Shang Dynasty

← Encyclopedia

The Shang Dynasty was the second of the traditional Chinese dynasties, ruling the North China Plain across roughly the second half of the second millennium BCE — conventionally dated to about 1600–1046 BCE, though the early figures are reconstructions rather than fixed years. It is the earliest period of Chinese history for which there is contemporary written evidence, and that evidence is unusual: most of it consists of records of divination, inscribed on bone. What survives of the Shang, then, is not a chronicle of events its kings wished remembered but the residue of their conversations with the dead — questions put to ancestors and to a high god, scratched into the very material the questioning used up.

The dynasty and its dating

The conventional span runs from the conquest of the preceding Xia, traditionally under the founder Tang (Cheng Tang), to the fall of the last king, Di Xin — remembered in later tradition as the tyrant Zhou — around 1046 BCE. The Chinese state’s Xia–Shang–Zhou Chronology Project, directed by the historian Li Xueqin and drawing on some two hundred specialists in radiocarbon dating, archaeology, textual study, and archaeoastronomy, fixed the dynasty’s beginning at about 1600 BCE and dated the Zhou conquest, after weighing radiocarbon ranges against the astronomical record, to 1046 BCE; preliminary results appeared in 2000 and the full report in 2022. These dates carry the weight of consensus, not of certainty. The early reigns belong to a horizon where the documentary record thins into reconstruction, and only the late phase — the two and a half centuries at the final capital — is anchored by contemporary inscriptions and by carbon dates that, for the reign of the great king Wu Ding, fall around the thirteenth century BCE.

Archaeologically the Shang is read in three stages. The early or Erligang phase, named for a site at Zhengzhou (identified with the early capital Bo), shows a state already casting bronze on an industrial scale around 1600–1400 BCE; a transitional middle phase follows; and the late or Anyang phase, from roughly 1300 to the fall, is the one the oracle bones illuminate. The Shang shifted their seat repeatedly — later tradition counts a long series of capitals — until the king Pan Geng moved the court to Yin, near modern Anyang, where it remained for the rest of the dynasty.

Anyang and the recovery of the dynasty

The last and best-known capital lies at Anyang in modern Henan, the great site called Yinxu, “the Ruins of Yin.” Systematic excavation began there in 1928 under the Academia Sinica, with the archaeologist Li Ji directing — among the first scientifically conducted digs on Chinese soil. The ground yielded the foundations of palace and temple buildings, large bronze foundries, sacrificial pits, the deep cruciform shaft tombs of the royal cemetery at Xibeigang, and tens of thousands of inscribed oracle bones.

One tomb stands apart. In 1976 the archaeologist Zheng Zhenxiang uncovered, away from the looted royal shafts, the undisturbed grave of Fu Hao — a consort of Wu Ding named in the oracle texts as a landholder, ritual officiant, and commander of armies, the earliest woman in Chinese history whose military career is contemporaneously documented. Her tomb held nearly two thousand grave goods, including more than four hundred bronzes and some six hundred jades, and because it could be matched by name to the inscriptions it gave the rare thing in Shang archaeology: a person, a date, and a written record converging on a single floor of earth.

The bones and the method

The oracle bones were the shoulder blades of cattle and the under-shells of turtles — scapulae and plastrons — cleaned, smoothed, and bored on the reverse with rows of hollows. A diviner touched a heated point to the thinned bone until the surface cracked with an audible report; the cracks branched in a rough 卜-shape, and their angle and form were read as the answer to a question put to the spirits. Many bones were afterward inscribed: the date in the sixty-day cycle and the diviner’s name, the charge or proposition, sometimes the king’s own forecast of the outcome, and occasionally a verification noting what in fact came to pass. The labor divided among an inquirer who framed the charge, a diviner who produced the crack, and a prognosticator — frequently the king himself — who pronounced its meaning.

The charges record the concerns of a throne: harvests and rainfall, the conduct and outcome of war, the king’s hunts and journeys, the birth and sex of royal children, the interpretation of dreams, sickness and toothache, and above all the proper offerings to the dead and the question of which offended ancestor was sending harm. This is pyromancy — divination by applied heat — and it stands at the head of a long Chinese divinatory tradition. By the Zhou the older bone-and- shell method was giving way to the counting of yarrow stalks, and it is that later technique, with its sixty-four hexagrams, that the Yijing systematized; but the wager is continuous from the Shang cracks forward — that the world is legible, and that its grain can be read at a chosen point by a qualified hand.

The bones also re-founded the dynasty as history. For more than two millennia their meaning lay buried; peasants and apothecaries ground inscribed fragments as “dragon bones” for medicine. In 1899 the scholar-official Wang Yirong recognized the marks on such pieces as archaic Chinese writing, and with his colleague Liu E — who published the first study in 1903 — opened the field of oracle-bone paleography. In 1933 Dong Zuobin sorted the inscriptions into five chronological periods by ten criteria, from the genealogy named to the calligraphic hand and the roster of diviners, giving the corpus an internal chronology and recovering the Shang calendar and its eclipse records from the texts themselves.

A religion of the dead

The religion the bones disclose centered on the dead. The Shang held that deceased kings and forebears persisted as powers who could help or harm the living, and who required regular sacrifice on a fixed ritual calendar. The royal ancestors were not addressed casually. Each dead king and queen received a temple name built from one of the ten “heavenly stems” — Grandfather Jia, Father Yi, Mother Geng — and was offered cult on the day of the ten-day Shang week that bore the matching stem, so that the year unfolded as a vast, interlocking schedule of named offerings cycling through the whole royal line. By the dynasty’s last reigns this had been regularized into a rotation of five principal ritual types running over a span that closely tracked the solar year, an almost bureaucratic liturgy in which the ancestors were served in genealogical order like a court receiving its officers.

Above the ancestors stood Di — the high god, also called Shangdi, “the Lord on High.” Di governed the elements of fortune the throne could not command: rain and drought, thunder, the harvest, the issue of battles, the building of cities, the person of the king himself. Yet Di is strikingly remote in the texts. He received no regular sacrifice and was rarely approached directly; the king reached him through the ancestral line, the recent dead interceding with the more distant and the most exalted forebears standing nearest to the god. Some inscriptions suggest the deceased kings were thought to ascend to Di’s court and take their place among the powers around him. The architecture is hierarchical and mediated — a graded order of the dead through which a human petition climbed toward a high god who did not deal with petitioners in person. In this royal ancestor cult lies the deep root of the ancestral reverence that would remain central to Chinese religion long after the dynasty fell, threading through later Confucian ritual propriety, the cosmology that the Yijing carried into Taoist and Neo-Confucian thought, and the household and lineage observances of Chinese popular religion down to the present.

The cult was costly in lives. The royal tombs were furnished with the slain — attendants, charioteers with their horses, captives taken in war — interred to accompany the dead king, and the sacrificial pits at Anyang hold the remains of many hundreds of human victims, often beheaded prisoners offered in batches to ancestors and powers. The scale of this human sacrifice, recorded both in the ground and in the divination charges that planned it, marks the distance between the Shang ritual order and the moralized, restrained ancestral observance of later ages.

Worship on this scale required vessels worthy of it. The Shang were master bronze casters, working by an exacting piece-mold technique, and their ritual vessels — the ding cauldrons, gu beakers, and jue cups cast for offering food and wine to the dead — are among the finest metalwork of the ancient world. Their surfaces carry the dense zoomorphic ornament whose central device, the frontal animal mask later called the taotie, gazes out of nearly every Shang bronze. These were not tableware but instruments of the cult, and their possession and casting belonged to the same royal monopoly as the bones: the right to feed the ancestors was the substance of the right to rule.

The scholarship and the sources

For a long time the dynasty was known only from much later texts, and some historians doubted it had existed at all. The bones settled the question. The royal genealogy they preserve corresponds closely to the Shang succession recorded centuries afterward by the Han historian Sima Qian in the Records of the Grand Historian — confirming a line that transmitted accounts had remembered but could not document, and lending new credit to the early Chinese historical tradition even where its earliest reaches remain unverified.

The modern reconstruction of the Shang rests on a compact, authoritative body of work. David N. Keightley’s Sources of Shang History: The Oracle-Bone Inscriptions of Bronze Age China (Berkeley, 1978) is the foundational guide in English to reading and dating the inscriptions, and his later The Ancestral Landscape (Berkeley, 2000) reconstructs the Shang religious world — the ancestors, the schedule of cult, the remote and mediated Di — from the same corpus. Robert L. Eno’s analysis of the deities and ancestors of the early oracle inscriptions — distinguishing the nature powers from the lineage dead and tracing how each was conceived — is available in full text both as the chapter Deities and Ancestors in Early Oracle Inscriptions (from Religions of China in Practice, Princeton, 1996) and in his teaching edition on Shang religion at Indiana University. For the material culture, Robert Bagley’s “Shang Archaeology” in The Cambridge History of Ancient China (1999) is the standard synthesis of the Anyang excavations and the bronze tradition. The chronology itself was placed on a quantitative footing by Li Xueqin’s methodology and results of the Xia–Shang–Zhou Chronology Project (Journal of East Asian Archaeology, 2002), whose contested conclusions frame every modern date for the dynasty. The divinatory lineage that runs from the Shang cracks to the hexagrams is treated, with its public-domain editions, under the Yijing.

Set beside the contemporaneous scribal cultures of Mesopotamia — where a god such as Nabu personified the written word, and where omen-reading filled clay libraries — the Shang case is its own thing: writing here is born not in administration or in a deity of letters but in the act of asking the dead, and the earliest Chinese texts are, almost without exception, divinatory. The Shang ritual order gathered a graded company of powers of its own, but those powers were the king’s forebears, and the building that mattered was the tomb — a literate religion beside the others of the ancient world, with Di and the royal ancestors collapsed into none of them.

The dynasty fell to the Zhou around 1046 BCE. Their founders justified the conquest with the claim that Heaven had withdrawn its mandate from a corrupt last king, transferring its sanction to a worthier house — a charge written by the victors, and one of the earliest expressions of an idea that would shape Chinese political thought for three thousand years. The Shang had asked their high god, through their dead, whether the harvest would come and the war be won. The Zhou answered for the future by reframing the high power as one that judged: a Heaven that watched a king’s conduct, kept accounts, and could be lost.

→ In the library: Legge — The Texts of Tâoism (SBE 39 & 40, 1891)

→ Related: Divination · Mesopotamia · I Ching · Zhou Dynasty · Confucianism · Taoism · China · Chinese Popular Religion · Sacrifice Ritual · Neo Confucianism Song Lixue · Nabu · Pantheon