Urartu

← Encyclopedia

Urartu was an Iron Age kingdom of the Armenian highlands, flourishing from the ninth to the early sixth century BCE around Lake Van in what is now eastern Turkey, with neighboring reaches in present-day Armenia and northwestern Iran. Its capital was Tushpa, on the lakeshore beneath the great rock of Van. The name comes from the Assyrians to the south, who called the land Urartu; its own kings wrote of the land of Biainili, and the word survives, by way of that Assyrian form, in the later name Ararat. From the Assyrian Urartu came the consonantal RRT of Hebrew, and from there the biblical Ararat — the highland region where, in Genesis, the ark of Noah grounds after the waters of the flood recede. So a kingdom whose own gods were fed bulls by the score, and whose own writing no later reader could parse, gave its borrowed name to the mountains on which a flood-remnant came to rest. For much of its history the kingdom was the southern empire’s chief rival on the northern frontier, and the two powers raided and inscribed their victories against each other for generations, each carving its triumphs into rock above the routes the other would have to use.

The kingdom’s chancery wrote in cuneiform — the wedge-script borrowed from the south, where it had been shaped for Akkadian, a Semitic tongue. The language the Urartian kings recorded with it was neither Semitic nor Indo-European but a member of the small Hurro-Urartian family, whose only well-attested relative is Hurrian, the language of the earlier highland and north-Mesopotamian world. So the script and the speech it served were strangers to each other: a borrowed hand carrying an unrelated voice. A handful of bilingual Assyrian-Urartian texts gave the modern decipherers their footing. Almost everything that is established about the kingdom’s gods comes from this royal cuneiform — building inscriptions, campaign annals, dedications — and from the temples whose stone outlasted them. The inscriptions are overwhelmingly the public speech of kings, not the private language of devotion, and they record what was done for the gods far more fully than what was thought about them.

The making of the kingdom

The state came together out of fragments. The highlands around the lake had long held a scatter of small principalities — the Assyrians, raiding northward across the Iron Age centuries, recorded them as a confederacy of lands rather than a single realm — and the welding of them into one kingdom is credited in the records to Arame, who ruled around 860–840 BCE and is the first king the southern annals name as a ruler of Urartu. Under his successors the fortress-confederacy hardened into a centralized monarchy. Sarduri I, about 832 BCE, fixed the seat of power at Tushpa beneath the rock of Van and left the kingdom’s earliest surviving royal inscription, written still in Assyrian before the chancery turned to recording Urartian. His son Ishpuini and grandson Minua, across the turn of the eighth century, were the great builders and consolidators: they pushed the frontiers outward, drove canals and irrigation works across the dry highland valleys, and — most consequentially for the kingdom’s character — made Haldi the sovereign god of the whole state. By the reign of Minua’s son Argishti I (roughly 785–760 BCE), who founded the citadel of Argishtihinili in the Araxes plain and another, Erebuni, on the site of present-day Yerevan, Urartu was among the foremost powers of the Near East, contesting eastern Anatolia and the southern Caucasus directly with Assyria. Sarduri II carried the kingdom to its widest reach before the Assyrian recovery under Tiglath-Pileser III broke its western expansion in the 740s and 730s BCE. The rivalry was a two-century duel of fortress against fortress along a frontier of high valleys, each king cutting his victories into the rock above the passes the other would have to climb — and each crediting those victories to his god.

The pantheon and the rise of Haldi

At the head of the order stood Haldi, the warrior-god to whom the kings credited their conquests. He was, in the strictest sense, an adopted god. The Urartologist Paul Zimansky has argued that Haldi was not a native highland deity at all but an obscure figure drawn from the south, with no securely Urartian roots; his cult was installed as the state religion only under the king Ishpuini, in the later ninth century BCE. Ishpuini’s elevation of Haldi was the founding act of Urartu as a sacral monarchy — the moment a frontier collection of fortress-lords became a kingdom with a single sovereign god at its head. From that point the relation was total. Campaigns went out in Haldi’s name; his blessing was sought before the march and a report rendered to him after it; the spoil of conquered lands was dedicated back to him, and the king styled himself the god’s servant. More inscriptions are addressed to Haldi than to any other figure in the highland pantheon.

Beneath him came Teisheba, a storm- and weather-god who answers directly to the Hurrian Teshub and stands in the same role as the Mesopotamian Adad — the lord of thunder, rain, and the destructive flood, the divine weather that an agricultural kingdom in a hard upland climate could neither command nor ignore. Third came Shivini, the sun-god, shown in highland art as a kneeling figure upholding a winged solar disk. Each of the three had a consort — Arubani (called Bagmashtu in the eastern reaches near Musasir) beside Haldi, Huba beside Teisheba, Tushpuea beside Shivini — and below the triad spread a crowded company of lesser gods, deified mountains, gates, and waters, the divine furniture of the land itself.

The Door of Haldi at Meher Kapısı

The fullest single statement the kingdom left of its order of worship is cut into living rock at Meher Kapısı, at the foot of a mountain a few kilometers east of Tushpa. The Urartians shaped certain rock faces into the form of a doorway — a sunken, framed niche that imitates a temple gate but opens into nothing but the mountain — and called such monuments gates of Haldi, doors through which the god was understood to pass. The Meher Kapısı niche, set high on a south-facing cliff, carries a long inscription of Ishpuini and his son Minua across its back wall: nearly a hundred lines listing the gods of the kingdom in their hierarchy, each with the precise sacrifice owed to it — so many bulls, so many sheep — beginning with Haldi, then Teisheba, then Shivini, and descending through scores of named divinities. Among the recipients of offering are not only the gods themselves but Haldi’s attributes treated as worthy of sacrifice in their own right: his armies, his spear, his greatness, his power, his mercy. The Door of Haldi is at once a liturgical ledger and a theological map — the kingdom’s pantheon fixed in stone in the order in which it was to be fed.

The susi temple and the house of weapons

Haldi’s temples took a distinctive form the excavators call the susi, the tower-temple: a tall, single-roomed square cella with thick buttressed corners, its lower courses of cut andesite set on bedrock and carrying mudbrick walls above. The best-preserved example, at the fortress of Ayanis on the eastern shore of Lake Van, stands in an open courtyard, a square cella some thirteen meters on a side with its floor laid in alabaster and its stone blocks carved and inlaid. The susi did not stand apart in a precinct of its own; it rose inside the fortified citadel that crowned each Urartian hilltop, so that the god’s house and the king’s stronghold were the same place. Religion and the state were not so much joined as indistinguishable.

What the temple held was not chiefly an image but an armory. Urartian shrines were called houses of weapons, hung with bows, spears, swords, axes, and shields, and the spear or shield of Haldi could itself be the focus of cult — the warrior-god present in his arms rather than his likeness. The treasure dedicated from campaigns accumulated there under the god’s protection, which made the great sanctuaries among the richest places in the kingdom and, to a covetous neighbor, the most worth taking.

The richest of all stood not in the Urartian heartland but at Musasir, the holy city the Urartians knew as Ardini, a semi-independent sanctuary-state in the mountains to the south where the temple of Haldi — built in the late ninth century BCE and shared with the goddess Bagbartu — drew dedications from kings across the region. In 714 BCE the Assyrian king Sargon II, on the eighth campaign of his reign, broke into Musasir, plundered first the palace storerooms of its ruler Urzana and then the far greater wealth of Haldi’s temple, and had his scribes set down the haul in a long report addressed to the god Ashur — the document modern scholars call the Letter to the God Ashur, recovered at the city of Assur. The inventory of the temple alone runs for column after column: more than a ton of gold and several tons of silver, bronze statues of Urartian kings set up in the sanctuary, vessels and furniture and ornament, and from the god’s own walls a mass of weapons reckoned in the tens of thousands — shields, javelins, and a vast store of swords, the accumulated armory of generations of dedication. The grand total of objects carried off ran into the hundreds of thousands. The scene was carved in relief on the wall of Sargon’s new capital at Dur-Sharrukin (Khorsabad), the temple shown with its gabled, pillared front and its cult image as Assyrian soldiers stripped its furnishings; the sculpture itself was later lost, recovered by the excavator Paul-Émile Botta in the 1840s only to sink into the Tigris during its shipment downriver, so that it survives at one further remove, in the careful field drawings of his artist Eugène Flandin. The richest single account of how an Urartian sanctuary was furnished is thus an Assyrian boast about its undoing, preserved in the hand of the draftsman of the men who carried it away. The loss of Haldi’s house at Musasir was understood as a wound to the kingdom itself: the Urartian king Rusa I, by the account that came down through the Assyrian record, is said to have torn the crown from his head and taken his own life.

The unbuilding of the highland

The kingdom outlived Sargon’s raid by a century, rebuilt under later kings — a second Rusa raised the great new fortress of Rusahinili at Toprakkale near Van and the citadel of Ayanis on the lake — but the world around it was hardening against it. From the late seventh century BCE the highlands took mounting pressure from the nomadic Cimmerians and then the Scythians moving down through the Caucasus, and from the rising power of the Medes to the south. One after another the fortresses fell silent. Teishebaini, the storm-god’s own city at Karmir Blur in present-day Armenia, was stormed and put to the torch around the turn of the sixth century BCE, its store-rooms and arsenals burned where they stood — the destruction so complete that the ash and the fallen goods preserved the fullest single record of how a Urartian citadel was stocked and lived in. Tushpa and the other strongholds passed out of the kings’ hands, and the country of Biainili dissolved into the movement of peoples from which the later Armenian highland took shape, drawn in time into the orbit of the Medes and then the Achaemenid Persian empire. Haldi acquired no heir. No temple of his was carried into a surviving tradition; no priesthood kept his rites; the god in whose name every campaign had opened went out of worship when the armed citadels that held his weapons burned, and the sacrifices counted out at Meher Kapısı were never offered again.

Scholarship and sources

Modern knowledge of Urartu rests on roughly two centuries of fieldwork around Lake Van and the publication of its royal inscriptions, gathered into the standard corpus of Urartian cuneiform texts. The foundational synthesis of the kingdom’s material culture was Boris Piotrovsky’s The Ancient Civilization of Urartu (1969), drawing on the long Soviet-Armenian excavations at Karmir Blur (Teishebaini) near Erevan. The standard English-language handbook is Paul E. Zimansky’s Ancient Ararat: A Handbook of Urartian Studies (1998), with his earlier Ecology and Empire: The Structure of the Urartian State (1985) reconstructing how a kingdom of fortresses fed and governed itself; the Handbook’s review in the American Journal of Archaeology places it within the field. The corpus of Urartian inscriptions on which all of this rests was assembled by Mirjo Salvini as the Corpus dei testi urartei, the indispensable collection of the kingdom in its own words. The religion proper has been treated as a problem of royal ideology — how a single imported god came to legitimize a dynasty — most directly in the study of Haldi and the Urartian monarch, Religion and Kingship Ideology: God Ḫaldi and the Urartian Monarch, published in Ancient West & East 17 (2018). The Musasir sanctuary itself, long known only from Sargon’s annals and the Khorsabad relief, has been pursued on the ground by the Rowanduz Archaeological Project in Iraqi Kurdistan, reported by Michael Danti in Expedition (2014). The deeper world against which Urartu defined itself — the cuneiform learning it took its script from, the storm-god vocabulary it inherited through Hurrian from the lands of Sumer, Babylon, and Elam — is the matter of Mesopotamian religion and of Mesopotamia more broadly, the southern order against which the highland pantheon’s distinctness stands out the more sharply.

What the inscriptions never set down — the experience behind the bulls counted out at Meher Kapısı, the meaning of a spear set up where a god’s image might have stood — is past recovery. Yet the shape of the belief is still legible in its own terms: the king who ruled only as Haldi’s servant; the god who marched at the head of the army and to whom every campaign was reported back; the square tower-temples standing armed inside their citadels, the bronze spear of the warrior-god worshipped in place of any likeness; and above Tushpa the false door cut into the mountain, the Gate of Haldi, framed in stone as if the god could walk out of the rock at the head of the host that had always gone out in his name.

→ Related: Mesopotamia · Iron Age · Adad · Mesopotamian Religion Sumerian Akkadian · Comparative Flood Myth · Sumer · Elam · Babylon