Supay

← Encyclopedia

A quarter-mile inside the Cerro Rico, past where the electric light gives out and the air turns close and metallic, a figure sits waiting in a niche cut from the rock. He has horns, and eyes that bulge from a face molded in clay and painted, and a lit cigarette has been set between his teeth to burn down on its own. Coca leaves are heaped in his lap. Cane alcohol, poured out an hour ago, is still drying dark on the stone at his feet. The miners who pass him call him Tío — the Uncle — and they feed him because down here the ore is his and the danger is his, and nothing that happens in the dark happens without his leave. What they do not do is carry any of this up into the daylight. On the surface, at the mouth of the shaft and in the town below, the earth belongs to Pachamama and to the Virgin; the church stands in the plaza and the offerings there are of another kind. The line runs at the threshold of the mine. Below it, a different lord.

That divided gesture — the effigy fed underground, the Virgin honored above — holds the whole history of Supay folded inside it. To follow it downward is to reach the pre-Christian lord of the interior earth, an ambivalent power who was neither god of the sky nor demon of a hell. To follow it forward is to watch a missionary translation turn that lord into “the Devil,” and to find the Devil still fed, still danced, alive in 2026 in the tunnels of Potosí and at the head of the greatest carnival in the Andes.

The word for shadow

Supay is a word before it is a being, and the word is older and stranger than the horns. In Quechua, supay was glossed by the earliest colonial lexicographers as shadow, and by close extension as soul — the anima, the animating double of a person — and from there as illness, as death, and as the state of one possessed or driven out of their mind. The Aymara form is supaya, and there the plural carries the load: the supaya are the spirits of the dead and of the earth’s interior, a swarming population of the below rather than a single named lord. To speak of Supay in the singular, as a personage, is already to have begun sorting a much wider and vaguer field of the dead, the dark, and the doubled soul into a shape a European could recognize.

The field itself is the inner world. Andean thought divides the whole — pacha, the fused word for world, time, and totality — into three joined realms. There is Hanan Pacha, the upper world of sun and moon and the celestial powers; there is Kay Pacha, “this world,” the perceptible here-and-now of people, animals, and growing plants; and there is Uku Pacha, or Ukhu Pacha, the inner world below, associated with darkness, with the dead, and with the interior of the earth. Crucially, Uku Pacha is not a pit of punishment. It is where the seeds go and where the water is stored, the matrix from which crops rise and metals are drawn; and it is not sealed off but connected, reached upward into the world of the living through caves, through springs, and through the mouths of mines. The below feeds the surface. What comes out of the ground — the potato, the spring, the vein of silver — comes out of Uku Pacha, and the power that owns that interior owns both its wealth and its threat.

So Supay, lord of that interior, was ambivalent by nature — benefactor and harm in one, guardian of the dead and of the buried riches, a power to be kept on good terms rather than an enemy to be defeated. The clearest surviving proof of that ambivalence is lexical. When the Dominican friar Domingo de Santo Tomás published the first Quechua vocabulary in 1560, he still recorded the word split down the middle: alli supay, the “good” supay, which he rendered as a good angel or spirit, and mana alli supay, the “not-good” one, the bad angel. A being that can be qualified as good or bad is not yet a Devil. It is a category — the interior spirit — that runs in both directions, exactly as one would expect of the power that both grows the crop and takes the dead.

This places Supay at a distinct address in the Andean sacred order. He is not among the sovereign powers of the sky and the state — not the sun of the Inca cult, nor the creator, nor Illapa of the thunder, nor Mama Killa the moon who keeps the count of the months. Nor is he the surface. That belongs to Pachamama, the earth-mother of the cultivated ground and the daylight. Supay is the third direction, the vertical below: the owner of the interior and its metals, held by the Quechua-speaking Runa and the Aymara as the lord one meets by going down.

The translation that made a devil

Everything that can be said about the pre-Christian Supay must be reconstructed against the grain of the sources, because nearly every source is a colonial or missionary one, written by men whose express purpose was to replace him. What survived of him did so almost entirely inside the extirpators’ own case-files and confession manuals — the very documents built to destroy him. Supay enters the written page already inside a Spanish sentence — and the sentence was built to make him the enemy.

The machinery of the substitution was translation. To preach a Christian hell on Andean ground, the missionaries needed an Andean word for its lord, and supay — with its freight of death, of shadow, of the interior dark — was the nearest fit. So the ambivalent field was collapsed onto a single Christian figure: Satan, and behind him the fallen angels. The tripartite cosmos was read as a familiar triad, Hanan Pacha becoming heaven, Kay Pacha the earth, and Uku Pacha simply hell. The mestizo chronicler Inca Garcilaso de la Vega, writing from Spain in the first decade of the seventeenth century, completed the equation from the inside, glossing the underworld as Zupaipa Huacin — “the house of the Devil” (recorded in the survey of the word’s history). The Jesuit José de Acosta, whose Historia natural y moral de las Indias of 1590 became the standard learned account of the New World, supplied the theology that made the collapse feel inevitable: the devil, Acosta held, had counterfeited among the peoples of the Indies a mockery of Christian truth, so that every Andean rite could be read as a diabolical imitation and every interior power as a mask of the one adversary. Under that reading there was nothing to understand in Supay, only something to unmask.

What began as translation hardened into prosecution. Through the seventeenth century the Peruvian church mounted sustained campaigns — the extirpación de idolatrías, the extirpation of idolatry — to hunt out and destroy Andean devotion as devil-worship: shrines broken, offerings punished, the venerated dead disinterred and burned. The vocabulary was theirs and marks their frame, not the tradition’s; but the campaigns had the institutional weight to make a dictionary entry into a fact of life. By the time the dust settled, the word had been remade. In colonial and in modern Quechua alike, supay means, plainly, “devil.” The good angel and the bad angel of Santo Tomás’s 1560 page had been fused into a single horned thing, and the fusion held. It is one of the most complete instances anywhere of translation working as conquest — an interior lord not so much argued out of existence as redefined into the enemy of the faith that arrived with the swords.

The Uncle of the mine

He was redefined, but he was not erased. Driven from the surface and out of respectable speech, the interior lord went where interiors are — underground — and there, in the deepest and deadliest work the colony invented, he is fed to this day. His mine name is El Tío, the Uncle; some call him Tío Supay, keeping the old word attached to the new mask. He owns the ore and the shaft, and his home is the greatest wound the Andes carries.

A clay effigy of El Tío seated in a working gallery of the Cerro Rico at Potosí, Bolivia. SHIBUYA K., via Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 3.0.

That wound is the Cerro Rico, the “rich hill” above Potosí in what is now Bolivia, a single mountain of silver that bankrolled an empire and is remembered by another name: the mountain that eats men. To work it the Spanish reforged the older Andean institution of rotational labor, the mit’a, into a forced draft under the reforms of Viceroy Francisco de Toledo in the 1570s; Andean communities across a vast catchment were compelled to send men in rotation into the shafts, and enslaved Africans were worked there beside them. They died of cave-ins, of exhaustion, of the mercury used to refine the ore. How many died over the centuries is contested and should be stated as contested — the very high figures often repeated do not survive scrutiny cleanly, and other estimates run far lower — but that the mortality was catastrophic is not in doubt. The Tío is bound to that mortality. He is the owner of the very metal that killed, and the danger and the wealth are the same power wearing two faces. The imperial labor system that the mine’s draft seized upon belonged to a different order; what the shaft kept was the older logic of the interior — that what is taken from below must be paid for.

His effigies are made by the miners themselves, hundreds of them, one to a gallery. The type is fixed: a horned, bulging-eyed devil molded in clay, sometimes goat-formed, very often with an erect phallus — a figure of the underground’s raw generative and destructive force. And he is fed on a schedule. On Tuesdays and Fridays the miners sit with him to share what they themselves consume in the cold and the dark: coca leaves to chew, hand-rolled cigarettes set alight, cane alcohol — puro, aguardiente — poured on the ground and passed around. The ritual visit is the ch’alla, the same libation-and-sharing that feeds the earth on the surface, carried down to the owner of the depths. At the intense moments — Carnival, and above all in August, the hungry month — the offering rises to a k’araku, the sacrifice of a llama or other camelid at the mine, its blood splashed on the threshold and the walls of the shaft. Around him cluster the taboos of the interior: no salt eaten before the descent, and by an old and now much-criticized rule the mine is his male domain, jealous of the surface. These specifics are named here at the distance the public record keeps them; they are described, not offered as instruction.

The logic that governs all of this is not confusion but a clean division of space, and it is worth stating plainly because outsiders so often misread it. Pachamama and the Catholic Virgin own the surface and the daylight — the field, the town, the plaza, the mouth of the mine where the miner crosses himself before going down. The Tío owns everything past the threshold: the ore, the dark, the luck, and the risk. To honor the Virgin above and the Uncle below is not to hold two contradictory faiths but to keep one coherent world with an inside and an outside, and to pay the right power in the right place. The anthropologist Michael Taussig built his best-known book on exactly this scene. In The Devil and Commodity Fetishism in South America (1980) he read the Bolivian tin-miners’ devil not as inherited superstition but as the miners’ own sharp commentary on wage labor — the Tío as the owner of a production the worker no longer owns, a figure through whom men who have been turned into hands underground name the alienation and the danger of the thing. The reading has been debated; but it decisively broke the old habit of filing the Tío under “pagan remnant,” and put in its place a living, present-tense religion of people thinking clearly about the mountain that eats them.

The devils that dance

Supay’s second living theater is not hidden underground but staged in the open, in daylight, at the head of a parade watched by hundreds of thousands. This is the Diablada, the “dance of the devils,” the signature dance of the Carnaval de Oruro in the Bolivian altiplano. Its dancers wear the interior lord’s face made spectacular: masks crowned with reptilian horns and bulging eyes, sequined capes, boots — a whole battalion of devils led by Lucifer and Satan, and among them the China Supay, the female devils, seductive and masked. Against this host stands the Archangel Michael, San Miguel, sword raised; the choreography is a morality play in which the sins and the devils are confronted and, in the end, subdued.

Diablada dancers in horned devil masks at the Carnaval de Oruro, Bolivia. Parallelepiped09, via Wikimedia Commons. CC BY-SA 4.0.

The whole spectacle is danced in devotion to the Virgen del Socavón, the Virgin of the Mineshaft, whose image, by the founding legend, appeared miraculously in a mine gallery of Oruro around 1756. That is the exact seam of the syncretism made visible: a carnival of horned devils, danced by miners and their descendants, offered to a Virgin discovered underground, in a town built on the same silver-and-tin economy as Potosí. The “devils” of the Diablada are the interior powers of the Andes dancing in plain sight, under Catholic sponsorship and with the Archangel’s sword hanging over them — the demonized Supay given back a body, a costume, and a festival. In 2001 the whole event was recognized on the world stage: on 18 May 2001 UNESCO proclaimed the Carnaval de Oruro a Masterpiece of the Oral and Intangible Heritage of Humanity, the Diablada named among its dances. It is not a small thing. Across roughly ten days before Ash Wednesday the carnival now moves on the order of tens of thousands of dancers and thousands of musicians in a parade that draws figures reported near 400,000 visitors — a demonized lord at the center of one of the largest acts of devotion in the hemisphere.

Reception: the historiographic problem and the fights over the dance

Supay is, before he is anything else, a problem in method. Because the ambivalent interior lord survives almost entirely inside the texts written to destroy him — Santo Tomás’s 1560 lexicon, Acosta’s 1590 natural history, Garcilaso’s gloss, the extirpation trial records — reconstructing him means reading his executioners against themselves, taking their evidence while refusing their frame. Modern Andean scholarship has largely done this: it treats the collapse of supay into “devil” as an act of translation-as-conquest to be named rather than repeated, and reads the Tío and the Diablada as living, resistant, syncretic religion rather than as fossils of a defeated paganism. That reframing, more than any new document, is what has changed the figure’s standing.

Popular reception has lagged far behind, and often flattens him back into the shape the missionaries made. Encyclopedic and pop-mythology sites still file Supay as a stock “Inca god of death” or simply “the Inca devil,” stripping out precisely the ambivalence — the good angel and the bad, the wealth and the danger held together — that is the whole point of him. The origin claims around the Diablada are their own contested ground, and carry a nationalist charge. Bolivian historiography traces the dance far back, up to some two millennia, to the Uru people and a protective god rendered Tiw — a lineage echoed in the language of the UNESCO proclamation itself, which speaks of an older llama llama dance “in worship of the Uru god Tiw.” The documented history is thinner and later: the name Diablada attaches to devil-costumed paraders in Oruro by 1789, and the first formally organized troupe with fixed choreography was founded in 1904. These are claims of unequal evidential weight — a deep-antiquity descent asserted, a staged modern form documented — best kept distinct rather than blended into one seamless pedigree.

The fights over ownership are live and sharpen the point. Bolivia has publicly protested the appropriation of the Diablada by Peruvian and other national pageantry, insisting on Oruro as its home — a dispute in which scholars note, reasonably, that Andean traditions long predate the modern borders now used to fence them. And the Tío himself has been drawn into the tourist economy: the Cerro Rico mine tours sell the descent to the effigy as an attraction, and the offerings of coca, cigarettes, and alcohol are packaged for visitors to buy and leave. That commercialization is reception too, and it is named here at a deliberate distance — the mountain that eats men is not a theme park, and the Uncle in his niche is not a photo opportunity, whatever the market makes of him.

What the missionaries could not finally do was kill the thing by renaming it. They took an interior lord who was neither wholly good nor wholly evil and pressed him into the single shape of the Christian adversary; and the Runa and the Aymara took that shape and kept it fed. He sits in the dark of Potosí with a cigarette burning down between his teeth, and he leads the dancers out into the light of Oruro every year before Lent, and in both places the offering is the same recognition it always was — that the interior owns what it owns, and that what comes up out of the ground is paid for below.

→ Related: Pachamama · Illapa · Mama Killa · Ekeko · Isla Del Sol · Caral Supe · Chavin De Huantar · Nazca Lines · The Inca · The Quechua · The Aymara · Inca Religion Inti Viracocha · Inca Empire Tawantinsuyu · Qorikancha Temple Of The Sun · Pachacamac Oracle · Machu Picchu · Tiwanaku · Sacsayhuaman · Cajamarca Inca City · Chavin · Moche · Chimu · Wari