Spiritualism

← Encyclopedia

Spiritualism is the movement, dating from the middle of the nineteenth century, that holds the dead to survive their death and to remain reachable — most often through a sensitive person, the medium, who relays their words at a sitting. Its distinctive claim was never only that the soul outlives the body, an old idea; it was that this could be shown, here and now, under something its adherents took to be the conditions of an experiment. The dead were not an article of faith to be accepted on authority but a presence to be elicited in a room, on a chosen evening, before witnesses. That fusion of the otherworldly with the demonstrable is the signature of the thing, and it explains both its astonishing reach and the war it provoked between belief and proof.

The 1848 origin

The conventional starting point is precise to the point of legend. In late March 1848, in Hydesville, Wayne County, New York, two young daughters of the farmer John D. Fox and his wife Margaret — Kate, about eleven, and Margaret, about fourteen — reported rappings in their rented cottage that seemed to answer questions put to them, knock for knock. The raps were taken as a code by which a discarnate intelligence could speak, and the intelligence was identified as a murdered peddler buried in the cellar. Within months their elder sister Leah, in Rochester, had drawn the girls into a circle of Quaker abolitionists around Isaac and Amy Post, and in November 1849 a public demonstration at Rochester’s Corinthian Hall converted a domestic disturbance into a movement. The reports spread with extraordinary speed across the United States and then to Britain and the Continent.

Nothing about the doctrine the movement would carry was invented in that farmhouse. The rappings supplied a public spectacle; the framework into which the spectacle was poured already existed, assembled out of three older currents. The revival meetings of the Second Great Awakening had primed a vast population for direct, ecstatic, unmediated contact with the unseen. The animal magnetism of Franz Anton Mesmer — see mesmerism — had supplied, through the magnetic trance and the somnambulist who spoke lucidly with eyes closed, both a technique of entranced access and a vocabulary of an invisible fluid linking minds. And the trance-dictated writings of Andrew Jackson Davis, the unschooled Poughkeepsie Seer, had sketched the spirit world in detail before Hydesville: his enormous The Principles of Nature, Her Divine Revelations, and a Voice to Mankind (1847), produced in mesmeric trance with a scribe, predicted in print, a year before the Fox rappings, that spirit communion would soon present itself as a living demonstration. When the rappings came, Davis’s cosmology was waiting to receive them. Within a decade the séance — a circle in a darkened room, table-tilting, automatic writing, direct voices, slate-writing, sometimes full materializations — was a familiar Victorian institution.

What was believed, and how it was practiced

What practitioners held was not uniform, but it had a center. Death is a passage, not an ending; the deceased pass into a graded series of ascending spheres from which they continue moral and intellectual progress and can still counsel the living; and the evidence of all this lay in plain sight for anyone willing to sit and attend. From Davis the movement took its working geography of the afterlife — concentric spheres governed by natural law rather than by Calvinist predestination, culminating in the luminous Summerland, a name that passed into common Spiritualist speech and was later borrowed, with shifts, by Theosophy and by modern Pagan traditions. The system was anti-creedal by temperament: no fall, no vicarious atonement, no hell, only an indefinite ascent open to all souls.

The ritual life ran on three overlapping circuits, and the most important was the quietest. The dominant unit was not the theatrical public séance but the small domestic home circle — six to a dozen sitters around a table, often a family, usually weekly, frequently without any paid medium at all. Scholars read the home circle as a deliberate counter-form to the gathered Protestant congregation: anti-hierarchical, lay-led, doctrinally unsupervised, centered on a table and a medium whose authority came from the spirits and not from ordination. Above it ran the circuit of professional trance lecturers, and above that, from the late 1860s, the summer camp meeting — Lake Pleasant, Onset Bay, and above all Cassadaga, the New York assembly later known as Lily Dale, which became the movement’s enduring institutional anchor.

For many the appeal was consolation in an age of staggering mortality, when diphtheria, cholera, and later the carnage of the American Civil War made the parlor a place of grief. To be told that the dead were not lost but merely elsewhere, and improving, and reachable, was a balm no orthodox pulpit offered so directly. For others the movement carried a reformist charge, and it was notably bound up with abolition, with religious dissent, and especially with women. Here its social logic was distinctive. Because mediumship was construed as a charism granted by spirits rather than a role conferred by male ordination, it was structurally insulated from clerical gatekeeping, and it gave women a rare authorized public voice. The trance lecturer could address mixed audiences on theology and politics while ostensibly disclaiming agency — the words were the spirits’, not hers — a permission and a constraint at once. Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton appeared on Spiritualist platforms; Victoria Woodhull, the first woman to run for the United States presidency, was elected president of the American Association of Spiritualists in 1871. Later historians, following Ann Braude’s Radical Spirits, have made this connection central to how the movement is read, though they are careful to present it as a documented association rather than a single settled thesis about the origins of women’s public voice.

Investigation, organization, and fraud

The movement provoked investigation as much as devotion, and the line between the two was rarely clean. The chemist William Crookes, already eminent for isolating the element thallium, examined the celebrated medium Daniel Dunglas Home in the early 1870s and reported, in the Quarterly Journal of Science, the action of a force he could not explain, which he proposed to call a Psychic Force — a verdict that drew scorn from much of the scientific community and never resolved. The Society for Psychical Research, founded in London in February 1882 with the Cambridge philosopher Henry Sidgwick as its first president, set out to test mediumship, telepathy, and apparitions by careful method, and produced verdicts that ran in every direction. Its very existence forced a crisis within the movement: when an SPR inquiry found the medium William Eglinton’s slate-writing probably fraudulent, leading Spiritualist members, the Christian-Spiritualist William Stainton Moses among them, resigned in protest — not over method but over whether external scientific adjudication was even theologically appropriate to a faith that defined itself, in the formula later codified by the National Spiritualist Association, as the science, philosophy, and religion of continuous life. The most famous convert of all, Arthur Conan Doyle, came to the movement during the First World War, framed it as a new revelation, and devoted his last years and a two-volume History of Spiritualism to its defense.

Against all of this stands the plain record of fraud. The spirit photographer William Mumler was tried in 1869; the Seybert Commission at the University of Pennsylvania investigated leading mediums between 1884 and 1887 and reported that it had not been cheered by the discovery of a single novel fact. And in October 1888, before a large New York audience at the Academy of Music, Margaret Fox declared the original Hydesville rappings a deliberate trick — first an apple bounced on a string, then the cracking of her own toe and knee joints — and gave a barefoot demonstration; the New York World announced that Spiritualism had received its death-blow. Her sister Kate, present in the hall, did not dissent. Within the year Margaret retracted the confession, claiming she had spoken under pressure and the influence of those opposed to the movement, leaving even the founding scene contested. Spiritualists answered these blows in characteristically religious terms — internally, theologically, rather than evidentially — and the National Spiritualist Association, organized in 1893 with the Declaration of Principles adopted from 1899, was founded in part precisely to discipline fraudulent mediumship out of the movement.

Spiritualism and Spiritism

The Anglo-American movement must be held apart from its Continental cousin, Spiritism, with which it is constantly and wrongly conflated. Spiritism is the doctrine codified in France from 1857 by Allan Kardec, the pen name of Hippolyte Léon Denizard Rivail, whose Le Livre des Esprits (The Spirits’ Book) organized communication with the dead into a systematic moral philosophy. The decisive divergence is reincarnation: Kardec made the soul’s repeated return to earthly life through successive bodies the engine of its progress, where Anglo-American Spiritualism held to a single life followed by unending ascent through the spheres, and formally rejected reincarnation at its 1930 convention. That single doctrinal fork produced two distinct religious cultures — Spiritism striking deepest root in France and then in Brazil, where it became a mass religion, while Spiritualism remained the dominant form in the English-speaking world. They are kin, not twins.

Reception into Theosophy and the occult revival

The movement also became the seedbed of the wider occult revival of the later nineteenth century, partly by feeding it and partly by being repudiated by it. Helena Blavatsky passed through mid-1870s American Spiritualist networks — Henry Steel Olcott’s investigation of the Eddy farm materializations in Vermont in 1874 was where the two future founders of the Theosophical Society first joined forces — before turning sharply against the séance. Theosophy absorbed the Spiritualist apparatus of graded post-mortem spheres and an invisible intermediate body while recasting its spirits as something else entirely: not the surviving personalities of the dead but lower astral shells, the elementaries, to be transcended rather than consulted. The split was doctrinal and bitter, and it marks one of the main channels by which the magnetic-fluid vocabulary of mesmerism and the sphere-cosmology of the séance flowed into the modern esoteric mainstream. The line of women’s public authority that ran through trance mediumship also ran on into the new movement, in figures such as Annie Besant.

Scholarship and primary texts

Modern scholarship treats Spiritualism less as a question of whether spirits spoke than as a major episode in religious and social history: a popular, largely lay movement that loosened the authority of the churches, gave women a platform, and fed directly into the occult revival. The indispensable interpretive anchor on its gender dimension is Ann Braude’s Radical Spirits: Spiritualism and Women’s Rights in Nineteenth-Century America (Beacon Press, 1989; 2nd ed. Indiana University Press, 2001), which argues that the movement and the antebellum women’s-rights campaign were structurally interwoven rather than merely adjacent. Bret E. Carroll’s Spiritualism in Antebellum America (Indiana University Press, 1997) reconstructs the home circle and the camp meeting as religious institutions, and Catherine L. Albanese’s A Republic of Mind and Spirit (Yale University Press, 2007) sets harmonialism within a longer American metaphysical-religion tradition. For the British scene, Janet Oppenheim’s The Other World: Spiritualism and Psychical Research in England, 1850–1914 (Cambridge University Press, 1985) and Alex Owen’s The Darkened Room (1989) remain standard. The Davis biography proper rests still on Robert W. Delp’s articles, the modern scholarly life never having been written.

The primary canon is, for the most part, in the public domain and verifiable text-by-text. Davis’s The Great Harmonia — the harmonial system at length — is held in full text by the University of Michigan’s Making of America collection, in volume one. Emma Hardinge Britten’s Modern American Spiritualism: A Twenty Years’ Record (1870), the movement’s own first great chronicle, survives in a clean scan at the International Association for the Preservation of Spiritualist and Occult Periodicals. The standard skeptical history — bibliographically invaluable, interpretively hostile, and to be read as such — is Frank Podmore’s two-volume Modern Spiritualism: A History and a Criticism (Methuen, 1902), with its companion texts gathered on his Wikisource author page. Crookes’s reports of his sittings with Home are collected in his Researches in the Phenomena of Spiritualism (1874); Kardec’s The Spirits’ Book, in Anna Blackwell’s English of 1875, stands as the parallel Spiritist canon.

Organized Spiritualist churches persist into the present, holding their Sunday services and their public demonstrations of mediumship, ordaining mediums, and keeping the camp at Lily Dale open through each summer season. The claim that fastened the otherworldly to the demonstrable has outlasted every confession, commission, and exposure ranged against it — carried now not by the spectacle that launched it but by the steady institutional weight of a faith that still receives its dead as evidence, in a room, on a chosen evening, before witnesses.

→ Related: Theosophy · Helena Blavatsky · Divination · Spiritism · Mesmerism · Franz Anton Mesmer · Hydesville · William Crookes · Theosophical Society · Occultism · Soul · Spirit