Urkesh

← Encyclopedia

In the foothills below the Taurus, where the rain-fed plain of the upper Khabur runs north toward the copper and the timber of the mountains, a low mound called Tell Mozan carries a city that the cuneiform world knew by name long before any spade reached it. The name is Urkesh, and in the literature of the Hurrians it is not merely a town on a trade road. It is a holy place — the home-city of Kumarbi, the grain-god who fathered the gods, and the seat of a deep stone shaft cut into the earth so that the living might speak with what lies beneath it. Of the two things, the second is the rarer. Cities that worship a high god are common across Mesopotamia. A city built around a permanent door into the underworld is not.

A Hurrian city, not a Sumerian or Akkadian one

The peoples of the third millennium spoke of three great language-worlds in the north and south of the Tigris–Euphrates basin: Sumerian, Akkadian, and a third that belonged to neither. The third was Hurrian, a tongue unrelated to the Semitic Akkadian of the southern cities and unrelated to Sumerian — its only known relative is the later Urartian of the Armenian highland. The Hurrians enter the documentary record as personal names and loanwords in southern tablets, then as a people of the northern arc from the Khabur across to the Zagros. The earliest kingdom that can be called theirs gathered around Urkesh. Here the high god is not Enlil of Nippur or Marduk of Babylon but Kumarbi, the father of the gods, whose city Urkesh is. This is a different pantheon, a different idiom of the sacred, set down in the same wedge-script the south had invented but bent to other ends.

The distinction is not a modern philologist’s convenience; the Hurrians of Urkesh marked it themselves. Their rulers carried the title endan — a Hurrian word for the sovereign, not the Sumerian lugal or the Akkadian šarrum — and styled themselves kings of Urkesh and Nawar, binding the holy city to its sister-seat across the plain. The high cult, the language of governance, and the mythology all point one way: this was a Hurrian world abutting the Sumero-Akkadian one, trading and intermarrying with it, occasionally subject to it, but never reducible to it. The wider religious sphere of the south — the city-gods, the temple economy, the reading of divine intention in signs — is the neighbor against which Urkesh defines itself; that sphere belongs to the entry on Mesopotamian religion, and the difference matters most precisely where the two systems part: in what they did with the dead.

Kumarbi, father of the gods

Kumarbi has no surviving temple-statue, but he is one of the best-attested gods of the second-millennium Near East, because the Hittites — who absorbed Hurrian religion wholesale into their state cult — copied the Hurrian myths into Hittite and stored them in the royal archives at Hattusa. From those tablets comes the Kumarbi cycle, a sequence of songs on kingship in heaven and the wars to hold it. Its opening, the Song of Kumarbi (the Hittite “Song of Going Forth,” cataloged as CTH 344), tells how heaven’s throne passed through a chain of usurpations: Alalu was overthrown by the sky-god Anu, and Anu in turn by Kumarbi, who bit off and swallowed his father’s genitals — and was thereby made pregnant with the storm-god Teshub, who would one day rise against him. The structure is unmistakable to anyone who has read Hesiod. The Greek succession of Ouranos, Kronos, and Zeus, with the castration of the sky-father and the birth of new gods from his severed flesh, runs along the same line as the Hurrian Anu, Kumarbi, and Teshub. The channel of transmission across Anatolia and the Aegean is argued rather than mapped, and each poem keeps its own gods and its own land; but the kinship of the two succession-sequences is among the firmest comparative results in the study of ancient mythology, and the Hurrian telling is the elder witness.

That this elder witness names Urkesh as Kumarbi’s own city gives the place a particular gravity. A Hurrian myth has the god’s son Silver come looking for his father and find him gone from his city of Urkesh — the kind of casual geography that betrays a real cult-center, a place where Kumarbi was at home. The grain-god who fathered the storm and then was overthrown by him is also the god most readily turned toward the earth and what it holds. In the layered Hurrian cosmos the living gods of the bright sky stand over a company of older, displaced powers consigned below — the former gods, the chthonic ancestors of the divine — and over the dead. Kumarbi’s affinities reach in both directions. At Urkesh the reach downward took architectural form.

The abi: a stone door into the underworld

Set into the city, beside the royal palace, is the feature that makes Urkesh singular. The excavators found a deep, stone-lined shaft — a lower circular chamber roughly four meters across at the top, joined to a higher rectangular forepart, the whole structure better than seven and a half meters long and sunk far into the ground. Potsherds from its fill reach back toward 2600 BCE, and the masonry continues below the level so far cleared, so the installation may have been opened earlier still, near the city’s foundation. It was kept in use, recut and respected, across the third millennium. This is the abi.

The word is not a guess. Later Hurrian and Hittite ritual texts from Hattusa describe an abi (the cognate Hittite term is api) — a pit dug as a passage to the world below, into which offerings were lowered so that the deities and spirits of the earth could be called up to receive them and to answer. The underworld powers so summoned were led by Allani, the lady, the Hurrian mistress of the dead whom the south knew as Ereshkigal and the Hittites set beside their Sun-goddess of the Earth. The offerings made into the Urkesh shaft tell the same story from the ground: among the animal bones recovered from it, pigs and puppies are conspicuous — creatures that across the ancient Near East were given not to the gods of the bright temple but to the powers of the dark earth, precisely the chthonic registers excluded from the ordinary upper cult. The abi was, in the plainest archaeological sense, a channel to the underworld kept open inside a living city.

This is what sets Urkesh apart from its southern neighbors. The Sumero-Akkadian world had its own dense traffic with the dead — the monthly kispum by which a household fed its ancestors, the ghost (eṭemmu) that haunted the negligent heir, the rare and guarded rite by which a named shade could be made to speak. But Sumer and Akkad built no permanent civic installation for it. Their dead were addressed at the grave, at the family table, in the privacy of the incantation-priest’s craft. The Urkesh abi is a different order of thing: a monumental, public, architecturally fixed mouth of the earth, maintained beside the seat of kings. In the judgment of the excavators it is a wholly unique structure, evidence of necromantic rites standing in sharp contrast to the religious mentality of the Sumerians and the Akkadians. The summoning of the earth-spirits and the dead was not, at Urkesh, an irregular and faintly shameful expedient. It was built into the plan of the city.

The architecture of the rite can be described without its operation. Offerings descended; the powers of the dark earth were called to the threshold to receive them; in exchange they were petitioned, and — in the ambivalent logic that attaches everywhere to such commerce — they were thought capable of carrying back below some portion of the evil that troubled the living. What passed between the petitioner and the summoned, the words and gestures by which the threshold was crossed, belong to the closed craft of the Hurrian ritualist and to the comparative study of necromancy and the wider arts of divination. The point that the shaft itself makes, mute and unarguable, is that this was a sanctioned center of the cult and not its margin.

Nergal on the terrace, and the oldest Hurrian words

The abi did not stand alone in the religious topography of the city. Above the palace rose a great temple terrace, a monumental raised platform with a plaza before it and a temple at its summit, the whole complex reaching back into the fourth millennium in its earliest phases and rebuilt across the city’s life. To the underworld-facing cult of the shaft, the terrace added the apparatus of a high temple — the vertical and the horizontal axes of the same sacred order, the descent into the earth and the ascent toward the god.

From a later king of Urkesh comes the city’s most famous object and the oldest connected text in the Hurrian language. Two cast copper lions, each gripping a stone tablet, were laid as foundation deposits for a temple; their inscription records that Tish-atal, endan of Urkesh, built a temple for the god Nergal, and calls on the god Nubadag to protect it and to destroy whoever would destroy it. One lion and its tablet are in the Louvre; the second lion is in New York. The dedication is telling: Nergal, the Sumero-Akkadian sovereign of the dead, taken up by the Hurrian king of the underworld’s holy city. The borrowing runs the right way for Urkesh — the city whose own abi opened on the realm Nergal ruled would naturally house his temple, naming the southern lord of the dead in the idiom of the north. That the earliest sustained Hurrian writing yet found should be a temple-dedication to a death-god, from the city of the death-shaft, is the kind of convergence that a holy place produces and a chronicle could never invent.

The dynasty in the sealings

Urkesh is not a city known only from its myths. Its third-millennium rulers left their seals, and the seals were rolled across the clay that locked the palace storerooms; the impressions survived where the documents did not. A cache of them named a king: Tupkish, endan of Urkesh, about 2250 BCE. With him came his queen, Uqnitum, whose own seals are more numerous than her husband’s and show her with her household — a queen’s establishment running in parallel to the king’s, an unusual prominence preserved in the imagery of court patronage. The seals of their courtiers, the nurse and the cook and the rest, came up in the same deposits, so that a third-millennium court can be read off the door-clay of a single palace.

Among the same sealings was a name that fixed Urkesh into the calendar of the wider Near East. A princess sealed her property as Tar’am-Agade, daughter of Naram-Sin, king of Akkad. Naram-Sin was the most powerful sovereign of the Akkadian empire, the first dynasty to claim dominion over the whole of Mesopotamia and the first of its kings to call himself a god. A daughter of his at Urkesh — whether married to its endan or installed as a high priestess — means that the holy Hurrian city stood in direct dynastic relation to imperial Akkad, neither swallowed by it nor sealed off from it, but bound to its house. The stratified position of her sealings, set against those of Tupkish and Uqnitum, gives the excavators one of their firmest chronological anchors, tying the local sequence of the palace to the reign of a king datable across the whole region.

What the dynastic record shows, set beside the cult, is a city of real political weight: a Hurrian capital controlling a route between the southern empires and the metal and stone of the highlands, with its own kings, its own queen’s court, and a marriage-tie to the most formidable power of the age — and at the center of it all the shaft, kept open, into which the kings of a death-god’s city went down to speak with the earth.

The recovery of Urkesh

For most of the modern era Urkesh was a name without a place. It appeared in cuneiform sources and in the Hurrian myths, and scholars knew there had been such a city, but no one could say where. The answer came from Tell Mozan, a mound in the Syrian Jazira near the Turkish border, where Giorgio Buccellati of UCLA and Marilyn Kelly-Buccellati of California State University, Los Angeles, opened excavations in 1984. Season by season the identification firmed: the architecture of a major third-millennium center, the temple terrace, the royal palace — and then, decisively, the seal impressions naming Tupkish, endan of Urkesh, which welded the modern mound to the ancient name. The abi was identified and excavated as the cult was understood, with the chthonic offerings read against the Hittite ritual texts that preserve the word. The work has continued through the seasons of war that closed much of Syria to foreign archaeology, with the site protected in place by an arrangement worked out with the local community — a holy city tended, again, by the people living above it.

Down through the second millennium the city’s importance shifted with the rise of the Hurrian power around it. It came under the Amorite kingdom of Mari, then was drawn into the orbit of the great Hurrian state of Mitanni, surviving as Nawar before the site was given up around 1350 BCE. But it is the third-millennium city, the holy city of Kumarbi, that the mound has returned. And the heart of what it returned is not the palace or the terrace or the bright record of kings. It is the abi — a stone-lined throat cut into the earth in the middle of a city, opened toward 2600 BCE and kept open for centuries, down which a people unlike their southern neighbors lowered the gifts of the dark earth and called its powers up by name. The masonry was sunk to last, and it did: the shaft sits exactly where its builders set it, mouth toward Allani’s country, the signature of a Hurrian death-cult that, alone among the early cities of the Near East, built itself a permanent door into the ground and never sealed it.

Texts, excavation, and scholarship

Urkesh is among the most fully published excavations in Syrian archaeology, with a continuous record kept by Giorgio Buccellati and Marilyn Kelly-Buccellati from 1984 onward. The chthonic character of the abi was set out by Billie Jean Collins, “A Channel to the Underworld in Syria,” Near Eastern Archaeology 67/1 (2004), which reads the pig and dog bones from the shaft against the Hittite and Hurrian api-ritual texts that describe pits dug to summon the deities of the earth — the single most direct treatment of the installation’s necromantic function and its contrast with southern practice.

The dynastic and chronological backbone rests on Giorgio Buccellati and Marilyn Kelly-Buccellati, “Tar’am-Agade, Daughter of Naram-Sin, at Urkesh” (2002), which publishes the sealing that ties the local palace sequence to the Akkadian royal house, and on their report on the royal palace in Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft 132 (2000). The temple terrace and the foundation lions are treated in Kelly-Buccellati, “The Great Temple Terrace at Urkesh and the Lions of Tish-atal” (2009). The lions themselves — the oldest connected Hurrian text, recording Tish-atal’s temple for Nergal — are accessible in the Metropolitan Museum of Art’s catalog of the New York lion, with its companion and limestone tablet in the Louvre.

The Hurrian religious frame within which the abi and the cult of Kumarbi must be read draws on the broader study of the Hurrian and Hittite mythological corpus from Hattusa, where the Kumarbi cycle was preserved; on the comparative study of the ancient Near Eastern cult of the dead surveyed in connection with Ugaritic and West Semitic religion, whose summoning of the deified dead offers the nearest Levantine analogue to the Urkesh rite; and on the wider apparatus of Mesopotamian death-belief — the ghost, the ancestor-offering, and the rare necromantic summoning of a named shade — that frames why the abi reads as a Hurrian departure rather than a Sumero-Akkadian inheritance.

→ Related: Mesopotamia · Mesopotamian Religion Sumerian Akkadian · Necromancy · Nergal · Ishtar · Divination · Ugaritic West Semitic Religion · Sumer