Vazimba

← Encyclopedia

There are springs on the highland plain that no one drains and pools that no one fishes, and boulders in the rice country that a farmer will plow around rather than break. Ask why, and the answer is not that the water is fouled or the stone too heavy to shift. It is that someone lies there — not a named grandfather sealed in a chamber of dressed stone, but one of the first people, whose grave has no wall and no door and cannot be pointed to precisely, only known to be near. The Malagasy call these first people the vazimba, and their singularity among the dead begins at exactly this point: they are the ancestors nobody can bury and everybody can find.

The masters of the land

In the memory of the highlands the vazimba stand at the head of the remembered world. They are the tompontany, the masters of the land — the people already here, holding the ground, when the ancestors of the present highland communities arrived to settle among them. To be tompontany is to hold a priority that no later coming can cancel: the vazimba were first, and firstness in this world is a kind of title, since ancestry over a place is authority over it.

They are not, in the record, a single thing. The tradition sorts them by where they belong. The vazimba andrano are the vazimba of the water, who keep the rivers, the lakes, and the sacred springs; the vazimba an-tany are the vazimba of the soil, the most numerous, remembered above all in the Betsiriry country of the central highlands; and the vazimba antsingy take their name from the tsingy, the great limestone karst of the west, and belong to its caves. The one name gathers water-dwellers, earth-dwellers, and cave-dwellers into a common order defined less by kind than by precedence — the powers of the ground from before.

How this reaches the written page runs, as so much of highland tradition does, through the Tantara ny Andriana eto Madagasikara, Callet’s vast compilation of Merina royal history and custom — a court text whose telling of first things served the dynasty that told it. It is the indispensable indigenous witness, and it is a witness with a setting: gathered at a Christianizing court and set in type on a mission press, it carries its royal and its missionary moment into everything it preserves, and is read here with its making in view. In the Tantara the vazimba are not only the land’s first inhabitants but the first sovereigns of the line that would become the highland dynasty. At the very head of the Merina royal genealogy stand two vazimba queens: Rangita — Rangitamanjakatrimovavy in the fuller name — remembered at Imerimanjaka, and Rafohy, whose name means the Short One, remembered at Alasora, one of the twelve sacred hills of Imerina, where the histories place her rule to about 1540. The oral tradition is genuinely unsure of their relation to one another. By some accounts Rafohy was the mother of Rangita; by others Rangita was the mother of the famed king Andriamanelo; the confusion reaches to the women’s very identities, and the record does not resolve it. What the record is firm on is the line’s descent through them. Andriamanelo, remembered as the first male king of the Merina and traditionally dated to about 1540 to 1575, comes down from the vazimba queens — half-vazimba, the tradition says, through Rangita and Rafohy — so that the dynasty which would displace the vazimba runs, at its source, through vazimba blood.

Alongside this frame-internal memory sits a scholarly question the memory does not settle, and it should be marked plainly. Whether “vazimba” names an actual earlier population — foragers or early settlers displaced and absorbed by later arrivals — or whether it names a category the highlanders built to think with, is debated. Jean-Pierre Domenichini read the term as a marker of cultural rather than ethnic difference. Solofo Randrianja has described it as a way of life rather than an ethnic group. On the other side stands the plain reading of the tradition itself, which remembers the vazimba as a people with queens, wars, and graves. Both readings are set here; neither is asserted. The vazimba may be the memory of those who came before, or the figure a settled people made of the land’s own priority — and the distance between those is precisely what the sources leave open (Vazimba).

The dead who cannot be closed

Within the Malagasy sacred world the vazimba are the first people who became tutelary powers of the land, and their force is best understood against the order they are not. The razana are the named family dead: parents and grandparents and the founders behind them, gathered into the stone tomb of the ancestral homeland, honored with the first-fruits of the rice, and brought out and rewrapped at the famadihana, the turning of the bones. The razana are placed. They have a chamber, a hill, a name, a lineage that owns them and is owned by them; they are the seniors of a particular family, reachable at a particular door. The vazimba are none of this. They are the dead whose graves nobody can find and everybody knows are there.

The difference is a matter of how the first people buried their dead. Highland tradition holds that the vazimba did not seal their dead in stone but gave them to the water — submerging them in bogs, pools, and rivers, so that the burial place became a sacred body of water rather than a walled chamber. The royal histories carry the custom into the dynasty’s own beginnings: Rafohy and Rangita, following vazimba usage, are remembered as laid to rest by submersion, each body placed in a silver coffin shaped like an outrigger canoe and sunk into a bog (Rafohy). Not every vazimba grave is water. Some are held to lie under boulders, and some in the old unmarked mounds that stand in the fields with no chamber and no name cut into them — earthworks whose builders the tradition assigns to the first people and whose exact contents no one disturbs. What the graves share is that they cannot be opened. A grave one cannot open is a grave one cannot close. The razana are honored and, in a sense, settled — reincorporated, rank by rank, into the standing house of the family. The vazimba are never settled in that way, because there is no chamber to seat them in and no rite of return to bring them out. They remain in the ground and the water, present and unappeased, which is exactly the source of their power. It is a paradox the highlands live with easily: the grave without a wall or a name is the one whose location a family will nonetheless know exactly, the pool where the offering goes, the mound the plow leaves standing.

Because they were first, the vazimba hold hasina — the sacred efficacy that runs through the Malagasy world, the potency that quickens the field and the child and ratifies rightful authority — over the ground itself. It is a hasina prior to any lineage. A family’s own razana bless the family’s own land; the vazimba are older than any family’s coming, and their sanctity attaches to the spring and the stone before the ancestors of any living family came to dwell beside it. This is why a pool can be sacred to people who have no dead in it, and why the first efficacy of a place is often reckoned to be the vazimba’s and not one’s own.

They are approached, therefore, with a care one does not extend to one’s own seniors. Because they are unappeased powers of the land rather than the kindly dead of one’s line, the vazimba are dealt with through offering and through the fady, the prohibitions that guard their sites. A vazimba place carries its own taboos — the withholding of salt, of garlic, of pork near the water or the tomb — and to keep them is to keep faith with the power that holds the ground. At their doany, the shrine-sites where the vazimba are honored, the living come to petition them: for healing of the body, for children, for protection and blessing. The vazimba spirit answers as a power older than any kingdom, and answers in both directions. Honored, kept in their fady, met at their pool with the proper offering, they bless. Wronged, crossed in a taboo, or disturbed in their waters, they are feared — sending sickness and misfortune to the one who broke faith. The relation is not the intimacy of a household with its grandparents but the wariness of a settled people toward the first owners of the ground they live on. It reaches the whole spread of the vazimba’s kinds. The vazimba of the water are petitioned at the spring and the lake; the vazimba of the soil in the rice country where the mounds stand; the vazimba of the tsingy in the limestone west, where the caves themselves are approached as the dwellings of the first people. What is constant across the three is the shape of the exchange: a place held sacred by right of priority, a taboo that guards it, and a power that must be kept on the right side of, because it was there before anyone came to keep it.

The tradition carries individual vazimba ancestresses as well, and the most renowned is Ranoro, remembered as a zazavavindrano, a daughter of the water. In the story she is the child of Andriantsira, the Lord of the Salt, and she marries the man Andriambodilova under a single binding fady: that he must never speak the word “salt.” For a time the taboo holds. When at last, in anger, he breaks it — flinging the forbidden word at her — she returns to the water and does not come back, and her doany survives at Andranoro on the Antananarivo plain, kept among the Antehiroka (Ranoro, the Daughter of the Water).

All of this holds a register of its own within the sacred world, distinct from the two orders of the dead that stand nearest to it. The vazimba are not the family razana in their stone tombs, the honored kin of a lineage; and they are not the tromba, the reigning dead who take voice through their mediums at the doany of the coastal kingdoms. They are the substratum beneath both — the land’s first inhabitants turned guardians, the reason the ground is sacred before anyone’s ancestor arrives to be buried in it. Where the razana are addressed as one’s own and the tromba speak as sovereigns, the vazimba are met as the prior owners of the earth: older, less familiar, and closer to the ground than either.

The kingdom, the shrine, and the open question

In the age of the highland kingdom the vazimba were both claimed and subdued, and the two moves were made by the same hand. The royal histories remember Andriamanelo and his successors warring on the vazimba communities of the surrounding country, pressing them westward; the last of the vazimba are held to have been overcome during the reign of Andrianjaka, traditionally dated to about 1610 to 1630, whose name is bound to the founding of the royal city on the hill of Antananarivo. Yet the same dynasty that unmade the vazimba as neighbors kept Rangita and Rafohy at the very head of its own line, so that the Merina kingdom traced its right to rule through the people it had displaced. The conquerors folded the conquered into their ancestry — which, in a world where descent over a place is title to it, was less a contradiction than a claim: to rule the land, one descended from its first masters.

The cult of the vazimba outlasted royal disapproval, and it outlasted the Christian centuries that followed. At Andranoro the honoring of Ranoro among the Antehiroka is a living practice, one of the most frequented places of ancestral petition on the Antananarivo plain; and vazimba doany across the highlands and the west remain sites of offering and healing now, not in memory only. The families and specialists who keep them are living people, and the rites are present-tense — the offering left at the pool, the fady kept at the tomb, the sick and the childless brought to the water to ask. The diviner-healers whom the highlands call the ombiasy are among those who read and tend such relations, though the vazimba are approached by ordinary petitioners as much as by any specialist.

The scholarship reads the vazimba on two levels at once, and the two do not meet. On the first level is the anthropology of the highland dead, where the order the vazimba belong to is drawn most sharply by contrast. Maurice Bloch’s Placing the Dead: Tombs, Ancestral Villages and Kinship Organization in Madagascar (Seminar Press, 1971) established how the highland dead — the razana in their stone tombs — bind kin to a fixed ancestral ground: a Merina may live anywhere but belongs where the tomb stands. Against that architecture of the placed and tombed dead, the un-tombed, water-dwelling vazimba stand as a contrasting order entirely, the dead who are precisely not fastened to a lineage and a chamber, and who hold the ground in a way no family’s ancestors can.

On the second level is the archaeology, and there the question the tradition raises stays genuinely open. The settlement chronology of Madagascar is unresolved. Peter Mitchell, surveying the evidence in Settling Madagascar: When Did People First Colonize the World’s Largest Island? (Journal of Island and Coastal Archaeology 15:4, 2020), finds no convincing evidence for a human presence on the island before the middle of the first millennium of the common era, and reads the earlier claims skeptically. Against that stand the very finds that would push the arrival back — cut-marked animal bones from Christmas River, stone tools from the rock shelter of Lakaton’i Anja, and other traces that press the datings far earlier, some reaching millennia before Mitchell’s threshold, and that drew a direct published rejoinder from other researchers holding the early evidence to be robust. Whether the vazimba are a folk memory of a real pre-Austronesian or early-settler population, absorbed and half-forgotten, or an autochthon-figure the highlanders raised to account for the land’s first sanctity, turns partly on a chronology the specialists have not agreed. The tradition and the trowel are asking, from opposite ends, the same unanswered thing.

What is not in question is what the vazimba do in the sacred world as it is lived. The razana can be gathered home, rewrapped, and seated at the head of the family, their place among the living renewed each time the tomb is opened. The vazimba cannot be gathered home, because they never left the ground — and a people whose graves cannot be closed are a people who cannot be finished. That is why a spring keeps its offering and a boulder keeps its distance long after everyone has forgotten which of the first people lies beneath. The ancestors of stone are visited. The masters of the land are simply there, holding the water, older than the tombs.

→ Related: Zanahary · Andriamanitra · Razana · Tromba · Ambohimanga · Rova Of Antananarivo · Ambondrombe · Lake Tritriva · The Malagasy · The Ombiasy · Famadihana