields. The disguise was the wooing; the unmasking is the consummation.

It is essential to the god’s history that this exquisite tale is Ovid’s own invention rather than inherited cult-lore. No earlier rite or temple-legend pairs the two deities; the marriage of the god of turning and the goddess of fruit is a poet’s construction, fitted together from two figures who shared the orchard and the season. Ovid’s elaboration so thoroughly captured the imagination of later ages that it has done more than any altar to keep the name alive — the episode itself a kind of metamorphosis, in which a minor Etruscan import becomes, through eighty lines of Latin, the very emblem of love that changes shape to win what it wants. The orchard goddess he courts has her own province and her own profile; here she is the still point the turning god revolves around until she turns to him.

The working god of the turning year

Beneath the literature lay a plainer deity. For ordinary Romans Vertumnus was a working god of growth and exchange — invoked over gardens and produce, over the slow ripening of the field and the brisk traffic of the market that sold its fruit. The gardener brought him the first of the harvest; his statue in the busy street was dressed and garlanded as the seasons changed, wearing the year on its bronze. He belonged, loosely, to that company of old Italic and Roman powers who governed the in-between and the increase rather than the high politics of the sky — near in spirit to Pomona of the cultivated fruit, to Flora of the flowering, to Consus and his stored grain, to Portunes at the gateway and the harbor, to Anna Perenna who personified the circling year itself, and to the Italic Picus, a figure who, like Vertumnus, lived in Ovid as a study in shape-changing. He was no Jupiter and no Saturn; he held no temple on the Capitol and bore no great myth of origin. His domain was the threshold where one state of things passes into the next, and it asked of its god not majesty but versatility.

There is a logic to that modesty. A sky-father is invoked at the edges of the year — at the great festivals, the oaths, the triumphs — but the god of turning is wanted in the middle of it, on every ordinary day when something is ripening and something else is being sold. He is closer to the rhythm of work than to the architecture of the state, and the dressing of his statue with each season’s first growth made the worship itself a calendar: a passer-by in the Vicus Tuscus could read the time of year off the god’s garlands. The very feature that kept him minor in the official hierarchy — having no fixed attribute, no single shape, no signature myth before Ovid supplied one — is the feature that made him supremely useful as an idea. A god who is always becoming is the perfect patron for a world that never holds still.

The textual record

The god survives in a small, dense archive. The single richest source is Propertius, Elegies 4.2 — the statue’s monologue — read here in the modern verse rendering of A. S. Kline, The Elegies: Book IV. The narrative core is Ovid, Metamorphoses 14.623–771, the Pomona episode, likewise available in Kline’s translation, Metamorphoses Book XIV. The decisive piece of cult evidence is Varro’s etymological note in De lingua Latina V.46, which fixes the statue in the Vicus Tuscus and names the god deus Etruriae princeps. For the Etruscan substratum, the federal sanctuary of Voltumna is documented chiefly through Livy’s repeated notices of the league’s councils. The foundational modern handbook treatment is Georg Wissowa’s Religion und Kultus der Römer (1912), which set the terms for a century of debate over the god’s origin; the identification with Voltumna and the philological doubts around vertere have been weighed and re-weighed since, including by L. Richardson Jr. in his work on the topography of the Roman Forum. The most thorough modern study is Maurizio Bettini’s Il dio elegante: Vertumno e la religione romana (Einaudi, 2015), a book-length “biography” of the deity built largely as a sustained commentary on Propertius 4.2, which restores the god to the center of a discussion of how Rome imagined transformation, foreignness, and the elegance of change.

Arcimboldo’s emperor

In time the god of turning was read as an allegory — a face for the year’s mutability, a ready emblem for any artist who wanted to picture change itself. The most famous of those pictures collapses the allegory into the literal. In 1590 and 1591 the painter Giuseppe Arcimboldo composed a portrait of his patron, the Holy Roman Emperor Rudolf II, entirely out of heaped fruit and vegetables and flowers — a pea-pod for an eyelid, a gourd for the brow, grapes and pears and apples massed into a sovereign’s head — and titled the canvas Vertumnus. The conceit is exact: the emperor wears the produce of every season at once, so that his single face holds the whole turning year, and the god of ripening becomes a still-life of a man. The painting itself then lived out a small metamorphosis of fortune — kept at Prague through the emperor’s reign, carried off as war-booty to Sweden in 1648, lost and found again, and at last fixed on the wall of Skokloster Castle, where it stays. The god whose name means to turn had become the means of showing how all things turn.

→ Related: Pomona · Consus · Portunes · Anna Perenna · Fauna · Etruscans · Flora · Picus · Saturn