Philosophy

Taoism

The Chinese tradition, at once philosophy and organized religion, built around the Tao — the nameless way and source of all things — and the art of acting in accord with it.

← Encyclopedia

Taoism is the Chinese tradition — at once a school of philosophy and an organized religion — built around the Tao, the “way”: the nameless source and underlying pattern of all that exists, and the art of living in accord with it rather than against its grain. The word tao meant simply a road or a method before these texts gave it cosmic weight, and the tradition is often split, for convenience, into a philosophical strand and a religious one — a division sharper in Western scholarship than in the practice itself.

The foundational texts are two. The Daodejing (Tao Teh King), traditionally ascribed to a sage called Laozi, is a terse book of some eighty-one brief chapters; modern scholarship treats Laozi as a legendary or composite figure and the text as a compilation reaching its form around the third century BCE. The Zhuangzi, named for the philosopher Zhuang Zhou, is its companion: longer, wilder, full of parable and paradox. Together they teach wu wei — usually rendered “non-action,” though it means something closer to action without forcing, the unstrained efficacy of water, which yields and yet wears down stone. The sage governs least, the texts hold, and accomplishes most by not contending.

This literary, contemplative current is what the West long meant by “Taoism.” But from roughly the second century CE there arose an organized religion with priesthood, liturgy, scripture, and a vast pantheon — its movements claiming revelation and pursuing longevity, even physical immortality, through diet, breath control, meditation, and alchemy both outward (compounded elixirs) and inward (the refining of energies within the body). Practitioners held that the adept could become an immortal, an xian, and ascend. The relation between this religion and the early philosophy is genuinely disputed: continuous development in one reading, distinct phenomena sharing a vocabulary in another.

Taoism developed alongside Confucianism, often as its counterweight — where the Confucian looked to ritual, hierarchy, and the duties of public life, the Taoist looked to spontaneity, withdrawal, and the natural order. The arrival of Buddhism from India reshaped both, and the three traditions interwove for centuries without one wholly displacing the others. It holds the ultimate to be impersonal and beyond naming, yet present in everything. That double instinct has invited comparison with two distant currents: the via negativa of apophatic mysticism, which approaches the divine only by saying what it is not, and Spinoza’s pantheism, with its single substance immanent in the world. The resemblances are real and worth tracing, though each tradition reaches them by its own road and means by them its own thing. What the Tao finally is, the oldest text insists in its first lines, cannot be said — the Tao that can be spoken is not the constant Tao. The tradition has spent two millennia speaking around it.

In the library: Legge — The Tao Teh King (1891) · Legge — The Texts of Tâoism (1891) · Giles — Chuang Tzŭ (1889)

Related: Confucianism · Buddhism · Quietism · Alchemy · Pantheism

Sources

  • Kohn 2000
  • Graham 1989