Siger of Brabant

← Encyclopedia

Siger of Brabant (c. 1240–1284) was a master in the Faculty of Arts at the University of Paris and the most visible figure in the controversy over how far a Christian philosopher could follow Aristotle. He read the Greek philosopher through the commentaries of the Andalusian Averroes, and pressed the readings where they led — into open conflict with the teachings of the Church. For that he became, in his own century and after, the standing example of reason taken too far.

The trouble lay in what a faithful reading of Aristotle seemed to require. On the strict text, the world had no beginning in time but was eternal; the soul’s intellect was not individual but one shared mind in which all human beings participated, so that nothing personal survived death. Both conclusions contradicted Christian doctrine outright. Siger appears, at least in his earlier work, to have stated them as the verdict of philosophy while granting that faith held otherwise and that faith was true. Later readers reduced this to the charge of a “double truth” — the claim that something could be true in philosophy and false in theology at once. Modern scholarship treats that label warily: it was mostly fixed on the Paris masters by their opponents, and the surviving texts read less as a defense of contradiction than as a careful, perhaps uneasy, marking of the limits of what unaided reason can reach.

The reaction was institutional. In 1270 the bishop of Paris, Étienne Tempier, condemned thirteen propositions of the kind the arts masters were teaching; in 1277 he issued a far longer list of two hundred and nineteen, a sweeping disciplinary act that touched even positions held by Thomas Aquinas. Aquinas had already written directly against the unicity of the intellect, and the dispute set the two men on opposite sides of the central question of the age. Siger left Paris and went to the papal court, then at Orvieto; he died there around 1284, killed, the reports say, by a secretary who had lost his mind — a death whose details are uncertain and whose circumstances the sources do not agree on.

What complicates the picture is Dante. In the Paradiso, Aquinas himself names Siger among the luminous spirits of the heaven of the sun, recalling the lecture hall in the Rue du Fouarre where Siger had “syllogized invidious truths.” That a poet steeped in Thomism should place the Averroist beside his own master, and in glory, has been read in many ways — as reconciliation, as honor paid to rigor, as a puzzle scholars have not fully settled. It is one of the reasons a relatively obscure university teacher kept a name.

Siger left commentaries and disputed questions rather than a finished system, and much of what was attributed to him is now doubted or reassigned. He survives less as a body of doctrine than as a position: the point at which the recovered Aristotle strained against revelation hard enough that the institution moved to hold them apart.

→ Related: Alexander Of Hales · Middle Ages